Client Focused Reforms - Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103 and Companion Policy NI 31-103CP
Client Focused Reforms - Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103 and Companion Policy NI 31-103CP
CSA Notice and Request For Comment
Proposed Amendments to
National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations
and to
Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations
Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client Focused Reforms)
Annex D: Summary of Comments on Consultation Paper 33-404 and Responses
Annex E: Ontario Local Matters
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CSA Notice and Request for Comment -- Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations and to Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations -- Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client-Focused Reforms)
CSA Notice and Request For Comment
Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations and to Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client Focused Reforms)
June 21, 2018
Introduction
The Canadian Securities Administrators (the CSA or we) are publishing for a 120-day comment period proposed amendments (the Proposed Amendments) to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103 or the Rule) and Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (31-103CP or the Companion Policy, together the Instrument). We are proposing amendments to the registrant conduct provisions in the Instrument in order to better align the interests of securities advisers, dealers and representatives (registrants) with the interests of their clients, to improve outcomes for clients, and to make clearer to clients the nature and the terms of their relationship with registrants. We are also proposing technical, non-substantive consistency changes to the Instrument.
This notice contains the following annexes:
• Annex A -- Proposed Amendments to NI 31-103
• Annex B -- Blackline showing changes to NI 31-103 under the Proposed Amendments
• Annex C -- Blackline showing changes to 31-103CP under the Proposed Amendments
• Annex D -- Summary of comments on CSA Consultation Paper 33-404 Proposals to Enhance the Obligations of Advisers, Dealers and Representatives Toward Their Clients (CP 33-404) and responses
• Annex E -- Local matters
This notice will also be available on the following websites of CSA jurisdictions:
www.lautorite.qc.cawww.albertasecurities.comwww.bcsc.bc.cawww.fcnb.canssc.novascotia.cawww.osc.gov.on.cawww.fcaa.gov.sk.cawww.msc.gov.mb.ca
Substance and purpose
Introduction -- Client Focused Reforms
The Proposed Amendments are part of the CSA's harmonized response to concerns we have identified relating to the client-registrant relationship as it stands today. After extensive consultations with stakeholders, we are proposing changes that we believe will achieve our stated goals of better aligning the interests of registrants with the interests of their clients, improving outcomes for clients, and making clearer to clients the nature and the terms of their relationships with registrants.
The CSA, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) (together referred to as the SROs) are committed to changes at the core of the Proposed Amendments which would require registrants to promote the best interests of clients and put clients' interests first. This is a fundamental change that focuses on the client's interests in the client-registrant relationship.
Under the Proposed Amendments, registrants will be required to:
• address conflicts of interest in the best interest of the client,
• put the client's interest first when making a suitability determination, and
• do more to clarify for clients what they should expect from their registrants.
The Proposed Amendments and the investor protection concerns that they seek to address are discussed in more detail below.
In preparing the Proposed Amendments, we have taken comments from the consultations into consideration. We have sought to make the Proposed Amendments scalable to fit registrants' different operating models, and to preserve the technology-neutral stance of the Instrument. Additional harmonized reforms that the CSA intends to develop at a later stage are discussed below.
The CSA have consulted with the SROs in developing the Proposed Amendments. We encourage all SRO members to provide their comments on the Proposed Amendments. It is our intention that our final amendments will be incorporated into SRO member rules and guidance; therefore, comments from all registrant categories will be beneficial to the rule development process.
Overarching regulatory best interest standard
The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and the Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick (FCNB) carried out extensive consultations with stakeholders and the SROs regarding the adoption of an overarching regulatory best interest standard as proposed in CP 33-404. They are not proposing to adopt an overarching standard at this time.
The OSC and FCNB have worked with the CSA to develop a harmonized approach that infuses the client's best interest into the conflicts of interest and suitability reforms. This approach addresses the specific concerns they had in these areas and ensures the interests of the client are paramount.
Additionally, with this harmonized approach, they believe clients will immediately benefit from the reforms, and registrants will have certainty as to the fundamental regulatory obligations they owe to clients.
To the extent they do not see a change in behavior demonstrating that the Proposed Amendments achieve the outcomes they are seeking for investors, they will revisit this approach.
Overview and scope of the Proposed Amendments
We seek to enhance the client-registrant relationship by amending the following provisions in the Rule, supported with detailed guidance:
• know your client (KYC),
• know your product (KYP),
• suitability,
• conflicts of interest, and
• relationship disclosure information (RDI).
These provisions set out the fundamental obligations of registrants toward their clients and are essential to investor protection. They are designed to work together throughout the client-registrant relationship, as an extension of the duty of registrants to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with their clients.
The Proposed Amendments relating to conflicts of interest and suitability include these critical provisions: registrants would have to address all existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest, including conflicts resulting from compensation arrangements and incentive practices, in the best interest of the client, and they would have to put the client's interest first when making suitability determinations.
The Proposed Amendments relating to KYC and KYP are designed to support these critical provisions. They are also intended to provide clarity about our expectations of what information a registrant must collect about a client, and to increase rigour and transparency around the products and services that registrants make available to their clients. Additional enhancements to the suitability determination requirement would also include explicitly requiring registrants to consider certain factors, including costs and their impact, and to require these determinations to be made on a portfolio basis.
In addition to requiring that conflicts of interest be addressed in the best interest of the client, the Proposed Amendments relating to conflicts of interest also include restrictions on referral arrangements and strengthen the prohibitions on misleading marketing and advertising.
The Proposed Amendments relating to RDI provide for expanded disclosure about any restrictions on the products or services a registrant will make available to a client, including when the registrant uses proprietary products, and the impact on a client's investment returns that may result from such restrictions, as well as the potential impact of costs and charges. We are also proposing to introduce a new requirement to make key information publicly available so that potential clients are better able to choose a registrant that is likely to meet their expectations.
Finally, we propose corresponding changes to requirements and guidance concerning the training of representatives and maintenance of policies, procedures, controls and documentation to support the important role of registrants' internal compliance systems.
Other CSA consultations
The CSA coordinated the policy considerations related to the key issues outlined in CP 33-404 and CSA Consultation Paper 81-408 Consultation on the Option of Discontinuing Embedded Commissions, published on January 10, 2017. As further outlined in CSA Staff Notice 81-330 Status Report on Consultation on Embedded Commissions and Next Steps published today, we believe the Proposed Amendments relating to conflicts of interest will allow registrants flexibility in how they address the material conflict of interest presented by embedded commissions in a manner that is in the best interests of clients.
Background
Consultation Process
NI 31-103 came into force on September 28, 2009 and introduced a harmonized, streamlined and modernized national registration regime. Since implementation, we have monitored the operation of the Instrument and have engaged in continuing dialogue with stakeholders with a view to further enhancing the regime.
The Proposed Amendments were developed after an extensive consultation process, beginning with the publication on October 25, 2012, of CSA Consultation Paper 33-403 The Standard of Conduct for Advisers and Dealers: Exploring the Appropriateness of Introducing a Statutory Best Interest Duty When Advice is Provided to Retail Clients (CP 33-403).
After publishing a status report{1} which indicated the key themes that emerged from the public comments on CP 33-403, we followed up with CP 33-404, published on April 28, 2016.
CP 33-404 set out our key concerns with respect to the client-registrant relationship and invited comment on a number of potential reforms to address those concerns. CP 33-404 sought comment on proposed targeted reforms aimed at enhancing the obligations of registrants towards their clients, and a proposed overarching best interest standard that would serve as the principle that would govern the interpretation of all other client-related obligations. Both consultation papers were followed by in-person consultations in a variety of forums, as well as the publication of research on conflicts of interest relating to registrants' compensation arrangements and incentive practices.{2}
We published a status report on our findings in CSA Staff Notice 33-319 Status Report on CSA Consultation Paper 33-404 Proposals to Enhance the Obligations of Advisers, Dealers, and Representatives Toward Their Clients (SN 33-319) on May 11, 2017, indicating that the CSA had identified certain reform areas that should be given higher priority. The Proposed Amendments were prioritized as they are fundamental to addressing the harms identified in CP 33-404.
We intend to develop and propose for comment additional reforms relating to some of the proposals discussed in CP 33-404. These are separate, longer-term projects, which will build on the comments we received on CP 33-404. We are not seeking comment on these potential reforms at this time. They include:
• reviewing proficiency standards,
• reviewing titles and designations, including the use of "advisor" to describe individuals who are not registered in a category of adviser,
• imposing a statutory fiduciary duty when a client grants discretionary authority in those jurisdictions which don't currently have this provision, and
• clarifying the role of ultimate designated persons and chief compliance officers.
Response to Consultations
The extensive consultation process, including several outreach sessions, has allowed us to gather critical information on investor needs and registrant practices and concerns. We have carefully considered this information in developing the Proposed Amendments, and have reviewed and, in some cases, narrowed our earlier proposals.
A summary of the comments we received on CP 33-404 and our responses to them are set out in Annex D. We thank all commenters for their helpful and detailed comments, and all participants in our outreach sessions and meetings.
Key Concerns
We have identified the following key investor protection concerns with respect to the client-registrant relationship, as discussed in more detail in CP 33-404:
• Clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing: in their suitability analysis, some registrants fail to consider all of the factors relevant to helping clients meet their investing goals.
• Expectations gap: clients often have misplaced reliance on or trust in their registrants, which exacerbate the agency problem inherent in the client-registrant relationship and can result in sub-optimal investment decisions.
• Conflicts of interest: the application in practice of the current rules is, in many instances, less effective than intended in mitigating conflicts of interest.
• Information asymmetry: the current regulatory framework is, in many instances, less effective than intended in mitigating the consequences of the information and financial literacy asymmetry between clients and registrants.
• Clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them: this over-arching concern is to a large extent due to the combined effect of the concerns listed above.
Examples of the harms giving rise to these concerns include, among other things
• research that shows financial self-interest may inappropriately influence registrants' recommendations to clients,
• persistent findings in compliance reviews of inadequate KYC information collection, affecting registrants' capacity to make sound suitability determinations for clients, and
• the persistence of suitability as a leading source of client complaints.
Summary of Proposed Amendments
Introduction
As discussed above, the Proposed Amendments are client focused reforms that put the interest of the client before any other consideration relevant to the client registrant relationship. Throughout the Proposed Amendments, we also emphasize clarifying expectations for that relationship in order to address the expectations gap and information asymmetry concerns.
Some of the Proposed Amendments would impose new requirements, while others would codify best practices set out in existing CSA and SRO guidance. The combination of the codification of best practices and the introduction of new requirements will result in a new, higher standard of conduct for all registrants.
Unless otherwise noted, section references in the summary below are to provisions in the Instrument.
KYC--section 13.2 [Know your client]
The Proposed Amendments to the KYC requirements are our response to a primary area of concern in the industry and provide clarity on our expectations of what information a registrant must collect to 'know a client' and how frequently this information must be updated. These enhanced KYC requirements are intended to support the enhanced suitability determination requirement, which we propose to amend by requiring that registrants put the client's interest first when determining suitability. This new requirement cannot be met without having complete and specific KYC information.
For example, we have noted that a proper assessment of a client's risk profile is often lacking, owing to insufficient KYC. This in turn leads to unsuitable investment recommendations, which form the primary basis for complaints to Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments services (OBSI) for the past several years.
The Proposed Amendments would thus clarify the content and scope of the KYC process by requiring the registrant to gather specific information on the client, such as the client's personal circumstances, investment knowledge, risk profile and investment time horizon.
We propose to amend KYC requirements to require registrants to have a thorough understanding of their client, taking into consideration the nature of the specific client-registrant relationship. Registrants would be required to:
• gather sufficient information about the client to support an enhanced suitability determination obligation, and
• update KYC information at specified intervals
The Proposed Amendments would clarify the KYC requirements by means of the following changes:
• 13.2(2)(c) -- explicitly sets out KYC information that must be collected by registrants in order for them to understand their clients well enough to meet their suitability determination obligations. The information required includes the client's
• personal circumstances
• financial circumstances
• investment needs and objectives
• investment knowledge
• risk profile
• investment time horizon
• 13.2(3.1) -- new subsection requiring registrants to take reasonable steps to obtain clients' confirmation of the accuracy of their KYC information collected at account opening and when any significant change occurs
• 13.2(4.1) -- new subsection specifying the circumstances when a client's KYC information must be reviewed and updated, including
• when the registrant knows or reasonably ought to know of a significant change in a client's KYC information, and
• in any event, at minimum intervals of
• 12 months for managed accounts
• 12 months prior to making a trade or recommendation for exempt market dealers
• 36 months for other accounts
We propose significantly expanded guidance in 31-103CP with respect to our expectations for these requirements. This includes, among other things, discussions of
• our expectations with respect to the establishment of a client's investment needs and objectives, taking into account the client's financial goals, as well as the development of the client's risk profile,
• the ways a registrant may tailor its KYC process to reflect its business model and the nature of its relationships with clients, and
• the collection of KYC information using technology.
KYP--new section 13.2.1 [Know your product]
There is currently no explicit Rule requirement concerning KYP, while the Companion Policy provides only limited principles-based guidance on our KYP expectations in the context of the proficiency and suitability requirements. We have determined that there should be an express KYP requirement in the Rule, as well as more detailed guidance in the Companion Policy, in order to codify our KYP expectations of firms and registrants as set out in previous CSA and SRO guidance. We have also determined that there should be greater detail in the Companion Policy to provide clarity on those expectations.
The Proposed Amendments to KYP are also intended to support an enhanced suitability determination requirement, as well as increase rigour and transparency around the securities and services that registrants make available to their clients.
Although we have not moved forward with certain of the KYP proposals from CP 33-404, several new elements have been added to registrants' KYP obligations in the Proposed Amendments, such as a requirement that firms understand how securities that they make available to clients compare to similar securities available in the market and a requirement that firms maintain an offering of securities and services that is consistent with how they hold themselves out and market their services.
The Proposed Amendments would add a new section 13.2.1 [Know your product] to the Rule to impose explicit KYP requirements at both the registered firm and registered individual levels, including:
• 13.2.1(1) -- obligations of a registered firm to
• take reasonable steps to understand the essential elements of the securities it makes available to clients, including how they compare with similar securities available in the market
• approve the securities it will make available
• monitor and reassess its approved securities
• 13.2.1(2) -- principles-based requirement that a registered firm must maintain an offering of securities and services that is consistent with how it holds itself out
• 13.2.1(3) -- obligations of registered individuals to take reasonable steps to
• understand at a general level, the securities that are available for them to purchase, sell or recommend through their firm, and how those securities compare
• thoroughly understand each specific security they purchase, sell or recommend to a client, including the impact of all of the costs associated with acquiring and holding the security
• 13.2.1(4) -- registered individuals must only purchase or recommend securities approved by their firm
• 13.2.1(5) -- registered firms must ensure that their registered individuals have the necessary information about each approved security
• 13.2.1(6),(7) -- tailored requirements and exemptions relating to certain client directed trades and transfers, portfolio manager directed trades, and securities offered through order-execution-only services
We propose guidance in 31-103CP with respect to our expectations as to how registrants may meet their KYP obligations. The guidance is detailed and pays particular attention to setting out our views concerning the process of approving a security, product costs, compensation structures and the use of proprietary products, and the importance of taking related conflicts of interest into account.
Suitability--section 13.3 [Suitability determination]
The changes we propose to make to the suitability obligation are extensive, and are responsive to concerns about the current suitability process. As stated above, unsuitable recommendations generate the majority of complaints to OBSI, indicating an imbalance in the client-registrant relationship. We have chosen a regulatory approach which favours the client's interest above other considerations, while at the same time providing registrants with more specific requirements to enable them to make appropriate suitability determinations.
We propose enhanced suitability obligations that would introduce a new core requirement that registrants must put their clients' interests first when making a suitability determination. Enhanced suitability obligations would also include:
• explicitly requiring registrants to consider certain factors, including costs and their impact, in making suitability determinations,
• moving away from trade-based suitability to an overall portfolio-level suitability analysis, and
• prescribing triggering events that will require a registrant to reassess suitability.
The Proposed Amendments would make the following changes to section 13.3 [Suitability determination]:
• 13.3(1) -- current suitability requirement replaced with new subsection providing that before a registrant acts by opening an account for a client, purchasing, selling, depositing, exchanging or transferring securities for a client's account, taking any other investment action for a client or making a recommendation or decision to take any such action, the registrant must determine, on a reasonable basis, that the action
• is suitable for the client, based on certain factors, including
• KYC information
• the registrant's understanding of the security
• the features and associated costs of the account type
• the impact on the account
• portfolio-level concentration and liquidity
• the analysis of the actual and potential impact of costs
• available alternatives at the firm
• any other relevant factor under the circumstances
• puts the client's interest first
• 13.3(2) -- new subsection prescribing trigger events that will require registrants to review a client's account and the securities in the account in accordance with subsection 13.3(1) and take appropriate action, promptly after these events occur
• a new registered individual is designated as responsible for the client's account
• a change in a security in the account
• a change in the client's KYC information
• the registrant undertakes a required review or update of the client's KYC information
• the registrant becomes aware that a security in the client's account or the account does not meet the criteria under subsection 13.3(1)
• 13.3(2.1) -- new subsection replacing current provision for client-directed trades
We propose guidance in 31-103CP with respect to our expectations as to how registrants may meet their enhanced suitability obligations. We clarify that, in order to ensure that the suitability obligation has been met, our review will be undertaken on the basis of what a reasonable registrant would have done under the same circumstances.
Conflicts of interest--Part 13: Division 2 [Conflicts of interest]
Conflicts of interest have been identified as a key concern in the client-registrant relationship. We have adopted a best interest standard in the Proposed Amendments relating to conflicts of interest because that standard:
• reflects our expectation of how conflicts must be addressed,
• has been given clear meaning in relation to conflicts of interest, which will assist in effective compliance with our expectations, and
• will help address the expectations gap between clients and registrants as described in CP 33-404.
We have also determined that current conflicts of interest requirements require further reforms
• specifying that all conflicts of interest must be addressed, not only those that are material,
• expressly applying conflicts of interest obligations to registered individuals, as well as their sponsoring firms,
• adding guidance relating to particular conflicts of interest, such as conflicts arising from sales and incentive practices and compensation arrangements, including the acceptance of compensation from third parties (such as embedded commissions) and the use of proprietary products,
• restricting certain referral arrangements, and
• expanding recordkeeping in Part 11, particularly as it concerns sales practices, compensation arrangements and other incentive practices.
The conflicts of interest requirements are fundamental registrant conduct obligations that protect investors. The Proposed Amendments to the conflicts of interest requirements will raise the bar for registrant conduct. The Proposed Amendments would require all existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts, not just material conflicts, to be addressed in the best interest of the client.
In order for a registered firm to properly address conflicts in the best interest of their clients, a firm must accurately identify all conflicts in a timely way. We expect that these Proposed Amendments will improve the timeliness of conflict reporting by registered individuals to their sponsoring firms and will help registered firms ensure that all existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts are addressed in the best interest of the client, in a timely manner. With respect to conflicts that are not material, registered firms can satisfy the conflicts of interest rule by addressing those non-material conflicts in a manner that is proportionate to the limited risk that such conflicts may pose to affected clients. The Proposed Amendments to the Companion Policy contain additional guidance on how we expect registrants to address non-material conflicts.
The Proposed Amendments would make the following changes to Division 2 [Conflicts of interest] of Part 13:
• 13.4 [A registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1 [A registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] -- new and revised sections
• expanding the obligation to take reasonable steps to identify all conflicts of interest (including those that are reasonably foreseeable) beyond those that are material
• specifying that the obligation applies to both registered firms and registered individuals
• requiring registered individuals to promptly report conflicts of interest they identify to their sponsoring firms
• 13.4.2 [A registered firm's responsibility to address conflicts of interest] -- new section requiring registered firms to address all conflicts of interest between the firm (including each individual acting on its behalf), and the firm's client, in the best interest of the client. If a conflict is not, or cannot, be addressed in the best interest of the client, then the registered firm must avoid that conflict
• 13.4.3 [A registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest] -- new section imposing on registered individuals the same obligations as set out in section 13.4.2, and also providing that they must not proceed with any activity related to an identified conflict of interest unless that conflict has been addressed in the best interest of the client and they have received the consent of their sponsoring firm
• 13.4.4 [Conflicts of interest that must be avoided] -- new section setting out certain conflicts that must be avoided (subject to appropriate exceptions), including those involving
• borrowing money from a client
• lending money to a client
• having control over the financial affairs of a client
• 13.4.5 [Conflicts disclosure] -- new section extending disclosure requirements to all identified conflicts of interest that a reasonable client would want to know about and specifying
• that disclosure must now include, in addition to the nature and extent of the conflict of interest
• the potential impact and risk that it may have on the client, and
• how it has been, or will be, addressed
• that disclosure must be prominent, specific and written in plain language
• the times when disclosure must be made
• that disclosure is not in itself sufficient to satisfy the obligation to address conflicts of interest in the best interest of the client
Division 3 [Referral arrangements]
• 13.7 [Definitions -- referral arrangements] and 13.8 [Permitted referral arrangements] -- expanded to
• prohibit payment of a referral fee by a registrant unless
• the party receiving the fee is also a registrant
• the referral fee is compliant with new section 13.8.1
• the terms of the referral arrangement are set out in a written agreement between the firm, and the other party to the referral
• the registered firm records all referral fees
• the registered firm ensures that the information prescribed by subsection 13.10(1) [disclosing referral arrangements to clients] has been provided to the client in writing
• 13.8.1 [Limitation on referral fees] -- new section providing that a referral fee must not
• continue for longer than 36 months
• constitute a series of payments that together exceed 25 percent of the fees or commissions collected from the client by the party who received the referral
• increase the amount of fees or commissions that would otherwise be paid by a client to that registrant for the same product or service
Division 7 [Misleading communications]
• 13.18 [Misleading Communications] -- new section providing that
• registrants must not hold their services out in any manner that could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead any person as to:
• their proficiency, experience, or qualifications
• the nature of the person's relationship, or potential relationship, with the registrant
• the products or services provided, or that may be provided
• registered individuals must not use a title, designation, award, or recognition that is based partly or entirely on that registrant's sales activity or revenue generation
• registered individuals must not use a corporate officer title unless their sponsoring firm has appointed that registrant to that corporate office pursuant to applicable corporate law
• registered individuals may only use a title or designation with the approval of their sponsoring firm
We also propose extensive new guidance in 31-103CP with respect to our expectations as to how registrants could meet enhanced conflicts of interest obligations. The guidance addresses, in view of the proposed elimination of the materiality threshold in section 13.4, the spectrum of materiality of conflicts of interest and our expectations concerning immaterial conflicts.
The guidance also identifies and directly addresses some conflicts of interest that give rise to key concerns and provides examples of controls that registered firms can consider putting in place when trying to address such conflicts in the best interest of their clients. These conflicts include:
• using proprietary products, including where firms make available both proprietary and non-proprietary products,
• receiving third party compensation,
• entering into referral arrangements, and
• internal compensation arrangements and incentive practices.
RDI--Part 14 [Handling client accounts -- firms], Division 2 [Disclosure to clients]
We have identified shortcomings in the relationship disclosure information that some clients receive from their registrants, despite the fact section 14.2 provides that: "A registrant must deliver to a client all information that a reasonable investor would consider important about the client's relationship with the registrant" and sets out a list of mandated disclosures.
We are particularly concerned that registrants do not always provide adequate disclosure about
• their use of proprietary products,
• limitations on the products and services that they will make available to a client, (including restrictions based on the firm's registration category or terms and conditions on its registration, as well as business decisions to limit what the firm offers to clients based on their account type or the amount of money they invest), and
• the impact each of these things can have on investment returns.
We believe clear disclosure of this information is important to ensure that clients have an adequate understanding of the relationship with their registrant. We therefore propose to add this information to the mandated disclosures in subsection 14.2(2).
Our research and consultations have also led us to conclude that we should expand disclosure requirements to recognize that expectations begin to be shaped before someone becomes a client of a registered firm. If investors have ready access to basic information about competing firms' products and services including the costs associated with those products and services, they will find it easier to choose a firm that is likely to meet their expectations.
We are therefore proposing a new provision that would require registered firms to make publicly available the information that potential clients would consider important in deciding whether to become a client. This is stated as a principle and a list of key things that must be covered. Firms are not required to try to anticipate all information that any investor might wish to consider, and there is no prescribed form or requirement to include an exhaustive product list. We anticipate that firms will post the information on their websites, or reply to requests by email or by giving out short print-on-demand documents.
To implement these requirements, the Proposed Amendments would make the following changes:
1.1 [Definitions] -- new defined term "third-party compensation" added to simplify drafting and ensure clarity of regulatory purpose
Part 14 [Handling client accounts -- firms],
New Division 1.1 [Publicly available information]
• 14.1.2 [Duty to provide information] -- new requirement that a registered firm must make publicly available information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client of the firm, including general descriptions of:
• the products, services and account types that it offers
• any material limitations or restrictions on what is made available (e.g., minimum investments, qualified purchaser etc.)
• charges and other costs to clients
• any minimum account sizes or minimum charges
• any third-party compensation associated with the firm's products, services and accounts
Division 2 [Disclosure to clients]
• 14.2(0.1) -- new defined term "proprietary product" added to simplify drafting and ensure clarity of regulatory purpose
• 14.2(2)(b) -- current requirement for a general description of the products and services the registered firm offers to the client expanded to include express requirement to disclose whether
• the firm will primarily or exclusively use proprietary products in the client's account
• there are any restrictions on the products or services the registrant will provide to the client
• 14.2(2)(k) -- current requirement for disclosure of the obligation to make suitability determinations is conformed with the suitability amendments in section 13.3
• 14.2(2)(l) -- revises the current requirement to provide a client with the KYC information that the firm has collected from them, in order to remove ambiguity and clarify the regulatory intent consistent with the existing guidance in the Companion Policy
• 14.2(2)(o) -- new requirement to explain the potential impact of each of the following on a client's investment returns
• operating and transaction charges
• embedded fees
• having access to only a limited range of products or services
We also propose additional guidance in the Companion Policy, setting out our expectations as to how registrants can satisfy the new obligations in the Proposed Amendments. In doing so, we build on existing guidance about our expectations that registrants will present disclosure information to clients in a clear and meaningful way in order to ensure they understand the information presented, which is consistent with registrants' obligation to deal with clients fairly, honestly and in good faith.
Part 3 [Registration requirements -- individuals], Division 2 [Education and experience requirements]
In view of the proposals for strengthened requirements regarding conduct toward clients and KYP, we believe it is necessary to mandate registered firms to establish training programs for their registered representatives.
The Proposed Amendments would add:
• 3.4.1 [Firm's obligation to provide training] -- new section requiring registered firms, other than investment fund managers, to provide training to their registered individuals on:
• compliance with securities legislation, including
• conflicts of interest requirements,
• the KYC and KYP obligations, and
• the obligation to make a suitability determination, and
• prescribed elements of the securities available through the firm
We also propose new guidance in the Companion Policy setting out our expectation that registered firms will develop, implement and maintain training programs that include examples of how to identify conflicts of interest and how to address them in the best interests of their clients.
Part 11 [Internal controls and systems], Division 2 [Books and records]
Maintaining an effective compliance system is a cornerstone obligation of registered firms. The elements of an effective compliance system are detailed in Part 11 of the Rule and Companion Policy. We expect all registrants to review and amend their compliance systems to reflect the new requirements, which should be tailored to their size and scope of operations, including products, types of clients, risk and compensating controls and any other relevant factors.
In particular, we expect all registrants to implement changes to their policies, procedures and controls to address conflicts of interest in the best interest of their clients and to establish a framework where the registrant puts the client's interest first when making suitability determinations.
The Proposed Amendments include:
• 11.5 [General requirements for records] -- recordkeeping requirements expanded to include
• demonstrating compliance with KYP requirements
• demonstrating how the firm has addressed, or plans to address, conflicts of interest identified under subsections 13.4 and 13.4.1 in the best interest of its clients
• documenting the firm's
• sales practices
• compensation arrangements
• incentive practices
• demonstrating compliance with requirements about documenting the use of titles and designations by the firm's registered individuals
• demonstrating compliance with the enhanced disclosure requirements discussed above
We also propose new guidance in the Companion Policy setting out our expectations as to how registrants may accommodate the Proposed Amendments in their compliance systems.
Exemptions
The Proposed Amendments do not apply in the following situations:
• for registrants dealing with certain permitted clients, the Proposed Amendments relating to suitability and KYC requirements do not apply;
• for registrants dealing with clients in the context of order-execution-only ("discount brokerage services"), and portfolio manager directed trades, suitability and related KYP requirements do not apply;
• for registered investment fund managers, conflicts of interest obligations set out in sections 13.4 to 13.4.5 do not apply in respect of investment funds that are subject to National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds.
Part 9 [Membership in an SRO], Custody obligations for mutual fund dealers registered in Québec that are MFDA members
For clarity, we are also proposing an amendment to section 9.4 [Exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members] by adding in subsection 9.4(3) that mutual fund dealers registered in Québec that are MFDA members may rely on certain of the exemptions in subsections 9.4(1) and (2) relating to custody of assets, provided the conditions of the exemption are met.
Transition
We are considering a phased implementation schedule for the final amendments:
• Referrals -- immediately upon coming into force, except 3 years to bring pre-existing arrangements into conformity;
• RDI -- 1 year to provide publicly available information under new requirement; 2 years for the other new requirements;
• KYC, KYP, suitability and conflicts of interest -- 2 years.
We invite your comments on this schedule.
Questions
We invite views on the questions below. Please provide a specific response.
Transactional relationships
Exempt market dealers often have transactional or "episodic" relationships with their clients, in contrast to the ongoing character of client relationships in other categories. Would the Proposed Amendments pose implementation challenges unique to transactional relationships, or would they have other unintended consequences related to them?
Conflicts that must be avoided
Are there other specific conflicts of interest that cannot be addressed in the client's best interest and must be avoided?
Referral fees
Does prohibiting a registrant from paying a referral fee to a non-registrant limit investors' access to securities related services? Would narrowing section 13.8.1 [Limitation on referral fees] to permit only the payment of a nominal one-time referral fee enhance investor protection?
Local Matters
Annex E includes, where applicable, additional information that is relevant in a local jurisdiction only.
Request for comments
We welcome your comments on the Proposed Amendments.
Please submit your comments in writing on or before October 19, 2018. If you are not sending your comments by email, please send a CD containing the submissions (in Microsoft Word format).
Address your submission to all of the CSA as follows:
British Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta Securities CommissionFinancial and Consumer Affairs Authority of SaskatchewanManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionAutorité des marchés financiersFinancial and Consumer Services Commission of New BrunswickSuperintendent of Securities, Department of Justice and Public Safety, Prince Edward IslandNova Scotia Securities CommissionSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorRegistrar of Securities, Northwest TerritoriesRegistrar of Securities, Yukon TerritorySuperintendent of Securities, Nunavut
Deliver your comments only to the addresses below. Your comments will be distributed to the other participating CSA members.
We cannot keep submissions confidential because securities legislation in certain provinces requires publication of the written comments received during the comment period. All comments received will be posted on the websites of each of the Alberta Securities Commission at www.albertasecurities.com, the Autorité des marchés financiers at www.lautorite.qc.ca, and the Ontario Securities Commission at www.osc.gov.on.ca. Therefore, you should not include personal information directly in comments to be published. It is important that you state on whose behalf you are making the submission.
Questions
Please refer your questions to any of the following:
Isaac FilatéSenior Legal CounselCapital Markets RegulationBritish Columbia Securities Commission604-899-6573 and 1-800-373-6393Bonnie KuhnSenior Legal CounselMarket RegulationAlberta Securities Commission403-355-3890Liz KutarnaDeputy Director, Capital MarketsSecurities DivisionFinancial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan306-787-5871Chris BeskoDirector, General CounselThe Manitoba Securities Commission204-945-2561 and 1-800-655-5244(Toll Free (Manitoba only))Debra FoubertDirector, Compliance and Registrant RegulationOntario Securities Commission416-593-8101Maye Mouftah, Senior Legal CounselOntario Securities Commission416-593-2358Erin Seed, Senior Legal CounselOntario Securities Commission416-596-4264Kat Szybiak, Senior Legal CounselOntario Securities Commission416-593-3686Sophie Jean, Directrice de l'encadrement des intermédiairesAutorité des marchés financiers514-395-0337 and 1-877-525-0337Sandrine Siewe, Analyste, Direction de l'encadrement des intermédiairesAutorité des marchés financiers514-395-0337 and 1-877-525-0337Jane AndersonDirector, Policy & Market Regulation andSecretary to the CommissionNova Scotia Securities Commission902-424-0179Steven DowlingActing DirectorConsumer, Labour and Financial Services DivisionJustice and Public SafetyGovernment of Prince Edward Island902-368-4551Jason AlcornSenior Legal CounselFinancial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick506-643-7857Susan W. PowellDeputy Director, SecuritiesFinancial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick506-643-7697John O'BrienSuperintendent of SecuritiesService NLGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador709-729-4909Jeff MasonDirector of Legal RegistriesDepartment of Justice, Government of Nunavut867-975-6591Thomas HallSuperintendent of SecuritiesDepartment of JusticeGovernment of the Northwest Territories867-767-9305Rhonda HorteDeputy SuperintendentOffice of the Yukon Superintendent of Securities867-667-5466
{1} CSA Staff Notice 33-316 -- Status Report on Consultation under CSA Consultation Paper 33-403: The Standard of Conduct for Advisers and Dealers: Exploring the Appropriateness of Introducing a Statutory Best Interest Duty When Advice is Provided to Retail Clients, published December 17, 2013.
{2} CSA Staff Notice 33-318 Review of Practices Firms Use to Compensate and Provide Incentives to their Representatives, published in December 2016, provided the results of a survey conducted in 2014 to identify compensation arrangements and incentive practices that firms use to motivate their representatives' behavior that raise potential conflicts of interest. The SROs also published notices in December 2016 that raised similar concerns.
Annex A: Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations
ANNEX A
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS
1. National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations is amended by this Instrument.
2. Section 1.1 is amended by adding the following definition:
"third-party compensation" means any monetary or non-monetary benefit provided, or expected to be provided, directly or indirectly to a registrant by a party other than the registrant's client in connection with the client's purchase or ownership of a security through the registrant;.
3. Subsection 3.4(1) is amended by replacing "features and risks of each security the individual recommends." with "features, returns and risks, and the initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, of each security the individual recommends.".
4. Division 2 of Part 3 is amended by adding the following section:
3.4.1 Firm's obligation to provide training
(1) A registered firm must provide training to its registered individuals on:
(a) compliance with securities legislation including, without limitation, the obligations respecting conflicts of interest, the know your client and know your product obligations, and the obligation to make a suitability determination;
(b) the structure, features, returns and risk, and the initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, of the securities available through the registered firm for the registered individuals to purchase or sell for, or recommend to, clients.
(2) Paragraph (1)(b) does not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as investment fund manager..
5. The title of Division 3 of Part 3 is amended by replacing "a self-regulatory organization" with "an SRO".
6. Section 3.16 is amended
(a) in paragraph (1)(b) by adding "determination" after "suitability", and
(b) in paragraph (2)(a) by adding "determination" after "suitability".
7. The title of Part 9 is amended by replacing "a self-regulatory organization" with "an SRO".
8. Subsection 9.3(1) is amended
(a) in paragraph (j) by adding "determination" after "suitability", and
(b) by repealing paragraph (k).
9. Subsection 9.3(2) is amended
(a) in paragraph (e) by adding "determination" after "suitability", and
(b) by repealing paragraph (f).
10. Subsection 9.4(1) is amended
(a) in paragraph (i) by adding "determination" after "suitability", and
(b) by repealing paragraph (j).
11. Subsection 9.4(2) is amended
(a) in paragraph (c) by adding "determination" after "suitability", and
(b) by repealing paragraph (d).
12. Subsection 9.4(3) is replaced with the following:
(3) The exemptions in subsections (1) and (2) do not apply in Québec, except for paragraphs (1)(m), (1)(m.2) to (1)(n.2) and paragraphs (2)(g), (2)(g.2) to (2)(h.2), as applicable, provided the conditions of the exemption are met..
13. Subsection 9.4(4) is replaced with the following:
(4) Subject to subsection (3), the requirements listed in subsection (1), other than paragraph (1)(h), do not apply to a mutual fund dealer registered in Québec to the extent equivalent requirements to those listed in subsection (1) are applicable to the mutual fund dealer under the regulations in Québec..
14. Subsection 11.5(2) is amended
(a) in paragraph (l) by adding ", 13.2.1 [know your product]" after "13.2 [know your client]",
(b) in paragraph (l) by adding "determination" after "suitability",
(c) in paragraph (o) by adding ", training" after "compliance",
(d) in paragraph (o) by replacing "." with ";", and
(e) by adding the following paragraphs:
(p) demonstrate how the firm has addressed, and plans to address, the conflicts of interest identified under sections 13.4 [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1 [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] in the best interest of its clients;
(q) document
(i) the firm's sales practices, compensation arrangements and incentive practices, and
(ii) other compensation arrangements and incentive practices from which the firm or its registered individuals, or any affiliate or associate of that firm, benefit;
(r) demonstrate compliance with section 13.18 [misleading communications];
(s) demonstrate compliance with section 14.1.2 [duty to provide information]..
15. The title of Division 1 of Part 13 is amended by replacing "Know your client and suitability" with "Know your client, know your product and suitability determination".
16. Section 13.2 is amended
(a) in subsection (1) by replacing "paragraph 2(b)" with "paragraph (2)(b)",
(b) by replacing paragraph (2)(c) with the following:
(c) ensure that it has sufficient information regarding all of the following to enable it to meet its obligations under section 13.3 [suitability determination] or, if applicable, the suitability requirement imposed by an SRO:
(i) the client's personal circumstances;
(ii) the client's financial circumstances;
(iii) the client's investment needs and objectives;
(iv) the client's investment knowledge;
(v) the client's risk profile;
(vi) the client's investment time horizon, and,
(c) by adding the following subsection:
(3.1) A registrant must take reasonable steps to obtain a client's confirmation of the accuracy of the information collected under subsection (2), including any significant changes to the information.,
(d) by adding the following subsection:
(4.1) Without limiting subsection (4),
(a) a registrant must review the information collected under this section
(i) if the registrant knows, or reasonably ought to know, of a significant change in the client's information collected under this section,
(ii) no less than once every 12 months for managed accounts,
(iii) if the registrant is an exempt market dealer, within 12 months before making a trade for, or recommendation to, the client,
(iv) in any other case, no less than once every 36 months,
(b) a registrant must update the information required under this section if, following the review of information under paragraph (4.1)(a), there has been a change in the information.,
(e) in subsection (6) by replacing "does" with "and subsection (4.1) do",
(f) in paragraph (6)(a) by adding "[suitability determination]" after "(2)", and
(g) by replacing paragraph (6)(b) with the following:
(b) the account of the permitted client to which the waiver applies is not a managed account..
17. Division 1 of Part 13 is amended by adding the following section:
13.2.1 Know your product
(1) A registered firm must not make a security available to clients unless the firm
(a) takes reasonable steps to understand the security, including all of the following:
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security;
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs;
(iii) how the security compares to similar securities available in the market;
(b) approves the security to be made available to clients, and
(c) monitors and reassesses the security, including monitoring for significant changes to the security.
(2) A registered firm must maintain an offering of securities and services that is consistent with how the firm holds itself out.
(3) A registered individual must not purchase or sell a security for, or recommend a security to, a client unless the registered individual takes reasonable steps to understand
(a) at a general level, the securities that are available through the registered firm for the registered individual to purchase or sell for, or recommend to, clients and how those securities compare;
(b) the security, including
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security, and
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs.
(4) A registered individual must not purchase a security for, or recommend a security to, a client unless the registered individual's sponsoring firm has approved that security to be made available to clients.
(5) A registered firm must ensure that its registered individuals have the necessary information about each security approved by the registered firm to be made available to clients to enable the registered individuals to comply with subsection (3).
(6) In the case of a security transferred by a client from another registered firm that is accepted by the registered firm or of a client-directed trade of a security, the requirements of subsections (1) and (3) apply to a registered firm or registered individual, as the case may be, only insofar as, under those requirements,
(a) the firm must not permit the security to be transferred into the client's account or the trade in the security to be made unless the firm
(i) takes reasonable steps to understand the structure, features, returns and risks of the security,
(ii) takes reasonable steps to understand the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs, and
(iii) monitors and reassesses the security, including monitoring for significant changes to the security; and
(b) the individual must not permit the security to be transferred into the client's account or the trade in the security to be made unless the individual takes reasonable steps to understand
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security; and
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs.
(7) This section does not apply to a registered dealer in respect of a security if either of the following applies:
(a) it makes the security available to a client only through an order-execution only service;
(b) it purchases or sells the security for a client only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client..
18. The heading to section 13.3 is amended by adding "determination" after "Suitability".
19. Section 13.3 is amended
(a) by replacing subsections (1) and (2) with the following:
(1) Before a registrant acts by opening an account for a client, purchasing, selling, depositing, exchanging or transferring securities for a client's account, taking any other investment action for a client or making a recommendation or decision to take any such action, the registrant must determine, on a reasonable basis, that the action satisfies the following criteria:
(a) the action is suitable for the client, based on the following factors:
(i) the client's information collected in accordance with section 13.2 [know your client];
(ii) the registrant's understanding of the security required in accordance with section 13.2.1 [know your product];
(iii) the features and associated costs of the account type made available to the client;
(iv) the impact of the action on the client's account, including considering the account's concentration and liquidity;
(v) the overall concentration and liquidity across all of the client's accounts at the firm;
(vi) the potential and actual impact of costs on the client's returns;
(vii) a consideration of a reasonable range of alternative actions available to the registrant through the registered firm at the time the determination is made;
(viii) any other factor that is relevant under the circumstances, and
(b) the action puts the client's interest first.
(2) A registrant must review the client's account and the securities in the client's account to determine whether the criteria in subsection (1) are met, and take appropriate action as necessary, promptly after any of the following occurs:
(a) a new registered individual is designated as responsible for the client's account;
(b) there is a change in a security in the client's account that may result in the security or account not meeting the criteria in subsection (1);
(c) there is a change in the client's information collected in accordance with subsection 13.2(2) that may result in a security or the client's account not meeting the criteria in subsection (1);
(d) the registrant has reviewed the client's information in accordance with subsection 13.2(4) or (4.1);
(e) the registrant becomes aware that a security or the client's account does not meet the criteria in subsection (1).
(2.1) Despite subsection (1), if a registrant receives an instruction from a client to take an action which would not meet the criteria in subsection (1), the registrant may carry out the client's instruction if the registrant has
(a) informed the client of the basis for the determination that the action would not meet the criteria in subsection (1),
(b) recommended to the client an alternative action that meets the criteria in subsection (1), and
(c) received written or electronically recorded confirmation of the client's instruction to proceed with the action despite the determination referred to in paragraph (a)., and
(b) by replacing paragraph (4)(b) with the following:
(b) the account of the permitted client to which the waiver applies is not a managed account..
20. The heading to section 13.4 is amended by replacing "Identifying and responding to" with "A registered firm's responsibility to identify".
21. Section 13.4 is amended
(a) by replacing subsection (1) with the following:
(1) A registered firm must take reasonable steps to identify existing conflicts of interest, and conflicts of interest that are reasonably foreseeable, between
(a) the firm, including each individual acting on the firm's behalf, and
(b) the client., and
(b) by repealing subsections (2) to (4).
22. Division 2 of Part 13 is amended by adding the following sections:
13.4.1 A registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest
(1) A registered individual must take reasonable steps to identify existing conflicts of interest, and conflicts of interest that are reasonably foreseeable, between the registered individual and the client.
(2) If a registered individual identifies a conflict of interest under subsection (1), the registered individual must promptly report that conflict of interest to the registered individual's sponsoring firm.
13.4.2 A registered firm's responsibility to address conflicts of interest
(1) A registered firm must address, in the best interest of a client, all conflicts of interest between itself, including each individual acting on its behalf, and the client.
(2) A registered firm must avoid any conflict of interest between the firm, including each individual acting on its behalf, and a client if the conflict is not, or cannot be, addressed in the best interest of the client.
13.4.3 A registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest
(1) A registered individual must address, in the best interest of a client, all conflicts of interest between the individual and the client.
(2) A registered individual must avoid any conflict of interest between the registered individual and a client if the conflict is not, or cannot be, addressed in the best interest of the client.
(3) A registered individual must not engage in any dealing or advising activity in connection with a conflict of interest identified by the registered individual under subsection 13.4.1(1) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest], unless
(a) the conflict has been addressed in the best interest of the client, and
(b) the registered individual's sponsoring firm has given the registered individual its consent to proceed with the activity.
13.4.4 Conflicts of interest that must be avoided
(1) A registrant must not borrow money, arrange a guarantee in relation to money the registrant has borrowed, or borrow securities or any other assets, from a client, unless either of the following applies:
(a) in the case of borrowed money, the client is a financial institution whose business includes lending money to the public, and the loan to the registrant is in the normal course of the financial institution's business;
(b) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited transaction.
(2) Despite any other provision of this Instrument, a registrant must not lend money, provide a guarantee in relation to a loan of money, extend credit, provide margin or lend securities or any other asset, to a client, unless any of the following apply:
(a) the activity is permitted under rules of an SRO applicable to the registrant;
(b) the registrant is an investment fund manager lending money on a short term basis to an investment fund that it manages, if the loan is for the purpose of funding redemptions of its securities or meeting expenses incurred by the investment fund in the normal course of its business;
(c) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited transaction.
(3) A registrant must not act under a power of attorney from a client, act as a trustee with respect to a trust in which a client is the settlor or beneficiary, or act as a trustee or executor in respect of the estate of a client, or otherwise have full or partial control or authority over the assets of a client, unless either of the following applies:
(a) the activity is permitted under rules of an SRO applicable to the registrant;
(b) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited appointment.
(4) Despite subsection (3), a registered adviser and its advising representatives may have full or partial control or authority over the assets of a client if those assets are held in a managed account.
13.4.5 Conflicts of interest disclosure
(1) A registered firm must disclose in writing a conflict of interest identified under subsections 13.4(1) [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1(2) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] to a client whose interests are affected by such conflict where a reasonable client would expect to be informed of such conflict.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the information delivered to a client under that subsection must include a description of each of the following:
(a) the nature and extent of the conflict of interest;
(b) the potential impact on and risk that the conflict of interest may pose to the client;
(c) how the conflict of interest has been, or will be, addressed.
(3) The disclosure required under subsection (1) must be prominent, specific and written in plain language.
(4) A registered firm must disclose a conflict of interest to a client under subsection (1):
(a) before opening an account for the client if the conflict might be present throughout the relationship between the registered firm and the client; and
(b) when the conflict of interest first arises or, in the case of a transaction that presents a conflict of interest, before entering into the transaction with the client.
(5) A registered firm must not rely solely on disclosure to address, in the best interest of the client, conflicts of interest identified under subsections 13.4(1) [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1(2) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest].
13.4.6 Investment fund managers
Sections 13.4 to 13.4.5 do not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of an investment fund that is subject to National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds..
23. Section 13.7 is amended
(a) by replacing "pay" with "provide" in the definition of "referral arrangement",
(b) by replacing "compensation" with "monetary or non-monetary benefit" in the definition of "referral fee", and
(c) by replacing "paid" with "provided" in the definition of "referral fee".
24. Section 13.8 is replaced with the following:
13.8 Permitted referral arrangements
(1) A registered firm, or an individual acting on its behalf, must not provide a referral fee to another person or company unless all of the following apply:
(a) the person or company receiving the referral fee is a registered individual or a registered firm;
(b) the referral fee complies with section 13.8.1 [limitation on referral fees];
(c) before a client is referred to the registrant, the terms of the referral arrangement are set out in a written agreement between the registered firms;
(d) the registered firm records all referral fees;
(e) the registered firm ensures that the information required under subsection 13.10(1) [disclosing referral arrangements to clients] is provided to the client in writing before the party receiving the referral opens an account for the client or provides services to the client.
(2) A registered firm, or an individual acting on its behalf must not accept a referral fee from another person or company unless all of the following apply:
(a) the referral fee complies with section 13.8.1 [limitation on referral fees];
(b) before a client is referred by the registrant, the terms of the referral arrangement are set out in a written agreement between the registered firm and the person or company receiving the referral of the client;
(c) the registered firm records all referral fees;
(d) the registered firm ensures that the information prescribed by subsection 13.10(1) [disclosing referral arrangements to clients] is provided to the client in writing before the party receiving the referral either opens an account for the client or provides services to the client.
13.8.1 Limitation on referral fees
A registrant must not provide or receive a referral fee if one or more of the following applies:
(a) the referral fee constitutes a series of payments that continue longer than 36 months from the date of the referral;
(b) the referral fee constitutes a series of payments that together exceed 25% of the fees or commissions collected from the client by the party who received the referral;
(c) the referral fee results in an increase in the amount of fees or commissions that would otherwise be paid by a client to the party who received the referral for the same product or service..
25. Subsection 13.10(1) is amended
(a) by replacing "The written disclosure of the referral arrangement required by paragraph 13.8(c) [permitted referral arrangements] must include" with "For the purposes of paragraphs 13.8(1)(e) and (2)(d) [permitted referral arrangements], the information required by this subsection is all of",
(b) in paragraph (a) by replacing "paragraph 13.8(a);" with "paragraphs 13.8(1)(c) and (2)(b) [permitted referral arrangements], as applicable;", and
(c) in paragraph (f) by deleting "if a referral is made to a registrant,".
26. Section 13.11 is repealed.
27. Section 13.12 is repealed.
28. Paragraph 13.17(1)(a) is replaced with the following:
(a) division 2 [conflicts of interest] of Part 13, except section 13.5 [restrictions on certain managed account transactions] and section 13.6 [disclosure when recommending related or connected securities];.
29. Part 13 is amended by adding the following division:
Division 7 Misleading communications
13.18 Misleading communications
(1) A registered individual must not hold himself or herself out, and a registered firm must not hold itself or its registered individuals out, in a manner that could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead a person as to any of the following matters:
(a) the proficiency, experience, or qualifications of the registrant;
(b) the nature of the person's relationship, or potential relationship, with the registrant;
(c) the products or services provided, or to be provided, by the registrant.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a registered individual must not use any of the following:
(a) a title, designation, award, or recognition that is based partly or entirely on that registered individual's sales activity or revenue generation;
(b) a corporate officer title unless their sponsoring firm has appointed that registered individual to that corporate office pursuant to applicable corporate law;
(c) a title or designation, unless the individual's sponsoring firm has approved the use by that registered individual of that title or designation..
30. The heading to section 14.1.1 is amended by adding " -- investment fund managers" after "Duty to provide information".
31. Part 14 is amended by adding the following division:
Division 1.1 Publicly available information
14.1.2 Duty to provide information
(1) A registered firm must make publicly available information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client of the registered firm, including general descriptions of the following:
(a) the products and services that it offers and any material limitations on those products and services;
(b) the types of account that it offers;
(c) the charges and other costs to clients, including any current fee schedule associated with its products, services and accounts;
(d) any minimum account sizes or minimum charges that apply to its products, services and accounts;
(e) any third-party compensation associated with its products, services and accounts;
(f) any restrictions on the clients to whom it makes products, services or accounts available.
(2) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of products and services that are offered exclusively to permitted clients..
32. Section 14.2 is amended
(a) by adding the following subsection:
(0.1) In this section, "proprietary product" means a security of an issuer if one or more of the following apply:
(a) the issuer of the security is a connected issuer of the registered firm;
(b) the issuer of the security is a related issuer of the registered firm;
(c) the registered firm or an affiliate of the registered firm is the investment fund manager or portfolio manager of the issuer of the security.,
(b) by replacing paragraph (2)(b) with the following:
(b) a general description of the products and services the registered firm offers to the client, including
(i) whether the firm will primarily or exclusively provide proprietary products to the client;
(ii) whether there are any other restrictions on the products or services the registrant will provide to the client;,
(c) in paragraph (2)(h) by replacing "compensation" with "third-party compensation that may be",
(d) in paragraph (2)(h) by deleting "by any other party" before "in relation to",
(e) in paragraph (2)(h) by replacing "a client may purchase through the registered firm" with "the client may purchase through the firm",
(f) by replacing paragraph (2)(k) with the following:
(k) a statement that the registered firm must determine that any investment action it takes, recommends or decides on, for the client is suitable for the client and puts the client's interests first;,
(g) in paragraph (2)(l) by replacing "a registered firm must collect" with "the registered firm has collected",
(h) in paragraph (2)(n) by replacing "." with ";", and
(i) by adding the following paragraph:
(o) an explanation of the impact on a client's investment returns from each of the following:
(i) the charges described in paragraphs (f) and (g);
(ii) any investment fund management expense fees or other ongoing fees the client may directly or indirectly incur in connection with the securities purchased for the client's account;
(iii) any restrictions on the products or services that the registered firm will provide to the client..
33. The first column of Appendix G is amended by replacing "section 13.3 [suitability]" with "section 13.3 [suitability determination]".
34. Appendix G is amended by deleting the following row:
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients]
1.
Dealer Member Rule 17.11; and
2.
Dealer Member Rule 100 [Margin Requirements]
35. The first column of Appendix H is amended by replacing "section 13.3 [suitability]" with "section 13.3 [suitability determination]".
36. Appendix H is amended by deleting the following row:
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients]
1.
Rule 3.2.1 [Client Lending and Margin]; and
2.
Rule 3.2.3 [Advancing Mutual Fund Redemption Proceeds]
37.
(1) Subject to subsection (2), this Instrument comes into force on •.
(2) [Transition measures to be considered further.]
Annex B: Blackline Showing Changes to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations under the Proposed Amendments
ANNEX B
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS
Table of Contents
|
Part 1 |
Interpretation |
|
||
|
1.1 |
Definitions of terms used throughout this Instrument |
|
1.2 |
Interpretation of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan |
|
1.3 |
Information may be given to the principal regulator |
|
||
Individual registration |
Part 2 |
Categories of registration for individuals |
|
||
|
2.1 |
Individual categories |
|
2.2 |
Client mobility exemption -- individuals |
|
2.3 |
Individuals acting for investment fund managers |
|
||
|
Part 3 |
Registration requirements -- individuals |
|
||
|
Division 1 General proficiency requirements |
|
|
3.1 |
Definitions |
|
3.2 |
U.S. equivalency |
|
3.3 |
Time limits on examination requirements |
|
Division 2 Education and experience requirements |
|
|
3.4 |
Proficiency -- initial and ongoing |
|
<<3.4.1>> |
<<Firm's obligation to provide training>> |
|
3.5 |
Mutual fund dealer -- dealing representative |
|
3.6 |
Mutual fund dealer -- chief compliance officer |
|
3.7 |
Scholarship plan dealer -- dealing representative |
|
3.8 |
Scholarship plan dealer -- chief compliance officer |
|
3.9 |
Exempt market dealer -- dealing representative |
|
3.10 |
Exempt market dealer -- chief compliance officer |
|
3.11 |
Portfolio manager -- advising representative |
|
3.12 |
Portfolio manager -- associate advising representative |
|
3.13 |
Portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer |
|
3.14 |
Investment fund manager -- chief compliance officer |
|
Division 3 Membership in |
|
|
3.15 |
Who must be approved by an SRO before registration |
|
3.16 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for SRO-approved persons |
|
||
|
Part 4 |
Restrictions on registered individuals |
|
||
|
4.1 |
Restriction on acting for another registered firm |
|
4.2 |
Associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice |
|
||
|
Part 5 |
Ultimate designated person and chief compliance officer |
|
||
|
5.1 |
Responsibilities of the ultimate designated person |
|
5.2 |
Responsibilities of the chief compliance officer |
|
||
|
Part 6 |
Suspension and revocation of registration -- individuals |
|
||
|
6.1 |
If individual ceases to have authority to act for firm |
|
6.2 |
If IIROC approval is revoked or suspended |
|
6.3 |
If MFDA approval is revoked or suspended |
|
6.4 |
If sponsoring firm is suspended |
|
6.5 |
Dealing and advising activities suspended |
|
6.6 |
Revocation of a suspended registration -- individual |
|
6.7 |
Exception for individuals involved in a hearing or proceeding |
|
6.8 |
Application of Part 6 in Ontario |
|
||
Firm registration |
Part 7 |
Categories of registration for firms |
|
||
|
7.1 |
Dealer categories |
|
7.2 |
Adviser categories |
|
7.3 |
Investment fund manager category |
|
||
|
Part 8 |
Exemptions from the requirement to register |
|
||
|
Division 1 Exemptions from dealer and underwriter registration |
|
|
8.0.1 |
General condition to dealer registration requirement exemptions |
|
8.1 |
Interpretation of "trade" in Québec |
|
8.2 |
Definition of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan |
|
8.3 |
Interpretation -- exemption from underwriter registration requirement |
|
8.4 |
Person or company not in the business of trading in British Columbia, Manitoba and New Brunswick |
|
8.5 |
Trades through or to a registered dealer |
|
8.5.1 |
Trades through a registered dealer by registered adviser |
|
8.6 |
Investment fund trades by adviser to managed account |
|
8.7 |
Investment fund reinvestment |
|
8.8 |
Additional investment in investment funds |
|
8.9 |
Additional investment in investment funds if initial purchase before September 14, 2005 |
|
8.10 |
Private investment club |
|
8.11 |
Private investment fund -- loan and trust pools |
|
8.12 |
Mortgages |
|
8.13 |
Personal property security legislation |
|
8.14 |
Variable insurance contract |
|
8.15 |
Schedule III banks and cooperative associations -- evidence of deposit |
|
8.16 |
Plan administrator |
|
8.17 |
Reinvestment plan |
|
8.18 |
International dealer |
|
8.19 |
Self-directed registered education savings plan |
|
8.20 |
Exchange contract -- Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan |
|
8.20.1 |
Exchange contract trades through or to a registered dealer -- Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan |
|
8.21 |
Specified debt |
|
8.22 |
Small security holder selling and purchase arrangements |
|
8.22.1 |
Short-term debt |
|
Division 2 Exemptions from adviser registration |
|
|
8.22.2 |
General condition to adviser registration requirement exemptions |
|
8.23 |
Dealer without discretionary authority |
|
8.24 |
IIROC members with discretionary authority |
|
8.25 |
Advising generally |
|
8.26 |
International adviser |
|
8.26.1 |
International sub-adviser |
|
Division 3 Exemptions from investment fund manager registration |
|
|
8.26.2 |
General condition to investment fund manager registration requirement exemptions |
|
8.27 |
Private investment club |
|
8.28 |
Capital accumulation plan |
|
8.29 |
Private investment fund -- loan and trust pools |
|
Division 4 Mobility exemption -- firms |
|
|
8.30 |
Client mobility exemption -- firms |
|
||
|
Part 9 |
Membership in |
|
||
|
9.1 |
IIROC membership for investment dealers |
|
9.2 |
MFDA membership for mutual fund dealers |
|
9.3 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for IIROC members |
|
9.4 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members |
|
||
|
Part 10 |
Suspension and revocation of registration -- firms |
|
||
|
Division 1 When a firm's registration is suspended |
|
|
10.1 |
Failure to pay fees |
|
10.2 |
If IIROC membership is revoked or suspended |
|
10.3 |
If MFDA membership is revoked or suspended |
|
10.4 |
Activities not permitted while a firm's registration is suspended |
|
Division 2 Revoking a firm's registration |
|
|
10.5 |
Revocation of a suspended registration -- firm |
|
10.6 |
Exception for firms involved in a hearing or proceeding |
|
10.7 |
Application of Part 10 in Ontario |
|
||
Business operations |
Part 11 |
Internal controls and systems |
|
||
|
Division 1 Compliance |
|
|
11.1 |
Compliance system |
|
11.2 |
Designating an ultimate designated person |
|
11.3 |
Designating a chief compliance officer |
|
11.4 |
Providing access to the board of directors |
|
Division 2 Books and records |
|
|
11.5 |
General requirements for records |
|
11.6 |
Form, accessibility and retention of records |
|
Division 3 Certain business transactions |
|
|
11.7 |
Tied settling of securities transactions |
|
11.8 |
Tied selling |
|
11.9 |
Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets |
|
11.10 |
Registered firm whose securities are acquired |
|
||
|
Part 12 |
Financial condition |
|
||
|
Division 1 Working capital |
|
|
12.1 |
Capital requirements |
|
12.2 |
Subordination agreement |
|
Division 2 Insurance |
|
|
12.3 |
Insurance -- dealer |
|
12.4 |
Insurance -- adviser |
|
12.5 |
Insurance -- investment fund manager |
|
12.6 |
Global bonding or insurance |
|
12.7 |
Notifying the regulator or the securities regulatory authority of a change, claim or cancellation |
|
Division 3 Audits |
|
|
12.8 |
Direction by the regulator or the securities regulatory authority to conduct an audit or review |
|
12.9 |
Co-operating with the auditor |
|
Division 4 Financial reporting |
|
|
12.10 |
Annual financial statements |
|
12.11 |
Interim financial information |
|
12.12 |
Delivering financial information -- dealer |
|
12.13 |
Delivering financial information -- adviser |
|
12.14 |
Delivering financial information -- investment fund manager |
|
12.15 |
[lapsed] |
|
||
Client relationships |
Part 13 |
Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms |
|
||
|
Division 1 Know your client<<, know your product>> and suitability<<determination>> |
|
|
13.1 |
Investment fund managers exempt from this Division |
|
13.2 |
Know your client |
|
<<13.2.1>> |
<<Know your product>> |
|
13.3 |
Suitability <<determination>> |
|
Division 2 Conflicts of interest |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
<<13.4.1>> |
<<A registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.2>> |
<<A registered firm's responsibility to address conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.3>> |
<<A registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.4>> |
<<Conflicts of interest that must be avoided>> |
|
<<13.4.5>> |
<<Conflicts of interest disclosure>> |
|
<<13.4.6>> |
<<Investment fund managers>> |
|
13.5 |
Restrictions on certain managed account transactions |
|
13.6 |
Disclosure when recommending related or connected securities |
|
Division 3 Referral arrangements |
|
|
13.7 |
Definitions -- referral arrangements |
|
13.8 |
Permitted referral arrangements |
|
<<13.8.1>> |
<<Limitation on referral fees>> |
|
13.9 |
Verifying the qualifications of the person or company receiving the referral |
|
13.10 |
Disclosing referral arrangements to clients |
|
13.11 |
|
|
Division 4 Loans and margin |
|
|
13.12 |
|
|
13.13 |
Disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money |
|
Division 5 Complaints |
|
|
13.14 |
Application of this Division |
|
13.15 |
Handling complaints |
|
13.16 |
Dispute resolution service |
|
Division 6 Registered sub-advisers |
|
|
13.17 |
Exemption from certain requirements for registered sub-advisers |
|
<<Division 7 Misleading communications>> |
|
|
<<13.18>> |
<<Misleading communications>> |
|
||
|
Part 14 |
Handling client accounts -- firms |
|
||
|
Division 1 Investment fund managers |
|
|
14.1 |
Application of this Part to investment fund managers |
|
14.1.1 |
Duty to provide information -- <<Investment fund managers>> |
|
<<Division 1.1 Publicly available information>> |
|
|
<<14.1.2>> |
<<Duty to provide information>> |
|
Division 2 Disclosure to clients |
|
|
14.2 |
Relationship disclosure information |
|
14.2.1 |
Pre-trade disclosure of charges |
|
14.3 |
Disclosure to clients about the fair allocation of investment opportunities |
|
14.4 |
When the firm has a relationship with a financial institution |
|
14.5 |
Notice to clients by non-resident registrants |
|
Division 3 Client assets and investment fund assets |
|
|
14.5.1 |
Definition of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan |
|
14.5.2 |
Restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement |
|
14.5.3 |
Cash and securities held by a qualified custodian |
|
14.6 |
Client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust |
|
14.6.1 |
Custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests |
|
14.6.2 |
Custodial provisions relating to short sales |
|
14.7 |
[repealed] |
|
14.8 |
[repealed] |
|
14.9 |
[repealed] |
|
Division 4 Client accounts |
|
|
14.10 |
Allocating investment opportunities fairly |
|
14.11 |
Selling or assigning client accounts |
|
Division 5 Reporting to clients |
|
|
14.11.1 |
Determining market value |
|
14.12 |
Content and delivery of trade confirmation |
|
14.13 |
Confirmations for certain automatic plans |
|
14.14 |
Account statements |
|
14.14.1 |
Additional statements |
|
14.14.2 |
Security position cost information |
|
14.15 |
Security holder statements |
|
14.16 |
Scholarship plan dealer statements |
|
14.17 |
Report on charges and other compensation |
|
14.18 |
Investment performance report |
|
14.19 |
Content of investment performance report |
|
14.20 |
Delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report |
|
||
Exemption from this Instrument |
Part 15 |
Granting an exemption |
|
||
|
15.1 |
Who can grant an exemption |
|
||
Transition and timing |
Part 16 |
Transition |
|
||
|
16.1 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.2 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.3 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.4 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.5 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.6 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.7 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.8 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.9 |
Registration of chief compliance officers |
|
16.10 |
Proficiency for dealing and advising representatives |
|
16.11 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.12 |
Continuation of existing discretionary relief |
|
16.13 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.14 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.15 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.16 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.17 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.18 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.19 |
[lapsed] |
|
16.20 |
[lapsed] |
|
||
|
Part 17 |
When this Instrument comes into force |
|
||
|
17.1 |
Effective date |
|
||
Forms |
FORM 31-103F1 CALCULATION OF EXCESS WORKING CAPITAL |
|
|
FORM 31-103F2 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENT FOR SERVICE |
|
|
FORM 31-103F3 USE OF MOBILITY EXEMPTION |
|
|
FORM 31-103F4 NET ASSET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS |
|
|
||
Appendices |
APPENDIX A -- BONDING AND INSURANCE CLAUSES |
|
|
APPENDIX B -- SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT |
|
|
APPENDIX C -- [lapsed] |
|
|
APPENDIX D -- [lapsed] |
|
|
APPENDIX E -- [lapsed] |
|
|
APPENDIX F -- [lapsed] |
|
|
APPENDIX G -- EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR IIROC MEMBERS |
|
|
APPENDIX H -- EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR MFDA MEMBERS |
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS
Part 1 Interpretation
1.1 Definitions of terms used throughout this Instrument
In this Instrument
"book cost" means the total amount paid to purchase a security, including any transaction charges related to the purchase, adjusted for reinvested distributions, returns of capital and corporate reorganizations;
"Canadian custodian" means any of the following:
(a) a bank listed in Schedule I, II or III of the Bank Act (Canada);
(b) a trust company that is incorporated under the laws of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada and licensed or registered under the laws of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada, and that has equity, as reported in its most recent audited financial statements, of not less than $10,000,000;
(c) a company that is incorporated under the laws of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada, and that is an affiliate of a bank or trust company referred to in paragraph (a) or (b), if either of the following applies:
(i) the company has equity, as reported in its most recent audited financial statements, of not less than $10,000,000;
(ii) the bank or trust company has assumed responsibility for all of the custodial obligations of the company for the cash and securities the company holds for a client or investment fund;
(b) an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC and that is permitted under the rules of IIROC, as amended from time to time, to hold the cash and securities of a client or investment fund;
"Canadian financial institution" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"connected issuer" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 33-105 Underwriting Conflicts;
"debt security" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"designated rating" has the same meaning as in National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds;
"designated rating organization" has the same meaning as in National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds;
"DRO affiliate" means an affiliate of a designated rating organization that issues credit ratings in a foreign jurisdiction and that has been designated as such under the terms of the designated rating organization's designation;
"eligible client" means a client of a person or company if any of the following apply:
(a) the client is an individual and was a client of the person or company immediately before becoming resident in the local jurisdiction;
(b) the client is the spouse or a child of a client referred to in paragraph (a);
(c) except in Ontario, the client is a client of the person or company on September 27, 2009 pursuant to the person or company's reliance on an exemption from the registration requirement under Part 5 of Multilateral Instrument 11-101 Principal Regulator System on that date;
"exempt market dealer" means a person or company registered in the category of exempt market dealer;
"foreign custodian" means any of the following:
(a) an entity that
(i) is incorporated or organized under the laws of a country, or a political subdivision of a country, other than Canada,
(ii) is regulated as a banking institution or trust company by the government, or an agency of the government, of the country under the laws of which it is incorporated or organized, or a political subdivision of that country, and
(iii) has equity, as reported in its most recent audited financial statements, of not less than the equivalent of $100,000,000;
(b) an affiliate of an entity referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the definition of "Canadian custodian", or paragraph (a) of this definition, if either of the following applies:
(i) the affiliate has equity, as reported in its most recent audited financial statements, of not less than the equivalent of $100,000,000;
(ii) the entity referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the definition of "Canadian custodian", or paragraph (a) of this definition, has assumed responsibility for all of the custodial obligations of the affiliate for the cash and securities the affiliate holds for a client or investment fund;
"IIROC" means the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada;
"IIROC provision" means a by-law, rule, regulation or policy of IIROC named in Appendix G, as amended from time to time;
"interim period" means a period commencing on the first day of the financial year and ending 9, 6 or 3 months before the end of the financial year;
"investment dealer" means a person or company registered in the category of investment dealer;
"managed account" means an account of a client for which a person or company makes the investment decisions if that person or company has discretion to trade in securities for the account without requiring the client's express consent to a transaction;
"marketplace" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation;
"MFDA" means the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada;
"MFDA provision" means a by-law, rule, regulation or policy of the MFDA named in Appendix H, as amended from time to time;
"mutual fund dealer" means a person or company registered in the category of mutual fund dealer;
"operating charge" means any amount charged to a client by a registered firm in respect of the operation, transfer or termination of a client's account and includes any federal, provincial or territorial sales taxes paid on that amount;
"original cost" means the total amount paid to purchase a security, including any transaction charges related to the purchase;
"permitted client" means any of the following:
(a) a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank;
(b) the Business Development Bank of Canada incorporated under the Business Development Bank of Canada Act (Canada);
(c) a subsidiary of any person or company referred to in paragraph (a) or (b), if the person or company owns all of the voting securities of the subsidiary, except the voting securities required by law to be owned by directors of the subsidiary;
(d) a person or company registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada as an adviser, investment dealer, mutual fund dealer or exempt market dealer;
(e) a pension fund that is regulated by either the federal Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions or a pension commission or similar regulatory authority of a jurisdiction of Canada or a wholly-owned subsidiary of such a pension fund;
(f) an entity organized in a foreign jurisdiction that is analogous to any of the entities referred to in paragraphs (a) to (e);
(g) the Government of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada, or any Crown corporation, agency or wholly-owned entity of the Government of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada;
(h) any national, federal, state, provincial, territorial or municipal government of or in any foreign jurisdiction, or any agency of that government;
(i) a municipality, public board or commission in Canada and a metropolitan community, school board, the Comité de gestion de la taxe scolaire de l'île de Montréal or an intermunicipal management board in Québec;
(j) a trust company or trust corporation registered or authorized to carry on business under the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) or under comparable legislation in a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction, acting on behalf of a managed account managed by the trust company or trust corporation, as the case may be;
(k) a person or company acting on behalf of a managed account managed by the person or company, if the person or company is registered or authorized to carry on business as an adviser or the equivalent under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction;
(l) an investment fund if one or both of the following apply:
(i) the fund is managed by a person or company registered as an investment fund manager under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada;
(ii) the fund is advised by a person or company authorized to act as an adviser under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada;
(m) in respect of a dealer, a registered charity under the Income Tax Act (Canada) that obtains advice on the securities to be traded from an eligibility adviser, as defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions, or an adviser registered under the securities legislation of the jurisdiction of the registered charity;
(n) in respect of an adviser, a registered charity under the Income Tax Act (Canada) that is advised by an eligibility adviser, as defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions, or an adviser registered under the securities legislation of the jurisdiction of the registered charity;
(o) an individual who beneficially owns financial assets, as defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions, having an aggregate realizable value that, before taxes but net of any related liabilities, exceeds $5 million;
(p) a person or company that is entirely owned by an individual or individuals referred to in paragraph (o), who holds the beneficial ownership interest in the person or company directly or through a trust, the trustee of which is a trust company or trust corporation registered or authorized to carry on business under the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) or under comparable legislation in a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction;
(q) a person or company, other than an individual or an investment fund, that has net assets of at least $25 million as shown on its most recently prepared financial statements;
(r) a person or company that distributes securities of its own issue in Canada only to persons or companies referred to in paragraphs (a) to (q);
"portfolio manager" means a person or company registered in the category of portfolio manager;
"principal jurisdiction" means
(a) for a person or company other than an individual, the jurisdiction of Canada in which the person or company's head office is located, and
(b) for an individual, the jurisdiction of Canada in which the individual's working office is located;
"principal regulator" has the same meaning as in section 4A.1 of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System;
"qualified custodian" means a Canadian custodian or a foreign custodian;
"registered firm" means a registered dealer, a registered adviser, or a registered investment fund manager;
"registered individual" means an individual who is registered
(a) in a category that authorizes the individual to act as a dealer or an adviser on behalf of a registered firm,
(b) as ultimate designated person, or
(c) as chief compliance officer;
"related issuer" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 33-105 Underwriting Conflicts;
"restricted dealer" means a person or company registered in the category of restricted dealer;
"restricted portfolio manager" means a person or company registered in the category of restricted portfolio manager;
"Schedule III bank" means an authorized foreign bank named in Schedule III of the Bank Act (Canada);
"scholarship plan dealer" means a person or company registered in the category of scholarship plan dealer;
"sponsoring firm" means the firm registered in a jurisdiction of Canada on whose behalf an individual acts as a dealer, an underwriter, an adviser, a chief compliance officer or an ultimate designated person;
"sub-adviser" means an adviser to
(a) a registered adviser, or
(b) a registered dealer acting as a portfolio manager as permitted by section 8.24 [IIROC members with discretionary authority];
"subsidiary" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"third-party compensation" means any monetary or non-monetary benefit provided, or expected to be provided, directly or indirectly to a registrant by a party other than the registrant's client in connection with the client's purchase or ownership of a security through the registrant;
"total percentage return" means the cumulative realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of an investment, plus income from the investment, over a specified period of time, expressed as a percentage;
"trailing commission" means any payment related to a client's ownership of a security that is part of a continuing series of payments to a registered firm or registered individual by any party;
"transaction charge" means any amount charged to a client by a registered firm in respect of a purchase or sale of a security and includes any federal, provincial or territorial sales taxes paid on that amount;
"working office" means the office of the sponsoring firm where an individual does most of his or her business.
1.2 Interpretation of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan
(1) Subject to sections 8.2, 8.26 and 14.5.1, in British Columbia, a reference to "securities" in this Instrument includes "exchange contracts", unless the context otherwise requires.
(2) Subject to sections 8.2, 8.26 and 14.5.1, in Alberta, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, a reference to "securities" in this Instrument includes "derivatives", unless the context otherwise requires.
1.3 Information may be given to the principal regulator
(1) [repealed]
(2) For the purpose of a requirement in this Instrument to notify or to deliver or submit a document to the regulator or the securities regulatory authority, the person or company may notify or deliver or submit the document to the person or company's principal regulator.
(3) [repealed]
(4) Despite subsection (2), for the purpose of the notice and delivery requirements in section 11.9 [registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets], if the principal regulator of the registrant and the principal regulator of the firm identified in paragraph 11.9(1)(a) or 11.9(1)(b), if registered in any jurisdiction of Canada, are not the same, the registrant must deliver the written notice to the following:
(a) the registrant's principal regulator; and
(b) the principal regulator of the firm identified in paragraph 11.9(1)(a) or 11.9(1)(b) as applicable, if registered in any jurisdiction of Canada identified in paragraph 11.9(1)(a) or 11.9(1)(b).
(5) Subsection (2) does not apply to
(a) section 8.18 [international dealer], and
(b) section 8.26 [international adviser].
Part 2 Categories of registration for individuals
2.1 Individual categories
(1) The following are the categories of registration for an individual who is required, under securities legislation, to be registered to act on behalf of a registered firm:
(a) dealing representative;
(b) advising representative;
(c) associate advising representative;
(d) ultimate designated person;
(e) chief compliance officer.
(2) An individual registered in the category of
(a) dealing representative may act as a dealer or an underwriter in respect of a security that the individual's sponsoring firm is permitted to trade or underwrite,
(b) advising representative may act as an adviser in respect of a security that the individual's sponsoring firm is permitted to advise on,
(c) associate advising representative may act as an adviser in respect of a security that the individual's sponsoring firm is permitted to advise on if the advice has been approved under subsection 4.2(1) [associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice],
(d) ultimate designated person must perform the functions set out in section 5.1 [responsibilities of the ultimate designated person], and
(e) chief compliance officer must perform the functions set out in section 5.2 [responsibilities of the chief compliance officer].
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, the same categories of registration for individuals as in subsection 2.1(1) are set out under section 25 of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.2 Client mobility exemption -- individuals
(1) The registration requirement does not apply to an individual if all of the following apply:
(a) the individual is registered as a dealing, advising or associate advising representative in the individual's principal jurisdiction;
(b) the individual's sponsoring firm is registered in the firm's principal jurisdiction;
(c) the individual does not act as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the local jurisdiction other than as he or she is permitted to in his or her principal jurisdiction according to the individual's registration in that jurisdiction;
(d) the individual does not act as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the local jurisdiction other than for 5 or fewer eligible clients;
(e) the individual complies with Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms;
(f) the individual deals fairly, honestly and in good faith in the course of his or her dealings with an eligible client;
(g) before first acting as a dealer or adviserfor an eligible client, the individual's sponsoring firm has disclosed to the client that the individual, and if the firm is relying on section 8.30 Client mobility exemption -- firms, the firm,
(i) is exempt from registration in the local jurisdiction, and
(ii) is not subject to requirements otherwise applicable under local securities legislation.
(2) If an individual relies on the exemption in this section, the individual's sponsoring firm must submit a completed Form 31-103F3 Use of Mobility Exemption to the securities regulatory authority of the local jurisdiction as soon as possible after the individual first relies on this section.
2.3 Individuals acting for investment fund managers
The investment fund manager registration requirement does not apply to an individual acting on behalf of a registered investment fund manager.
Part 3 Registration requirements -- individuals
Division 1 General proficiency requirements
3.1 Definitions
In this Part
"Branch Manager Proficiency Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the RESP Dealers Association of Canada and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Canadian Investment Funds Course Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the IFSE Institute and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Canadian Investment Manager designation" means the designation earned through the Canadian investment manager program prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every program that preceded that program, or succeeded that program, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned program;
"Canadian Securities Course Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"CFA Charter" means the charter earned through the Chartered Financial Analyst program prepared and administered by the CFA Institute and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every program that preceded that program, or succeeded that program, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned program;
"Exempt Market Products Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the IFSE Institute and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Investment Funds in Canada Course Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Mutual Fund Dealers Compliance Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the IFSE Institute and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"New Entrants Course Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"PDO Exam" means
(a) the Officers', Partners' and Directors' Exam prepared and administered by the IFSE Institute and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination, or
(b) the Partners, Directors and Senior Officers Course Exam prepared and administered by CSI Global Education Inc. and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Sales Representative Proficiency Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the RESP Dealers Association of Canada and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination;
"Series 7 Exam" means the examination prepared and administered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in the United States of America and so named on the day this Instrument comes into force, and every examination that preceded that examination, or succeeded that examination, that does not have a significantly reduced scope and content when compared to the scope and content of the first-mentioned examination.
3.2 U.S. equivalency
In this Part, an individual is not required to have passed the Canadian Securities Course Exam if the individual has passed the Series 7 Exam and the New Entrants Course Exam.
3.3 Time limits on examination requirements
(1) For the purpose of this Part, an individual is deemed to have not passed an examination unless the individual passed the examination not more than 36 months before the date of his or her application for registration.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the individual passed the examination more than 36 months before the date of his or her application and has met one of the following conditions:
(a) the individual was registered in the same category in any jurisdiction of Canada at any time during the 36-month period before the date of his or her application;
(b) the individual has gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience during the 36-month period before the date of his or her application.
(3) For the purpose of paragraph (2)(a), an individual is not considered to have been registered during any period in which the individual's registration was suspended.
(4) Subsection (1) does not apply to the examination requirements in:
(a) section 3.7 [scholarship plan dealer -- dealing representative] if the individual was registered in a jurisdiction of Canada as a dealing representative of a scholarship plan dealer on and since September 28, 2009; and
(b) section 3.9 [exempt market dealer -- dealing representative] if the individual was registered as a dealing representative of an exempt market dealer in Ontario or Newfoundland and Labrador on and since September 28, 2009.
Division 2 Education and experience requirements
3.4 Proficiency -- initial and ongoing
(1) An individual must not perform an activity that requires registration unless the individual has the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently, including understanding the structure, features, returns and risks, and the initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, of each security the individual recommends.
(2) A chief compliance officer must not perform an activity set out in section 5.2 [responsibilities of the chief compliance officer] unless the individual has the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently.
3.4.1 Firm's obligation to provide training
(1) A registered firm must provide training to its registered individuals on:
(a) compliance with securities legislation including, without limitation, the obligations respecting conflicts of interest, the know your client and know your product obligations, and the obligation to make a suitability determination;
(b) the structure, features, returns and risk, and the initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, of the securities available through the registered firm for the registered individuals to purchase or sell for, or recommend to, clients.
(2) Paragraph (1)(b) does not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as investment fund manager.
3.5 Mutual fund dealer -- dealing representative
A dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer must not act as a dealer in respect of the securities listed in paragraph 7.1(2)(b) unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has passed the Canadian Investment Funds Course Exam, the Canadian Securities Course Exam or the Investment Funds in Canada Course Exam;
(b) the individual has met the requirements of section 3.11 [portfolio manager -- advising representative];
(c) the individual has earned a CFA Charter and has gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration;
(d) the individual is exempt from section 3.11 [portfolio manager -- advising representative] because of subsection 16.10(1) [proficiency for dealing and advising representatives].
3.6 Mutual fund dealer -- chief compliance officer
A mutual fund dealer must not designate an individual as its chief compliance officer under subsection 11.3(1) [designating a chief compliance officer] unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has:
(i) passed the Canadian Investment Funds Course Exam, the Canadian Securities Course Exam or the Investment Funds in Canada Course Exam;
(ii) passed the PDO Exam, the Mutual Fund Dealers Compliance Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam; and
(iii) gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration;
(b) the individual has met the requirements of section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer];
(c) section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer] does not apply in respect of the individual because of subsection 16.9(2) [registration of chief compliance officers].
3.7 Scholarship plan dealer -- dealing representative
A dealing representative of a scholarship plan dealer must not act as a dealer in respect of the securities listed in paragraph 7.1(2)(c) unless the individual has passed the Sales Representative Proficiency Exam.
3.8 Scholarship plan dealer -- chief compliance officer
A scholarship plan dealer must not designate an individual as its chief compliance officer under subsection 11.3(1) [designating a chief compliance officer] unless the individual has:
(a) passed the Sales Representative Proficiency Exam;
(b) passed the Branch Manager Proficiency Exam;
(c) passed the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam, and
(d) gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration.
3.9 Exempt market dealer -- dealing representative
A dealing representative of an exempt market dealer must not perform an activity listed in paragraph 7.1(2)(d) unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has passed the Canadian Securities Course Exam;
(b) the individual has passed the Exempt Market Products Exam;
(c) the individual has earned a CFA Charter and has gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration;
(d) the individual satisfies the conditions set out in section 3.11 [portfolio manager -- advising representative];
(e) the individual is exempt from section 3.11 [portfolio manager -- advising representative] because of subsection 16.10(1) [proficiency for dealing and advising representatives].
3.10 Exempt market dealer -- chief compliance officer
An exempt market dealer must not designate an individual as its chief compliance officer under subsection 11.3(1) [designating a chief compliance officer] unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has:
(i) passed the Exempt Market Products Exam or the Canadian Securities Course Exam;
(ii) passed the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam; and
(iii) gained 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration;
(b) the individual has met the requirements of section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer];
(c) section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer] does not apply in respect of the individual because of subsection 16.9(2) [registration of chief compliance officers].
3.11 Portfolio manager -- advising representative
An advising representative of a portfolio manager must not act as an adviser on behalf of the portfolio manager unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has earned a CFA Charter and has gained 12 months of relevant investment management experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration;
(b) the individual has received the Canadian Investment Manager designation and has gained 48 months of relevant investment management experience, 12 months of which was gained in the 36-month period before applying for registration.
3.12 Portfolio manager -- associate advising representative
An associate advising representative of a portfolio manager must not act as an adviser on behalf of the portfolio manager unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has completed Level 1 of the Chartered Financial Analyst program and has gained 24 months of relevant investment management experience;
(b) the individual has received the Canadian Investment Manager designation and has gained 24 months of relevant investment management experience.
3.13 Portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer
A portfolio manager must not designate an individual as its chief compliance officer under subsection 11.3(1) [designating a chief compliance officer] unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has
(i) earned a CFA Charter or a professional designation as a lawyer, Chartered Accountant, Certified General Accountant or Certified Management Accountant in a jurisdiction of Canada, a notary in Québec, or the equivalent in a foreign jurisdiction,
(ii) passed the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam and, unless the individual has earned the CFA Charter, the Canadian Securities Course Exam, and
(iii) either
A) gained 36 months of relevant securities experience while working at an investment dealer, a registered adviser or an investment fund manager, or
B) provided professional services in the securities industry for 36 months and also worked at a registered dealer, a registered adviser or an investment fund manager for 12 months;
(b) the individual has passed the Canadian Securities Course Exam and either the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam and any of the following apply:
(i) the individual has worked at an investment dealer or a registered adviser for 5 years, including for 36 months in a compliance capacity;
(ii) the individual has worked for 5 years at a Canadian financial institution in a compliance capacity relating to portfolio management and also worked at a registered dealer or a registered adviser for 12 months;
(c) the individual has passed either the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam and has met the requirements of section 3.11 [portfolio manager -- advising representative].
3.14 Investment fund manager -- chief compliance officer
An investment fund manager must not designate an individual as its chief compliance officer under subsection 11.3(1) [designating a chief compliance officer] unless any of the following apply:
(a) the individual has
(i) earned a CFA Charter or a professional designation as a lawyer, Chartered Accountant, Certified General Accountant or Certified Management Accountant in a jurisdiction of Canada, a notary in Québec, or the equivalent in a foreign jurisdiction,
(ii) passed the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam and, unless the individual has earned the CFA Charter, the Canadian Securities Course Exam, and
(iii) either
A) gained 36 months of relevant securities experience while working at a registered dealer, a registered adviser or an investment fund manager, or
B) provided professional services in the securities industry for 36 months and also worked in a relevant capacity at an investment fund manager for 12 months;
(b) the individual has
(i) passed the Canadian Investment Funds Course Exam, the Canadian Securities Course Exam, or the Investment Funds in Canada Course Exam,
(ii) passed the PDO Exam or the Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam, and
(iii) gained 5 years of relevant securities experience while working at a registered dealer, registered adviser or an investment fund manager, including 36 months in a compliance capacity;
(c) the individual has met the requirements of section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer];
(d) section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer] does not apply in respect of the individual because of subsection 16.9(2) [registration of chief compliance officers].
Division 3 Membership in a self-regulatory organizationan SRO
3.15 Who must be approved by an SRO before registration
(1) A dealing representative of an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC must be an "approved person" as defined under the rules of IIROC.
(2) Except in Québec, a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA must be an "approved person" as defined under the rules of the MFDA.
3.16 Exemptions from certain requirements for SRO-approved persons
(1) The following sections do not apply to a registered individual who is a dealing representative of an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC:
(a) subsection 13.2(3) [know your client];
(b) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(c) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money].
(1.1) Subsection (1) only applies to a registered individual who is a dealing representative of an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC in respect of a requirement specified in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) if the registered individual complies with the corresponding IIROC provisions that are in effect.
(2) The following sections do not apply to a registered individual who is a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA:
(a) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(b) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money].
(2.1) Subsection (2) only applies to a registered individual who is a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA in respect of a requirement specified in paragraph (2)(a) or (b) if the registered individual complies with the corresponding MFDA provisions that are in effect.
(3) In Québec, the requirements listed in subsection (2) do not apply to a registered individual who is a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer to the extent equivalent requirements to those listed in subsection (2) are applicable to the registered individual under the regulations in Québec.
Part 4 Restrictions on registered individuals
4.1 Restriction on acting for another registered firm
(1) A firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada must not permit an individual to act as a dealing, advising or associate advising representative of the registered firm if either of the following apply:
(a) the individual acts as an officer, partner or director of another firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada that is not an affiliate of the first-mentioned registered firm;
(b) the individual is registered as a dealing, advising or associate advising representative of another firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada.
(2) Paragraph (1)(b) does not apply in respect of a representative whose registration as a dealing, advising or associate advising representative of more than one registered firm was granted before July 11, 2011.
4.2 Associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice
(1) An associate advising representative of a registered adviser must not advise on securities unless, before giving the advice, the advice has been approved by an individual designated by the registered firm under subsection (2).
(2) A registered adviser must designate, for an associate advising representative, an advising representative to review the advice of the associate advising representative.
(3) No later than 7 days following the date of a designation under subsection (2), a registered adviser must provide the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority with the names of the advising representative and the associate advising representative who are the subject of the designation.
Part 5 Ultimate designated person and chief compliance officer
5.1 Responsibilities of the ultimate designated person
The ultimate designated person of a registered firm must do all of the following:
(a) supervise the activities of the firm that are directed towards ensuring compliance with securities legislation by the firm and each individual acting on the firm's behalf;
(b) promote compliance by the firm, and individuals acting on its behalf, with securities legislation.
5.2 Responsibilities of the chief compliance officer
The chief compliance officer of a registered firm must do all of the following:
(a) establish and maintain policies and procedures for assessing compliance by the firm, and individuals acting on its behalf, with securities legislation;
(b) monitor and assess compliance by the firm, and individuals acting on its behalf, with securities legislation;
(c) report to the ultimate designated person of the firm as soon as possible if the chief compliance officer becomes aware of any circumstances indicating that the firm, or any individual acting on its behalf, may be in non-compliance with securities legislation and any of the following apply:
(i) the non-compliance creates, in the opinion of a reasonable person, a risk of harm to a client;
(ii) the non-compliance creates, in the opinion of a reasonable person, a risk of harm to the capital markets;
(iii) the non-compliance is part of a pattern of non-compliance;
(d) submit an annual report to the firm's board of directors, or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the firm, for the purpose of assessing compliance by the firm, and individuals acting on its behalf, with securities legislation.
Part 6 Suspension and revocation of registration -- individuals
6.1 If individual ceases to have authority to act for firm
If a registered individual ceases to have authority to act as a registered individual on behalf of his or her sponsoring firm because of the end of, or a change in, the individual's employment, partnership, or agency relationship with the firm, the individual's registration with the firm is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
6.2 If IIROC approval is revoked or suspended
If IIROC revokes or suspends a registered individual's approval in respect of an investment dealer, the individual's registration as a dealing representative of the investment dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
6.3 If MFDA approval is revoked or suspended
Except in Québec, if the MFDA revokes or suspends a registered individual's approval in respect of a mutual fund dealer, the individual's registration as a dealing representative of the mutual fund dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
6.4 If sponsoring firm is suspended
If a registered firm's registration in a category is suspended, the registration of each registered dealing, advising or associate advising representative acting on behalf of the firm in that category is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
6.5 Dealing and advising activities suspended
If an individual's registration in a category is suspended, the individual must not act as a dealer, an underwriter or an adviser, as the case may be, under that category.
6.6 Revocation of a suspended registration -- individual
If a registration of an individual has been suspended under this Part and it has not been reinstated, the registration is revoked on the 2nd anniversary of the suspension.
6.7 Exception for individuals involved in a hearing or proceeding
Despite section 6.6, if a hearing or proceeding concerning a suspended individual is commenced under securities legislation or under the rules of an SRO, the individual's registration remains suspended.
6.8 Application of Part 6 in Ontario
Other than section 6.5 [dealing and advising activities suspended], this Part does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, measures governing suspension in section 29 of the Securities Act (Ontario) are similar to those in Parts 6 and 10.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Part 7 Categories of registration for firms
7.1 Dealer categories
(1) The following are the categories of registration for a person or company that is required, under securities legislation, to be registered as a dealer:
(a) investment dealer;
(b) mutual fund dealer;
(c) scholarship plan dealer;
(d) exempt market dealer;
(e) restricted dealer.
(2) A person or company registered in the category of
(a) investment dealer may act as a dealer or an underwriter in respect of any security,
(b) mutual fund dealer may act as a dealer in respect of any security of
(i) a mutual fund, or
(ii) an investment fund that is a labour-sponsored investment fund corporation or labour-sponsored venture capital corporation under legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada,
(c) scholarship plan dealer may act as a dealer in respect of a security of a scholarship plan, an educational plan or an educational trust,
(d) exempt market dealer may
(i) act as a dealer by trading a security that is distributed under an exemption from the prospectus requirement,
(ii) act as a dealer by trading a security if all of the following apply:
(A) the trade is not a distribution;
(B) an exemption from the prospectus requirement would be available to the seller if the trade were a distribution;
(C) the class of security is not listed, quoted or traded on a marketplace, or
(iii) [repealed]
(iv) act as an underwriter in respect of a distribution of securities that is made under an exemption from the prospectus requirement;
(e) restricted dealer may act as a dealer or an underwriter in accordance with the terms, conditions, restrictions or requirements applied to its registration.
(3) [repealed]
(4) Subsection (1) does not apply in Ontario.
(5) [repealed]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, the same categories of registration for firms acting as dealers as in subsection 7.1(1) are set out under subsection 26(2) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7.2 Adviser categories
(1) The following are the categories of registration for a person or company that is required, under securities legislation, to be registered as an adviser:
(a) portfolio manager;
(b) restricted portfolio manager.
(2) A person or company registered in the category of
(a) portfolio manager may act as an adviser in respect of any security, and
(b) restricted portfolio manager may act as an adviser in respect of any security in accordance with the terms, conditions, restrictions or requirements applied to its registration.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, the same categories of registration for firms acting as advisers as in subsection 7.2(1) are set out under subsection 26(6) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7.3 Investment fund manager category
The category of registration for a person or company that is required, under securities legislation, to be registered as an investment fund manager is "investment fund manager".
Part 8 Exemptions from the requirement to register
Division 1 Exemptions from dealer and underwriter registration
8.0.1 General condition to dealer registration requirement exemptions
The exemptions in this Division are not available to a person or company if the person or company is registered in the local jurisdiction and if their category of registration permits the person or company to act as a dealer or trade in a security for which the exemption is provided.
8.1 Interpretation of "trade" in Québec
In this Part, in Québec, "trade" refers to any of the following activities:
(a) the activities described in the definition of "dealer" in section 5 of the Securities Act (R.S.Q., c. V-1.1), including the following activities:
(i) the sale or disposition of a security by onerous title, whether the terms of payment are on margin, installment or otherwise, but does not include a transfer or the giving in guarantee of securities in connection with a debt or the purchase of a security, except as provided in paragraph (b);
(ii) participation as a trader in any transaction in a security through the facilities of an exchange or a quotation and trade reporting system;
(iii) the receipt by a registrant of an order to buy or sell a security;
(b) a transfer or the giving in guarantee of securities of an issuer from the holdings of a control person in connection with a debt.
8.2 Definition of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan
Despite section 1.2, in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, a reference to "securities" in this Division excludes "exchange contracts".
8.3 Interpretation -- exemption from underwriter registration requirement
In this Division, an exemption from the dealer registration requirement is an exemption from the underwriter registration requirement.
8.4 Person or company not in the business of trading in British Columbia, Manitoba and New Brunswick
(1) In British Columbia and New Brunswick, a person or company is exempt from the dealer registration requirement if the person or company
(a) is not engaged in the business of trading in securities or exchange contracts as a principal or agent, and
(b) does not hold himself, herself or itself out as engaging in the business of trading in securities or exchange contracts as a principal or agent.
(2) In Manitoba, a person or company is exempt from the dealer registration requirement if the person or company
(a) is not engaged in the business of trading in securities as a principal or agent, and
(b) does not hold himself, herself or itself out as engaging in the business of trading in securities as a principal or agent.
8.5 Trades through or to a registered dealer
The dealer registration requirement does not apply to a person or company in respect of a trade in a security if either of the following applies:
(a) the trade is made through a registered dealer, if the dealer is registered in a category that permits the trade unless, in furtherance of the trade, the person or company seeking the exemption solicits or contacts directly any purchaser or prospective purchaser in relation to the trade;
(b) the trade is made to a registered dealer who is purchasing as principal, if the dealer is registered in a category that permits the trade.
8.5.1 Trades through a registered dealer by registered adviser
The dealer registration requirement does not apply to a registered adviser, or an advising representative or associate advising representative acting on behalf of the registered adviser, in respect of trading activities that are incidental to its providing advice to a client, if the trade is made through a dealer registered in a category that permits the trade or a dealer operating under an exemption from the dealer registration requirement.
8.6 Investment fund trades by adviser to managed account
(1) The dealer registration requirement does not apply to a registered adviser, or an adviser that is exempt from registration under section 8.26 [international adviser], in respect of a trade in a security of an investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the adviser or an affiliate of the adviser acts as the fund's adviser;
(a.1) the adviser or an affiliate of the adviser acts as the fund's investment fund manager;
(b) the trade is to a managed account of a client of the adviser.
(2) The exemption in subsection (1) is not available if the managed account or investment fund was created or is used primarily for the purpose of qualifying for the exemption.
(3) An adviser that relies on subsection (1) must provide written notice to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority that it is relying on the exemption within 10 days of its first use of the exemption.
8.7 Investment fund reinvestment
(1) Subject to subsections (2), (3), (4) and (5), the dealer registration requirement does not apply to an investment fund, or the investment fund manager of the fund, in respect of a trade in a security with a security holder of the investment fund if the trade is permitted by a plan of the investment fund and is in a security of the investment fund's own issue and if any of the following apply:
(a) a dividend or distribution out of earnings, surplus, capital or other sources payable in respect of the investment fund's securities is applied to the purchase of the security that is of the same class or series as the securities to which the dividends or distributions are attributable;
(b) the security holder makes an optional cash payment to purchase the security of the investment fund and both of the following apply:
(i) the security is of the same class or series of securities described in paragraph (a) that trade on a marketplace;
(ii) the aggregate number of securities issued under the optional cash payment does not exceed, in the financial year of the investment fund during which the trade takes place, 2 per cent of the issued and outstanding securities of the class to which the plan relates as at the beginning of the financial year.
(2) The exemption in subsection (1) is not available unless the plan that permits the trade is available to every security holder in Canada to which the dividend or distribution is available.
(3) The exemption in subsection (1) is not available if a sales charge is payable on a trade described in the subsection.
(4) At the time of the trade, if the investment fund is a reporting issuer and in continuous distribution, the investment fund must have set out in the prospectus under which the distribution is made
(a) details of any deferred or contingent sales charge or redemption fee that is payable at the time of the redemption of the security, and
(b) any right that the security holder has to elect to receive cash instead of securities on the payment of a dividend or making of a distribution by the investment fund and instructions on how the right can be exercised.
(5) At the time of the trade, if the investment fund is a reporting issuer and is not in continuous distribution, the investment fund must provide the information required by subsection (4) in its prospectus, annual information form or a material change report.
8.8 Additional investment in investment funds
The dealer registration requirement does not apply to an investment fund, or the investment fund manager of the fund, in respect of a trade in a security of the investment fund's own issue with a security holder of the investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the security holder initially acquired securities of the investment fund as principal for an acquisition cost of not less than $150,000 paid in cash at the time of the acquisition;
(b) the trade is in respect of a security of the same class or series as the securities initially acquired, as described in paragraph (a);
(c) the security holder, as at the date of the trade, holds securities of the investment fund and one or both of the following apply:
(i) the acquisition cost of the securities being held was not less than $150,000;
(ii) the net asset value of the securities being held is not less than $150,000.
8.9 Additional investment in investment funds if initial purchase before September 14, 2005
The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade by an investment fund in a security of its own issue to a purchaser that initially acquired a security of the same class as principal before September 14, 2005 if all of the following apply:
(a) the security was initially acquired under any of the following provisions:
(i) in Alberta, section 86(e) and paragraph 131(1)(d) of the Securities Act (Alberta) as they existed prior to their repeal by sections 9(a) and 13 of the Securities Amendment Act (Alberta), 2003 SA c.32 and sections 66.2 and 122.2 of the Alberta Securities Commission Rules (General);
(ii) in British Columbia, sections 45(2) (5) and (22), and 74(2) (4) and (19) of the Securities Act (British Columbia);
(iii) in Manitoba, section 19(3) and paragraph 58(1)(a) of the Securities Act (Manitoba) and section 90 of the Securities Regulation MR 491/88R;
(iv) in New Brunswick, section 2.8 of Local Rule 45-501 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions;
(v) in Newfoundland and Labrador, paragraphs 36(1)(e) and 73(1)(d) of the Securities Act (Newfoundland and Labrador);
(vi) in Nova Scotia, paragraphs 41(1)(e) and 77(1)(d) of the Securities Act (Nova Scotia);
(vii) in Northwest Territories, sections 3(c) and (z) of Blanket Order No. 1;
(viii) in Nunavut, sections 3(c) and (z) of Blanket Order No. 1;
(ix) in Ontario, section 35(1)5 and paragraph 72(1)(d) of the Securities Act (Ontario) as they existed prior to their repeal by sections 5 and 11 of the Securities Act (Ontario) S.O. 2009, c. 18, Sch. 26 and section 2.12 of Ontario Securities Commission Rule 45-501 Exempt Distributions that came into force on January 12, 2004;
(x) in Prince Edward Island, paragraph 2(3)(d) of the former Securities Act (Prince Edward Island) and Prince Edward Island Local Rule 45-512 Exempt Distributions -- Exemption for Purchase of Mutual Fund Securities;
(xi) in Québec, former section 51 and subsection 155.1(2) of the Securities Act (Québec);
(xii) in Saskatchewan, paragraphs 39(1)(e) and 81(1)(d) of The Securities Act, 1988 (Saskatchewan);
(b) the trade is for a security of the same class or series as the initial trade;
(c) the security holder, as at the date of the trade, holds securities of the investment fund that have one or both of the following characteristics:
(i) an acquisition cost of not less than the minimum amount prescribed by securities legislation referred to in paragraph (a) under which the initial trade was conducted;
(ii) a net asset value of not less than the minimum amount prescribed by securities legislation referred to in paragraph (a) under which the initial trade was conducted.
8.10 Private investment club
The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a security of an investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the fund has no more than 50 beneficial security holders;
(b) the fund does not seek and has never sought to borrow money from the public;
(c) the fund does not distribute and has never distributed its securities to the public;
(d) the fund does not pay or give any remuneration for investment management or administration advice in respect of trades in securities, except normal brokerage fees;
(e) the fund, for the purpose of financing its operations, requires security holders to make contributions in proportion to the value of the securities held by them.
8.11 Private investment fund -- loan and trust pools
(1) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a security of an investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the fund is administered by a trust company or trust corporation that is registered or authorized by an enactment of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada to carry on business in Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada;
(b) the fund has no promoter or investment fund manager other than the trust company or trust corporation referred to in paragraph (a);
(c) the fund commingles the money of different estates and trusts for the purpose of facilitating investment.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a trust company or trust corporation registered under the laws of Prince Edward Island that is not registered under the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) or under comparable legislation in another jurisdiction of Canada is not a trust company or trust corporation for the purpose of paragraph (1)(a).
8.12 Mortgages
(1) In this section, "syndicated mortgage" means a mortgage in which two or more persons or companies participate, directly or indirectly, as lenders in the debt obligation that is secured by the mortgage.
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a mortgage on real property in a jurisdiction of Canada by a person or company who is registered or licensed, or exempted from registration or licensing, under mortgage brokerage or mortgage dealer legislation of that jurisdiction.
(3) In Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Québec and Saskatchewan, subsection (2) does not apply in respect of a trade in a syndicated mortgage.
(4) This section does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario a similar exemption from the dealer registration requirement is provided under subsection 35(4) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.13 Personal property security legislation
(1) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade to a person or company, other than an individual in a security evidencing indebtedness secured by or under a security agreement, secured in accordance with personal property security legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada that provides for the granting of security in personal property.
(2) This section does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario a similar exemption from the dealer registration requirement is provided under subsection 35(2) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.14 Variable insurance contract
(1) In this section
"contract", "group insurance", "insurance company", "life insurance" and "policy" have the respective meanings assigned to them in the legislation referenced opposite the name of the local jurisdiction in Appendix A of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"variable insurance contract" means a contract of life insurance under which the interest of the purchaser is valued for purposes of conversion or surrender by reference to the value of a proportionate interest in a specified portfolio of assets.
(2) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a variable insurance contract by an insurance company if the variable insurance contract is
(a) a contract of group insurance,
(b) a whole life insurance contract providing for the payment at maturity of an amount not less than 75% of the premium paid up to age 75 years for a benefit payable at maturity,
(c) an arrangement for the investment of policy dividends and policy proceeds in a separate and distinct fund to which contributions are made only from policy dividends and policy proceeds, or
(d) a variable life annuity.
8.15 Schedule III banks and cooperative associations -- evidence of deposit
(1) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in an evidence of deposit issued by a Schedule III bank or an association governed by the Cooperative Credit Associations Act (Canada).
(2) This section does not apply in Ontario or Alberta.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, subsection 8.15(1) is not required because the security described in the exemption is excluded from the definition of "security" in subsection 1(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
In Alberta, subsection 8.15(1) is not required because the exemption is provided under subsection 1(ggg)(v)(B) of the Securities Act (Alberta).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.16 Plan administrator
(1) In this section
"consultant" has the same meaning as in section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"executive officer" has the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"permitted assign" has the same meaning as in section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions;
"plan" means a plan or program established or maintained by an issuer providing for the acquisition of securities of the issuer by employees, executive officers, directors or consultants of the issuer or of a related entity of the issuer;
"plan administrator" means a trustee, custodian, or administrator, acting on behalf of, or for the benefit of, employees, executive officers, directors or consultants of an issuer or of a related entity of an issuer;
"related entity" has the same meaning as in section 2.22 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions.
(2) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade made pursuant to a plan of the issuer in a security of an issuer, or an option to acquire a security of the issuer, made by the issuer, a control person of the issuer, a related entity of the issuer, or a plan administrator of the issuer with any of the following:
(a) the issuer;
(b) a current or former employee, executive officer, director or consultant of the issuer or a related entity of the issuer;
(c) a permitted assign of a person or company referred to in paragraph (b).
(3) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a security of an issuer, or an option to acquire a security of the issuer, made by a plan administrator of the issuer if
(a) the trade is pursuant to a plan of the issuer, and
(b) the conditions in section 2.14 of National Instrument 45-102 Resale of Securities are satisfied.
8.17 Reinvestment plan
(1) Subject to subsections (3), (4) and (5), the dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of the following trades by an issuer, or by a trustee, custodian or administrator acting for or on behalf of the issuer, to a security holder of the issuer if the trades are permitted by a plan of the issuer:
(a) a trade in a security of the issuer's own issue if a dividend or distribution out of earnings, surplus, capital or other sources payable in respect of the issuer's securities is applied to the purchase of the security;
(b) subject to subsection (2), a trade in a security of the issuer's own issue if the security holder makes an optional cash payment to purchase the security of the issuer that trades on a marketplace.
(2) The aggregate number of securities issued under the optional cash payment referred to in paragraph (1)(b) must not exceed, in any financial year of the issuer during which the trade takes place, 2% of the issued and outstanding securities of the class to which the plan relates as at the beginning of the financial year.
(3) A plan that permits the trades described in subsection (1) must be available to every security holder in Canada to which the dividend or distribution out of earnings, surplus, capital or other sources is available.
(4) This section is not available in respect of a trade in a security of an investment fund.
(5) Subject to section 8.4 [transition -- reinvestment plan] of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions, if the security traded under a plan described in subsection (1) is of a different class or series than the class or series of the security to which the dividend or distribution is attributable, the issuer or the trustee, custodian or administrator must have provided to each participant that is eligible to receive a security under the plan either a description of the material attributes and characteristics of the security traded under the plan or notice of a source from which the participant can obtain the information without charge.
8.18 International dealer
(1) In this section
"foreign security" means
(a) a security issued by an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, or
(b) a security issued by a government of a foreign jurisdiction.
(2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of any of the following:
(a) an activity, other than a sale of a security, that is reasonably necessary to facilitate a distribution of securities that are offered primarily in a foreign jurisdiction;
(b) a trade in a debt security with a permitted client if the debt security
(i) is denominated in a currency other than the Canadian dollar, or
(ii) is or was originally offered primarily in a foreign jurisdiction and a prospectus has not been filed with a Canadian securities regulatory authority for the distribution;
(c) a trade in a debt security that is a foreign security with a permitted client, other than during the security's distribution;
(d) a trade in a foreign security with a permitted client, unless the trade is made during the security's distribution under a prospectus that has been filed with a Canadian securities regulatory authority;
(e) a trade in a foreign security with an investment dealer;
(f) a trade in any security with an investment dealer that is purchasing as principal.
(3) The exemption under subsection (2) is not available to a person or company unless all of the following apply:
(a) the head office or principal place of business of the person or company is in a foreign jurisdiction;
(b) the person or company is registered under the securities legislation of the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located in a category of registration that permits it to carry on the activities in that jurisdiction that registration as a dealer would permit it to carry on in the local jurisdiction;
(c) the person or company engages in the business of a dealer in the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located;
(d) the person or company is trading as principal or agent for
(i) the issuer of the securities,
(ii) a permitted client, or
(iii) a person or company that is not a resident of Canada;
(e) the person or company has submitted to the securities regulatory authority a completed Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service.
(4) The exemption under subsection (2) is not available to a person or company in respect of a trade with a permitted client unless one of the following applies:
(a) the permitted client is a person or company registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada as an adviser or dealer;
(b) the person or company has notified the permitted client of all of the following:
(i) the person or company is not registered in the local jurisdiction to make the trade;
(ii) the foreign jurisdiction in which the head office or principal place of business of the person or company is located;
(iii) all or substantially all of the assets of the person or company may be situated outside of Canada;
(iv) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against the person or company because of the above;
(v) the name and address of the agent for service of process of the person or company in the local jurisdiction.
(5) A person or company that relied on the exemption in subsection (2) during the 12-month period preceding December 1 of a year must notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority of that fact by December 1 of that year.
(6) In Ontario, subsection (5) does not apply to a person or company that complies with the filing and fee payment requirements applicable to an unregistered exempt international firm under Ontario Securities Commission Rule 13-502 Fees.
(7) The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a person or company that is exempt from the dealer registration requirement under this section if the person or company provides advice to a client and the advice is
(a) in connection with an activity or trade described under subsection (2), and
(b) not in respect of a managed account of the client.
8.19 Self-directed registered education savings plan
(1) In this section
"self-directed RESP" means an educational savings plan registered under the Income Tax Act (Canada)
(a) that is structured so that contributions by a subscriber to the plan are deposited directly into an account in the name of the subscriber, and
(b) under which the subscriber maintains control and direction over the plan that enables the subscriber to direct how the assets of the plan are to be held, invested or reinvested subject to compliance with the Income Tax Act (Canada).
(2) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in a self-directed RESP to a subscriber if both of the following apply:
(a) the trade is made by any of the following:
(i) a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer who is acting on behalf of the mutual fund dealer in respect of securities listed in paragraph 7.1(2)(b);
(ii) a Canadian financial institution;
(iii) in Ontario, a financial intermediary;
(b) the self-directed RESP restricts its investments in securities to securities in which the person or company who trades the self-directed RESP is permitted to trade.
8.20 Exchange contract -- Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan
(1) In Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, the dealer registration requirement does not apply to a person or company in respect of a trade in an exchange contract by the person or company if one of the following applies:
(a) the trade is made through a registered dealer, if the dealer is registered in a category that permits the trade unless, in furtherance of the trade, the person or company seeking the exemption solicits or contacts directly any purchaser or prospective purchaser in relation to the trade;
(b) the trade is made to a registered dealer who is purchasing as principal, if the dealer is registered in a category that permits the trade.
(2) [repealed]
(3) [repealed]
8.20.1 Exchange contract trades through or to a registered dealer -- Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan
In Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, the dealer registration requirement does not apply to a registered adviser, or an advising representative or associate advising representative acting on behalf of the registered adviser, in respect of trading activities related to exchange contracts that are incidental to its providing advice to a client, if the trade is made through a dealer registered in a category that permits the trade or a dealer operating under an exemption from the dealer registration requirement.
8.21 Specified debt
(1) In this section
"permitted supranational agency" means any of the following:
(a) the African Development Bank, established by the Agreement Establishing the African Development Bank which came into force on September 10, 1964, that Canada became a member of on December 30, 1982;
(b) the Asian Development Bank, established under a resolution adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific in 1965;
(c) the Caribbean Development Bank, established by the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Development Bank which came into force on January 26, 1970, as amended, that Canada is a founding member of;
(d) the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, established by the Agreement Establishing the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and approved by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Agreement Act (Canada), that Canada is a founding member of;
(e) the Inter-American Development Bank, established by the Agreement establishing the Inter-American Development Bank which became effective December 30, 1959, as amended from time to time, that Canada is a member of;
(f) the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, established by the Agreement for an International Bank for Reconstruction and Development approved by the Bretton Woods and Related Agreements Act (Canada);
(g) the International Finance Corporation, established by Articles of Agreement approved by the Bretton Woods and Related Agreements Act (Canada).
(2) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade in any of the following:
(a) a debt security issued by or guaranteed by the Government of Canada or the government of a jurisdiction of Canada;
(b) a debt security issued by or guaranteed by a government of a foreign jurisdiction if the debt security has a designated rating from a designated rating organization or its DRO affiliate;
(c) a debt security issued by or guaranteed by a municipal corporation in Canada;
(d) a debt security secured by or payable out of rates or taxes levied under the law of a jurisdiction of Canada on property in the jurisdiction and collectible by or through the municipality in which the property is situated;
(e) a debt security issued by or guaranteed by a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank, other than debt securities that are subordinate in right of payment to deposits held by the issuer or guarantor of those debt securities;
(f) a debt security issued by the Comité de gestion de la taxe scolaire de l'île de Montréal;
(g) a debt security issued by or guaranteed by a permitted supranational agency if the debt securities are payable in the currency of Canada or the United States of America.
(3) Paragraphs (2)(a), (c) and (d) do not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, exemptions from the dealer registration requirement similar to those in paragraphs 8.21(a), (c) and (d) are provided under paragraph 2 of subsection 35(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.22 Small security holder selling and purchase arrangements
(1) In this section
"exchange" means
(a) TSX Inc.,
(b) TSX Venture Exchange Inc., or
(c) an exchange that
(i) has a policy that is substantially similar to the policy of the TSX Inc., and
(ii) is designated by the securities regulatory authority for the purpose of this section;
"policy" means,
(a) in the case of TSX Inc., sections 638 and 639 [Odd lot selling and purchase arrangements] of the TSX Company Manual, as amended from time to time,
(b) in the case of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc., Policy 5.7 Small Shareholder Selling and Purchase Arrangements, as amended from time to time, or
(c) in the case of an exchange referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of "exchange", the rule, policy or other similar instrument of the exchange on small shareholder selling and purchase arrangements.
(2) The dealer registration requirement does not apply in respect of a trade by an issuer or its agent, in securities of the issuer that are listed on an exchange, if all of the following apply:
(a) the trade is an act in furtherance of participation by the holders of the securities in an arrangement that is in accordance with the policy of that exchange;
(b) the issuer and its agent do not provide advice to a security holder about the security holder's participation in the arrangement referred to in paragraph (a), other than a description of the arrangement's operation, procedures for participation in the arrangement, or both;
(c) the trade is made in accordance with the policy of that exchange, without resort to an exemption from, or variation of, the significant subject matter of the policy;
(d) at the time of the trade after giving effect to a purchase under the arrangement, the market value of the maximum number of securities that a security holder is permitted to hold in order to be eligible to participate in the arrangement is not more than $25,000.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(c), an exemption from, or variation of, the maximum number of securities that a security holder is permitted to hold under a policy in order to be eligible to participate in the arrangement provided for in the policy is not an exemption from, or variation of, the significant subject matter of the policy.
8.22.1 Short-term debt
(1) In this section "short-term debt instrument" means a negotiable promissory note or commercial paper maturing not more than one year from the date of issue.
(2) Except in Ontario, the dealer registration requirement does not apply to any of the following in respect of a trade in a short-term debt instrument with a permitted client:
(a) a bank listed in Schedule I, II or III to the Bank Act (Canada);
(b) an association to which the Cooperative Credit Associations Act (Canada) applies or a central cooperative credit society for which an order has been made under subsection 473 (1) of that Act;
(c) a loan corporation, trust company, trust corporation, insurance company, treasury branch, credit union, caisse populaire, financial services cooperative or credit union league or federation that is authorized by a statute of Canada or of a jurisdiction in Canada to carry on business in Canada or in any jurisdiction in Canada, as the case may be;
(d) the Business Development Bank of Canada;
(3) The exemption under subsection (2) is not available to a person or company if the short-term debt instrument is convertible or exchangeable into, or accompanied by a right to purchase, another security other than another short-term debt instrument.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, an exemption from the dealer registration requirement similar to that in section 8.22.1 is provided under section 35.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Division 2 Exemptions from adviser registration
8.22.2 General condition to adviser registration requirement exemptions
The exemptions in this Division are not available to a person or company if the person or company is registered in the local jurisdiction in a category of registration that permits the person or company to act as an adviser in respect of the activities for which the exemption is provided.
8.23 Dealer without discretionary authority
The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a registered dealer, or a dealing representative acting on behalf of the dealer, that provides advice to a client if the advice is
(a) in connection with a trade in a security that the dealer and the representative are permitted to make under his, her or its registration,
(b) provided by the representative, and
(c) not in respect of a managed account of the client.
8.24 IIROC members with discretionary authority
The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a registered dealer, or a dealing representative acting on behalf of the dealer, that acts as an adviser in respect of a client's managed account if the registered dealer is an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC and the advising activities are conducted in accordance with the rules of IIROC.
8.25 Advising generally
(1) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4), "financial or other interest" includes the following:
(a) ownership, beneficial or otherwise, in the security or in another security issued by the same issuer;
(b) an option in respect of the security or another security issued by the same issuer;
(c) a commission or other compensation received, or expected to be received, from any person or company in connection with the trade in the security;
(d) a financial arrangement regarding the security with any person or company;
(e) a financial arrangement with any underwriter or other person or company who has any interest in the security.
(2) The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a person or company that acts as an adviser if the advice the person or company provides does not purport to be tailored to the needs of the person or company receiving the advice.
(3) If a person or company that is exempt under subsection (2) recommends buying, selling or holding a specified security, a class of securities or the securities of a class of issuers in which any of the following has a financial or other interest, the person or company must disclose the interest concurrently with providing the advice:
(a) the person or company;
(b) any partner, director or officer of the person or company;
(c) any other person or company that would be an insider of the first-mentioned person or company if the first-mentioned person or company were a reporting issuer.
(4) If the financial or other interest of the person or company includes an interest in an option described in paragraph (b) of the definition of "financial or other interest" in subsection (1), the disclosure required by subsection (3) must include a description of the terms of the option.
(5) This section does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, measures similar to those in section 8.25 are in section 34 of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.26 International adviser
(1) Despite section 1.2, in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, a reference to "securities" in this section excludes "exchange contracts".
(2) In this section
"aggregate consolidated gross revenue" does not include the gross revenue of an affiliate of the adviser if the affiliate is registered in a jurisdiction of Canada;
"foreign security" means
(a) a security issued by an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, and
(b) a security issued by a government of a foreign jurisdiction;
(3) The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a person or company if either of the following applies:
(a) the person or company provides advice on a foreign security to a permitted client that is not registered under the securities legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada as an adviser or dealer;
(b) the person or company provides advice on a security that is not a foreign security and the advice is incidental to the advice referred to in paragraph (a).
(4) The exemption under subsection (3) is not available unless all of the following apply:
(a) the adviser's head office or principal place of business is in a foreign jurisdiction;
(b) the adviser is registered in a category of registration, or operates under an exemption from registration, under the securities legislation of the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located, that permits it to carry on the activities in that jurisdiction that registration as an adviser would permit it to carry on in the local jurisdiction;
(c) the adviser engages in the business of an adviser in the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located;
(d) as at the end of its most recently completed financial year, not more than 10% of the aggregate consolidated gross revenue of the adviser, its affiliates and its affiliated partnerships was derived from the portfolio management activities of the adviser, its affiliates and its affiliated partnerships in Canada;
(e) before advising a client, the adviser notifies the client of all of the following:
(i) the adviser is not registered in the local jurisdiction to provide the advice described under subsection (3);
(ii) the foreign jurisdiction in which the adviser's head office or principal place of business is located;
(iii) all or substantially all of the adviser's assets may be situated outside of Canada;
(iv) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against the adviser because of the above;
(v) the name and address of the adviser's agent for service of process in the local jurisdiction;
(f) the adviser has submitted to the securities regulatory authority a completed Form 31-103F2 Submission to jurisdiction and appointment of agent for service.
(5) A person or company that relied on the exemption in subsection (3) during the 12 month period preceding December 1 of a year must notify the regulator, or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority of that fact by December 1 of that year.
(6) In Ontario, subsection (5) does not apply to a person or company that complies with the filing and fee payment requirements applicable to an unregistered exempt international firm under Ontario Securities Commission Rule 13-502 Fees.
8.26.1 International sub-adviser
(1) The adviser registration requirement does not apply to a sub-adviser if all of the following apply:
(a) the obligations and duties of the sub-adviser are set out in a written agreement with the registered adviser or registered dealer;
(b) the registered adviser or registered dealer has entered into a written agreement with its clients on whose behalf investment advice is or portfolio management services are to be provided, agreeing to be responsible for any loss that arises out of the failure of the sub-adviser
(i) to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of its office honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the registrant and each client of the registrant for whose benefit the advice is or portfolio management services are to be provided, or
(ii) to exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances.
(2) The exemption under subsection (1) is not available unless all of the following apply:
(a) the sub-adviser's head office or principal place of business is in a foreign jurisdiction;
(b) the sub-adviser is registered in a category of registration, or operates under an exemption from registration, under the securities legislation of the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located, that permits it to carry on the activities in that jurisdiction that registration as an adviser would permit it to carry on in the local jurisdiction;
(c) the sub-adviser engages in the business of an adviser in the foreign jurisdiction in which its head office or principal place of business is located.
Division 3 Exemptions from investment fund manager registration
8.26.2 General condition to investment fund manager registration requirement exemptions
The exemptions in this Division are not available to a person or company if the person or company is registered in the local jurisdiction as an investment fund manager.
8.27 Private investment club
The investment fund manager registration requirement does not apply to a person or company in respect of its acting as an investment fund manager for an investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the fund has no more than 50 beneficial security holders;
(b) the fund does not seek and has never sought to borrow money from the public;
(c) the fund does not distribute and has never distributed its securities to the public;
(d) the fund does not pay or give any remuneration for investment management or administration advice in respect of trades in securities, except normal brokerage fees;
(e) the fund, for the purpose of financing its operations, requires security holders to make contributions in proportion to the value of the securities held by them.
8.28 Capital accumulation plan
(1) In this section
"capital accumulation plan" means a tax assisted investment or savings plan, including a defined contribution registered pension plan, a group registered retirement savings plan, a group registered education savings plan, or a deferred profit-sharing plan, that permits a plan member to make investment decisions among two or more investment options offered within the plan, and in Québec and Manitoba, includes a simplified pension plan;
"plan member" means a person that has assets in a capital accumulation plan;
"plan sponsor" means an employer, trustee, trade union or association or a combination of them that establishes a capital accumulation plan, and includes a plan service provider to the extent that the plan sponsor has delegated its responsibilities to the plan service provider; and
"plan service provider" means a person that provides services to a plan sponsor to design, establish, or operate a capital accumulation plan.
(2) The investment fund manager registration requirement does not apply to a plan sponsor or their plan service provider in respect of activities related to a capital accumulation plan.
8.29 Private investment fund -- loan and trust pools
(1) The investment fund manager registration requirement does not apply to a trust company or trust corporation that administers an investment fund if all of the following apply:
(a) the trust company or trust corporation is registered or authorized by an enactment of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada to carry on business in Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada;
(b) the fund has no promoter or investment fund manager other than the trust company or trust corporation;
(c) the fund commingles the money of different estates and trusts for the purpose of facilitating investment.
(2) The exemption in subsection (1) is not available to a trust company or trust corporation registered under the laws of Prince Edward Island unless it is also registered under the Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada) or under comparable legislation in another jurisdiction of Canada.
(3) This section does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, section 35.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario) provides a general exemption from the registration requirement for trust companies, trust corporations and other specified financial institutions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Division 4 Mobility exemption -- firms
8.30 Client mobility exemption -- firms
The dealer registration requirement and the adviser registration requirement do not apply to a person or company if all of the following apply:
(a) the person or company is registered as a dealer or adviser in its principal jurisdiction;
(b) the person or company does not act as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the local jurisdiction other than as it is permitted to in its principal jurisdiction according to its registration;
(c) the person or company does not act as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the local jurisdiction other than in respect of 10 or fewer eligible clients;
(d) the person or company complies with Parts 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms and 14 Handling client accounts -- firms;
(e) the person or company deals fairly, honestly and in good faith in the course of its dealings with an eligible client.
Part 9 Membership in a self-regulatory organizationan SRO
9.1 IIROC membership for investment dealers
An investment dealer must not act as a dealer unless the investment dealer is a "dealer member", as defined under the rules of IIROC.
9.2 MFDA membership for mutual fund dealers
Except in Québec, a mutual fund dealer must not act as a dealer unless the mutual fund dealer is a "member", as defined under the rules of the MFDA.
9.3 Exemptions from certain requirements for IIROC members
(1) Unless it is also registered as an investment fund manager, an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC is exempt from the following requirements:
(a) section 12.1 [capital requirements];
(b) section 12.2 [subordination agreement];
(c) section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer];
(d) section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance];
(e) section 12.7 [notifying the regulator of a change, claim or cancellation];
(f) section 12.10 [annual financial statements];
(g) section 12.11 [interim financial information];
(h) section 12.12 [delivering financial information -- dealer];
(i) subsection 13.2(3) [know your client];
(j) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(k)
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients];[repealed];(l) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money];
(l.1) section 13.15 [handling complaints];
(m) subsections 14.2(2) to (6) [relationship disclosure information];
(m.1) section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges];
(m.2) section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement];
(m.3) section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian];
(n) section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust];
(n.1) section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests];
(n.2) section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales];
(o) [repealed];
(p) [repealed];
(p.1) section 14.11.1 [determining market value];
(q) section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation];
(r) section 14.14 [account statements];
(s) section 14.14.1 [additional statements];
(t) section 14.14.2 [security position cost information];
(u) section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation];
(v) section 14.18 [investment performance report];
(w) section 14.19 [content of investment performance report];
(x) section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report].
(1.1) Subsection (1) only applies to a registered firm in respect of a requirement specified in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (x) if the registered firm complies with the corresponding IIROC provisions that are in effect.
(2) If an investment dealer is a member of IIROC and is registered as an investment fund manager, the firm is exempt from the following requirements:
(a) section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer];
(b) section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance];
(c) section 12.12 [delivering financial information -- dealer];
(d) subsection 13.2(3) [know your client];
(e) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(f)
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients];[repealed];(g) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money];
(h) section 13.15 [handling complaints];
(i) subsections 14.2(2) to (6) [relationship disclosure information];
(i.1) section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges];
(i.2) section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement];
(i.3) section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian];
(j) section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust];
(j.1) section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests];
(j.2) section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales];
(k) [repealed];
(l) [repealed];
(l.1) section 14.11.1 [determining market value];
(m) section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation];
(n) section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation];
(o) section 14.18 [investment performance report];
(p) section 14.19 [content of investment performance report];
(q) section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report].
(2.1) Subsection (2) only applies to a registered firm in respect of a requirement specified in any of paragraphs (2)(a) to (q) if the registered firm complies with the corresponding IIROC provisions that are in effect.
(3) [repealed]
(4) [repealed]
(5) [repealed]
(6) [repealed]
9.4 Exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members
(1) Unless it is also registered as an exempt market dealer, a scholarship plan dealer or an investment fund manager, a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA is exempt from the following requirements:
(a) section 12.1 [capital requirements];
(b) section 12.2 [subordination agreement];
(c) section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer];
(d) section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance];
(e) section 12.7 [notifying the regulator of a change, claim or cancellation];
(f) section 12.10 [annual financial statements];
(g) section 12.11 [interim financial information];
(h) section 12.12 [delivering financial information -- dealer];
(i) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(j)
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients];[repealed];(k) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money];
(l) section 13.15 [handling complaints];
(m) subsections 14.2(2), (3) and (5.1) [relationship disclosure information];
(m.1) section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges];
(m.2) section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement];
(m.3) section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian];
(n) section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust];
(n.1) section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests];
(n.2) section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales];
(o) [repealed];
(p) [repealed];
(p.1) section 14.11.1 [determining market value];
(q) section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation];
(r) section 14.14 [account statements];
(s) section 14.14.1 [additional statements];
(t) section 14.14.2 [security position cost information];
(u) section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation];
(v) section 14.18 [investment performance report];
(w) section 14.19 [content of investment performance report];
(x) section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report].
(1.1) Subsection (1) only applies to a registered firm in respect of a requirement specified in any of paragraphs (1)(a) to (x) if the registered firm complies with the corresponding MFDA provisions that are in effect.
(2) If a registered firm is a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA and is registered as an exempt market dealer, scholarship plan dealer or investment fund manager, the firm is exempt from the following requirements:
(a) section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer];
(b) section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance];
(c) section 13.3 [suitability determination];
(d)
section 13.12 [restriction on lending to clients];[repealed];(e) section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money];
(f) section 13.15 [handling complaints];
(g) subsections 14.2(2), (3) and (5.1) [relationship disclosure information];
(g.1) section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges];
(g.2) section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement];
(g.3) section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian];
(h) section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust];
(h.1) section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests];
(h.2) section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales];
(i) [repealed];
(j) [repealed];
(j.1) section 14.11.1 [determining market value];
(k) section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation];
(l) section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation];
(m) section 14.18 [investment performance report];
(n) section 14.19 [content of investment performance report];
(o) section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report].
(2.1) Subsection (2) only applies to a registered firm in respect of a requirement specified in any of paragraphs (2)(a) to (o) if the registered firm complies with the corresponding MFDA provisions that are in effect.
(3) SubsectionsThe exemptions in subsections (1) and (2) do not apply in Québec, except for paragraphs (1)(m), (1)(m.2) to (1)(n.2) and paragraphs (2)(g), (2)(g.2) to (2)(h.2), as applicable, provided the conditions of the exemption are met.
(4) In QuébecSubject to subsection (3), the requirements listed in subsection (1), other than paragraph (1)(h), do not apply to a mutual fund dealer registered in Québec to the extent equivalent requirements to those listed in subsection (1) are applicable to the mutual fund dealer under the regulations in Québec.
Part 10 Suspension and revocation of registration -- firms
Division 1 When a firm's registration is suspended
10.1 Failure to pay fees
(1) In this section, "annual fees" means
(a) in Alberta, the fees required under section 5 of ASC Rule 13-501 Fees,
(b) in British Columbia, the annual fees required under section 22 of the Securities Regulation, B.C. Reg. 196/97,
(c) in Manitoba, the fees required under paragraph 1.(2)(a) of the Manitoba Fee Regulation, M.R 491\88R,
(d) in New Brunswick, the fees required under section 2.2 (c) of Local Rule 11-501 Fees,
(e) in Newfoundland and Labrador, the fees required under section 143 of the Securities Act,
(f) in Nova Scotia, the fees required under Part XIV of the Regulations,
(g) in Northwest Territories, the fees required under sections 1(c) and 1(e) of the Securities Fee regulations, R-066-2008;
(h) in Nunavut, the fees required under section 1(a) of the Schedule to R-003-2003 to the Securities Fee regulation, R.R.N.W.T. 1990, c.20,
(i) in Prince Edward Island, the fees required under section 175 of the Securities Act R.S.P.E.I., Cap. S-3.1,
(j) in Québec, the fees required under section 271.5 of the Québec Securities Regulation,
(k) in Saskatchewan, the annual registration fees required under section 176 of The Securities Regulations (Saskatchewan), and
(l) in Yukon, the fees required under O.I.C. 2009\66, pursuant to section 168 of the Securities Act.
(2) If a registered firm has not paid the annual fees by the 30th day after the date the annual fees were due, the registration of the firm is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
10.2 If IIROC membership is revoked or suspended
If IIROC revokes or suspends a registered firm's membership, the firm's registration in the category of investment dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
10.3 If MFDA membership is revoked or suspended
Except in Québec, if the MFDA revokes or suspends a registered firm's membership, the firm's registration in the category of mutual fund dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation.
10.4 Activities not permitted while a firm's registration is suspended
If a registered firm's registration in a category is suspended, the firm must not act as a dealer, an underwriter, an adviser, or an investment fund manager, as the case may be, under that category.
Division 2 Revoking a firm's registration
10.5 Revocation of a suspended registration -- firm
If a registration has been suspended under this Part and it has not been reinstated, the registration is revoked on the 2nd anniversary of the suspension.
10.6 Exception for firms involved in a hearing or proceeding
Despite section 10.5, if a hearing or proceeding concerning a suspended registrant is commenced under securities legislation or under the rules of an SRO, the registrant's registration remains suspended.
10.7 Application of Part 10 in Ontario
Other than section 10.4 [activities not permitted while a firm's registration is suspended], this Part does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, measures governing suspension in section 29 of the Securities Act (Ontario) are similar to those in Parts 6 and 10.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Part 11 Internal controls and systems
Division 1 Compliance
11.1 Compliance system
A registered firm must establish, maintain and apply policies and procedures that establish a system of controls and supervision sufficient to
(a) provide reasonable assurance that the firm and each individual acting on its behalf complies with securities legislation, and
(b) manage the risks associated with its business in accordance with prudent business practices.
11.2 Designating an ultimate designated person
(1) A registered firm must designate an individual who is registered under securities legislation in the category of ultimate designated person to perform the functions described in section 5.1 [responsibilities of the ultimate designated person].
(2) A registered firm must designate an individual under subsection (1) who is one of the following:
(a) the chief executive officer of the registered firm or, if the firm does not have a chief executive officer, an individual acting in a capacity similar to a chief executive officer;
(b) the sole proprietor of the registered firm;
(c) the officer in charge of a division of the registered firm, if the activity that requires the firm to register occurs only within the division and the firm has significant other business activities.
(3) If an individual who is registered as a registered firm's ultimate designated person ceases to meet any of the conditions listed in subsection (2), the registered firm must designate another individual to act as its ultimate designated person.
11.3 Designating a chief compliance officer
(1) A registered firm must designate an individual who is registered under securities legislation in the category of chief compliance officer to perform the functions described in section 5.2 [responsibilities of the chief compliance officer].
(2) A registered firm must not designate an individual to act as the firm's chief compliance officer unless the individual has satisfied the applicable conditions in Part 3 Registration requirements -- individuals and the individual is one of the following:
(a) an officer or partner of the registered firm;
(b) the sole proprietor of the registered firm.
(3) If an individual who is registered as a registered firm's chief compliance officer ceases to meet any of the conditions listed in subsection (2), the registered firm must designate another individual to act as its chief compliance officer.
11.4 Providing access to the board of directors
A registered firm must permit its ultimate designated person and its chief compliance officer to directly access the firm's board of directors, or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the firm, at such times as the ultimate designated person or the chief compliance officer may consider necessary or advisable in view of his or her responsibilities.
Division 2 Books and records
11.5 General requirements for records
(1) A registered firm must maintain records to
(a) accurately record its business activities, financial affairs, and client transactions, and
(b) demonstrate the extent of the firm's compliance with applicable requirements of securities legislation.
(2) The records required under subsection (1) include, but are not limited to, records that do the following:
(a) permit timely creation and audit of financial statements and other financial information required to be filed or delivered to the securities regulatory authority;
(b) permit determination of the registered firm's capital position;
(c) demonstrate compliance with the registered firm's capital and insurance requirements;
(d) demonstrate compliance with internal control procedures;
(e) demonstrate compliance with the firm's policies and procedures;
(f) permit the identification and segregation of client cash, securities, and other property;
(g) identify all transactions conducted on behalf of the registered firm and each of its clients, including the parties to the transaction and the terms of the purchase or sale;
(h) provide an audit trail for
(i) client instructions and orders, and
(ii) each trade transmitted or executed for a client or by the registered firm on its own behalf;
(i) permit the generation of account activity reports for clients;
(j) provide securities pricing as may be required by securities legislation;
(k) document the opening of client accounts, including any agreements with clients;
(l) demonstrate compliance with sections 13.2 [know your client], 13.2.1 [know your product] and 13.3 [suitability determination];
(m) demonstrate compliance with complaint-handling requirements;
(n) document correspondence with clients;
(o) document compliance, training and supervision actions taken by the firm;
(p) demonstrate how the firm has addressed, and plans to address, the conflicts of interest identified under sections 13.4 [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1 [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] in the best interest of its clients;
(q) document
(i) the firm's sales practices, compensation arrangements and incentive practices, and
(ii) other compensation arrangements and incentive practices from which the firm or its registered individuals, or any affiliate or associate of that firm, benefit;
(r) demonstrate compliance with section 13.18 [misleading communications];
(s) demonstrate compliance with section 14.1.2 [duty to provide information].
11.6 Form, accessibility and retention of records
(1) A registered firm must keep a record that it is required to keep under securities legislation
(a) for 7 years from the date the record is created,
(b) in a safe location and in a durable form, and
(c) in a manner that permits it to be provided to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority in a reasonable period of time.
(2) A record required to be provided to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority must be provided in a format that is capable of being read by the regulator or the securities regulatory authority.
(3) Paragraph (1)(c) does not apply in Ontario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: In Ontario, how quickly a registered firm is required to provide information to the regulator is addressed in subsection 19(3) of the Securities Act (Ontario).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Division 3 Certain business transactions
11.7 Tied settling of securities transactions
A registered firm must not require a person or company to settle that person's or company's transaction with the registered firm through that person's or company's account at a Canadian financial institution as a condition, or on terms that would appear to a reasonable person to be a condition, of supplying a product or service, unless this method of settlement would be, to a reasonable person, necessary to provide the specific product or service that the person or company has requested.
11.8 Tied selling
A dealer, adviser or investment fund manager must not require another person or company
(a) to buy, sell or hold a security as a condition, or on terms that would appear to a reasonable person to be a condition, of supplying or continuing to supply a product or service, or
(b) to buy, sell or use a product or service as a condition, or on terms that would appear to a reasonable person to be a condition, of buying or selling a security.
11.9 Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets
(1) A registrant must give the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority written notice in accordance with subsection (2) if it proposes to acquire any of the following:
(a) for the first time, direct or indirect ownership, beneficial or otherwise, of 10% or more of the voting securities or other securities convertible into voting securities of
(i) a firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada or any foreign jurisdiction, or
(ii) a person or company of which a firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada or any foreign jurisdiction is a subsidiary;
(b) all or a substantial part of the assets of a firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada or any foreign jurisdiction.
(2) The notice required under subsection (1) must be delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority at least 30 days before the proposed acquisition and must include all relevant facts regarding the acquisition sufficient to enable the regulator or the securities regulatory authority to determine if the acquisition is
(a) likely to give rise to a conflict of interest,
(b) likely to hinder the registered firm in complying with securities legislation,
(c) inconsistent with an adequate level of investor protection, or
(d) otherwise prejudicial to the public interest.
(3) [repealed]
(4) Except in Ontario and British Columbia, if, within 30 days of the receipt of a notice under subsection (1), the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority notifies the registrant making the acquisition that the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority objects to the acquisition, the acquisition must not occur until the regulator or the securities regulatory authority approves it.
(5) In Ontario, if, within 30 days of the receipt of a notice under subparagraph (1)(a)(i) or paragraph (1)(b), the regulator notifies the registrant making the acquisition that the regulator objects to the acquisition, the acquisition must not occur until the regulator approves it.
(6) Following receipt of a notice of objection under subsection (4) or (5), the person or company who submitted the notice under subsection (1) may request an opportunity to be heard on the matter by the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority objecting to the acquisition.
11.10 Registered firm whose securities are acquired
(1) A registered firm must give the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority written notice in accordance with subsection (2) if it knows or has reason to believe that any person or company, alone or in combination with any other person or company, is about to acquire, or has acquired, for the first time, direct or indirect ownership, beneficial or otherwise, of 10% or more of the voting securities or other securities convertible into voting securities of any of the following:
(a) the registered firm;
(b) a person or company of which the registered firm is a subsidiary.
(2) The notice required under subsection (1) must,
(a) be delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority as soon as possible,
(b) include the name of each person or company involved in the acquisition, and
(c) include all facts that to the best of the registered firm's knowledge after reasonable inquiry regarding the acquisition are sufficient to enable the regulator or the securities regulatory authority to determine if the acquisition is
(i) likely to give rise to a conflict of interest,
(ii) likely to hinder the registered firm in complying with securities legislation,
(iii) inconsistent with an adequate level of investor protection, or
(iv) otherwise prejudicial to the public interest.
(3) [repealed]
(4) This section does not apply if notice of the acquisition was provided under section 11.9 [registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets].
(5) Except in British Columbia and Ontario, if, within 30 days of the receipt of a notice under subsection (1), the regulator or the securities regulatory authority notifies the person or company making the acquisition that the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority objects to the acquisition, the acquisition must not occur until the regulator or the securities regulatory authority approves it.
(6) In Ontario, if, within 30 days of the receipt of a notice under paragraph (1)(a), the regulator notifies the person or company making the acquisition that the regulator objects to the acquisition, the acquisition must not occur until the regulator approves it.
(7) Following receipt of a notice of objection under subsection (5) or (6), the person or company proposing to make the acquisition may request an opportunity to be heard on the matter by the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority objecting to the acquisition.
Part 12 Financial condition
Division 1 Working capital
12.1 Capital requirements
(1) If, at any time, the excess working capital of a registered firm, as calculated in accordance with Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, is less than zero, the registered firm must notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority as soon as possible.
(2) The excess working capital of a registered firm, as calculated in accordance with Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, must not be less than zero for 2 consecutive days.
(3) For the purpose of completing Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, the minimum capital is
(a) $25,000, for a registered adviser that is not also a registered dealer or a registered investment fund manager,
(b) $50,000, for a registered dealer that is not also a registered investment fund manager, and
(c) $100,000, for a registered investment fund manager.
(4) Paragraph (3)(c) does not apply to a registered investment fund manager that is exempt from the dealer registration requirement under section 8.6 [investment fund trades by adviser to managed account] in respect of all investment funds for which it acts as adviser.
(5) This section does not apply to an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC and is registered as an investment fund manager if all of the following apply:
(a) the firm has a minimum capital of not less than $100,000 as calculated in accordance with IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report;
(b) the firm notifies the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority as soon as possible if, at any time, the firm's risk adjusted capital, as calculated in accordance with IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report is less than zero;
(c) the risk adjusted capital of the firm, as calculated in accordance with IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report, is not less than zero for 2 consecutive days.
(6) This section does not apply to a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA if it is also registered as an exempt market dealer, a scholarship plan dealer or an investment fund manager and if all of the following apply:
(a) the firm has a minimum capital, as calculated in accordance with MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, of not less than
(i) $50,000, if the firm is registered as an exempt market dealer or scholarship plan dealer,
(ii) $100,000, if the firm is registered as an investment fund manager;
(b) the firm notifies the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority as soon as possible if, at any time, the firm's risk adjusted capital, as calculated in accordance with MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report is less than zero;
(c) the risk adjusted capital of the firm, as calculated in accordance with MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, is not less than zero for 2 consecutive days.
12.2 Subordination agreement
(1) If a registered firm has entered into a subordination agreement in the form set out in Appendix B, it may exclude the amount of non-current related party debt subordinated under that agreement from the calculation of its excess working capital on Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital.
(2) The registered firm must deliver an executed copy of the subordination agreement referred to subsection (1) to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority on the earliest of the following dates:
(a) 10 days after the date on which the subordination agreement is executed;
(b) the date on which the amount of the subordinated debt is excluded from the registered firm's non-current related party debt as calculated on Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital.
(3) The registered firm must notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority 10 days before it
(a) repays the loan or any part of the loan, or
(b) terminates the agreement.
Division 2 Insurance
12.3 Insurance -- dealer
(1) A registered dealer must maintain bonding or insurance
(a) that contains the clauses set out in Appendix A [bonding and insurance clauses], and
(b) that provides for a double aggregate limit or a full reinstatement of coverage.
(2) A registered dealer must maintain bonding or insurance in respect of each clause set out in Appendix A in the highest of the following amounts for each clause:
(a) $50,000 per employee, agent and dealing representative or $200,000, whichever is less;
(b) one per cent of the total client assets that the dealer holds or has access to, as calculated using the dealer's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(c) one per cent of the dealer's total assets, as calculated using the dealer's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(d) the amount determined to be appropriate by a resolution of the dealer's board of directors, or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the firm.
(3) In Québec, this section does not apply to a scholarship plan dealer or a mutual fund dealer registered only in Québec.
12.4 Insurance -- adviser
(1) A registered adviser must maintain bonding or insurance
(a) that contains the clauses set out in Appendix A [bonding and insurance clauses], and
(b) that provides for a double aggregate limit or a full reinstatement of coverage.
(2) A registered adviser that does not hold or have access to client assets must maintain bonding or insurance in respect of each clause set out in Appendix A in the amount of $50,000 for each clause.
(3) A registered adviser that holds or has access to client assets must maintain bonding or insurance in respect of each clause set out in Appendix A in the highest of the following amounts for each clause:
(a) one per cent of assets under management that the adviser holds or has access to, as calculated using the adviser's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(b) one per cent of the adviser's total assets, as calculated using the adviser's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(c) $200,000;
(d) the amount determined to be appropriate by a resolution of the adviser's board of directors or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the firm.
12.5 Insurance -- investment fund manager
(1) A registered investment fund manager must maintain bonding or insurance
(a) that contains the clauses set out in Appendix A [bonding and insurance clauses], and
(b) that provides for a double aggregate limit or a full reinstatement of coverage.
(2) A registered investment fund manager must maintain bonding or insurance in respect of each clause set out in Appendix A in the highest of the following amounts for each clause:
(a) one per cent of assets under management, as calculated using the investment fund manager's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(b) one per cent of the investment fund manager's total assets, as calculated using the investment fund manager's most recent financial records, or $25,000,000, whichever is less;
(c) $200,000;
(d) the amount determined to be appropriate by a resolution of the investment fund manager's board of directors or individuals acting in a similar capacity for the firm.
12.6 Global bonding or insurance
A registered firm must not maintain bonding or insurance under this Division that benefits, or names as an insured, another person or company unless the bond provides, without regard to the claims, experience or any other factor referable to that other person or company, the following:
(a) the registered firm has the right to claim directly against the insurer in respect of losses, and any payment or satisfaction of those losses must be made directly to the registered firm;
(b) the individual or aggregate limits under the policy must only be affected by claims made by or on behalf of
(i) the registered firm, or
(ii) a subsidiary of the registered firm whose financial results are consolidated with those of the registered firm.
12.7 Notifying the regulator or the securities regulatory authority of a change, claim or cancellation
A registered firm must, as soon as possible, notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority in writing of any change in, claim made under, or cancellation of any insurance policy required under this Division.
Division 3 Audits
12.8 Direction by the regulator or the securities regulatory authority to conduct an audit or review
A registered firm must direct its auditor in writing to conduct any audit or review required by the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority during its registration and must deliver a copy of the direction to the regulator or the securities regulatory authority
(a) with its application for registration, and
(b) no later than the 10th day after the registered firm changes its auditor.
12.9 Co-operating with the auditor
A registrant must not withhold, destroy or conceal any information or documents or otherwise fail to cooperate with a reasonable request made by an auditor of the registered firm in the course of an audit.
Division 4 Financial reporting
12.10 Annual financial statements
(1) Annual financial statements delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority under this Division for financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2011 must include the following:
(a) a statement of comprehensive income, a statement of changes in equity and a statement of cash flows, each prepared for the most recently completed financial year and the financial year immediately preceding the most recently completed financial year, if any;
(b) a statement of financial position, signed by at least one director of the registered firm, as at the end of the most recently completed financial year and the financial year immediately preceding the most recently completed financial year, if any;
(c) notes to the financial statements.
(2) The annual financial statements delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority under this Division must be audited.
12.11 Interim financial information
(1) Interim financial information delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority under this Division for interim periods relating to financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2011 may be limited to the following:
(a) a statement of comprehensive income for the 3-month period ending on the last day of the interim period and for the same period of the immediately preceding financial year, if any;
(b) a statement of financial position, signed by at least one director of the registered firm, as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the same interim period of the immediately preceding financial year, if any.
(2) The interim financial information delivered to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority under this Division must be prepared using the same accounting principles that the registered firm uses to prepare its annual financial statements.
12.12 Delivering financial information -- dealer
(1) A registered dealer must deliver the following to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year:
(a) its annual financial statements for the financial year;
(b) a completed Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, showing the calculation of the dealer's excess working capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any.
(2) A registered dealer must deliver the following to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year:
(a) its interim financial information for the interim period;
(b) a completed Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, showing the calculation of the dealer's excess working capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding interim period, if any.
(2.1) If a registered firm is a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA and is registered as an exempt market dealer or scholarship plan dealer, the firm is exempt from paragraphs (1)(b) and (2)(b) if all of the following apply:
(a) the firm has a minimum capital of not less than $50,000 as calculated in accordance with MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report;
(b) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any;
(c) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding month, if any.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to an exempt market dealer unless it is also registered in another category, other than the portfolio manager or restricted portfolio manager category.
(4) Despite paragraph (1)(b), in Québec, a firm registered only in that jurisdiction and only in the category of mutual fund dealer may deliver to the securities regulatory authority, no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year, the Monthly Report on Net Free Capital provided in Appendix I of the Regulation respecting the trust accounts and financial resources of securities firms, as that Appendix read on September 27, 2009, that shows the calculation of the firm's net free capital as at the end of its financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any.
(5) Despite paragraph (2)(b), in Québec, a firm registered only in that jurisdiction and only in the category of mutual fund dealer may deliver to the securities regulatory authority, no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year, the Monthly Report on Net Free Capital provided in Appendix I of the Regulation respecting the trust accounts and financial resources of securities firms, as that Appendix read on September 27, 2009, that shows the calculation of the firm's net free capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding interim period, if any.
12.13 Delivering financial information -- adviser
A registered adviser must deliver the following to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year:
(a) its annual financial statements for the financial year;
(b) a completed Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, showing the calculation of the adviser's excess working capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any.
12.14 Delivering financial information -- investment fund manager
(1) A registered investment fund manager must deliver the following to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year:
(a) its annual financial statements for the financial year;
(b) a completed Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, showing the calculation of the investment fund manager's excess working capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any;
(c) a completed Form 31-103F4 Net Asset Value Adjustments if any net asset value adjustment has been made in respect of an investment fund managed by the investment fund manager during the financial year.
(2) A registered investment fund manager must deliver the following to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year:
(a) its interim financial information for the interim period;
(b) a completed Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital, showing the calculation of the investment fund manager's excess working capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding interim period, if any;
(c) a completed Form 31-103F4 Net Asset Value Adjustments if any net asset value adjustment has been made in respect of an investment fund managed by the investment fund manager during the interim period.
(3) [repealed]
(4) If a registered firm is an investment dealer that is a member of IIROC and is registered as an investment fund manager, the firm is exempt from paragraphs (1)(b) and (2)(b) if
(a) the firm has a minimum capital of not less than $100,000, as calculated in accordance with IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report;
(b) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any, and
(c) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed IIROC Form 1 Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding month, if any.
(5) If a registered firm is a mutual fund dealer that is a member of the MFDA and is registered as an investment fund manager, the firm is exempt from paragraphs (1)(b) and (2)(b) if
(a) the firm has a minimum capital of not less than $100,000, as calculated in accordance with MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report,
(b) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 90th day after the end of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the financial year and as at the end of the immediately preceding financial year, if any, and
(c) the firm delivers to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority a completed MFDA Form 1 MFDA Financial Questionnaire and Report, no later than the 30th day after the end of the first, second and third interim period of its financial year, that shows the calculation of the firm's risk adjusted capital as at the end of the interim period and as at the end of the immediately preceding month, if any.
12.15 [lapsed]
Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms
Division 1 Know your client, know your product and suitability determination
13.1 Investment fund managers exempt from this Division
This Division does not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as an investment fund manager.
13.2 Know your client
(1) For the purpose of paragraph (2)(b) in Ontario, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, "insider" has the meaning ascribed to that term in the Securities Act except that "reporting issuer", as it appears in the definition of "insider", is to be read as "reporting issuer or any other issuer whose securities are publicly traded".
(2) A registrant must take reasonable steps to
(a) establish the identity of a client and, if the registrant has cause for concern, make reasonable inquiries as to the reputation of the client,
(b) establish whether the client is an insider of a reporting issuer or any other issuer whose securities are publicly traded,
(c) ensure that it has sufficient information regarding all of the following to enable it to meet its obligations under section 13.3 [suitability determination] or, if applicable, the suitability requirement imposed by an SRO:
(i) the client's personal circumstances;
(ii) the client's financial circumstances;
(iii)
(i)the client's investment needs and objectives;(iv)
(ii)the client'sfinancial circumstancesinvestment knowledge;(v)
(iii)the client's risktolerance, andprofile;(vi) the client's investment time horizon, and
(d) establish the creditworthiness of the client if the registered firm is financing the client's acquisition of a security.
(3) For the purpose of establishing the identity of a client that is a corporation, partnership or trust, the registrant must establish the following:
(a) the nature of the client's business;
(b) the identity of any individual who,
(i) In the case of a corporation, is a beneficial owner of, or exercises direct or indirect control or direction over, more than 25% of the voting rights attached to the outstanding voting securities of the corporation, or
(ii) in the case of a partnership or trust, exercises control over the affairs of the partnership or trust.
(3.1) A registrant must take reasonable steps to obtain a client's confirmation of the accuracy of the information collected under subsection (2), including any significant changes to the information.
(4) A registrant must take reasonable steps to keep the information required under this section current.
(4.1) Without limiting subsection (4),
(a) a registrant must review the information collected under this section
(i) if the registrant knows, or reasonably ought to know, of a significant change in the client's information collected under this section,
(ii) no less than once every 12 months for managed accounts,
(iii) if the registrant is an exempt market dealer, within 12 months before making a trade for, or recommendation to, the client,
(iv) in any other case, no less than once every 36 months,
(b) a registrant must update the information required under this section if, following the review of information under paragraph (4.1)(a), there has been a change in the information.
(5) This section does not apply if the client is a registered firm, a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank.
(6) Paragraph (2)(c) doesand subsection (4.1) do not apply to a registrant in respect of a permitted client if
(a) the permitted client has waived, in writing, the requirements under subsections 13.3(1) and (2)[suitability determination], and
(b)
the registrant does not act as an adviser in respect of a managedthe account of the permitted client.to which the waiver applies is not a managed account.
(7) Paragraph (2)(b) does not apply to a registrant in respect of a client for which the registrant only trades securities referred to in paragraphs 7.1(2)(b) and (2)(c).
13.2.1 Know your product
(1) A registered firm must not make a security available to clients unless the firm
(a) takes reasonable steps to understand the security, including all of the following:
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security;
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs;
(iii) how the security compares to similar securities available in the market;
(b) approves the security to be made available to clients, and
(c) monitors and reassesses the security, including monitoring for significant changes to the security.
(2) A registered firm must maintain an offering of securities and services that is consistent with how the firm holds itself out.
(3) A registered individual must not purchase or sell a security for, or recommend a security to, a client unless the registered individual takes reasonable steps to understand
(a) at a general level, the securities that are available through the registered firm for the registered individual to purchase or sell for, or recommend to, clients and how those securities compare;
(b) the security, including
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security, and
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs.
(4) A registered individual must not purchase a security for, or recommend a security to, a client unless the registered individual's sponsoring firm has approved that security to be made available to clients.
(5) A registered firm must ensure that its registered individuals have the necessary information about each security approved by the registered firm to be made available to clients to enable the registered individuals to comply with subsection (3).
(6) In the case of a security transferred by a client from another registered firm that is accepted by the registered firm or of a client-directed trade of a security, the requirements of subsections (1) and (3) apply to a registered firm or registered individual, as the case may be, only insofar as, under those requirements,
(a) the firm must not permit the security to be transferred into the client's account or the trade in the security to be made unless the firm
(i) takes reasonable steps to understand the structure, features, returns and risks of the security,
(ii) takes reasonable steps to understand the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs, and
(iii) monitors and reassesses the security, including monitoring for significant changes to the security; and
(b) the individual must not permit the security to be transferred into the client's account or the trade in the security to be made unless the individual takes reasonable steps to understand
(i) the structure, features, returns and risks of the security; and
(ii) the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs.
(7) This section does not apply to a registered dealer in respect of a security if either of the following applies:
(a) it makes the security available to a client only through an order-execution only service;
(b) it purchases or sells the security for a client only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client.
13.3 Suitability determination
(1) A registrant must take reasonable steps to ensure that, before it makes a recommendation to or accepts an instruction from a client to buy or sell a security, or makes a purchase or sale of a security for a client's managed account, the purchase or sale is suitable for the client.
(1) Before a registrant acts by opening an account for a client, purchasing, selling, depositing, exchanging or transferring securities for a client's account, taking any other investment action for a client or making a recommendation or decision to take any such action, the registrant must determine, on a reasonable basis, that the action satisfies the following criteria:
(a) the action is suitable for the client, based on the following factors:
(i) the client's information collected in accordance with section 13.2 [know your client];
(ii) the registrant's understanding of the security required in accordance with section 13.2.1 [know your product];
(iii) the features and associated costs of the account type made available to the client;
(iv) the impact of the action on the client's account, including considering the account's concentration and liquidity;
(v) the overall concentration and liquidity across all of the client's accounts at the firm;
(vi) the potential and actual impact of costs on the client's returns;
(vii) a consideration of a reasonable range of alternative actions available to the registrant through the registered firm at the time the determination is made;
(viii) any other factor that is relevant under the circumstances, and
(b) the action puts the client's interest first.
(2) A registrant must review the client's account and the securities in the client's account to determine whether the criteria in subsection (1) are met, and take appropriate action as necessary, promptly after any of the following occurs:
(a) a new registered individual is designated as responsible for the client's account;
(b) there is a change in a security in the client's account that may result in the security or account not meeting the criteria in subsection (1);
(c) there is a change in the client's information collected in accordance with subsection 13.2(2) that may result in a security or the client's account not meeting the criteria in subsection (1);
(d) the registrant has reviewed the client's information in accordance with subsection 13.2(4) or (4.1);
(e) the registrant becomes aware that a security or the client's account does not meet the criteria in subsection (1).
(2.1) Despite subsection (1), if a registrant receives an instruction from a client to take an action which would not meet the criteria in subsection (1), the registrant may carry out the client's instruction if the registrant has
(a) informed the client of the basis for the determination that the action would not meet the criteria in subsection (1),
(b) recommended to the client an alternative action that meets the criteria in subsection (1), and
(c)
(2) If a client instructs a registrant to buy, sell or hold a security and in the registrant's reasonable opinion following the instruction would not be suitable for the client, the registrant must inform the client of the registrant's opinion and must not buy or sell the security unless the client instructs the registrant to proceed nonetheless.received written or electronically recorded confirmation of the client's instruction to proceed with the action despite the determination referred to in paragraph (a).
(3) This section does not apply if the client is a registered firm, a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank.
(4) This section does not apply to a registrant in respect of a permitted client if
(a) the permitted client has waived, in writing, the requirements under this section, and
(b)
the registrant does not act as an adviser in respect of a managedthe account of the permitted client to which the waiver applies is not a managed account.
Division 2 Conflicts of interest
13.4 Identifying and responding toA registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest
(1) A registered firm must take reasonable steps to identify existing material conflicts of interest, and material conflicts of interest that the registered firm in its reasonable opinion would expect to arise, between are reasonably foreseeable, between
(a) the firm, including each individual acting on the firm
''s behalf, anda(b) the client.
(2) A registered firm must respond to an existing or potential conflict of interest identified under subsection (1). [repealed]
(3) [repealed]
(4) [repealed]
13.4.1 A registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest
(1) A registered individual must take reasonable steps to identify existing conflicts of interest, and conflicts of interest that are reasonably foreseeable, between the registered individual and the client.
(3) If a reasonable investor would expect to be informed of2) If a registered individual identifies a conflict of interest identified under subsection (1), the registered firm must disclose, in a timely manner, the nature and extent of the conflict of interest to the client whose interest conflicts with the interest identifiedindividual must promptly report that conflict of interest to the registered individual's sponsoring firm.
13.4.2 A registered firm's responsibility to address conflicts of interest
(1) A registered firm must address, in the best interest of a client, all conflicts of interest between itself, including each individual acting on its behalf, and the client.
(2) A registered firm must avoid any conflict of interest between the firm, including each individual acting on its behalf, and a client if the conflict is not, or cannot be, addressed in the best interest of the client.
13.4.3 A registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest
(1) A registered individual must address, in the best interest of a client, all conflicts of interest between the individual and the client.
(2) A registered individual must avoid any conflict of interest between the registered individual and a client if the conflict is not, or cannot be, addressed in the best interest of the client.
(3) A registered individual must not engage in any dealing or advising activity in connection with a conflict of interest identified by the registered individual under subsection 13.4.1(1) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest], unless
(a) the conflict has been addressed in the best interest of the client, and
(b) the registered individual's sponsoring firm has given the registered individual its consent to proceed with the activity.
13.4.4 Conflicts of interest that must be avoided
(1) A registrant must not borrow money, arrange a guarantee in relation to money the registrant has borrowed, or borrow securities or any other assets, from a client, unless either of the following applies:
(a) in the case of borrowed money, the client is a financial institution whose business includes lending money to the public, and the loan to the registrant is in the normal course of the financial institution's business;
(b) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited transaction.
(2) Despite any other provision of this Instrument, a registrant must not lend money, provide a guarantee in relation to a loan of money, extend credit, provide margin or lend securities or any other asset, to a client, unless any of the following apply:
(a) the activity is permitted under rules of an SRO applicable to the registrant;
(b) the registrant is an investment fund manager lending money on a short term basis to an investment fund that it manages, if the loan is for the purpose of funding redemptions of its securities or meeting expenses incurred by the investment fund in the normal course of its business;
(c) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited transaction.
(3) A registrant must not act under a power of attorney from a client, act as a trustee with respect to a trust in which a client is the settlor or beneficiary, or act as a trustee or executor in respect of the estate of a client, or otherwise have full or partial control or authority over the assets of a client, unless either of the following applies:
(a) the activity is permitted under rules of an SRO applicable to the registrant;
(b) if the registrant is a registered individual, all of the following apply:
(i) the client is a related person, as defined by the Income Tax Act (Canada), of the registered individual;
(ii) the registered individual provides prior written notice to his or her sponsoring firm;
(iii) the registered individual obtains the prior written approval of his or her sponsoring firm to carry out the otherwise prohibited appointment.
(4) Despite subsection (3), a registered adviser and its advising representatives may have full or partial control or authority over the assets of a client if those assets are held in a managed account.
13.4.5 Conflicts of interest disclosure
(1) A registered firm must disclose in writing a conflict of interest identified under subsections 13.4(1) [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1(2) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] to a client whose interests are affected by such conflict where a reasonable client would expect to be informed of such conflict.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the information delivered to a client under that subsection must include a description of each of the following:
(a) the nature and extent of the conflict of interest;
(b) the potential impact on and risk that the conflict of interest may pose to the client;
(c) how the conflict of interest has been, or will be, addressed.
(3) The disclosure required under subsection (1) must be prominent, specific and written in plain language.
(4) A registered firm must disclose a conflict of interest to a client under subsection (1):
(a) before opening an account for the client if the conflict might be present throughout the relationship between the registered firm and the client; and
(b) when the conflict of interest first arises or, in the case of a transaction that presents a conflict of interest, before entering into the transaction with the client.
(5) A registered firm must not rely solely on disclosure to address, in the best interest of the client, conflicts of interest identified under subsections 13.4(1) [a registered firm's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest] and 13.4.1(2) [a registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest].
13.4.6 Investment fund managers
(4) This section doesSections 13.4 to 13.4.5 do not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of an investment fund that is subject to National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds.
13.5 Restrictions on certain managed account transactions
(1) In this section, "responsible person" means, for a registered adviser,
(a) the adviser,
(b) a partner, director or officer of the adviser, and
(c) each of the following who has access to, or participates in formulating, an investment decision made on behalf of a client of the adviser or advice to be given to a client of the adviser:
(i) an employee or agent of the adviser;
(ii) an affiliate of the adviser;
(iii) partner, director, officer, employee or agent of an affiliate of the adviser.
(2) A registered adviser must not knowingly cause an investment portfolio managed by it, including an investment fund for which it acts as an adviser, to do any of the following:
(a) purchase a security of an issuer in which a responsible person, or an associate of a responsible person is a partner, officer or director unless
(i) this fact is disclosed to the client, and
(ii) the written consent of the client to the purchase is obtained before the purchase;
(b) purchase or sell a security from or to the investment portfolio of any of the following:
(i) a responsible person;
(ii) an associate of a responsible person;
(iii) an investment fund for which a responsible person acts as an adviser;
(c) provide a guarantee or loan to a responsible person or an associate of a responsible person.
13.6 Disclosure when recommending related or connected securities
A registered firm must not make a recommendation in any medium of communication to buy, sell or hold a security issued by the registered firm, a security of a related issuer or, during the security's distribution, a security of a connected issuer of the registered firm, unless any of the following apply:
(a) the firm discloses, in the same medium of communication, the nature and extent of the relationship or connection between the firm and the issuer;
(b) the recommendation is in respect of a security of a mutual fund, a scholarship plan, an educational plan or an educational trust that is an affiliate of, or is managed by an affiliate of, the registered firm and the names of the registered firm and the fund, plan or trust, as the case may be, are sufficiently similar to indicate that they are affiliated.
Division 3 Referral arrangements
13.7 Definitions -- referral arrangements
In this Division
"client" includes a prospective client;
"referral arrangement" means any arrangement in which a registrant agrees to
payprovide or receive a referral fee;"referral fee" means any form of
compensationmonetary or non-monetary benefit, direct or indirect,paidprovided for the referral of a client to or from a registrant.
13.8 Permitted referral arrangements
(1) A registered firm, or an individual acting on its behalf, must not provide a referral fee to another person or company unless all of the following apply:
(a) the person or company receiving the referral fee is a registered individual or a registered firm;
(b) the referral fee complies with section 13.8.1 [limitation on referral fees];
(c) before a client is referred to the registrant, the terms of the referral arrangement are set out in a written agreement between the registered firms;
(d) the registered firm records all referral fees;
(e) the registered firm ensures that the information required under subsection 13.10(1) [disclosing referral arrangements to clients] is provided to the client in writing before the party receiving the referral opens an account for the client or provides services to the client.
(2) A registered firm, or an individual acting on its behalf must not accept a referral fee from another person or company unless all of the following apply:
A registered firm, or a registered individual whose registration is sponsored by the registered firm, must not participate in a referral arrangement with another person or company unless,(a) the referral fee complies with section 13.8.1 [limitation on referral fees];
(
ab) before a client is referred byor tothe registrant, the terms of the referral arrangement are set out in a written agreement between the registered firm and the person or companyreceiving the referral of the client;(
bc) the registered firm records all referral fees, and;(
cd) theregistrantregistered firm ensures that the information prescribed by subsection 13.10(1) [disclosing referral arrangements to clients] is provided to the client in writing before the party receiving the referral either opens an account for the client or provides services to the client.
13.8.1 Limitation on referral fees
A registrant must not provide or receive a referral fee if one or more of the following applies:
(a) the referral fee constitutes a series of payments that continue longer than 36 months from the date of the referral;
(b) the referral fee constitutes a series of payments that together exceed 25% of the fees or commissions collected from the client by the party who received the referral;
(c) the referral fee results in an increase in the amount of fees or commissions that would otherwise be paid by a client to the party who received the referral for the same product or service.
13.9 Verifying the qualifications of the person or company receiving the referral
A registered firm, or a registered individual whose registration is sponsored by the registered firm, must not refer a client to another person or company unless the firm first takes reasonable steps to satisfy itself that the person or company has the appropriate qualifications to provide the services, and if applicable, is registered to provide those services.
13.10 Disclosing referral arrangements to clients
(1) The written disclosure of the referral arrangement required by paragraph 13.8(cFor the purposes of paragraphs 13.8(1)(e) and (2)(d) [permitted referral arrangements] must include, the information required by this subsection is all of the following:
(a) the name of each party to the agreement referred to in
paragraph 13.8(a)paragraphs 13.8(1)(c) and (2)(b) [permitted referral arrangements], as applicable;(b) the purpose and material terms of the agreement, including the nature of the services to be provided by each party;
(c) any conflicts of interest resulting from the relationship between the parties to the agreement and from any other element of the referral arrangement;
(d) the method of calculating the referral fee and, to the extent possible, the amount of the fee;
(e) the category of registration of each registrant that is a party to the agreement with a description of the activities that the registrant is authorized to engage in under that category and, giving consideration to the nature of the referral, the activities that the registrant is not permitted to engage in;
(f)
if a referral is made to a registrant,a statement that all activity requiring registration resulting from the referral arrangement will be provided by the registrant receiving the referral;(g) any other information that a reasonable client would consider important in evaluating the referral arrangement.
(2) If there is a change to the information set out in subsection (1), the registrant must ensure that written disclosure of that change is provided to each client affected by the change as soon as possible and no later than the 30th day before the date on which a referral fee is next paid or received.
13.11 Referral arrangements before this Instrument came into force13.11 [repealed]
(1) This Division applies to a referral arrangement entered into before this Instrument came into force if a referral fee is paid under the referral arrangement after this Instrument comes into force.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply until 6 months after this Instrument comes into force.
Division 4 Loans and margin
13.12 Restriction on lending to clients13.12 [repealed]
(1) A registrant must not lend money, extend credit or provide margin to a client.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), an investment fund manager may lend money on a short term basis to an investment fund it manages, if the loan is for the purpose of funding redemptions of its securities or meeting expenses incurred by the investment fund in the normal course of its business.
13.13 Disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money
(1) If a registrant recommends that a client should use borrowed money to finance any part of a purchase of a security, the registrant must, before the purchase, provide the client with a written statement that is substantially similar to the following:
"Using borrowed money to finance the purchase of securities involves greater risk than a purchase using cash resources only. If you borrow money to purchase securities, your responsibility to repay the loan and pay interest as required by its terms remains the same even if the value of the securities purchased declines."
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if one of the following applies:
(a) the registrant has provided the client with the statement described under subsection (1) no earlier than the 180th day before the date of the proposed purchase;
(b) [repealed]
(c) the client is a permitted client.
Division 5 Complaints
13.14 Application of this Division
(1) This Division does not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as an investment fund manager.
(2) In Québec, a registered firm is deemed to comply with this Division if it complies with sections 168.1.1 to 168.1.3 of the Securities Act (Québec).
13.15 Handling complaints
A registered firm must document and, in a manner that a reasonable investor would consider fair and effective, respond to each complaint made to the registered firm about any product or service offered by the firm or a representative of the firm.
13.16 Dispute resolution service
(1) In this section,
"complaint" means a complaint that
(a) relates to a trading or advising activity of a registered firm or a representative of the firm, and
(b) is received by the firm within 6 years of the day when the client first knew or reasonably ought to have known of an act or omission that is a cause of or contributed to the complaint;
"OBSI" means the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments.
(2) If a registered firm receives a complaint from a client, the firm must, as soon as possible, provide the client with a written acknowledgement of the complaint that includes the following:
(a) a description of the firm's obligations under this section;
(b) the steps that the client must take in order for an independent dispute resolution or mediation service to be made available to the client under subsection (4);
(c) the name of the independent dispute resolution or mediation service that will be made available to the client under subsection (4) and contact information for the service.
(3) If a registered firm decides to reject a complaint or to make an offer to resolve a complaint, the firm must, as soon as possible, provide the client with written notice of the decision and include the information referred to in subsection (2).
(4) A registered firm must as soon as possible ensure that an independent dispute resolution or mediation service is made available to a client at the firm's expense with respect to a complaint if either of the following apply:
(a) after 90 days of the firm's receipt of the complaint, the firm has not given the client written notice of a decision under subsection (3), and the client has notified the independent dispute resolution or mediation service specified under paragraph (2)(c) that the client wishes to have the complaint considered by the service;
(b) within 180 days of the client's receipt of written notice of the firm's decision under subsection (3), the client has notified the independent dispute resolution or mediation service specified under paragraph (2)(c) that the client wishes to have the complaint considered by the service.
(5) Subsection (4) does not apply unless the client agrees that any amount the client will claim for the purpose of the independent dispute resolution or mediation service's consideration of the complaint will be no greater than $350,000.
(6) For the purposes of the requirement to make available an independent dispute resolution or mediation service under subsection (4), a registered firm must take reasonable steps to ensure that OBSI will be the service that is made available to the client.
(7) Subsection (6) does not apply in Québec.
(8) This section does not apply in respect of a complaint made by a permitted client that is not an individual.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Note: Amendments to Section 13.16 came into force on May 1, 2014. There are transition periods for firms registered before May 1, 2014.
Except in Québec, if a dealer or adviser was registered before September 29, 2009 and a complaint was received by the firm on or before August 1, 2014, section 13.16 does not apply in respect of that complaint.
If a dealer or adviser registered between September 29, 2009 and April 30, 2014 and a complaint was received by the firm on or before August 1, 2014, in respect of that complaint, the dealer or adviser must comply with section 13.16 as it read on April 30, 2014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Division 6 Registered sub-advisers
13.17 Exemption from certain requirements for registered sub-advisers
(1) A registered sub-adviser is exempt from the following requirements in respect of its activities as a sub-adviser:
(a)
section 13.4 [identifying and responding to conflicts of interest];division 2 [conflicts of interest] of Part 13, except section 13.5 [restrictions on certain managed account transactions] and section 13.6 [disclosure when recommending related or connected securities];(b) division 3 [referral arrangements] of Part 13;
(c) division 5 [complaints] of Part 13;
(d) section 14.3 [disclosure to clients about the fair allocation of investment opportunities];
(e) section 14.5 [notice to clients by non-resident registrants];
(f) section 14.14 [account statements];
(g) section 14.14.1 [additional statements];
(h) section 14.14.2 [security position cost information];
(i) section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation];
(j) section 14.18 [investment performance report].
(2) The exemption under subsection (1) is not available unless all of the following apply:
(a) the obligations and duties of the registered sub-adviser are set out in a written agreement with the sub-adviser's registered adviser or registered dealer;
(b) the registered adviser or registered dealer has entered into a written agreement with its clients on whose behalf investment advice is or portfolio management services are to be provided agreeing to be responsible for any loss that arises out of the failure of the registered sub-adviser
(i) to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of its office honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the registrant and each client of the registrant for whose benefit the advice is or portfolio management services are to be provided, or
(ii) to exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances.
Division 7 Misleading communications
13.18 Misleading communications
(1) A registered individual must not hold himself or herself out, and a registered firm must not hold itself or its registered individuals out, in a manner that could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead a person as to any of the following matters:
(a) the proficiency, experience, or qualifications of the registrant;
(b) the nature of the person's relationship, or potential relationship, with the registrant;
(c) the products or services provided, or to be provided, by the registrant.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a registered individual must not use any of the following:
(a) a title, designation, award, or recognition that is based partly or entirely on that registered individual's sales activity or revenue generation;
(b) a corporate officer title unless their sponsoring firm has appointed that registered individual to that corporate office pursuant to applicable corporate law;
(c) a title or designation, unless the individual's sponsoring firm has approved the use by that registered individual of that title or designation.
Part 14 Handling client accounts -- firms
Division 1 Investment fund managers
14.1 Application of this Part to investment fund managers
Other than sections 14.1.1, 14.5.1, 14.5.2, 14.5.3, 14.6, 14.6.1 and 14.6.2, subsection 14.12(5) and section 14.15, this Part does not apply to an investment fund manager in respect of its activities as an investment fund manager.
14.1.1 Duty to provide information -- investment fund managers
A registered investment fund manager of an investment fund must, within a reasonable period of time, provide a registered dealer or a registered adviser that has a client that owns securities of the investment fund with the information that is required by the dealer or adviser in order for the dealer or adviser to comply with paragraph 14.12(1)(c), subsections 14.14(4) and (5), 14.14.1(2) and 14.14.2(1) and paragraph 14.17(1)(h).
Division 1.1 Publicly available information
14.1.2 Duty to provide information
(1) A registered firm must make publicly available information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client of the registered firm, including general descriptions of the following:
(a) the products and services that it offers and any material limitations on those products and services;
(b) the types of account that it offers;
(c) the charges and other costs to clients, including any current fee schedule, associated with its products, services and accounts;
(d) any minimum account sizes or minimum charges that apply to its products, services and accounts;
(e) any third-party compensation associated with its products, services and accounts;
(f) any restrictions on the clients to whom it makes products, services or accounts available.
(2) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of products and services that are offered exclusively to permitted clients.
Division 2 Disclosure to clients
14.2 Relationship disclosure information
(0.1) In this section, "proprietary product" means a security of an issuer if one or more of the following apply:
(a) the issuer of the security is a connected issuer of the registered firm;
(b) the issuer of the security is a related issuer of the registered firm;
(c) the registered firm or an affiliate of the registered firm is the investment fund manager or portfolio manager of the issuer of the security.
(1) A registered firm must deliver to a client all information that a reasonable investor would consider important about the client's relationship with the registrant.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the information delivered to a client under that subsection must include the following:
(a) a description of the nature or type of the client's account;
(a.1) in the case of a registered firm that holds the client's assets, or directs or arranges which custodian will hold the client's assets, disclosure of the location where, and a general description of the manner in which, the client's assets are held, and a description of the risks and benefits to the client arising from the assets being held at that location and in that manner;
(a.2) in the case of a registered firm that has access to the client's assets
(i) disclosure of the location where, and a general description of the manner in which, the client's assets are held, and a description of the risks and benefits to the client arising from the assets being held in that location and in that manner, and
(ii) a description of the manner in which the client's assets are accessible by the registered firm, and a description of the risks and benefits to the client arising from having access to the assets in that manner;
(b) a general description of the products and services the registered firm offersto the client, including
(i) whether the firm will primarily or exclusively provide proprietary products to the client;
(ii) whether there are any other restrictions on the products or services the registrant will provide to the client;
(c) a general description of the types of risks that a client should consider when making an investment decision;
(d) a description of the risks to a client of using borrowed money to finance a purchase of a security;
(e) a description of the conflicts of interest that the registered firm is required to disclose to a client under securities legislation;
(f) disclosure of the operating charges the client might be required to pay related to the client's account;
(g) a general description of the types of transaction charges the client might be required to pay;
(h) a general description of any third-party compensation that may be paid to the registered firm
by any other partyin relation to the different types of products thatathe client may purchase through theregisteredfirm;(i) a description of the content and frequency of reporting for each account or portfolio of a client;
(j) disclosure of the firm's obligations if a client has a complaint contemplated under section 13.16 [dispute resolution service] and the steps that the client must take in order for an independent dispute resolution or mediation service to be made available to the client at the firm's expense;
(k) a statement that the registered firm
has an obligation to assess whether a purchase or sale of a security is suitable for a client prior to executing the transaction or at any other timemust determine that any investment action it takes, recommends or decides on, for the client is suitable for the client and puts the client's interests first;(l) the information
athe registered firmmust collecthas collected about the client under section 13.2 [know your client];(m) a general explanation of how investment performance benchmarks might be used to assess the performance of a client's investments and any options for benchmark information that might be made available to clients by the registered firm;
(n) if the registered firm is a scholarship plan dealer, an explanation of any terms of the scholarship plan offered to the client by the registered firm that, if those terms are not met by the client or the client's designated beneficiary under the plan, might cause the client or the designated beneficiary to suffer a loss of contributions, earnings or government contributions in the plan;
(o) an explanation of the impact on a client's investment returns from each of the following:
(i) the charges described in paragraphs (f) and (g);
(ii) any investment fund management expense fees or other ongoing fees the client may directly or indirectly incur in connection with the securities purchased for the client's account;
(iii) any restrictions on the products or services that the registered firm will provide to the client.
(3) A registered firm must deliver the information in subsection (1), if applicable, and subsection (2) to the client in writing, except that the information in paragraph (2)(b) may be provided orally or in writing, before the firm first
(a) purchases or sells a security for the client, or
(b) advises the client to purchase, sell or hold a security.
(4) If there is a significant change in respect of the information delivered to a client under subsections (1) or (2), the registered firm must take reasonable steps to notify the client of the change in a timely manner and, if possible, before the firm next
(a) purchases or sells a security for the client; or
(b) advises the client to purchase, sell or hold a security.
(5) [repealed]
(5.1) A registered firm must not impose any new operating charge in respect of an account of a client, or increase the amount of any operating charge in respect of an account of a client, unless written notice of the new or increased operating charge is provided to the client at least 60 days before the date on which the imposition or increase becomes effective.
(6) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
(7) Except for subsections (5.1), (6) and (8), this section does not apply to a registered dealer in respect of a client for whom the dealer purchases or sells securities only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client.
(8) A registered dealer referred to in subsection (7) must deliver the information required under paragraphs (2)(a) and (e) to (j) to the client in writing, and the information in paragraph (2)(b) orally or in writing, before the dealer first purchases or sells a security for the client.
14.2.1 Pre-trade disclosure of charges
(1) Before a registered firm accepts an instruction from a client to purchase or sell a security in an account other than a managed account, the firm must disclose to the client
(a) the charges the client will be required to pay in respect of the purchase or sale, or a reasonable estimate if the actual amount of the charges is not known to the firm at the time of disclosure,
(b) in the case of a purchase to which deferred charges apply, that the client might be required to pay a deferred sales charge on the subsequent sale of the security and the fee schedule that will apply, and
(c) whether the firm will receive trailing commissions in respect of the security.
(2) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
(3) This section does not apply to a dealer in respect of a client for whom the dealer purchases or sells securities only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client
14.3 Disclosure to clients about the fair allocation of investment opportunities
A registered adviser must deliver to a client a summary of the policies required under section 11.1 [compliance system] that provide reasonable assurance that the firm and each individual acting on its behalf complies with section 14.10 [allocating investment opportunities fairly] and that summary must be delivered
(a) when the adviser opens an account for the client, and
(b) if there is a significant change to the summary last delivered to the client, in a timely manner and, if possible, before the firm next
(i) purchases or sells a security for the client, or
(ii) advises the client to purchase, sell or hold a security.
14.4 When the firm has a relationship with a financial institution
(1) If a registered firm opens a client account to trade in securities, in an office or branch of a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank, the registered firm must give the client a written notice stating that it is a separate legal entity from the Canadian financial institution or Schedule III bank and, unless otherwise advised by the registrant, securities purchased from or through the registrant
(a) are not insured by a government deposit insurer,
(b) are not guaranteed by the Canadian financial institution or Schedule III bank, and
(c) may fluctuate in value.
(2) A registered firm that is subject to subsection (1) must receive a written confirmation from the client that the client has read and understood the notice before the registered firm
(a) purchases or sells a security for the client, or
(b) advises the client to purchase, sell or hold a security.
(3) This section does not apply to a registered firm if the client is a permitted client.
14.5 Notice to clients by non-resident registrants
(1) A registered firm whose head office is not located in the local jurisdiction must provide a client in the local jurisdiction with a statement in writing disclosing the following:
(a) the firm is not resident in the local jurisdiction;
(b) the jurisdiction in Canada or the foreign jurisdiction in which the head office or the principal place of business of the firm is located;
(c) all or substantially all of the assets of the firm may be situated outside the local jurisdiction;
(d) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against the firm because of the above;
(e) the name and address of the agent for service of process of the firm in the local jurisdiction.
(2) This section does not apply to a registered firm whose head office is in Canada if the firm is registered in the local jurisdiction.
Division 3 Client assets and investment fund assets
14.5.1 Definition of "securities" in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan
Despite section 1.2, in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, a reference to "securities" in this Division excludes "exchange contracts".
14.5.2 Restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement
(1) A registered firm must not be a custodian or sub-custodian for a client of the firm or for an investment fund in respect of the client's or investment fund's cash or securities unless the registered firm
(a) is a Canadian custodian under paragraph (a), (b) or (d) of the definition of "Canadian custodian", and
(b) has established and maintains a system of controls and supervision that a reasonable person would conclude is sufficient to manage the risks to the client or investment fund associated with the custody of the client's or investment fund's cash or securities.
(2) A registered firm must ensure that any custodian for a client of the firm or for an investment fund managed by the firm in respect of the client's or investment fund's cash or securities is a Canadian custodian if the firm
(a) directs or arranges which custodian will hold the cash or securities of the client or investment fund, or
(b) holds or has access to the cash or securities of the client or investment fund.
(3) Despite the requirement to use a Canadian custodian in subsection (2), a foreign custodian may be a custodian of the cash or securities of the client or investment fund if a reasonable person would conclude, considering all of the relevant circumstances, including, for greater certainty, the nature of the regulation and the sufficiency of the equity of the foreign custodian, that using the foreign custodian is more beneficial to the client or investment fund than using a Canadian custodian.
(4) Despite the requirement to use a Canadian custodian in subsection (2), a Canadian financial institution may be a custodian of the cash of the client or investment fund.
(5) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), the registered firm must ensure that the qualified custodian is functionally independent of the registered firm unless
(a) the qualified custodian is a Canadian custodian under paragraph (a), (b) or (d) of the definition of "Canadian custodian", and
(b) the registered firm ensures that the qualified custodian has established and maintains a system of controls and supervision that a reasonable person would conclude is sufficient to manage the risks to the client or investment fund associated with the custody of the client's or investment fund's cash or securities.
(6) For the purpose of subsection (4), the registered firm must ensure that the Canadian financial institution is functionally independent of the registered firm.
(7) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of any of the following:
(a) an investment fund that is subject to National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds;
(b) an investment fund that is subject to National Instrument 41-101 General Prospectus Requirements;
(c) a security that is recorded on the books of the security's issuer, or the transfer agent of the security's issuer, only in the name of the client or investment fund;
(d) cash or securities of a permitted client, if the permitted client
(i) is not an individual or an investment fund, and
(ii) has acknowledged in writing that the permitted client is aware that the requirements in this section that would otherwise apply to the registered firm do not apply;
(e) customer collateral subject to custodial requirements under National Instrument 94-102 Derivatives: Customer Clearing and Protection of Customer Collateral and Positions;
(f) a security that evidences a debt obligation secured by a mortgage registered or published against the title of real estate if
(i) the mortgage is registered or published in the name of the client or investment fund as mortgagee, or
(ii) in the case of a syndicated mortgage, the mortgage is registered or published in the name of either of the following as mortgagee:
(A) a person or company that is registered or licensed under mortgage brokerage, mortgage administrators or mortgage dealer legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada if that mortgage is held in trust for the client or investment fund, as applicable;
(B) each investor that is a mortgagee in respect of that mortgage.
14.5.3 Cash and Securities held by a qualified custodian
A registered firm that is subject to subsection 14.5.2(2), (3) or (4) must take reasonable steps to ensure that cash and securities of a client or an investment fund,
(a) except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c), are held by the qualified custodian or, in respect of cash, the Canadian financial institution using an account number or other designation in the records of the qualified custodian or the Canadian financial institution, as applicable, sufficient to show that the beneficial ownership of the cash or securities of the client or investment fund is vested in that client or investment fund,
(b) in the case of cash held in an account in the name of the registered firm, is held separate and apart from the registered firm's own property and held by the qualified custodian, or the Canadian financial institution, in a designated trust account in trust for clients or investment funds, or
(c) in the case of cash or securities held for the purpose of bulk trading, are held in the name of the registered firm in trust for its clients or investment funds if the cash or securities are transferred to the client's or investment fund's account held by that client's or investment fund's qualified custodian or, in respect of cash, Canadian financial institution as soon as possible following a trade.
14.6 Client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust
(1) If a registered firm holds client assets or investment fund assets other than cash or securities, or if a registered firm holds cash or securities of a client or an investment fund as permitted by section 14.5.2, the registered firm must hold the assets
(a) separate and apart from its own property,
(b) in trust for the client or investment fund, and
(c) in the case of cash, in a designated trust account with a Canadian custodian or Canadian financial institution.
(2) Despite paragraph (1)(c), a foreign custodian may be a custodian for the cash of the client or investment fund if a reasonable person would conclude, considering all of the relevant circumstances, including, for greater certainty, the nature of the regulation and the sufficiency of the equity of the foreign custodian, that using the foreign custodian is more beneficial to the client or investment fund than using a Canadian custodian or a Canadian financial institution.
14.6.1 Custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests
(1) In this section, "clearing corporation option", "futures exchange", "option on futures", "specified derivative" and "standardized future" have the same meaning as in section 1.1 of National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds.
(2) Subsection 14.5.2(2) does not apply to a registered firm in respect of cash or securities of a client or investment fund deposited with a dealer as margin for transactions outside of Canada involving clearing corporation options, options on futures or standardized futures if
(a) in the case of standardized futures and options on futures, the dealer is a member of a futures exchange or, in the case of clearing corporation options, is a member of a stock exchange, and, as a result in either case, is subject to a regulatory audit,
(b) the dealer has a net worth, determined from its most recent audited financial statements, in excess of $50 million, and
(c) a reasonable person would conclude that using the dealer is more beneficial to the client or investment fund than using a Canadian custodian.
(3) Subsection 14.5.2(2) does not apply to a registered firm in respect of cash or securities of a client or investment fund deposited with the client's or investment fund's counterparty over which the client or investment fund has granted a security interest in connection with a particular specified derivatives transaction.
(4) The registered firm must take reasonable steps to ensure that any agreement by which cash or securities of a client or investment fund are deposited in accordance with subsection (2) or (3) requires the person or company holding the cash or securities to ensure that its records show that the client or investment fund is the beneficial owner of the cash or securities.
14.6.2 Custodial provisions relating to short sales
Subsection 14.5.2(2) does not apply to a registered firm in respect of cash or securities of a client or investment fund deposited as security in connection with a short sale of securities with a dealer outside of Canada if
(a) the dealer is a member of a stock exchange and is subject to a regulatory audit,
(b) the dealer has a net worth, determined from its most recent audited financial statements, in excess of $50 million, and
(c) a reasonable person would conclude that using the dealer is more beneficial to the client or investment fund than using a Canadian custodian.
14.7 [repealed]
14.8 [repealed]
14.9 [repealed]
Division 4 Client accounts
14.10 Allocating investment opportunities fairly
A registered adviser must ensure fairness in allocating investment opportunities among its clients.
14.11 Selling or assigning client accounts
If a registered firm proposes to sell or assign a client's account in whole or in part to another registrant, the registered firm must, prior to the sale or assignment, give a written explanation of the proposal to the client and inform the client of the client's right to close the client's account.
Division 5 Reporting to clients
14.11.1 Determining market value
(1) For the purposes of this Division, the market value of a security
(a) that is issued by an investment fund which is not listed on an exchange must be determined by reference to the net asset value provided by the investment fund manager of the fund on the relevant date,
(b) in any other case, is the amount that the registered firm reasonably believes to be the market value of the security
(i) after referring to a price quotation on a marketplace, if one is published for the security, using the last bid price in the case of a long security and the last ask price in the case of a short security, as shown on a consolidated pricing list or exchange quotation sheet as of the close of business on the relevant date or the last trading day before the relevant date, and after making any adjustments considered by the registered firm to be necessary to accurately reflect the market value,
(ii) if no reliable price for the security is quoted on a marketplace, after referring to a published market report or inter-dealer quotation sheet, on the relevant date or the last trading day before the relevant date, and after making any adjustments considered by the registered firm to be necessary to accurately reflect the market value,
(iii) if the market value for the security cannot be reasonably determined in accordance with subparagraph (i) or (ii), after applying the policy of the registered firm for determining market value, which must include procedures to assess the reliability of valuation inputs and assumptions and provide for
(A) the use of inputs that are observable, and
(B) the use of unobservable inputs and assumptions, if observable inputs are not reasonably available.
(2) If a registered firm determines the market value of a security in accordance with subparagraph (1)(b)(iii), when it refers to the market value in a statement under section 14.14 [account statements], 14.14.1 [additional statements], 14.14.2 [security position cost information], 14.15 [security holder statements] or 14.16 [scholarship plan dealer statements], the registered firm must include the following notification or a notification that is substantially similar:
"There is no active market for this security so we have estimated its market value."
(3) If a registered firm reasonably believes that it cannot determine the market value of a security in accordance with subsection (1), the market value of the security must be reported in a statement delivered under section 14.14 [account statements], 14.14.1 [additional statements], 14.14.2 [security position cost information], 14.15 [security holder statements] or 14.16 [scholarship plan dealer statements] as not determinable, and the market value of the security must be excluded from the total market value referred to in paragraphs 14.14(5)(e), 14.14.1(2)(e) and 14.14.2(5)(c).
14.12 Content and delivery of trade confirmation
(1) A registered dealer that has acted on behalf of a client in connection with a purchase or sale of a security must promptly deliver to the client or, if the client consents in writing, to a registered adviser acting for the client, a written confirmation of the transaction, setting out the following:
(a) the quantity and description of the security purchased or sold;
(b) the price per security paid or received by the client;
(b.1) in the case of a purchase of a debt security, the security's annual yield;
(c) the amount of each transaction charge, deferred sales charge or other charge in respect of the transaction, and the total amount of all charges in respect of the transaction;
(c.1) in the case of a purchase or sale of a debt security, either of the following:
(i) the total amount of any mark-up or mark-down, commission or other service charges the registered dealer applied to the transaction;
(ii) the total amount of any commission charged to the client by the registered dealer and, if the dealer applied a mark-up or mark-down or any service charge other than a commission, the following notification or a notification that is substantially similar:
"Dealer firm remuneration has been added to the price of this security (in the case of a purchase) or deducted from the price of this security (in the case of a sale). This amount was in addition to any commission this trade confirmation shows was charged to you.";
(d) whether the registered dealer acted as principal or agent;
(e) the date and the name of the marketplace, if any, on which the transaction took place, or if applicable, a statement that the transaction took place on more than one marketplace or over more than one day;
(f) the name of the dealing representative, if any, involved in the transaction;
(g) the settlement date of the transaction;
(h) if applicable, that the security is a security issued by the registered dealer, a security issued by a related issuer of the registered dealer or, if the transaction occurred during the security's distribution, a security issued by a connected issuer of the registered dealer.
(2) If a transaction under subsection (1) involved more than one transaction or if the transaction took place on more than one marketplace the information referred to in subsection (1) may be set out in the aggregate if the confirmation also contains a statement that additional details concerning the transaction will be provided to the client upon request and without additional charge.
(3) Paragraph (1)(h) does not apply if all of the following apply:
(a) the security is a security of a mutual fund that is established and managed by the registered dealer or by an affiliate of the registered dealer, in its capacity as investment fund manager of the mutual fund;
(b) the names of the dealer and the mutual fund are sufficiently similar to indicate that they are affiliated or related.
(4) For the purpose of paragraph (1)(f), a dealing representative may be identified by means of a code or symbol if the confirmation also contains a statement that the name of the dealing representative will be provided to the client on request of the client.
(5) A registered investment fund manager that has executed a redemption order received directly from a security holder must promptly deliver to the security holder a written confirmation of the redemption, setting out the following:
(a) the quantity and description of the security redeemed;
(b) the price per security received by the client;
(c) the commission, sales charge, service charge and any other amount charged in respect of the redemption;
(d) the settlement date of the redemption.
(6) Subsection 14.12 (5) does not apply to trades in a security of an investment fund made in reliance on section 8.6 [investment fund trades by adviser to managed account].
(7) In Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario and Saskatchewan, a registered dealer that complies with the requirements of this section in respect of a purchase or sale of a security is not subject to any of subsections 37(1), (2) or (3) of the Securities Act (Newfoundland and Labrador), subsection 36(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario) and subsection 42(1) of The Securities Act, 1988 (Saskatchewan).
14.13 Confirmations for certain automatic plans
The requirement under section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation] to deliver a confirmation promptly does not apply to a registered dealer in respect of a transaction if all of the following apply:
(a) the client gave the dealer prior written notice that the transaction is made pursuant to the client's participation in an automatic payment plan, including a dividend reinvestment plan, or an automatic withdrawal plan in which a transaction is made at least monthly;
(b) the registered dealer delivered a confirmation as required under section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation] for the first transaction made under the plan after receiving the notice referred to in paragraph (a);
(c) the transaction is in a security of a mutual fund, scholarship plan, educational plan or educational trust.
(d) [repealed]
14.14 Account statements
(1) A registered dealer must deliver to a client a statement that includes the information referred to in subsections (4) and (5)
(a) at least once every 3 months, or
(b) if the client has requested to receive statements on a monthly basis, for each one-month period.
(2) A registered dealer must deliver to a client a statement that includes the information referred to in subsections (4) and (5) after the end of any month in which a transaction was effected in securities held by the dealer in the client's account, other than a transaction made under an automatic withdrawal plan or an automatic payment plan, including a dividend reinvestment plan.
(2.1) Paragraph 1(b) and subsection (2) do not apply to a mutual fund dealer in connection with its activities as a dealer in respect of the securities listed in paragraph 7.1(2)(b) [dealer categories].
(3) A registered adviser must deliver to a client a statement that includes the information referred to in subsections (4) and (5) at least once every 3 months, except that if the client has requested to receive statements on a monthly basis, the adviser must deliver a statement to the client for each one-month period.
(3.1) [repealed]
(4) If a registered dealer or registered adviser made a transaction for a client during the period covered by a statement delivered under subsection (1), (2) or (3), the statement must include the following:
(a) the date of the transaction;
(b) whether the transaction was a purchase, sale or transfer;
(c) the name of the security;
(d) the number of securities purchased, sold or transferred;
(e) the price per security if the transaction was a purchase or sale;
(f) the total value of the transaction if it was a purchase or sale.
(5) If a registered dealer or registered adviser holds securities owned by a client in an account of the client, a statement delivered under subsection (1), (2) or (3) must indicate that the securities are held for the client by the registered firm and must include the following information about the client's account determined as at the end of the period for which the statement is made:
(a) the name and quantity of each security in the account;
(b) the market value of each security in the account and, if applicable, the notification in subsection 14.11.1(2) [determining market value];
(c) the total market value of each security position in the account;
(d) any cash balance in the account;
(e) the total market value of all cash and securities in the account;
(f) whether the account is eligible for coverage under an investor protection fund approved or recognized by the securities regulatory authority and, if it is, the name of the investor protection fund;
(g) which securities in the account might be subject to a deferred sales charge if they are sold.
(6) [repealed]
(7) For the purposes of this section, a security is considered to be held by a registered firm for a client if
(a) the firm is the registered owner of the security as nominee on behalf of the client, or
(b) the firm has physical possession of a certificate evidencing ownership of the security.
14.14.1 Additional statements
(1) A registered dealer or registered adviser must deliver a statement that includes the information referred to in subsection (2) to a client if any of the following apply in respect of a security owned by the client that is held or controlled by a party other than the dealer or adviser:
(a) the dealer or adviser has trading authority over the security or the client's account in which the security is held or was transacted;
(b) the dealer or adviser receives continuing payments related to the client's ownership of the security from the issuer of the security, the investment fund manager of the issuer or any other party;
(c) the security is issued by a scholarship plan, a mutual fund or an investment fund that is a labour-sponsored investment fund corporation, or labour-sponsored venture capital corporation, under legislation of a jurisdiction of Canada and the dealer or adviser is the dealer or adviser of record for the client on the records of the issuer of the security or the records of the issuer's investment fund manager.
(2) A statement delivered under subsection (1) must include the following in respect of the securities or the account referred to in subsection (1), determined as at the end of the period for which the statement is made:
(a) the name and quantity of each security;
(b) the market value of each security and, if applicable, the notification in subsection 14.11.1(2) [determining market value];
(c) the total market value of each security position;
(d) any cash balance in the account;
(e) the total market value of all of the cash and securities;
(f) disclosure in respect of the party that holds or controls each security and a description of the way it is held;
(g) whether the securities are, or the account is, eligible for coverage under an investor protection fund approved or recognized by the securities regulatory authority;
(h) which of the securities might be subject to a deferred sales charge if they are sold.
(2.1) Paragraph (2)(g) does not apply if the party referred to in paragraph (2)(f) is required under section 14.14, or under an IIROC provision or MFDA provision, to deliver a statement to the client in respect of the securities or the account referred to in subsection (1) of this section.
(3) If subsection (1) applies to a registered dealer or a registered adviser, the dealer or adviser must deliver a statement that includes the information in subsection (2) to a client at least once every 3 months, except that if a client has requested to receive statements on a monthly basis, the adviser must deliver a statement to the client every month.
(4) If subsection (1) applies to a registered dealer or a registered adviser that is also required to deliver a statement to a client under subsection 14.14(1) or (3), a statement delivered under subsection (1) must be delivered to the client in one of the following ways:
(a) combined with a statement delivered to the client under subsection 14.14(1) or (3) for the period ending on the same date;
(b) as a separate document accompanying a statement delivered to the client under subsection 14.14(1) or (3) for the period ending on the same date;
(c) as a separate document delivered within 10 days after the statement delivered to the client under subsection 14.14(1) or (3) for the period ending on the same date.
(5) For the purposes of this section, a security is considered to be held for a client by a party other than the registered firm if any of the following apply:
(a) the other party is the registered owner of the security as nominee on behalf of the client;
(b) ownership of the security is recorded on the books of its issuer in the client's name;
(c) the other party has physical possession of a certificate evidencing ownership of the security;
(d) the client has physical possession of a certificate evidencing ownership of the security.
(6) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
14.14.2 Security position cost information
(1) If a registered dealer or registered adviser is required to deliver a statement to a client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(5) [account statements] or 14.14.1(2) [additional statements], the dealer or adviser must deliver the information referred to in subsection (2) to a client at least once every 3 months.
(2) The information delivered under subsection (1) must disclose the following:
(a) for each security position, in the statement, opened on or after July 15, 2015, presented on an average cost per unit or share basis or an aggregate basis,
(i) the cost of the security position, determined as at the end of the period for which the information referred to in subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(2) is provided, or
(ii) if the security position was transferred from another registered firm, the information referred to in subparagraph (i) or the market value of the security position as at the date of the transfer of the security position;
(b) for each security position, in the statement, opened before July 15, 2015, presented on an average cost per unit or share basis or an aggregate basis,
(i) the cost of the security position, determined as at the end of the period for which the information referred to in subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(2) is provided, or
(ii) the market value of the security position on
(A) December 31, 2015, or
(B) a date that is earlier than December 31, 2015 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded historical position cost information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date;
(c) the total cost of all of the security positions in the statement, determined in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b);
(d) for each security position for which the registered firm reasonably believes it cannot determine the cost in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b), disclosure of that fact in the statement.
(2.1) If a registered firm reports one or more security positions of a client using the market value determined as at the date referred to in subparagraph (2)(a)(ii) or (2)(b)(ii), the firm must disclose in the statement that it is providing the market value of the security position as at the relevant date, instead of the cost of the security position.
(3) The cost of security positions required to be disclosed under subsection (2) must be either the book cost or the original cost and must be accompanied by the definition of "book cost" in section 1.1 [definitions of terms used throughout this Instrument] or the definition of "original cost" in section 1.1, as applicable.
(4) The information delivered under subsection (1) must be delivered to the client in one of the following ways:
(a) combined with a statement delivered to the client that includes the information required under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(2) for the period ending on the same date;
(b) in a separate document accompanying a statement delivered to the client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(2) for the period ending on the same date;
(c) in a separate document delivered within 10 days after a statement delivered to the client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(2) for the period ending on the same date.
(5) If the information under subsection (1) is delivered to the client in a separate document in accordance with paragraph (4)(c), the separate document must also include the following:
(a) the market value of each security in the statement and, if applicable, the notification in subsection 14.11.1(2) [determining market value];
(b) the total market value of each security position in the statement;
(c) the total market value of all cash and securities in the statement.
(6) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
14.15 Security holder statements
If there is no dealer or adviser of record for a security holder on the records of a registered investment fund manager, the investment fund manager must deliver to the security holder at least once every 12 months a statement that includes the following:
(a) the information required under subsection 14.14(4) [account statements] for each transaction that the registered investment fund manager made for the security holder during the period;
(b) the information required under subsection 14.14.1(2) [additional statements] for the securities of the security holder that are on the records of the registered investment fund manager;
(c) the information required under section 14.14.2 [security position cost information].
14.16 Scholarship plan dealer statements
Sections 14.14 [account statements], 14.14.1 [additional statements] and 14.14.2 [security position cost information] do not apply to a scholarship plan dealer if both of the following apply:
(a) the scholarship plan dealer is not registered in another dealer or adviser category;
(b) the scholarship plan dealer delivers to a client a statement at least once every 12 months that provides the information required under subsections 14.14(4) and 14.14.1(2).
14.17 Report on charges and other compensation
(1) For each 12-month period, a registered firm must deliver to a client a report on charges and other compensation containing the following information, except that the first report delivered after a client has opened an account may cover a period of less than 12 months:
(a) the registered firm's current operating charges which might be applicable to the client's account;
(b) the total amount of each type of operating charge related to the client's account paid by the client during the period covered by the report, and the total amount of those charges;
(c) the total amount of each type of transaction charge related to the purchase or sale of securities paid by the client during the period covered by the report, and the total amount of those charges;
(d) the total amount of the operating charges reported under paragraph (b) and the transaction charges reported under paragraph (c);
(e) if the registered firm purchased or sold debt securities for the client during the period covered by the report, either of the following:
(i) the total amount of any mark-ups, mark-downs, commissions or other service charges the firm applied on the purchases or sales of debt securities;
(ii) the total amount of any commissions charged to the client by the firm on the purchases or sales of debt securities and, if the firm applied mark-ups, mark-downs or any service charges other than commissions on the purchases or sales of debt securities, the following notification or a notification that is substantially similar:
"For debt securities purchased or sold for you during the period covered by this report, dealer firm remuneration was added to the price you paid (in the case of a purchase) or deducted from the price you received (in the case of a sale). This amount was in addition to any commissions you were charged.";
(f) if the registered firm is a scholarship plan dealer, the unpaid amount of any enrolment fee or other charge that is payable by the client;
(g) the total amount of each type of payment, other than a trailing commission, that is made to the registered firm or any of its registered individuals by a securities issuer or another registrant in relation to registerable services to the client during the period covered by the report, accompanied by an explanation of each type of payment;
(h) if the registered firm received trailing commissions related to securities owned by the client during the period covered by the report, the following notification or a notification that is substantially similar:
"We received $[amount] in trailing commissions in respect of securities you owned during the 12-month period covered by this report.
Investment funds pay investment fund managers a fee for managing their funds. The managers pay us ongoing trailing commissions for the services and advice we provide you. The amount of the trailing commission depends on the sales charge option you chose when you purchased the fund. You are not directly charged the trailing commission or the management fee. But, these fees affect you because they reduce the amount of the fund's return to you. Information about management fees and other charges to your investment funds is included in the prospectus or fund facts document for each fund."
(2) For the purposes of this section, the information in respect of securities of a client required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) [account statements] must be delivered in a separate report on charges and other compensation for each of the client's accounts.
(3) For the purposes of this section, the information in respect of securities of a client required to be reported under subsection 14.14.1(1) [additional statements] must be delivered in a report on charges and other compensation for the client's account through which the securities were transacted.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not apply if the registered firm provides a report on charges and other compensation that consolidates, into a single report, the required information for more than one of a client's accounts and any securities of the client required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(1) and if the following apply:
(a) the client has consented in writing to the form of disclosure referred to in this subsection;
(b) the consolidated report specifies the accounts and securities with respect to which information is required to be reported under subsection 14.14.1(1) [additional statements].
(5) This section does not apply to a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
14.18 Investment performance report
(1) A registered firm must deliver an investment performance report to a client every 12 months, except that the first report delivered after a registered firm first makes a trade for a client may be sent within 24 months after that trade.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the information in respect of securities of a client required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) [account statements] must be delivered in a separate report for each of the client's accounts.
(3) For the purposes of this section, the information in respect of securities of a client required to be reported under subsection 14.14.1(1) [additional statements] must be delivered in the report for each of the client's accounts through which the securities were transacted.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not apply if the registered firm provides a report that consolidates, into a single report, the required information for more than one of a client's accounts and any securities of the client required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(1) and if the following apply:
(a) the client has consented in writing to the form of disclosure referred to in this subsection;
(b) the consolidated report specifies the accounts and securities with respect to which information is required to be reported under subsection 14.14.1(1) [additional statements].
(5) This section does not apply to
(a) a client's account that has existed for less than a 12-month period;
(b) a registered dealer in respect of a client's account in which the dealer executes trades only as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client; and
(c) a registered firm in respect of a permitted client that is not an individual.
(6) Despite subsection (1), a registered firm is not required to deliver a report to a client for a 12-month period referred to in that subsection if the firm reasonably believes
(a) there are no securities of the client with respect to which information is required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) [account statements] or subsection 14.14.1(1) [additional statements], or
(b) no market value can be determined for any securities of the client in respect to which information is required to be reported under subsection 14.14(5) or 14.14.1(1).
14.19 Content of investment performance report
(1) An investment performance report required to be delivered under section 14.18 by a registered firm must include all of the following in respect of the securities referred to in a statement in respect of which subsection 14.14(1), (2) or (3) [account statements] or 14.14.1(1) [additional statements] apply:
(a) the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at the beginning of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
(b) the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at the end of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
(c) the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the client's account, and the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account, in the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
(d) the market values determined under subsection (1.1);
(e) [repealed]
(f) the annual change in the market value of the client's account for the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report, determined using the following formula
A - B - C + D
where
A = the market value of all cash and securities in the account as at the end of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
B = the market value of all cash and securities in the account at the beginning of that 12-month period;
C = the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account in that 12-month period; and
D = the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account in that 12-month period;
(g) subject to subsection (1.2), the cumulative change in the market value of the account since the account was opened, determined using the following formula
A - E + F
where
A = the market value of all cash and securities in the account as at the end of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
E = the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account since account opening; and
F = the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account since account opening;
(h) [repealed]
(i) the amount of the annualized total percentage return for the client's account calculated net of charges, using a money-weighted rate of return calculation method generally accepted in the securities industry;
(j) the definition of "total percentage return" in section 1.1 and a notification indicating the following:
(i) that the total percentage return in the investment performance report was calculated net of charges;
(ii) the calculation method used;
(iii) a general explanation in plain language of what the calculation method takes into account.
(1.1) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(d), the investment performance report must include the following, as applicable:
(a) if the client's account was opened on or after July 15, 2015, the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the client's account, and the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account, since opening the account;
(b) if the client's account was opened before July 15, 2015, and the firm has not delivered an investment performance report for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016,
(i) the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at
(A) July 15, 2015, or
(B) a date that is earlier than July 15, 2015 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date, and
(ii) the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account, and the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account, since the date referred to in clause (i)(A) or (B), as applicable;
(c) if the client's account was opened before July 15, 2015, and the firm delivered an investment performance report for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016,
(i) the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at
(A) January 1, 2016, or
(B) a date that is earlier than January 1, 2016 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date, and
(ii) the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account, and the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account, since the date referred to in clause (i)(A)or (B), as applicable.
(1.2) Paragraph (1)(g) does not apply if the client's account was opened before July 15, 2015 and the registered firm includes in the investment performance report the cumulative change in the market value of the account determined using the following formula, instead of the formula in paragraph (g):
A - G - H + I
where
A
=
the market value of all cash and securities in the account as at the end of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
G
=
the market value of all cash and securities in the account determined as follows:
(a)
if the firm has not delivered an investment performance report for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016, the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at
(i)
July 15, 2015, or
(ii)
a date that is earlier than July 15, 2015 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date,
(b)
if the firm has delivered an investment performance report for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016, the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at
(i)
January 1, 2016, or
(ii)
a date that is earlier than January 1, 2016 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date;
H
=
the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account since the date used for the purposes of the definition of "G"; and
I
=
the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account since the date used for the purposes of the definition of "G".
(2) The information delivered for the purposes of paragraph (1)(i) must be provided for each of the following periods:
(a) the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report;
(b) the 3-year period preceding the end of the 12-month period covered by the report;
(c) the 5-year period preceding the end of the 12-month period covered by the report;
(d) the 10-year period preceding the end of the 12-month period covered by the report;
(e) subject to subsection (3.1), the period since the client's account was opened if the account has been open for more than one year before the date of the report or, if the account was opened before July 15, 2015, the period since
(i) July 15, 2015, or
(ii) a date that is earlier than July 15, 2015 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded annualized total percentage return information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date.
(3) Despite subsection (2), if any portion of a period referred to in paragraph (2)(b), (c) or (d) was before July 15, 2015, the registered firm is not required to report the annualized total percentage return for that period.
(3.1) Paragraph (2)(e) does not apply to a registered firm that delivered an investment performance report for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016 if the firm provides, in the report, the annualized total percentage return information referred to in that paragraph for the period since
(a) January 1, 2016, or
(b) a date that is earlier than January 1, 2016 if the registered firm reasonably believes accurate, recorded annualized total percentage return information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date.
(4) Despite subsection (1), the information a scholarship plan dealer is required to deliver under section 14.18 [investment performance report] in respect of each scholarship plan in which a client has invested through the scholarship plan dealer is the following:
(a) the total amount that the client has invested in the plan as at the date of the investment performance report;
(b) the total amount that would be returned to the client if, as at the date of the investment performance report, the client ceased to make prescribed payments into the plan;
(c) a reasonable projection of future payments that the plan might pay to the client's designated beneficiary under the plan, or to the client, at the maturity of the client's investment in the plan;
(d) a summary of any terms of the plan that, if not met by the client or the client's designated beneficiary under the plan, might cause the client or the designated beneficiary to suffer a loss of contributions, earnings or government contributions in the plan.
(5) The information delivered under section 14.18 [investment performance report] must be presented using text, tables and charts, and must be accompanied by notes in the investment performance report explaining
(a) the content of the report and how a client can use the information to assess the performance of the client's investments; and
(b) the changing value of the client's investments as reflected in the information in the report.
(6) If a registered firm delivers information required under this section in a report to a client for a period of less than one year, the firm must not calculate the disclosed information on an annualized basis.
(7) If the registered firm reasonably believes the market value cannot be determined for a security position, the market value must be assigned a value of zero in the calculation of the information delivered under subsection 14.18(1) and the fact that its market value could not be determined must be disclosed to the client.
14.20 Delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report
(1) A report under section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation] and a report under section 14.18 [investment performance report] must include information for the same 12-month period and the reports must be delivered together in one of the following ways:
(a) combined with a statement delivered to the client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(1), (2) or (3) [account statements], subsection 14.14.1(2) [additional statements] or section 14.16 [scholarship plan dealer statements];
(b) accompanying a statement delivered to the client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(1), (2) or (3) [account statements], subsection 14.14.1(2) [additional statements] or section 14.16 [scholarship plan dealer statements];
(c) within 10 days after a statement delivered to the client that includes information required under subsection 14.14(1),(2) or (3) [account statements], subsection 14.14.1(2) [additional statements] or section 14.16 [scholarship plan dealer statements].
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in respect of the first report under section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation] and the first report under section 14.18 [investment performance report] for a client.
Part 15 Granting an exemption
15.1 Who can grant an exemption
(1) The regulator or the securities regulatory authority may grant an exemption from this Instrument, in whole or in part, subject to such conditions or restrictions as may be imposed in the exemption.
(2) Despite subsection (1), in Ontario only the regulator may grant such an exemption.
(3) Except in Alberta and Ontario, an exemption referred to in subsection (1) is granted under the statute referred to in Appendix B of National Instrument 14-101 Definitions opposite the name of the local jurisdiction.
Part 16 Transition
16.1 [lapsed]
16.2 [lapsed]
16.3 [lapsed]
16.4 [lapsed]
16.5 [lapsed]
16.6 [lapsed]
16.7 [lapsed]
16.8 [lapsed]
16.9 Registration of chief compliance officers
(1) [lapsed]
(2) If an individual applies to be registered as the chief compliance officer of a registered firm within 3 months after this Instrument comes into force and the individual was identified on the National Registration Database as the firm's compliance officer in a jurisdiction of Canada on the date this Instrument came into force, the following sections do not apply in respect of the individual so long as he or she remains registered as the firm's chief compliance officer:
(a) section 3.6 [mutual fund dealer -- chief compliance officer], if the registered firm is a mutual fund dealer;
(b) section 3.8 [scholarship plan dealer -- chief compliance officer], if the registered firm is a scholarship plan dealer;
(c) section 3.10 [exempt market dealer -- chief compliance officer], if the registered firm is an exempt market dealer;
(d) section 3.13 [portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer], if the registered firm is a portfolio manager.
(3) [lapsed]
(4) [lapsed]
16.10 Proficiency for dealing and advising representatives
If an individual is registered in a jurisdiction of Canada as a dealing or advising representative in a category referred to in a section of Division 2 [education and experience requirements] of Part 3 on the day this Instrument comes into force, that section does not apply to the individual so long as the individual remains registered in the category.
16.11 [lapsed]
16.12 Continuation of existing discretionary relief
A person or company that was entitled to rely on an exemption, waiver or approval granted to it by a regulator or securities regulatory authority relating to a requirement under securities legislation or securities directions existing immediately before this Instrument came into force is exempt from any substantially similar provision of this Instrument to the same extent and on the same conditions, if any, as contained in the exemption, waiver or approval.
16.13 [lapsed]
16.14 [lapsed]
16.15 [lapsed]
16.16 [lapsed]
16.17 [lapsed]
16.18 [lapsed]
16.19 [lapsed]
16.20 [lapsed]
Part 17 When this Instrument comes into force
17.1 Effective date
(1) Except in Ontario, this Instrument comes into force on September 28, 2009.
(2) In Ontario, this Instrument comes into force on the later of the following:
(a) September 28, 2009;
(b) the day on which sections 4, 5 and subsections 20(1) to (11) of Schedule 26 of the Budget Measures Act, 2009 are proclaimed in force.
FORM 31-103F1 CALCULATION OF EXCESS WORKING CAPITAL
______________________________
Firm Name
Capital Calculation
(as at __________ with comparative figures as at __________)
|
Component |
Current period |
Prior period |
|
|||
1. |
Current assets |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
2. |
Less current assets not readily convertible into cash (e.g., prepaid expenses) |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
3. |
Adjusted current assets Line 1 minus line 2 = |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
4. |
Current liabilities |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
5. |
Add 100% of non-current related party debt unless the firm and the lender have executed a subordination agreement in the form set out in Appendix B of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations and the firm has delivered a copy of the agreement to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority. See section 12.2 of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
6. |
Adjusted current liabilities Line 4 plus line 5 = |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
7. |
Adjusted working capital Line 3 minus line 6 = |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
8. |
Less minimum capital |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
9. |
Less market risk |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
10. |
Less any deductible under the bonding or insurance policy required under Part 12 of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations or, in Québec, for a firm registered only in that jurisdiction and solely in the category of mutual fund dealer, less the deductible under the liability insurance required under section 193 of the Québec Securities Regulation |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
11. |
Less Guarantees |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
12. |
Less unresolved differences |
__________ |
__________ |
|
|||
13. |
Excess working capital |
__________ |
__________ |
Notes:
Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital must be prepared using the accounting principles that you use to prepare your financial statements in accordance with National Instrument 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards. Section 12.1 of Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations provides further guidance in respect of these accounting principles.
Line 5. Related-party debt -- Refer to the CICA Handbook for the definition of "related party" for publicly accountable enterprises. The firm is required to deliver a copy of the executed subordination agreement to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority on the earlier of a) 10 days after the date the agreement is executed or b) the date an amount subordinated by the agreement is excluded from its calculation of excess working capital on Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital. The firm must notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, 10 days before it repays the loan (in whole or in part), or terminates the subordination agreement. See section 12.2 of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations.
Line 8. Minimum Capital -- The amount on this line must be not less than (a) $25,000 for an adviser and (b) $50,000 for a dealer. For an investment fund manager, the amount must be not less than $100,000 unless subsection 12.1(4) of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations applies.
Line 9. Market Risk -- The amount on this line must be calculated according to the instructions set out in Schedule 1 to Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital. A schedule supporting the calculation of any amounts included in Line 9 as market risk should be provided to the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority in conjunction with the submission of Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital.
Line 11. Guarantees -- If the registered firm is guaranteeing the liability of another party, the total amount of the guarantee must be included in the capital calculation. If the amount of a guarantee is included in the firm's statement of financial position as a current liability and is reflected in line 4, do not include the amount of the guarantee on line 11.
Line 12. Unresolved differences -- Any unresolved differences that could result in a loss from either firm or client assets must be included in the capital calculation. The examples below provide guidance as to how to calculate unresolved differences:
(i) If there is an unresolved difference relating to client securities, the amount to be reported on Line 12 will be equal to the fair value of the client securities that are short, plus the applicable margin rate for those securities.
(ii) If there is an unresolved difference relating to the registrant's investments, the amount to be reported on Line 12 will be equal to the fair value of the investments (securities) that are short.
(iii) If there is an unresolved difference relating to cash, the amount to be reported on Line 12 will be equal to the amount of the shortfall in cash.
Please refer to section 12.1 of Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations for further guidance on how to prepare and file Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Management Certification
Registered Firm Name: _______________
We have examined the attached capital calculation and certify that the firm is in compliance with the capital requirements as at
______________________________.
Name and Title |
Signature |
Date |
|
||
1. __________ |
__________ |
__________ |
|
||
__________ |
|
|
|
||
2. __________ |
__________ |
__________ |
|
||
__________ |
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Schedule 1 of Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital (calculating line 9 [market risk])
For purposes of completing this form:
(1) "Fair value" means the value of a security determined in accordance with Canadian GAAP applicable to publicly accountable enterprises.
(2) For each security whose value is included in line 1, Current Assets, multiply the fair value of the security by the margin rate for that security set out below. Add up the resulting amounts for all of the securities you hold. The total is the "market risk" to be entered on line 9.
(a) Bonds, Debentures, Treasury Bills and Notes
(i) Bonds, debentures, treasury bills and other securities of or guaranteed by the Government of Canada, of the United Kingdom, of the United States of America and of any other national foreign government (provided such foreign government securities are currently rated Aaa or AAA, or the short-term ratings equivalent of either of those ratings, by a designated rating organization or its DRO affiliate), maturing (or called for redemption):
within 1 year:
1% of fair value multiplied by the fraction determined by dividing the number of days to maturity by 365
over 1 year to 3 years:
1 % of fair value
over 3 years to 7 years:
2% of fair value
over 7 years to 11 years:
4% of fair value
over 11 years:
4% of fair value
(ii) Bonds, debentures, treasury bills and other securities of or guaranteed by any jurisdiction of Canada and obligations of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, maturing (or called for redemption):
within 1 year:
2% of fair value multiplied by the fraction determined by dividing the number of days to maturity by 365
over 1 year to 3 years:
3 % of fair value
over 3 years to 7 years:
4% of fair value
over 7 years to 11 years:
5% of fair value
over 11 years:
5% of fair value
(iii) Bonds, debentures or notes (not in default) of or guaranteed by any municipal corporation in Canada or the United Kingdom maturing:
within 1 year:
3% of fair value multiplied by the fraction determined by dividing the number of days to maturity by 365
over 1 year to 3 years:
5 % of fair value
over 3 years to 7 years:
5% of fair value
over 7 years to 11 years:
5% of fair value
over 11 years:
5% of fair value
(iv) Other non-commercial bonds and debentures, (not in default): 10% of fair value
(v) Commercial and corporate bonds, debentures and notes (not in default) and non-negotiable and non-transferable trust company and mortgage loan company obligations registered in the registered firm's name maturing:
within 1 year:
3% of fair value
over 1 year to 3 years:
6 % of fair value
over 3 years to 7 years:
7% of fair value
over 7 years to 11 years:
10% of fair value
over 11 years:
10% of fair value
(b) Bank Paper
Deposit certificates, promissory notes or debentures issued by a Canadian chartered bank (and of Canadian chartered bank acceptances) maturing:
within 1 year:
2% of fair value multiplied by the fraction determined by dividing the number of days to maturity by 365
over 1 year:
apply rates for commercial and corporate bonds, debentures and notes
(c) Acceptable foreign bank paper
Deposit certificates, promissory notes or debentures issued by a foreign bank, readily negotiable and transferable and maturing:
within 1 year:
2% of fair value multiplied by the fraction determined by dividing the number of days to maturity by 365
over 1 year:
apply rates for commercial and corporate bonds, debentures and notes
"Acceptable Foreign Bank Paper" consists of deposit certificates or promissory notes issued by a bank other than a Canadian chartered bank with a net worth (i.e., capital plus reserves) of not less than $200,000,000.
(d) Mutual Funds
Securities of mutual funds qualified by prospectus for sale in any jurisdiction of Canada:
(i) 5% of the net asset value per security as determined in accordance with National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure, where the fund is a money market mutual fund as defined in National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds; or
(ii) the margin rate determined on the same basis as for listed stocks multiplied by the net asset value per security of the fund as determined in accordance with National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure.
Securities of mutual funds qualified by prospectus for sale in the United States of America: 5% of the net asset value per security if the fund is registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended from time to time, and complies with Rule 2a-7 thereof.
(e) Stocks
In this paragraph, "securities" includes rights and warrants and does not include bonds and debentures.
(i) On securities including investment fund securities, rights and warrants, listed on any exchange in Canada or the United States of America:
Long Positions -- Margin Required
Securities selling at $2.00 or more -- 50% of fair value
Securities selling at $1.75 to $1.99 -- 60% of fair value
Securities selling at $1.50 to $1.74 -- 80% of fair value
Securities selling under $1.50 -- 100% of fair value
Short Positions -- Credit Required
Securities selling at $2.00 or more -- 150% of fair value
Securities selling at $1.50 to $1.99 -- $3.00 per share
Securities selling at $0.25 to $1.49 -- 200% of fair value
Securities selling at less than $0.25 -- fair value plus $0.25 per share
(ii) For positions in securities that are constituent securities on a major broadly-based index of one of the following exchanges, 50% of the fair value:
(a) Australian Stock Exchange Limited
(b) Bolsa de Madrid
(c) Borsa Italiana
(d) Copenhagen Stock Exchange
(e) Euronext Amsterdam
(f) Euronext Brussels
(g) Euronext Paris S.A.
(h) Frankfurt Stock Exchange
(i) London Stock Exchange
(j) New Zealand Exchange Limited
(k) Stockholm Stock Exchange
(l) SIX Swiss Exchange
(m) The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited
(n) Tokyo Stock Exchange
(f) Mortgages
(i) For a firm registered in any jurisdiction of Canada except Ontario:
(a) Insured mortgages (not in default): 6% of fair value
(b) Mortgages which are not insured (not in default): 12% of fair value.
(ii) For a firm registered in Ontario:
(a) Mortgages insured under the National Housing Act (Canada) (not in default): 6% of fair value
(b) Conventional first mortgages (not in default): 12% of fair value.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you are registered in Ontario regardless of whether you are also registered in another jurisdiction of Canada, you will need to apply the margin rates set forth in (ii) above.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(g) For all other securities -- 100% of fair value.
FORM 31-103F2 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENT FOR SERVICE (sections 8.18 [international dealer] and 8.26 [international adviser])
1. Name of person or company ("International Firm"):
2. If the International Firm was previously assigned an NRD number as a registered firm or an unregistered exempt international firm, provide the NRD number of the firm.
3. Jurisdiction of incorporation of the International Firm:
4. Head office address of the International Firm:
5. The name, e-mail address, phone number and fax number of the International Firm's chief compliance officer.
Name:
E-mail address:
Phone:
Fax:
6. Section of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations the International Firm is relying on:
[ ] Section 8.18 [international dealer]
[ ] Section 8.26 [international adviser]
[ ] Other
7. Name of agent for service of process (the "Agent for Service"):
8. Address for service of process on the Agent for Service:
9. The International Firm designates and appoints the Agent for Service at the address stated above as its agent upon whom may be served a notice, pleading, subpoena, summons or other process in any action, investigation or administrative, criminal, quasi-criminal or other proceeding (a "Proceeding") arising out of or relating to or concerning the International Firm's activities in the local jurisdiction and irrevocably waives any right to raise as a defence in any such proceeding any alleged lack of jurisdiction to bring such Proceeding.
10. The International Firm irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the judicial, quasi-judicial and administrative tribunals of the local jurisdiction in any Proceeding arising out of or related to or concerning the International Firm's activities in the local jurisdiction.
11. Until 6 years after the International Firm ceases to rely on section 8.18 [international dealer] or section 8.26 [international adviser], the International Firm must submit to the securities regulatory authority
a. a new Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service in this form no later than the 30th day before the date this Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service is terminated; and
b. an amended Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service no later than the 30th day before any change in the name or above address of the Agent for Service.
12. This Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the local jurisdiction.
Dated: ____________________
______________________________
(Signature of the International Firm or authorized signatory)
______________________________
(Name and Title of authorized signatory)
Acceptance
The undersigned accepts the appointment as Agent for Service of (Insert name of International Firm) under the terms and conditions of the foregoing Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service.
Dated: ____________________
______________________________
(Signature of Agent for Service or authorized signatory)
______________________________
(Name and Title of authorized signatory)
FORM 31-103F3 USE OF MOBILITY EXEMPTION (section 2.2 [client mobility exemption -- individuals])
This is to notify the securities regulatory authority that the individual named in paragraph 1 is relying on the exemption in section 2.2 [client mobility exemption -- individuals] of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations.
1. Individual information
Name of individual: ____________________
NRD number of individual: _______________
The individual is relying on the client mobility exemption in each of the following jurisdictions of Canada:
______________________________
______________________________
2. Firm information
Name of the individual's sponsoring firm: ____________________
NRD number of firm: ____________________
Dated: ____________________
______________________________
(Signature of an authorized signatory of the individual's sponsoring firm)
______________________________
(Name and title of authorized signatory)
FORM 31-103F4 NET ASSET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS (Section 12.14 [delivering financial information -- investment fund manager])
This is to notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, of a net asset value (NAV) adjustment made in respect of an investment fund managed by the investment fund manager in accordance with paragraph 12.14(1)(c) or paragraph 12.14(2)(c). All of the information requested should be provided on a fund by fund basis. Please attach a schedule if necessary.
1. Name of the investment fund manager:
2. Name of each of the investment funds for which a NAV adjustment occurred:
3. Date(s) the NAV error occurred:
4. Date the NAV error was discovered:
5. Date of the NAV adjustment:
6. Original total NAV on the date the NAV error first occurred:
7. Original NAV per unit on each date(s) the NAV error occurred:
8. Revised NAV per unit on each date(s) the NAV error occurred:
9. NAV error as percentage (%) of the original NAV on each date(s) the NAV error occurred:
10. Total dollar amount of the NAV adjustment:
11. Effect (if any) of the NAV adjustment per unit or share:
12. Total amount reimbursed to security holders, or any corrections made to purchase and redemption transactions affecting the security holders of each investment fund affected, if any:
13. Date of the NAV reimbursement or correction to security holder transactions, if any:
14. Total amount reimbursed to investment fund, if any:
15. Date of the reimbursement to investment fund, if any:
16. Description of the cause of the NAV error:
17. Was the NAV error discovered by the investment fund manager?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
18. If No, who discovered the NAV error?
19. Was the NAV adjustment a result of a material error under the investment fund manager's policies and procedures? :
Yes [ ] No [ ]
20. Have the investment fund manager's policies and procedures been changed following the NAV adjustment?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
21. If Yes, describe the changes:
22. If No, explain why not:
23. Has the NAV adjustment been communicated to security holders of each of the investment funds affected?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
24. If Yes, describe the communications:
Notes:
Line 2. NAV adjustment -- Refers to the correction made to make the investment fund's NAV accurate.
Line 3. NAV error -- Refers to the error discovered on the Original NAV. Please refer to Section 12.14 of Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations for guidance on NAV error and causes of NAV errors.
Line 3. Date(s) the NAV error occurred -- Means the date of the NAV error first occurred and the subsequent dates of the NAV error.
Line 8. Revised NAV per unit -- Refers to the NAV per unit calculated after taking into account the NAV error.
Line 9. NAV error as a percentage (%) of the original NAV -- Refers to the following calculation:
(Revised NAV / Original NAV) -- 1 × 100
APPENDIX A -- BONDING AND INSURANCE CLAUSES (section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer], section 12.4 [insurance -- adviser] and section 12.5 [insurance -- investment fund manager])
Clause |
Name of Clause |
Details |
|
||
A |
Fidelity |
This clause insures against any loss through dishonest or fraudulent act of employees. |
|
||
B |
On Premises |
This clause insures against any loss of money and securities or other property through robbery, burglary, theft, hold-up, or other fraudulent means, mysterious disappearance, damage or destruction while within any of the insured's offices, the offices of any banking institution or clearing house or within any recognized place of safe-deposit. |
|
||
C |
In Transit |
This clause insures against any loss of money and securities or other property through robbery, burglary, theft, hold-up, misplacement, mysterious disappearance, damage or destruction, while in transit in the custody of any employee or any person acting as messenger except while in the mail or with a carrier for hire other than an armoured motor vehicle company. |
|
||
D |
Forgery or Alterations |
This clause insures against any loss through forgery or alteration of any cheques, drafts, promissory notes or other written orders or directions to pay sums in money, excluding securities. |
|
||
E |
Securities |
This clause insures against any loss through having purchased or acquired, sold or delivered, or extended any credit or acted upon securities or other written instruments which prove to have been forged, counterfeited, raised or altered, or lost or stolen, or through having guaranteed in writing or witnessed any signatures upon any transfers, assignments or other documents or written instruments. |
APPENDIX B -- SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT (Line 5 of Form 31-103F1 Calculation of excess working capital)
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the ___ day of __________, 20___
BETWEEN:
[insert name]
(the "Lender")
AND
[insert name]
(the "Registered Firm", which term shall include all successors and assigns of the Registered Firm)
(collectively, the "Parties")
This Agreement is entered into by the Parties under National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations ("NI 31-103") in connection with a loan made on the ____day of ________, 20__ by the Lender to the Registered Firm in the amount of $ _________________(the "Loan") for the purpose of allowing the Registered Firm to carry on its business.
For good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Subordination
The repayment of the loan and all amounts owed thereunder are subordinate to the claims of the other creditors of the Registered Firm.
2. Dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, insolvency or bankruptcy of the Registered Firm
In the event of the dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, insolvency or bankruptcy of the Registered Firm:
(a) the creditors of the Registered Firm shall be paid their existing claims in full in priority to the claims of the Lender;
(b) the Lender shall not be entitled to make any claim upon any property belonging or having belonged to the Registered Firm, including asserting the right to receive any payment in respect to the Loan, before the existing claims of the other creditors of the Registered Firm have been settled.
3. Terms and conditions of the Loan
During the term of this Agreement:
(a) interest can be paid at the agreed upon rate and time, provided that the payment of such interest does not result in a capital deficiency under NI 31-103;
(b) any loan or advance or posting of security for a loan or advance by the Registered Firm to the Lender, shall be deemed to be a payment on account of the Loan.
4. Notice to the Securities Regulatory Authority
The Registered Firm must notify the Securities Regulatory Authority 10 days before the full or partial repayment of the loan. Further documentation may be requested by the Securities Regulatory Authority after receiving the notice from the Registered Firm.
5. Termination of this Agreement
This Agreement may only be terminated by the Lender once the notice required pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement is received by the Securities Regulatory Authority.
The Parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date set out above.
[Registered Firm]
______________________________
Authorized signatory
______________________________
Authorized signatory
[Lender]
______________________________
Authorized signatory
______________________________
Authorized signatory
APPENDIX C
[lapsed]
APPENDIX D
[lapsed]
APPENDIX E
[lapsed]
APPENDIX F
[lapsed]
APPENDIX G -- EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR IIROC MEMBERS (Section 9.3 [exemptions from certain requirements for IIROC members])
NI 31-103 Provision |
|
IIROC Provision |
|
||
section 12.1 [capital requirements] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 17.1; and |
|
2. |
Form 1 |
|
||
section 12.2 [subordination agreement] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 5.2; and |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 5.2A |
|
||
section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 17.5 |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.2 [Financial Institution Bond]; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.4 [Amounts Required]; and |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.5 [Provisos with respect to Dealer Member Rules 400.2, 400.3 and 400.4] |
|
||
section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.7 [Global Financial Institution Bonds] |
|
||
section 12.7 [notifying the regulator of a change, claim or cancellation] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 17.6; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.3 [Notice of Termination]; and |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 400.3B [Termination or Cancellation] |
|
||
section 12.10 [annual financial statements] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 16.2 [Dealer Member Filing Requirements]; and |
|
2. |
Form 1 |
|
||
section 12.11 [interim financial information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 16.2 [Dealer Member Filing Requirements]; and |
|
2. |
Form 1 |
|
||
section 12.12 [delivering financial information -- dealer] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 16.2 [Dealer Member Filing Requirements] |
|
||
subsection 13.2(3) [know your client] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(a)-(n) [Identity and Creditworthiness]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.2; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 2500, Part II [Opening New Accounts]; |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 2700, Part II [New Account Documentation and Approval]; and |
|
5. |
Form 2 New Client Application Form |
|
||
section 13.3 [suitability <<determination>>] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(o) [Business Conduct]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(p) [Suitability determination required when accepting order]; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(q) [Suitability determination required when recommendation provided]; |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(r) [Suitability determination required for account positions held when certain events occur]; |
|
5. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(s) [Suitability of investments in client accounts]; |
|
6. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(t) -- (v) [Exemptions from the suitability assessment requirements] |
|
7. |
Dealer Member Rule 1300.1(w) [Corporation approval] |
|
8. |
Dealer Member Rule 2700, Part I [Customer Suitability]; and |
|
9. |
Dealer Member Rule 3200 [Minimum requirements for Dealer Members seeking approval under Rule 1300.1(t) to offer an order-execution only service] |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 29.26 |
|
||
section 13.15 [handling complaints] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 2500, Part VIII [Client Complaints]; and |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 2500B [Client Complaint Handling] |
|
||
subsection 14.2(2) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 3500.5 [Content of relationship disclosure] |
|
||
subsection 14.2(3) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 3500.4 [Format of relationship disclosure] |
|
||
subsection 14.2(4) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 3500.1 [Objective of relationship disclosure requirements] |
|
||
subsection 14.2(5.1) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 29.8 |
|
||
subsection 14.2(6) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 3500.1 [Objective of relationship disclosure requirements] |
|
||
section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 29.9 |
|
||
section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 17.2A [Establishment and maintenance of adequate internal controls in accordance with Dealer Member Rule 2600]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rules 17.3, 17.3A, 17.3B and 2000 [Segregation Requirements]; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 4 [Segregation of Clients' Securities]; |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 5 [Safekeeping of Clients' Securities]; |
|
5. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 6 [Safeguarding of Securities and Cash]; and |
|
6. |
Definition of "acceptable securities locations", General Notes and Definitions to Form 1 |
|
||
section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200 [Minimum Records] |
|
||
section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 17.3 |
|
||
section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rules 17.2, 17.2A, 17.3, 17.3A, 17.3B, 17.11 and 2000 [Segregation Requirements]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 100 [Margin Requirements]; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 2200 [Cash and Securities Loan Transactions]; |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 4 [Segregation of Clients' Securities]; |
|
5. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 5 [Safekeeping of Clients' Securities]; |
|
6. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 6 [Safeguarding of Securities and Cash]; and |
|
7. |
Definitions of "acceptable counterparties", "acceptable institutions", "acceptable securities locations", "regulated entities", General Notes and Definitions to Form 1 |
|
||
section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 100 [Margin Requirements]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 2200 [Cash and Securities Loan Transactions]; |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 2600 -- Internal Control Policy Statement 6 [Safeguarding of Securities and Cash]; and |
|
4. |
Definitions of "acceptable counterparties", "acceptable institutions", "acceptable securities locations", "regulated entities", General Notes and Definitions to Form 1 |
|
||
section 14.8 [securities subject to a safekeeping agreement] -- [repealed] |
|
|
|
||
section 14.9 [securities not subject to a safekeeping agreement] -- [repealed] |
|
|
|
||
section 14.11.1 [determining market value] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.1(c); and |
|
2. |
Definition (g) of the General Notes and Definitions to Form 1 |
|
||
section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(l) [Trade confirmations] |
|
||
section 14.14 [account statements] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(d) [Client account statements]; and |
|
2. |
"Guide to Interpretation of Rule 200.2", Item (d) |
|
||
section 14.14.1 [additional statements] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(e) [Report on client positions held outside of the Dealer Member]; |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.4 [Timing of sending documents to clients]; and |
|
3. |
"Guide to Interpretation of Rule 200.2", Item (e) |
|
||
section 14.14.2 [security position cost information] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.1(a); |
|
2. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.1(b); |
|
3. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.1(e); |
|
4. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(d)(ii)(F) and (H); and |
|
5. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(e)(ii)(C) and (E) |
|
||
section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(g) [Fee/ charge report]; and |
|
2. |
"Guide to Interpretation of Rule 200.2", Item (g) |
|
||
section 14.18 [investment performance report] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(f) [Performance report]; and |
|
2. |
"Guide to Interpretation of Rule 200.2", Item (f) |
|
||
section 14.19 [content of investment performance report] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.2(f) [Performance report]; and |
|
2. |
"Guide to Interpretation of Rule 200.2", Item (f) |
|
||
section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report] |
1. |
Dealer Member Rule 200.4 [Timing of the sending of documents to clients] |
APPENDIX H -- EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR MFDA MEMBERS (Section 9.4 [exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members])
NI 31-103 Provision |
|
MFDA Provision |
|
||
section 12.1 [capital requirements] |
1. |
Rule 3.1.1 [Minimum Levels]; |
|
2. |
Rule 3.1.2 [Notice]; |
|
3. |
Rule 3.2.2 [Member Capital]; |
|
4. |
Form 1; and |
|
5. |
Policy No. 4 [Internal Control Policy Statements -- Policy Statement 2: Capital Adequacy] |
|
||
section 12.2 [subordination agreement] |
1. |
Form 1, Statement F [Statement of Changes in Subordinated Loans]; and |
|
2. |
Membership Application Package -- Schedule I (Subordinated Loan Agreement) |
|
||
section 12.3 [insurance -- dealer] |
1. |
Rule 4.1 [Financial Institution Bond]; |
|
2. |
Rule 4.4 [Amounts Required]; |
|
3. |
Rule 4.5 [Provisos]; |
|
4. |
Rule 4.6 [Qualified Carriers]; and |
|
5. |
Policy No. 4 [Internal Control Policy Statements -- Policy Statement 3: Insurance] |
|
||
section 12.6 [global bonding or insurance] |
1. |
Rule 4.7 [Global Financial Institution Bonds] |
|
||
section 12.7 [notifying the regulator of a change, claim or cancellation] |
1. |
Rule 4.2 [Notice of Termination]; and |
|
2. |
Rule 4.3 [Termination or Cancellation] |
|
||
section 12.10 [annual financial statements] |
1. |
Rule 3.5.1 [Monthly and Annual]; |
|
2. |
Rule 3.5.2 [Combined Financial Statements]; and |
|
3. |
Form 1 |
|
||
section 12.11 [interim financial information] |
1. |
Rule 3.5.1 [Monthly and Annual]; |
|
2. |
Rule 3.5.2 [Combined Financial Statements]; and |
|
3. |
Form 1 |
|
||
section 12.12 [delivering financial information -- dealer] |
1. |
Rule 3.5.1 [Monthly and Annual] |
|
||
section 13.3 [suitability <<determination>>] |
1. |
Rule 2.2.1 ["Know-Your-Client"]; and |
|
2. |
Policy No. 2 [Minimum Standards for Account Supervision] |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
section 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money] |
1. |
Rule 2.6 [Borrowing for Securities Purchases] |
|
||
section 13.15 [handling complaints] |
1. |
Rule 2.11 [Complaints]; |
|
2. |
Policy No. 3 [Complaint Handling, Supervisory Investigations and Internal Discipline]; and |
|
3. |
Policy No. 6 [Information Reporting Requirements] |
|
||
subsections 14.2(2), (3) and (5.1) [relationship disclosure information] |
1. |
Rule 2.2.5 [Relationship Disclosure]; and |
|
2. |
Rule 2.4.3 [Operating Charges] |
|
||
section 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges] |
1. |
Rule 2.4.4 [Transaction Fees or Charges] |
|
||
section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement] |
1. |
Rule 3.3.1 [General]; |
|
2. |
Rule 3.3.2 [Cash]; |
|
3. |
Rule 3.3.3 [Securities]; and |
|
4. |
Policy No. 4 [Internal Control Policy Statements -- Policy Statement 4: Cash and Securities, and Policy Statement 5: Segregation of Clients' Securities] |
|
||
section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian] |
1. |
Policy No. 4 [Internal Control Policy Statements -- Policy Statement 4: Cash and Securities, and Policy Statement 5: Segregation of Clients' Securities] |
|
||
section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust] |
1. |
Rule 3.3.1 [General]; |
|
2. |
Rule 3.3.2 [Cash]; |
|
3. |
Rule 3.3.3 [Securities]; and |
|
4. |
Policy No. 4 [Internal Control Policy Statements -- Policy Statement 4: Cash and Securities, and Policy Statement 5: Segregation of Clients' Securities] |
|
||
section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests] |
1. |
Rule 3.2.1 [Client Lending and Margin] |
|
||
section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales] |
1. |
Rule 3.2.1 [Client Lending and Margin] |
|
||
section 14.8 [securities subject to a safekeeping agreement] -- [repealed] |
|
|
|
||
section 14.9 [securities not subject to a safekeeping agreement] -- [repealed] |
|
|
|
||
section 14.11.1 [determining market value] |
1. |
Rule 5.3(1)(f) [definition of "market value"]; and |
|
2. |
Definitions to Form 1 [definition of "market value of a security"] |
|
||
section 14.12 [content and delivery of trade confirmation] |
1. |
Rule 5.4.1 [Delivery of Confirmations]; |
|
2. |
Rule 5.4.2 [Automatic Plans]; and |
|
3. |
Rule 5.4.3 [Content] |
|
||
section 14.14 [account statements] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.1 [Delivery of Account Statement]; and |
|
2. |
Rule 5.3.2 [Content of Account Statement] |
|
||
section 14.14.1 [additional statements] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.1 [Delivery of Account Statement]; and |
|
2. |
Rule 5.3.2 [Content of Account Statement] |
|
||
section 14.14.2 [security position cost information] |
1. |
Rule 5.3(1)(a) [definition of "book cost"]; |
|
2. |
Rule 5.3(1)(c) [definition of "cost"]; and |
|
3. |
Rule 5.3.2(c) [Content of Account Statement -- Market Value and Cost Reporting] |
|
||
section 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.3 [Report on Charges and Other Compensation] |
|
||
section 14.18 [investment performance report] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.4 [Performance Report]; and |
|
2. |
Policy No. 7 Performance Reporting |
|
||
section 14.19 [content of investment performance report] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.4 [Performance Report]; and |
|
2. |
Policy No. 7 Performance Reporting |
|
||
section 14.20 [delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report] |
1. |
Rule 5.3.5 [Delivery of Report on Charges and Other Compensation and Performance Report] |
Annex C: Blackline Showing Changes to Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations under the Proposed Amendments
COMPANION POLICY 31-103 CP REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS
Table of Contents
Companion Policy 31-103CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations |
Part 1 Definitions and fundamental concepts |
|
|
||
|
1.1 |
Introduction |
|
1.2 |
Definitions |
|
1.3 |
Fundamental concepts |
|
||
Individual registration |
Part 2 Categories of registration for individuals |
|
|
||
|
2.1 |
Individual categories |
|
2.2 |
Client mobility exemption -- individuals |
|
||
|
Part 3 Registration requirements -- individuals |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 General proficiency requirements |
|
|
3.3 |
Time limits on examination requirements |
|
Division 2 Education and experience requirements |
|
|
3.4 |
Proficiency -- initial and ongoing |
|
<<3.4.1>> |
<<Firm's obligation to provide training>> |
|
3.11 |
Portfolio manager -- advising representative |
|
3.12 |
Portfolio manager -- associate advising representative |
|
Division 3 Membership in |
|
|
3.16 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for SRO<<->>approved persons |
|
||
|
Part 4 Restrictions on registered individuals |
|
|
||
|
4.1 |
Restriction on acting for another registered firm |
|
4.2 |
Associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice |
|
||
|
Part 5 Ultimate designated person and chief compliance officer |
|
|
||
|
5.1 |
Responsibilities of the ultimate designated person |
|
5.2 |
Responsibilities of the chief compliance officer |
|
||
|
Part 6 Suspension and revocation of registration -- individuals |
|
|
||
|
6.1 |
If individual ceases to have authority to act for firm |
|
6.2 |
If IIROC approval is revoked or suspended |
|
6.3 |
If MFDA approval is revoked or suspended |
|
6.6 |
Revocation of a suspended registration -- individual |
|
||
Firm registration |
Part 7 Categories of registration for firms |
|
|
||
|
7.1 |
Dealer categories |
|
7.2 |
Adviser categories |
|
7.3 |
Investment fund manager category |
|
||
|
Part 8 Exemptions from the requirement to register |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 Exemptions from dealer and underwriter registration |
|
|
8.5 |
Trades through or to a registered dealer |
|
8.5.1 |
Trades through a registered dealer by registered adviser |
|
8.6 |
Investment fund trades by adviser to managed account |
|
8.18 |
International dealer |
|
8.19 |
Self-directed registered education savings plan |
|
<<8.22.1>> |
<<Short-term debt>> |
|
Division 2 Exemptions from adviser registration |
|
|
|
|
|
8.24 |
IIROC members with discretionary authority |
|
8.25 |
Advising generally |
|
8.26 |
International adviser |
|
8.26.1 |
International sub-adviser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division 4 Mobility exemption -- firms |
|
|
8.30 |
Client mobility exemption -- firms |
|
||
|
Part 9 Membership in |
|
|
||
|
9.3 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for IIROC members |
|
9.4 |
Exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members |
|
||
|
Part 10 Suspension and revocation of registration -- firms |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 When a firm's registration is suspended |
|
|
10.1 |
Failure to pay fees |
|
10.2 |
If IIROC membership is revoked or suspended |
|
10.3 |
If MFDA membership is revoked or suspended |
|
Division 2 Revoking a firm's registration |
|
|
10.5 |
Revocation of a suspended registration -- firm |
|
10.6 |
Exception for firms involved in a hearing or proceeding |
|
||
Business operations |
Part 11 Internal controls and systems |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 Compliance |
|
|
11.1 |
Compliance system |
|
11.2 |
Designating an ultimate designated person |
|
11.3 |
Designating a chief compliance officer |
|
Division 2 Books and records |
|
|
11.5 |
General requirements for records |
|
11.6 |
Form, accessibility and retention of records |
|
Division 3 Certain business transactions |
|
|
11.8 |
Tied selling |
|
11.9 |
Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets |
|
11.10 |
Registered firm whose securities are acquired |
|
||
|
Part 12 Financial condition |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 Working capital |
|
|
12.1 |
Capital requirements |
|
12.2 |
Subordination agreement |
|
Division 2 Insurance |
|
|
12.4 |
Insurance -- adviser |
|
12.6 |
Global bonding or insurance |
|
Division 4 Financial reporting |
|
|
12.10 |
Annual financial statements |
|
12.11 |
Interim financial information |
|
12.14 |
Delivering financial information -- investment fund manager |
|
||
Client relationships |
Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 Know your client<<, know your product>> and suitability <<determination>> |
|
|
13.2 |
Know your client |
|
<<13.2.1>> |
<<Know your product>> |
|
13.3 |
Suitability <<determination>> |
|
Division 2 Conflicts of interest |
|
|
|
|
|
<<13.4.1>> |
<<A registered firm's responsibility to identify>> conflicts of interest |
|
<<13.4.2>> |
<<A registered individual's responsibility to identify conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.3>> |
<<A registered firm's responsibility to address conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.4>> |
<<A registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest>> |
|
<<13.4.5>> |
<<Conflicts of interest disclosure>> |
|
13.5 |
Restrictions on certain managed account transactions |
|
13.6 |
Disclosure when recommending related or connected securities |
|
Division 3 Referral arrangements |
|
|
13.7 |
Definitions -- referral arrangements |
|
13.8 |
Permitted referral arrangements |
|
<<13.8.1>> |
<<Limitation on referral fees>> |
|
13.9 |
Verifying the qualifications of the person or company receiving the referral |
|
13.10 |
Disclosing referral arrangements to clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division 5 Complaints |
|
|
<<13.14>> |
<<Application of this Division>> |
|
13.15 |
Handling complaints |
|
13.16 |
Dispute resolution service |
|
Division 6 Registered sub-advisers |
|
|
13.17 |
Exemption from certain requirements for registered sub-advisers |
|
<<Division 7 Misleading communications>> |
|
|
<<13.18>> |
<<Misleading communications>> |
|
||
|
Part 14 Handling client accounts -- firms |
|
|
||
|
Division 1 Investment fund managers |
|
|
<<Division 1.1 Publicly available information>> |
|
|
Division 2 Disclosure to clients |
|
|
14.2 |
Relationship disclosure information |
|
14.2.1 |
Pre-trade disclosure of charges |
|
14.4 |
When the firm has a relationship with a financial institution |
|
Division 3 Client assets and investment fund assets |
|
|
14.5.2 |
Restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement |
|
14.5.3 |
Cash and securities held by a qualified custodian |
|
14.6 |
Client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust |
|
14.6.1 |
Custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests |
|
14.6.2 |
Custodial provisions relating to short sales |
|
Division 4 Client accounts |
|
|
14.10 |
Allocating investment opportunities fairly |
|
Division 5 Reporting to clients |
|
|
14.11.1 |
Determining market value |
|
14.12 |
Content and delivery of trade confirmation |
|
14.14 |
Account statements |
|
14.14.1 |
Additional statements |
|
14.14.2 |
Security position cost information |
|
14.15 |
Security holder statements |
|
14.16 |
Scholarship plan dealer statements |
|
14.17 |
Report on charges and other compensation |
|
14.18 |
Investment performance report |
|
14.19 |
Content of investment performance report |
|
14.20 |
Delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report |
|
||
Appendices |
Appendix A -- Contact information |
|
|
||
|
Appendix B -- Terms not defined in NI 31-103 or this Companion Policy |
|
|
||
|
Appendix C -- Proficiency requirements for individuals acting on behalf of a registered firm |
|
|
||
|
Appendix D |
|
|
||
|
Appendix E |
|
|
||
|
Appendix F -- Part 14 Client reporting requirements and sole EMDs |
COMPANION POLICY 31-103 CP REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS
Part 1 Definitions and fundamental concepts
1.1 Introduction
Purpose of this Companion Policy
This Companion Policy sets out how the Canadian Securities Administrators (the CSA or we) interpret or apply the provisions of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103) and related securities legislation.
Numbering system
Except for Part 1, the numbering of Parts, Divisions and sections in this Companion Policy corresponds to the numbering in NI 31-103. Any general guidance for a Part or a Division appears immediately after the Part or Division name. Any specific guidance on sections in NI 31-103 follows any general guidance. If there is no guidance for a Part, Division or section, the numbering in this Companion Policy will skip to the next provision that does have guidance.
All references in this Companion Policy to sections, Parts and Divisions are to NI 31-103, unless otherwise noted.
Additional requirements applicable to registrants
For additional requirements that may apply to them, registrants should refer to:
• National Instrument 31-102 National Registration Database (NI 31-102) and the Companion Policy to NI 31-102
• National Instrument 33-109 Registration Information (NI 33-109) and the Companion Policy to NI 33-109
• National Policy 11-204 Process for Registration in Multiple Jurisdictions (NP 11-204), and
• securities and derivatives legislation in their jurisdiction
Registrants that are members of a self-regulatory organization (SRO)an SRO must also comply with their SRO's requirements.
Disclosure and notices
Delivering disclosure and notices to the principal regulator
Under section 1.3, registrants must deliver all disclosure and notices required under NI 31-103 to the registrant's principal regulator. This does not apply to notices under sections 8.18 [international dealer] and 8.26 [international adviser]. Registrants must deliver these notices to the regulator in each jurisdiction where they are registered or relying on an exemption from registration.
Electronic delivery of documents
These documents may be delivered electronically. Registrants should refer to National Policy 11-201 Electronic Delivery of Documents (NP 11-102201).
See Appendix A for contact information for each regulator.
Clear and meaningful disclosure to clients
We expect registrants to present disclosure information to clients in a clear and meaningful manner in order to ensure clients understand the information presented. Registrants should ensure that investors can readily understand the information. These requirements are consistent with the obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with clients.
1.2 Definitions
Unless defined in NI 31-103, terms used in NI 31-103 and in this Companion Policy have the meaning given to them in the securities legislation of each jurisdiction or in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions. See Appendix B for a list of some terms that are not defined in NI 31-103 or this Companion Policy but are defined in other securities legislation.
In this Companion Policy "regulator" means the regulator or securities regulatory authority in a jurisdiction.
Permitted client
The following discussion provides guidance on the term "permitted client", which is defined in section 1.1.
"Permitted client" is used in the following sections:
• 8.18 [international dealer]
• 8.22.1 [short-term debt]
• 8.26 [international adviser]
• 13.2 [know your client]
• 13.3 [suitability determination]
• 13.13 [disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money]
• 14.2 [relationship disclosure information]
• 14.2.1 [pre-trade disclosure of charges]
• 14.4 [when the firm has a relationship with a financial institution]
• 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement]
• 14.14.1 [additional statements]
• 14.14.2 [security position cost information]
• 14.17 [report on charges and other compensation]
• 14.18 [investment performance report]
Exemptions from registration when dealing with permitted clients
Sections 8.18 and 8.26 exempt international dealers and international advisers from the registration requirement if they deal with certain permitted clients and meet certain other conditions.
Section 8.22.1 exempts certain financial institutions from the dealer registration requirement when dealing in a short-term debt instrument with permitted clients.
Exemptions from other requirements when dealing with permitted clients
Under section 13.3, permitted clients may waive their right to have a registrant determine that a trade is suitable. In order to rely on this exemption, the registrant must determine that a client is a permitted client at the time the client waives their right to suitability.
Under sections 13.13 and 14.4, registrants do not have to provide certain disclosures to permitted clients. In order to rely on these exemptions, registrants must determine that a client is a permitted client at the time the client opens an account.
Under sections 14.2, 14.2.1, 14.14.1, 14.14.2, 14.17 and 14.18, registrants do not have to provide certain disclosures or reports to a permitted client that is not an individual.
Under paragraph 14.5.2(7)(d), registered firms are not required to ensure that cash or securities of permitted clients, that are not individuals or investment funds, are held with a qualified custodian if the permitted client has acknowledged in writing that the permitted client is aware that this qualified custodian requirement will not apply to the firm. In order to rely on this exemption, we expect registered firms to determine that the client is a permitted client that is not an individual or investment fund at the time the client acknowledges that its right to a qualified custodian will not apply.
Determining assets
The definition of permitted client includes monetary thresholds based on the value of the client's assets. The monetary thresholds in paragraphs (o) and (q) of the definition are intended to create "bright-line" standards. Investors who do not satisfy these thresholds do not qualify as permitted clients under the applicable paragraph.
Paragraph (o) of the definition
Paragraph (o) refers to an individual who beneficially owns financial assets with an aggregate realizable value that exceeds $5 million, before taxes but net of any related liabilities.
In general, determining whether financial assets are beneficially owned by an individual should be straightforward. However, this determination may be more difficult if financial assets are held in a trust or in other types of investment vehicles for the benefit of an individual.
Factors indicating beneficial ownership of financial assets include:
• possession of evidence of ownership of the financial asset
• entitlement to receive any income generated by the financial asset
• risk of loss of the value of the financial asset, and
• the ability to dispose of the financial asset or otherwise deal with it as the individual sees fit
For example, securities held in a self-directed RRSP for the sole benefit of an individual are beneficially owned by that individual. Securities held in a group RRSP are not beneficially owned if the individual cannot acquire and deal with the securities directly.
"Financial assets" is defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions (NI 45-106).
Realizable value is typically the amount that would be received by selling an asset.
Paragraph (q) of the definition
Paragraph (q) refers to a person or company that has net assets of at least $25 million, as shown on its last financial statements. "Net assets" under this paragraph is total assets minus total liabilities.
1.3 Fundamental concepts
This section describes the fundamental concepts that form the basis of the registration regime:
• requirement to register
• business trigger for trading and advising, and
• fitness for registration
A registered firm is responsible for the conduct of the individuals whose registration it sponsors. A registered firm
• must undertake due diligence before sponsoring an individual to be registered to act on its behalf (see further guidance in Part 4 Due diligence by firms of the Companion Policy to NI 33-109)
• has an ongoing obligation to monitor and supervise its registered individuals in an effective manner (see further guidance in section 11.1 of this Companion Policy)
Failure of a registered firm to take reasonable steps to discharge these responsibilities may be relevant to the firm's own continued fitness for registration.
Requirement to register
The requirement to register is found in securities legislation. Firms must register if they are:
• in the business of trading
• in the business of advising
• holding themselves out as being in the business of trading or advising
• acting as an underwriter, or
• acting as an investment fund manager
Individuals must register if they trade, underwrite or advise on behalf of a registered dealer or adviser, or act as the ultimate designated person (UDP) or chief compliance officer (CCO) of a registered firm. Except for the UDP and the CCO, individuals who act on behalf of a registered investment fund manager do not have to register.
However, all permitted individuals of any registrant must file Form 33-109F4 Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals (Form 33-109F4).
There is no renewal requirement for registration, but fees must be paid every year to maintain registration.
Multiple categories
Registration in more than one category may be necessary. For example, an adviser that also manages an investment fund may have to register as a portfolio manager and an investment fund manager. An adviser that manages a portfolio and distributes units of an investment fund may have to register as a portfolio manager and as a dealer.
Registration exemptions
NI 31-103 provides exemptions from the registration requirement. There may be additional exemptions in securities legislation. Some exemptions do not need to be applied for if the conditions of the exemption are met. In other cases, on receipt of an application, the regulator has discretion to grant exemptions for specified dealers, advisers or investment fund managers, or activities carried out by them if registration is required but specific circumstances indicate that it is not otherwise necessary for investor protection or market integrity.
Business trigger for trading and advising
We refer to trading or advising in securities for a business purpose as the "business trigger" for registration.
We look at the type of activity and whether it is carried out for a business purpose to determine if an individual or firm must register. We consider the factors set out below, among others, to determine if the activity is for a business purpose. For the most part, these factors are from case law and regulatory decisions that have interpreted the business purpose test for securities matters.
Factors in determining business purpose
This section describes factors that we consider relevant in determining whether an individual or firm is trading or advising in securities for a business purpose and, therefore, subject to the dealer or adviser registration requirement.
This is not a complete list. We do not automatically assume that any one of these factors on its own will determine whether an individual or firm is in the business of trading or advising in securities.
(a) Engaging in activities similar to a registrant
We usually consider an individual or firm engaging in activities similar to those of a registrant to be trading or advising for a business purpose. Examples include promoting securities or stating in any way that the individual or firm will buy or sell securities. If an individual or firm sets up a business to carry out any of these activities, we may consider them to be trading or advising for a business purpose.
(b) Intermediating trades or acting as a market maker
In general, we consider intermediating a trade between a seller and a buyer of securities to be trading for a business purpose. This typically takes the form of the business commonly referred to as a broker. Making a market in securities is also generally considered to be trading for a business purpose.
(c) Directly or indirectly carrying on the activity with repetition, regularity or continuity
Frequent or regular transactions are a common indicator that an individual or firm may be engaged in trading or advising for a business purpose. The activity does not have to be their sole or even primary endeavour for them to be in the business.
We consider regularly trading or advising in any way that produces, or is intended to produce, profits to be for a business purpose. We also consider any other sources of income and how much time an individual or firm spends on all activities associated with the trading or advising.
(d) Being, or expecting to be, remunerated or compensated
Receiving, or expecting to receive, any form of compensation for carrying on the activity, including whether the compensation is transaction or value based, indicates a business purpose. It does not matter if the individual or firm actually receives compensation or in what form. Having the capacity or the ability to carry on the activity to produce profit is also a relevant factor.
(e) Directly or indirectly soliciting
Contacting anyone to solicit securities transactions or to offer advice may reflect a business purpose. Solicitation includes contacting someone by any means, including advertising that proposes buying or selling securities or participating in a securities transaction, or that offers services or advice for these purposes.
Business trigger examples
This section explains how the business trigger might apply to some common situations.
(a) Securities issuers
A securities issuer is an entity that issues or trades in its own securities. In general, securities issuers with an active non-securities business do not have to register as a dealer if they:
• do not hold themselves out as being in the business of trading in securities
• trade in securities infrequently
• are not, or do not expect to be, compensated for trading in securities
• do not act as intermediaries, and
• do not produce, or intend to produce, a profit from trading in securities
During the start-up stage, securities issuers may not yet be actively carrying on their intended business. We consider a start-up securities issuer to have an "active non-securities business" if the entity is raising capital to start a non-securities business. Although the entity does not need to be producing a product or delivering a service, we would expect it to have a bona fide business plan to do so, containing milestones and the time anticipated to reach those milestones. For example, technology companies may raise money with only a business plan for many years before they start producing a product or delivering a service. Similarly, junior exploration companies may raise money with only a business plan long before they find or extract any resources.
However, securities issuers may have to register as dealers if they are in the business of trading. Conduct that would indicate that security issuers are in the business includes frequently trading in securities. While frequent trading is a common indicator of being in the business of trading, we recognize that trading may be more frequent during the start-up stage, as an issuer needs to raise capital to launch and advance the business. If the trading is primarily for the purpose of advancing the issuer's business plan, then the frequency of the activities alone should not result in the issuer being in the business of trading in securities. If the capital raising and use of that capital are not advancing the business, the issuer may need to register as a dealer.
Securities issuers may also have to register as a dealer if they
• employ or contract individuals to perform activities on their behalf that are similar to those performed by a registrant (other than underwriting in the normal course of a distribution or trading for their own account)
• actively solicit investors, subject to the discussion below, or
• act as an intermediary by investing client money in securities
For example, an investment fund manager that carries on the activities described above may have to register as a dealer.
Many issuers actively solicit through officers, directors or other employees. If these individuals' activities are incidental to their primary roles with an issuer, they would likely not be in the business of trading. Factors that would suggest that the issuer and these individuals are in the business of trading are:
• the principal purpose of the individual's employment is raising capital through distributions of the issuer's securities;
• the individuals spend the majority of their time raising capital in this manner;
• the individuals' compensation or remuneration is based solely or primarily on the amount of capital they raise for the issuer.
Securities issuers that are distributing securities are subject to the prospectus requirements unless an exemption is available. Regulators have the discretionary authority to require an underwriter for a prospectus distribution.
(b) Venture capital and private equity
This guidance does not apply to labour sponsored or venture capital funds as defined in National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure (NI 81-106).
Venture capital and private equity investing are distinguished from other forms of investing by the role played by venture capital and private equity management companies (collectively, VCs). This type of investing includes a range of activities that may require registration.
VCs typically raise money under one of the prospectus exemptions in NI 45-106, including for trades to "accredited investors". The investors typically agree that their money will remain invested for a period of time. The VC uses this money to invest in securities of companies that are usually not publicly traded. The VC usually becomes actively involved in the management of the company, often over several years.
Examples of active management in a company include the VC having:
• representation on the board of directors
• direct involvement in the appointment of managers
• a say in material management decisions
The VC looks to realize on the investment either through a public offering of the company's securities, or a sale of the business. At this point, the investors' money can be returned to them, along with any profit.
Investors rely on the VC's expertise in selecting and managing the companies it invests in. In return, the VC receives a management fee or "carried interest" in the profits generated from these investments. They do not receive compensation for raising capital or trading in securities.
Applying the business trigger factors to the VC activities as described above, there would be no requirement for the VC to register as:
• a portfolio manager, if the advice provided in connection with the purchase and sale of companies is incidental to the VC's active management of these companies, or
• a dealer, if both the raising of money from investors and the investing of that money by the VC (in securities of companies that are usually not publicly traded) are occasional and uncompensated activities
If the VC is actively involved in the management of the companies it invests in, the investment portfolio would generally not be considered an investment fund. As a result, the VC would not need to register as an investment fund manager.
The business trigger factors and investment fund manager analysis may apply differently if the VC engages in activities other than those described above.
(c) One-time activities
In general, we do not require registration for one-time trading or advising activities. This includes trading or advising that:
• is carried out by an individual or firm acting as a trustee, executor, administrator, personal or other legal representative, or
• relates to the sale of a business
(d) Incidental activities
If trading or advising activity is incidental to a firm's primary business, we may not consider it to be for a business purpose.
For example, merger and acquisition specialists that advise the parties to a transaction between companies are not normally required to register as dealers or advisers in connection with that activity, even though the transaction may result in trades in securities and they will be compensated for the advice. If the transaction results in trades in the securities of the company to an acquirer, this is considered incidental to the acquisition transaction. However, if the merger and acquisition specialists also engage in capital raising from prospective investors (including private placements), they will need to consider whether such activity would be in the business of trading and require registration.
Another example is professionals, such as lawyers, accountants, engineers, geologists and teachers, who may provide advice on securities in the normal course of their professional activities. We do not consider them to be advising on securities for a business purpose. For the most part, any advice on securities will be incidental to their professional activities. This is because they:
• do not regularly advise on securities
• are not compensated separately for advising on securities
• do not solicit clients on the basis of their securities advice, and
• do not hold themselves out as being in the business of advising on securities
Registration trigger for investment fund managers
Investment fund managers are subject to a registration trigger. This means that if a firm carries on the activities of an investment fund manager, it must register. However, investment fund managers are not subject to the business trigger.
Fitness for registration
The regulator will only register an applicant if they appear to be fit for registration. Following registration, individuals and firms must maintain their fitness in order to remain registered. If the regulator determines that a registrant has become unfit for registration, the regulator may suspend or revoke the registration. See Part 6 of this Companion Policy for guidance on suspension and revocation of individual registration. See Part 10 of this Companion Policy for guidance on suspension and revocation of firm registration.
Terms and conditions
The regulator may impose terms and conditions on a registration at the time of registration or at any time after registration. Terms and conditions imposed at the time of registration are generally permanent, for example, in the case of a restricted dealer who is limited to specific activities. Terms and conditions imposed after registration are generally temporary. For example, if a registrant does not maintain the required capital, it may have to file monthly financial statements and capital calculations until the regulator's concerns are addressed.
Opportunity to be heard
Applicants and registrants have an opportunity to be heard by the regulator before their application for registration is denied. They also have an opportunity to be heard before the regulator imposes terms and conditions on their registration if they disagree with the terms and conditions.
Assessing fitness for registration -- firms
We assess whether a firm is or remains fit for registration through the information it is required to provide on registration application forms and as a registrant, and through compliance reviews. Based on this information, we consider whether the firm is able to carry out its obligations under securities legislation. For example, registered firms must be financially viable. A firm that is insolvent or has a history of bankruptcy may not be fit for registration.
In addition, when determining whether a firm whose head office is outside Canada is, and remains, fit for registration, we will consider whether the firm maintains registration or regulatory organization membership in the foreign jurisdiction that is appropriate for the securities business it carries out there.
Assessing fitness for registration -- individuals
We use three fundamental criteria to assess whether an individual is or remains fit for registration:
• proficiency
• integrity, and
• solvency
(a) Proficiency
Individual applicants must meet the initial proficiency requirements by demonstrating that they have the applicable education, training and experience requirements prescribed by securities legislation and demonstrateas well as knowledge of securities legislation and the securities they recommend.Registered. Once registered, the individuals are required to know the securities that are available for them to purchase and sell for, or recommend to, clients as part of the know your product obligation. They should continually update their knowledge and training to keep pace with new securities, services and developments in the industry that are relevant to their business. Firms are required to provide training to their registered individuals.
See Part 3 and section 13.2.1 of this Companion Policy for more specific guidance on proficiency and on the know your product obligation.
(b) Integrity
Registered individuals must conduct themselves with integrity and have an honest character. The regulator will assess the integrity of individuals through the information they are required to provide on registration application forms and as registrants, and through compliance reviews. For example, applicants are required to disclose information about conflicts of interest, such as other employment or partnerships, service as a member of a board of directors, or relationships with affiliates, and about any regulatory or legal actions against them.
(c) Solvency
The regulator will assess the overall financial condition of an individual applicant or registrant. An individual that is insolvent or has a history of bankruptcy may not be fit for registration. Depending on the circumstances, the regulator may consider the individual's contingent liabilities. The regulator may take into account an individual's bankruptcy or insolvency when assessing their continuing fitness for registration.
Part 2 Categories of registration for individuals
2.1 Individual categories
Multiple individual categories
Individuals who carry on more than one activity requiring registration on behalf of a registered firm must:
• register in all applicable categories, and
• meet the proficiency requirements of each category
For example, an advising representative of a portfolio manager who is also the firm's CCO must register in the categories of advising representative and CCO. They must meet the proficiency requirements of both of these categories.
Individual registered in a firm category
An individual can be registered in both a firm and individual category. For example, a sole proprietor who is registered in the firm category of portfolio manager must also be registered in the individual category of advising representative.
2.2 Client mobility exemption -- individuals
Conditions of the exemption
The mobility exemption in section 2.2 allows registered individuals to continue dealing with and advising clients who move to another jurisdiction, without registering in that other jurisdiction. Section 8.30 [client mobility exemption -- firms] contains a similar exemption for registered firms.
The exemption becomes available when the client (not the registrant) moves to another jurisdiction. An individual may deal with up to five "eligible" clients in each other jurisdiction. Each of the client, their spouse and any children are an eligible client.
An individual may only rely on the exemption if:
• they and their sponsoring firm are registered in their principal jurisdiction
• they and their sponsoring firm only act as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the other jurisdiction as permitted under their registration in their principal jurisdiction
• they comply with Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms
• they act fairly, honestly and in good faith in their dealings with the eligible client, and
• their sponsoring firm has disclosed to the eligible client that the individual and if applicable, their sponsoring firm, are exempt from registration in the other jurisdiction and are not subject to the requirements of securities legislation in that jurisdiction
As soon as possible after an individual first relies on this exemption, their sponsoring firm must complete and file Form 31-103F3 Use of mobility exemption (Form 31-103F3) with the other jurisdiction.
Limits on the number of clients
Sections 2.2 and 8.30 are independent of each other: individuals may rely on the exemption from registration in section 2.2 even though their sponsoring firm is registered in the local jurisdiction (and is not relying on the exemption from registration in section 8.30). The limits in sections 2.2 and 8.30 are per jurisdiction.
For example a firm using the exemption in section 8.30 could have 10 clients in each of several local jurisdictions where it is not registered. An individual may also use the exemption in section 2.2 to have 5 clients in each of several jurisdictions where the individual is not registered.
The individual limits are per individual. For example several individuals working for the same firm could each have 5 clients in the same local jurisdiction and each individual could still rely on the exemption in section 2.2. However, the firm may not exceed its 10 client limit if it wants to rely on the exemption in section 8.30. If the firm exceeds the 10 client limit, the firm must be registered in the local jurisdiction.
Part 3 Registration requirements -- individuals
Division 1 General proficiency requirements
Application of proficiency requirements
Part 3 sets out the initial and ongoing proficiency requirements for
• dealing representatives and chief compliance officers of mutual fund dealers, scholarship plan dealers and exempt-market dealers respectively
• advising representatives, associate advising representatives and chief compliance officers of portfolio managers
• chief compliance officers of investment fund managers
The regulator is required to determine the individual's fitness for registration and may exercise discretion in doing so.
Section 3.3 does not provide proficiency requirements for dealing representatives of investment dealers since the IIROC Rules provide those requirements for the individuals who are approved persons of IIROC member firms.
Exam based requirements
Individuals must pass exams -- not courses -- to meet the education requirements in Part 3. For example, an individual must pass the Canadian Securities Course Exam, but does not have to complete the Canadian Securities Course. Individuals are responsible for completing the necessary preparation to pass an exam and for proficiency in all areas covered by the exam.
3.3 Time limits on examination requirements
Under section 3.3, there is a time limit on the validity of exams prescribed in Part 3. Individuals must pass an exam within 36 months before they apply for registration. However, this time limit does not apply if the individual:
• was registered in an active capacity (i.e., not suspended), in the same category in a jurisdiction of Canada at any time during the 36-month period before the date of their application; or
• has gained relevant securities industry experience for a total of 12 months during the 36-month period before the date of their application: these months do not have to be consecutive, or with the same firm or organization
These time limits do not apply to the CFA Charter or the CIM designation, since we do not expect the holders of these designations to have to retake the courses forming part of the requirements applicable to these designations. However, if the individual no longer has the right to use the CFA Charter or the CIM designation, by reason of revocation of the designation or otherwise, we may consider the reasons for such a revocation to be relevant in determining an individual's fitness for registration. Registered individuals are required to notify the regulator of any change in the status of their CFA Charter or the CIM designation within 10 days of the change, by submitting Form 33-109F5 Change of Registration Information in accordance with NI 31-102.
When assessing an individual's fitness for registration, the regulator may consider
• the date on which the relevant examination was passed, and
• the length of time between any suspension and reinstatement of registration during the 36-month period
See Part 6 of this Companion Policy for guidance on the meaning of "suspension" and "reinstatement".
Relevant securities industry experience
The securities industry experience under paragraph 3.3(2)(b) should be relevant to the category applied for. It may include experience acquired:
• during employment at a registered dealer, a registered adviser or an investment fund manager
• in related investment fields, such as investment banking, securities trading on behalf of a financial institution, securities research, portfolio management, investment advisory services or supervision of those activities
• in legal, accounting or consulting practices related to the securities industry
• in other professional service fields that relate to the securities industry, or
• in a securities-related business in a foreign jurisdiction
Division 2 Education and experience requirements
See Appendix C for a chart that sets out the proficiency requirements for each individual category of registration.
Granting exemptions
The regulator may grant an exemption from any of the education and experience requirements in Division 2 if it is satisfied that an individual has qualifications or relevant experience that is equivalent to, or more appropriate in the circumstances than, the prescribed requirements.
Proficiency for representatives of restricted dealers and restricted portfolio managers
The regulator will decide on a case-by-case basis what education and experience are required for registration as:
• a dealing representative or CCO of a restricted dealer, and
• an advising representative or CCO of a restricted portfolio manager
The regulator will determine these requirements when it assesses the individual's fitness for registration.
3.4 Proficiency -- initial and ongoing
Proficiency principle
Under section 3.4, registered individuals must not perform an activity that requires registration unless they have the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently, including understanding the structure, features and risks of each security they recommend to a client (also referred to as know-your-product or KYP).
The requirement to understand the structure, features and risks of each security recommended to a client is a proficiency requirement. This requirement is in addition to the suitability obligation in section 13.3 and applies even where there is an exemption from the suitability obligation such as, for example, the exemption in subsection 13.3(4) in respect of permitted clients. CCOs must also not perform an activity that requires registration unless they have the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently. CCOs must have a good understanding of the regulatory requirements applicable to the firm and individuals acting on its behalf. CCOs must also haveIn the case of CCOs, this includes the knowledge and ability to design and implement an effective compliance system.
Responsibility of the firm
The responsibility of registered firms to oversee the compliance of registered individuals acting on their behalf extends to ensuring that they are proficient at all times. A registered firm must not permit an individual they sponsor to perform an activity if the proficiency requirements are not met.
3.4.1 Firm's obligation to provide training
Compliance training
Under section 3.4.1, firms must provide compliance training. We expect firms to develop, implement and maintain an ongoing compliance training program to ensure that everyone at the firm understands the standards of conduct, acts with integrity when dealing with clients, and understands their role in the compliance system. In particular, registered individuals should be trained in relation to their conflicts of interest, know your client (also referred to as KYC), know your product (also referred to as KYP) and suitability determination obligations, including product training to ensure their registered representatives have a sufficient understanding of the securities and their risks.
The firm's training program should include ongoing communication and training on changes in regulatory requirements or the firm's policies and procedures. The firm's training program should be in writing, reviewed and kept up to date. The training program materials should include examples of:
• how to identify existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest between a registered individual and their client
• how to address conflicts of interest in the best interest of their client, and
• how to put the client's interest first when making suitability determinations for their client
Firms should perform evaluations to test the effectiveness of their ongoing training program at regular intervals. These evaluations should be designed to allow for the identification and documentation of any gaps, which should be reported in writing to the firm's UDP. The scope of the testing, and the methods used in the testing, will depend on the nature, size and complexity of its business and should be documented as part of the firm's evaluation.
If a firm only has one individual who is registered in a category that authorizes the individual to act as a dealer or an adviser on behalf of the registered firm (small firm), we do not expect the firm to have a training program in place. However, we expect a small firm to still be able to demonstrate that it has all the required elements of an effective compliance system.
Training to support the know your product obligation
As part of their know your product obligation, firms must also assess whether any additional training or proficiency requirements are necessary in order for their registered individuals to understand the securities and make appropriate suitability determinations. See section 13.2.1 of this Companion Policy for additional guidance on the know your product obligation.
Outsourcing of training
Firms should perform their own analysis of all securities they recommend to clients and provide product training to ensure their registered representatives have a sufficient understanding of the securities and their risks to meet their suitability obligations under section 13.3. Similarly, registered individuals should have a thorough understanding of a security before they recommend it to a client (also referred to as know-your-product or KYP).
Although a firm may outsource elements of its training program, the firm remains responsible for demonstrating that its registered individuals have been trained on the firm's policies and procedures.
3.11 Portfolio manager -- advising representative
3.12 Portfolio manager -- associate advising representative
The 12 months of relevant investment management experience referred to in section 3.11 and 24 months of relevant investment management experience referred to in section 3.12 do not have to be consecutive, or with the same firm or organization.
For individuals with a CFA charter, the regulator will decide on a case-by-case basis whether the experience they gained to earn the charter qualifies as relevant investment management experience.
Relevant investment management experience
The relevant investment management experience requirement is in addition to the specific course or designation requirements for each category of registration. We will assess whether an individual has acquired relevant investment management experience on a case-by-case basis. This section describes factors we may consider in assessing certain types of experience.
Relevant investment management experience under sections 3.11 and 3.12 may vary according to the level of specialization of the individual. It may include:
• securities research and analysis experience, demonstrating an ability in, and understanding of, portfolio analysis or portfolio security selection, or
• management of investment portfolios on a discretionary basis, including investment decision making, rebalancing and evaluating performance
Advising representatives
An advising representative may have discretionary authority over investments of others. Accordingly, this category of registration involves the most onerous proficiency requirements. We expect an individual who seeks registration as an advising representative to demonstrate a high quality of experience that is clearly relevant to discretionary portfolio management. This section sets out specific examples of experience that may satisfy the relevant investment management experience requirement for advising representatives.
(a) Discretionary portfolio management
We may consider experience performing discretionary portfolio management in a professional capacity to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative. Such experience may include working at:
• an adviser registered or operating under an exemption from registration in a foreign jurisdiction
• an insurance company
• a pension fund
• a government, corporate, bank or trust company treasury
• an IIROC member firm
(b) Assistant or associate portfolio management
We may consider experience supporting registered portfolio managers or other professional discretionary asset managers to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative. This may include:
• working with portfolio managers to formulate, draft and implement written investment policy statements for clients, and
• researching and analysing individual securities for potential inclusion in investment portfolios
(c) Research analyst with an IIROC member firm or registered adviser
We may consider experience performing research and analysis of individual securities with recommendations for the purpose of determining their suitability for inclusion in client investment portfolios to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative.
Associate advising representatives
This category may be appropriate for individuals who meet the minimum education and experience requirements in section 3.12 but do not meet the more onerous requirements for registration as an advising representative under section 3.11. In evaluating the experience required to obtain registration as an associate advising representative, we take into account that the advice provided by an associate advising representative must be approved by an advising representative in accordance with section 4.2. Experience gained as an associate advising representative does not automatically qualify an individual to be registered as an advising representative.
We will assess on a case-by-case basis whether such experience meets the more stringent quality of experience required for registration as an advising representative. This section sets out specific examples of experience that may satisfy the relevant investment management experience requirement for associate advising representatives.
(a) Client relationship management
We may consider client relationship management experience with a registered portfolio manager firm to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an associate advising representative where the applicant has assisted portfolio managers in tailoring strategies for specific clients. This may include experience assisting the portfolio managers in assessing suitability, creating investment policy statements, determining asset allocation, monitoring client portfolios and performing research and analysis on the economy or asset classes generally.
We recognize that many individuals who perform client relationship management services may not provide specific advice and therefore may not trigger the registration requirement. For example, some client services representatives conduct activities such as marketing the services of the firm by providing general information about the registrant firm and its services that do not include a strategy tailored to any specific client. While some client service representatives may accompany advising representatives or associate advising representatives to meetings with clients and provide assistance with marketing and client development activities, without registration they may not themselves develop an investment policy statement for the client, provide specific information such as recommending a particular model portfolio for the client or explain the implications of discretionary portfolio decisions that were made by the client's advising representative.
(b) Corporate finance
We may consider corporate finance experience involving valuing and analysing securities for initial public offerings, debt and equity financings, takeover bids and mergers to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an associate advising representative where this experience demonstrates an ability in, and understanding of, portfolio analysis or portfolio securities selection.
Some types of experience remain highly case-specific
While the quality and nature of the experience discussed above may differ from individual to individual and we assess experience on a case-by-case basis, there are some types of experience that are even more highly case-specific. This section sets out specific examples of case specific experience that may satisfy the relevant investment management experience requirement for advising representatives and associate advising representatives.
(a) IIROC registered representatives
Some registered representatives may offer a broad range of products involving security-specific research and analysis of their own, in addition to meeting with clients to review and discuss know-your-client and investment suitability. We may consider this to be sufficient experience to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative. Other registered representatives may sell mostly or exclusively a limited number of model portfolios or "portfolio solutions" to clients based on their investment objectives, risk profile or other factors unique to the individual client. We may consider this sufficient experience to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an associate advising representative.
However, where an individual is restricted to the sale of mutual funds, we may not consider such experience to be sufficient to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative or associate advising representative.
(b) Consultants
Consulting services relating to portfolio manager selection and monitoring may be highly specific to the individual or firm providing the services and may vary greatly among consultants in the sophistication of research and analysis and specificity of advice. Some may be responsible for hiring and ongoing monitoring of advisers or sub-advisers, while others may simply provide a desired asset allocation and list of recommended advisers based on the investment objectives of the client. We would generally expect to see a very high degree of sophistication and specificity in the analysis provided by the consultant and a high degree of investor reliance on the consultant in order for the individual to meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an advising representative.
Research and analysis to review and monitor the performance of registered portfolio managers, and referring clients for discretionary money management based on that review and monitoring, may meet the relevant investment management experience requirement for registration as an associate advising representative. We would not expect that general financial planning advice and referrals to portfolio managers alone would meet the threshold for relevant investment management experience required for registration as an advising representative or associate advising representative.
In some situations, the activities submitted as relevant investment management experience involve or may involve providing specific advice to clients and therefore may require registration. We also recognize that many individuals who provide portfolio manager selection and monitoring do not provide specific advice and therefore may not trigger the registration requirement. We may consider the following factors in determining whether a consultant is required to register:
• the client contracts directly with the consultant, rather than with the portfolio managers
• the consultant manages the hiring and evaluation of the portfolio managers
• there is reliance by the client on the consultant
• there are client expectations about the services to be provided by the consultant
Division 3 Membership in a self-regulatory organizationan SRO
3.16 Exemptions from certain requirements for SRO-approved persons
Section 3.16 exempts registered individuals who are dealing representatives of IIROC or MFDA members from the requirements in NI 31-103 for suitability and disclosure when recommending the use of borrowed money. This is because IIROC and the MFDA have their own rules for these matters.
In Québec, these requirements doThis exemption does not apply to dealing representatives of a mutual fund dealer to the extent that equivalent requirements are applicable to those dealing representatives under regulations in Québec. registered only in Québec. Those dealing representatives are subject to the suitability determination obligation in section 13.3 and to the disclosure requirement when recommending the use of borrowed money in section 13.13.
This section also exempts registered individuals who are dealing representatives of IIROC from the know your client obligations in section 13.2.
We expect registered individuals who are dealing representatives of IIROC or MFDA members to comply with the by-laws, rules, regulations and policies of IIROC or the MFDA, as applicable (SRO provisions). These individuals cannot rely on the exemptions in section 3.16 unless they are complying with the corresponding SRO provisions specified in NI 31-103. We regard compliance with IIROC or MFDA procedures, interpretations, notices, bulletins and practices as relevant to compliance with the applicable SRO provisions.
For these purposes, an individual that has an exemption from an SRO provision and complies with the terms of that exemption would be considered to have complied with that SRO provision.
Part 4 Restrictions on registered individuals
4.1 Restriction on acting for another registered firm
We will consider exemption applications on a case-by-case basis. When reviewing a registered firm's application for relief from this restriction, we will consider if:
• there are valid business reasons for the individual to be registered with both firms
• the individual will have sufficient time to adequately serve both firms
• the applicant's sponsoring firms have demonstrated that they have policies and procedures addressing any conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of the dual registration, and
• the sponsoring firms will be able to deal with these conflicts, including supervising how the individual will deal with these conflicts.
In the case of paragraph 4.1(1)(b), namely a dealing, advising or associate advising representative acting for another registered firm, affiliation of the firms may be one of the factors that we would consider in respect of an exemption application.
We note that the prohibitions in section 4.1 are in addition to the conflicts of interest provisions set out in section 13.4 [identifying and responding to conflicts of interest]. See section 13.4 for further guidance on individuals who serve on boards of directors.
4.2 Associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice
The associate advising representative category allows an individual to work at a registered adviser while completing the proficiency requirements for an advising representative. For example, a previously registered advising representative could work in an advising capacity while acquiring the relevant work experience required for an advising representative under section 3.11.
Associate advising representatives are not required to subsequently register as a full advising representative since this category also accommodates individuals who provide specific advice to clients, but do not manage client portfolios without supervision.
As required by section 4.2, registered firms must designate an advising representative to approve the advice provided by an associate advising representative. The designated advising representative must approve the advice before the associate advising representative gives the advice. The appropriate processes for approving the advice will depend on the circumstances, including the associate advising representative's level of experience.
Registered firms that have associate advising representatives must:
• document their policies and procedures for meeting the supervision and approval obligations as required under section 11.1
• implement controls as required under section 11.1
• maintain records as required under section 11.5, and
• notify the regulator of the names of the advising representative and the associate advising representative whose advice they are approving no later than the seventh day after the advising representative is designated
Part 5 Ultimate designated person and chief compliance officer
Sections 11.2 and 11.3 require registered firms to designate a UDP and a CCO. The UDP and CCO must be registered and perform the compliance functions set out in sections 5.1 and 5.2. While the UDP and CCO have specific compliance functions, they are not solely responsible for compliance -- it is the responsibility of the firm as a whole.
The same person as UDP and CCO
The UDP and the CCO can be the same person if they meet the requirements for both registration categories. We prefer firms to separate these functions, but we recognize that it might not be practical for some registered firms.
UDP or CCO as advising or dealing representative
The UDP or CCO may also be registered in trading or advising categories. For example, a small registered firm might conclude that one individual can adequately function as UDP and CCO, while also carrying on advising and trading activities. We may have concerns about the ability of a UDP or CCO of a large firm to conduct these additional activities and carry out their UDP, CCO and advising responsibilities at the same time.
5.1 Responsibilities of the ultimate designated person
The UDP is responsible for promoting a culture of compliance and overseeing the effectiveness of the firm's compliance system. They do not have to be involved in the day to day management of the compliance group. There are no specific education or experience requirements for the UDP. However, they are subject to the proficiency principle in section 3.4.
5.2 Responsibilities of the chief compliance officer
The CCO is an operating officer who is responsible for the monitoring and oversight of the firm's compliance system. This includes:
• establishing or updating policies and procedures for the firm's compliance system, and
• managing the firm's compliance monitoring and reporting according to the policies and procedures
At the firm's discretion, the CCO may also have authority to take supervisory or other action to resolve compliance issues.
The CCO must meet the proficiency requirements set out in Part 3. No other compliance staff have to be registered unless they are also advising or trading. The CCO may set the knowledge and skills necessary or desirable for individuals who report to them.
If a firm is registered in multiple categories, the CCO must meet the most stringent of the proficiency requirements of the firm's categories of registration.
Firms must designate one CCO. However, in large firms, the scale and kind of activities carried out by different operating divisions may warrant the designation of more than one CCO. We will consider applications, on a case-by-case basis, for different individuals to act as the CCO of a firm's operating divisions.
We will not usually register the same person as CCO of more than one firm unless the firms are affiliated, and the scale and kind of activities carried out make it reasonable for the same person to act as CCO of more than one firm. We will consider applications, on a case-by-case basis, for the CCO of one registered firm to act as the CCO of another registered firm.
Paragraph 5.2(c) requires the CCO to report to the UDP any instances of non-compliance with securities legislation that:
• create a reasonable risk of harm to a client or to the market, or
• are part of a pattern of non-compliance
The CCO should report non-compliance to the UDP even if it has been corrected.
Paragraph 5.2(d) requires the CCO to submit an annual report to the board of directors.
Part 6 Suspension and revocation of registration -- individuals
The requirements for surrendering registration and additional requirements for suspending and revoking registration are found in the securities legislation of each jurisdiction. The guidance for Part 6 relates to requirements under both securities legislation and NI 31-103.
There is no renewal requirement for registration. A registered individual may carry on the activities for which they are registered until their registration is:
• suspended automatically under NI 31-103
• suspended by the regulator under certain circumstances, or
• surrendered by the individual
6.1 If individual ceases to have authority to act for firm
Under section 6.1, if a registered individual ceases to have authority to act on behalf of their sponsoring firm because their working relationship with the firm ends or changes, the individual's registration with the registered firm is suspended until reinstated or revoked under securities legislation. This applies whether the individual or the firm ends the relationship.
If a registered firm terminates its working relationship with a registered individual for any reason, the firm must complete and file a notice of termination on Form 33-109F1 Notice of Termination of Registered Individuals and Permitted Individuals (Form 33-109F1) no later than ten days after the effective date of the individual's termination. This includes when an individual resigns, is dismissed or retires.
The firm must file additional information about the individual's termination prescribed in Part 5 of Form 33-109F1 (except where the individual is deceased), no later than 30 days after the date of termination. The regulator uses this information to determine if there are any concerns about the individual's conduct that may be relevant to their ongoing fitness for registration. Under NI 33-109, the firm must provide this information to the individual on request.
Suspension
An individual whose registration is suspended must not carry on the activity they are registered for. The individual otherwise remains a registrant and is subject to the jurisdiction of the regulator. A suspension remains in effect until the regulator reinstates or revokes the individual's registration.
If an individual who is registered in more than one category is suspended in one of the categories, the regulator will consider whether to suspend the individual's registration in other categories or to impose terms and conditions, subject to an opportunity to be heard.
Automatic suspension
An individual's registration will automatically be suspended if:
• they cease to have a working relationship with their sponsoring firm
• the registration of their sponsoring firm is suspended or revoked, or
• they cease to be an approved person of an SRO.
An individual must have a sponsoring firm to be registered. If an individual leaves their sponsoring firm for any reason, their registration is automatically suspended. Automatic suspension is effective on the day that an individual no longer has authority to act on behalf of their sponsoring firm.
Individuals do not have an opportunity to be heard by the regulator in the case of any automatic suspension.
Suspension in the public interest
An individual's registration may be suspended if the regulator exercises its power under securities legislation and determines that it is no longer in the public interest for the individual to be registered. The regulator may do this if it has serious concerns about the ongoing fitness of the individual. For example, this may be the case if an individual is charged with a crime, in particular fraud or theft.
Reinstatement
"Reinstatement" means that a suspension on a registration has been lifted. Once reinstated, an individual may resume carrying on the activity they are registered for. If a suspended individual joins a new sponsoring firm, they will have to apply for reinstatement under the process set out in NI 33-109. In certain cases, the reinstatement or transfer to the new firm will be automatic.
Automatic transfers
Subject to certain conditions set out in NI 33-109, an individual's registration may be automatically reinstated if they:
• transfer directly from one sponsoring firm to another registered firm in the same jurisdiction
• join the new sponsoring firm within 90 days of leaving their former sponsoring firm
• seek registration in the same category as the one previously held, and
• complete and file Form 33-109F7 Reinstatement of Registered Individuals and Permitted Individuals (Form 33-109F7)
This allows individuals to engage in activities requiring registration from their first day with the new sponsoring firm.
Individuals are not eligible for an automatic reinstatement if they:
• have new information to disclose regarding regulatory, criminal, civil or financial matters as described in Item 9 of Form 33-109F7, or
• as a result of allegations of criminal activity, breach of securities legislation or breach of SRO rules:
• were dismissed by their former sponsoring firm, or
• were asked by their former sponsoring firm to resign
In these cases, the individual must apply to have their registration reinstated under NI 33-109 using Form 33-109F4.
6.2 If IIROC approval is revoked or suspended
6.3 If MFDA approval is revoked or suspended
Registered individuals acting on behalf of member firms of an SRO are required to be an approved person of the SRO.
If an SRO suspends or revokes its approval of an individual, the individual's registration in the category requiring SRO approval will be automatically suspended. This automatic suspension of individuals does not apply to mutual fund dealers registered only in Québec.
If an SRO suspends an individual for reasons that do not involve significant regulatory concerns and subsequently reinstates the individual's approval, the individual's registration will usually be reinstated by the regulator as soon as possible.
Revocation
6.6 Revocation of a suspended registration -- individual
If an individual's registration has been suspended under Part 6 but not reinstated, it will be automatically revoked on the second anniversary of the suspension.
"Revocation" means that the regulator has terminated the individual's registration. An individual whose registration has been revoked must submit a new application if they want to be registered again.
Surrender or termination of registration
If an individual wants to terminate their registration in one or more of the non-principal jurisdictions where the individual is registered, the individual may apply to surrender their registration at any time by completing Form 33-109F2 Change or Surrender of Individual Categories (Form 33-109F2) and having their sponsoring firm file it.
If an individual wants to terminate their registration in their principal jurisdiction, Form 33-109F1 must be filed by the individual's sponsoring firm. Once Form 33-109F1 is filed, the individual's termination of registration will be reflected in all jurisdictions.
Part 7 Categories of registration for firms
The categories of registration for firms have two main purposes:
• to specify the type of business that the firm may conduct, and
• to provide a framework for the requirements the registrant must meet
Firms registered in more than one category
A firm may be required to register in more than one category. For example, a portfolio manager that manages an investment fund must register both as a portfolio manager and as an investment fund manager.
Individual registered in a firm category
An individual can be registered in both a firm and individual category. For example, a sole proprietor who is registered in the firm category of portfolio manager must also be registered in the individual category of advising representative.
7.1 Dealer categories
Section 7.1 of NI 31-103 sets out the dealer registration categories and permitted activities for each category. For example, investment dealers may act as a dealer or an underwriter in respect of any security or transaction. All other dealer categories are limited:
• a mutual fund dealer may only act as a dealer in respect of mutual funds and certain other investment funds
• a scholarship plan dealer may only act as a dealer in respect of scholarship plans, educational plans and educational trusts
• a restricted dealer may only act as a dealer or an underwriter in accordance with the terms and conditions of its registration.
Exempt market dealer
Under paragraph 7.1(2)(d), an exempt market dealer may only act as a dealer or an underwriter in the "exempt market". The permitted activities of an exempt market dealer are determined by reference to the prospectus exemptions in securities legislation (e.g., the accredited investor, minimum amount investment and offering memorandum exemptions in NI 45-106).
In short, an exempt market dealer may act as a dealer or underwriter in a distribution by an issuer, including a reporting issuer, if the distribution is being made under an exemption from the prospectus requirement. An exempt market dealer may not act as a dealer or underwriter in a distribution that is being made under a prospectus (a prospectus distribution). The investment dealer category or, in the case of a mutual fund prospectus distribution, the mutual fund dealer category, are the appropriate dealer registration categories for prospectus distributions.
This distinction is explained further below.
Trades that are distributions
Under subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(i), exempt market dealers are permitted to trade in securities if the trade is a distribution made under a prospectus exemption. This includes trading in securities of investment funds and reporting issuers provided the securities are distributed under an exemption from the prospectus requirement. For example, where a reporting issuer is making a prospectus offering through an investment dealer, an exempt market dealer may participate in a private placement of securities of the same class, if those securities are actually distributed by the reporting issuer under a prospectus exemption. Certain form and fee requirements may apply to the private placement of securities under exemptions from the prospectus requirement.
Permitted activities under subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(i) also include participating in a resale of securities, where the resale is deemed to be a distribution under National Instrument 45-102 Resale of Securities (NI 45-102). For example, if a reporting issuer makes a private placement of common shares to an accredited investor in reliance on the accredited investor exemption in NI 45-106, the shares will generally be subject to a four-month restricted period. If the accredited investor wishes to resell the shares to another accredited investor within the four-month restricted period, the resale will be deemed to be a distribution under NI 45-102. An exempt market dealer may participate in this resale if made in reliance on a prospectus exemption. However, once the four-month restricted period has expired, and the shares become freely trading, an exempt market dealer may not participate in the resale if common shares of the issuer are listed, quoted or traded on a marketplace, whether the transaction is on-exchange or off-exchange, due to the restriction in subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(ii). Secondary trading in listed securities should be conducted through an investment dealer in accordance with the rules and requirements applicable to investment dealers.
Trades that are not distributions
Exempt market dealers are permitted to participate in a resale of securities, if all the conditions in subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(ii) are met. These include that a prospectus exemption would have been available to the seller if the trade were a distribution and the class of securities is not listed, quoted or traded on a domestic or foreign marketplace. In determining whether a prospectus exemption is available for the purposes of subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(ii), it is necessary to consider the terms of the prospectus exemption. For example, if the terms of the exemption provide that the exemption is only available to an issuer, it is not available for the resale of securities (e.g., offering memorandum exemption).
In short, exempt market dealers are permitted to:
• trade or underwrite securities if the trade is a distribution made under a prospectus exemption
• participate in the resale of securities that are subject to resale restrictions
• participate in the resale of securities, if a prospectus exemption would be available to the seller if the trade were a distribution and the class of securities is not listed, quoted or traded on a marketplace.
Exempt market dealers are not permitted to
• establish an omnibus account with an investment dealer and trade listed securities through the investment dealer on behalf of their clients, since this activity is trading in listed securities contrary to subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(ii)
• participate in a distribution of securities offered under a prospectus in any capacity, including as a dealer (agent, finder, selling group member) or underwriter. This includes participating in the sale of special warrants convertible into prospectus qualified securities, since this activity is an "act in furtherance" of the trade of a prospectus qualified security contrary to subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(i).
Restricted dealer
The restricted dealer category in paragraph 7.1(2)(e) permits specialized dealers that may not qualify under another dealer category, to carry on a limited trading business. It is intended to be used only if there is a compelling case for the proposed trading to take place outside the other registration categories.
The regulator will impose terms and conditions that restrict the dealer's activities. The CSA will co-ordinate terms and conditions for restricted dealers.
7.2 Adviser categories
The registration requirement in section 7.2 applies to advisers who give "specific advice". Advice is specific when it is tailored to the needs and circumstances of a client or potential client. For example, an adviser who recommends a security to a client is giving specific advice.
Restricted portfolio manager
The restricted portfolio manager category in paragraph 7.2(2)(b) permits individuals or firms to advise in specific securities, classes of securities or securities of a class of issuers.
The regulator will impose terms and conditions on a restricted portfolio manager's registration that limit the manager's activities. For example, a restricted portfolio manager might be limited to advising in respect of a specific sector, such as securities of oil and gas issuers.
7.3 Investment fund manager category
Investment fund managers direct the business, operations or affairs of an investment fund. They organize the fund and are responsible for its management and administration. If an entity is uncertain about whether it must register as an investment fund manager, it should consider whether the fund is an "investment fund" for the purposes of securities legislation. See section 1.2 of the Companion Policy to NI 81-106 for guidance on the general nature of investment funds.
For additional guidance on the investment fund manager registration requirement in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan and Yukon see Multilateral Policy 31-202 Registration Requirement for Investment Fund Manager. Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario and Québec have adopted Multilateral Instrument 32-102 Registration Exemptions for Non-Resident Investment Fund Managers and Companion Policy 32-102CP Registration Exemptions for Non-Resident Investment Fund Managers, which provide limited exemptions from, and guidance on, the investment fund manager registration requirement for non-resident investment fund managers.
An investment fund manager may:
• advertise to the general public a fund it manages without being registered as an adviser, and
• promote the fund to registered dealers without being registered as a dealer
If an investment fund manager acts as portfolio manager for a fund it manages, it should consider whether it may have to be registered as an adviser. If it distributes units of the fund directly to investors, it should consider whether it may have to be registered as a dealer.
In most fund structures, the investment fund manager is a separate legal entity from the fund itself. However, in situations where the board of directors or the trustee(s) of an investment fund direct the business, operations or affairs of the investment fund, the fund itself may be required to register in the investment fund manager category. To address the investor protection concerns that may arise from the investment fund manager and the fund being the same legal entity, and the practical issues of applying the ongoing requirements of a registrant on the fund, terms and conditions may be imposed.
An investment fund manager may delegate or outsource certain functions to service providers. However, the investment fund manager is responsible for these functions and must supervise the service provider. See Part 11 of this Companion Policy for more guidance on outsourcing.
Investment fund complexes or groups with more than one investment fund manager
Determining whether investment fund registration is necessary involves applying a functional test that examines the activities being carried out to determine whether an entity is directing the business, operations or affairs of an investment fund. Typically an investment fund has only one investment fund manager. However, there may be limited circumstances where investment fund complexes or groups may have more than one entity within the fund complex that is acting as an investment fund manager. Although the investment fund manager functions are often delegated to one entity within the fund complex, there may be more than one entity in the group subject to investment fund manager registration, absent an exemption from registration. We will consider exemption applications on a case-by-case basis to allow only one investment fund manager within the fund complex to be registered in appropriate circumstances.
Part 8 Exemptions from the requirement to register
NI 31-103 provides several exemptions from the registration requirement. There may be additional exemptions in securities legislation. If a firm is exempt from registration, the individuals acting on its behalf are also exempt from registration. A person or company cannot rely on the exemptions in Divisions 1, 2 and 3 of this Part in a local jurisdiction if the person or company is registered to conduct the activities covered by the exemption in that jurisdiction. We expect registrants to conduct activities within a jurisdiction under their category of registration, in full compliance with securities legislation, including the requirements of NI 31-103.
Division 1 Exemptions from dealer and underwriter registration
We provide no specific guidance for the following exemptions because there is guidance on them in the Companion Policy to NI 45-106:
• 8.12 [mortgages]
• 8.17 [reinvestment plan]
8.5 Trades through or to a registered dealer
No solicitation or contact
Section 8.5 provides an exemption from the dealer registration requirement for trades made
• through an appropriately registered dealer, or
• to an appropriately registered dealer that is purchasing for that dealer's account.
The exemption in paragraph 8.5(1)(a) for trades made through a registered dealer is not available if the person relying on it solicits or contacts purchasers of the securities directly. For example, if an individual acts in furtherance of a trade by soliciting or contacting potential purchasers of securities (sometimes referred to as a finder) and then the sale to the purchaser is executed through a registered dealer, the individual would not qualify for this exemption.
A person may utilize the exemption for acts in furtherance of a trade in relation to working with issuers or appropriately registered dealers, provided they do not directly solicit or contact purchasers.
Cross-border trades (jitneys)
Section 8.5 provides an exemption from the dealer registration requirement if the trade is made through a registered dealer, provided the person relying on the exemption has no direct contact with the purchaser of the security. On that basis, the execution of a trade through or to an appropriately registered dealer by a dealer located in another jurisdiction would qualify under this exemption.
However, if for example a dealer in the United States that is not registered in Alberta contacts a potential purchaser in Alberta to solicit the purchase of securities, this trade does not qualify for this exemption. The dealer in the United States must instead contact a dealer registered in Alberta, and have that dealer contact potential purchasers in Alberta.
Plan administrators
A plan administrator can rely on this exemption to place sell orders with dealers in respect of shares of issuers held by plan participants. Section 8.16 [plan administrator] covers the activity of the plan administrator receiving sell orders from plan participants.
8.5.1 Trades through a registered dealer by registered adviser
Section 8.5.1 provides that the dealer registration requirement does not apply to a registered adviser for incidental trading activities. The exemption is only available if the trade is made through a registered dealer or a dealer exempt from registration. For example, a portfolio manager may not use the exemption to trade units of a pooled fund it manages, without involving a registered dealer or having another exemption available, including the exemption in section 8.6.
8.6 Investment fund trades by adviser to managed account
Registered advisers often use investment funds which they or their affiliates have created as a way to efficiently invest their clients' money. In issuing units of those funds to managed account clients, they are in the business of trading in securities. Under the exemption in section 8.6, a registered adviser does not have to register as a dealer for a trade in a security of an investment fund if:
• the adviser or an affiliate of the adviser acts as the fund's adviser,
• the adviser or an affiliate of the adviser acts as the fund's investment fund manager, and
• the distribution of units of the fund is made only into the adviser's clients' managed accounts.
Subsection 8.6(2) limits the availability of this exemption to legitimate managed accounts. The exemption is not available in respect of accounts that are in substance non-discretionary accounts and that have been created primarily for the purpose of distributing investment funds of the adviser to an investor without the involvement of a registered dealer.
An adviser relying on this exemption is required to provide written notice of its reliance on the exemption.
The exemption in section 8.6 is also available to those who qualify for the international adviser exemption under section 8.26.
8.18 International dealer
General principle
This exemption allows international dealers to provide limited services to permitted clients without having to register in Canada. The term "permitted client" is defined in section 1.1. International dealers that seek wider access to Canadian investors must register in an appropriate category.
Notice requirement
If a firm is relying on the exemption in more than one jurisdiction, it must provide an initial notice by filing a Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service (Form 31-103F2) with the regulator in each jurisdiction where it relies on the exemption. If there is any change to the information in the firm's Form 31-103F2, it must update it by filing a replacement Form 31-103F2 with them.
So long as the firm continues to rely on the exemption, it must file an annual notice with each regulator. Subsection 8.18(5) does not prescribe a form of annual notice. An email or letter will therefore be acceptable.
In Ontario, compliance with the filing and fee payment requirements applicable to an unregistered exempt international dealer under Ontario Securities Commission Rule 13-502 Fees satisfies the annual notification requirement in subsection (5).
8.19 Self-directed registered education savings plan
We consider the creation of a self-directed registered education savings plan, as defined in section 8.19, to be a trade in a security, whether or not the assets held in the plan are securities. This is because the definition of "security" in securities legislation of most jurisdictions includes "any document constituting evidence of an interest in a scholarship or educational plan or trust".
Section 8.19 provides an exemption from the dealer registration requirement for the trade when the plan is created but only under the conditions described in subsection 8.19(2).
8.22.1 Short-term debt
This exemption allows specified financial institutions to trade short-term debt instruments with permitted clients, without having to register. The exemption is available in all jurisdictions of Canada, except Ontario. In Ontario, there are alternate exemptions that may be available for trading in short-term debt instruments, including the exemptions in section 35.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario) and section 4.1 of the Ontario Securities Commission Rule 45-501 Ontario Prospectus and Registration Exemptions.
Division 2 Exemptions from adviser registration
8.24 IIROC members with discretionary authority
Section 8.24 contains an exemption from the requirement to register as an adviser for registered dealers that are members of IIROC and their dealing representatives. The exemption is available when they act as an adviser in respect of a client's managed account. The term "managed account" is defined in section 1.1 of NI 31-103. This exemption is available for all managed accounts, including where the client is a pooled fund or investment fund.
8.25 Advising generally
Section 8.25 contains an exemption from the requirement to register as an adviser if the advice is not tailored to the needs of the recipient.
In general, we would not consider advice about specific securities to be tailored to the needs of the recipient if it:
• is a general discussion of the merits and risks of the security
• is delivered through investment newsletters, articles in general circulation newspapers or magazines, websites, e-mail, Internet chat rooms, bulletin boards, television or radio, and
• does not claim to be tailored to the needs and circumstances of any recipient
This type of general advice can also be given at conferences. However, if a purpose of the conference is to solicit the audience and generate specific trades in specific securities, we may consider the advice to be tailored or we may consider the individual or firm giving the advice to be engaged in trading activity.
Under subsection 8.25(3), if an individual or firm relying on the exemption has a financial or other interest in the securities they recommend, they must disclose the interest to the recipient when they make the recommendation.
8.26 International adviser
This exemption allows international advisers to provide limited services to certain permitted clients without having to register in Canada. International advisers that seek wider access to Canadian investors must register in an appropriate category.
Incidental advice on Canadian securities
An international adviser relying on the exemption in section 8.26 may advise in Canada on foreign securities without having to register. It may also advise in Canada on securities of Canadian issuers, but only to the extent that the advice is incidental to its acting as an adviser for foreign securities.
However, this is not an exception or a "carve-out" that allows some portion of a permitted client's portfolio to be made up of Canadian securities chosen by the international adviser without restriction. Any advice with respect to Canadian securities must be directly related to the activity of advising on foreign securities. Permissible incidental advice would include, for example:
• an international adviser, when advising on a portfolio with a particular investment objective, such as gold mining companies, could advise on securities of a Canadian gold mining company within that portfolio, provided that the portfolio is otherwise made up of foreign securities
• an international adviser, having a mandate to advise on equities traded on European exchanges could advise with respect to the securities of a Canadian corporation traded on a European exchange, to the extent the Canadian corporation forms part of the mandate
Revenue derived in Canada
An international adviser is only permitted to undertake a prescribed amount of business in Canada. In making the calculation required under paragraph 8.26(4)(d), it is necessary to include all revenues derived from portfolio management activities in Canada, which would include any sub-adviser arrangements. However, the calculation of aggregate consolidated gross revenue derived in Canada does not include the gross revenue of affiliates that are registered in a jurisdiction of Canada.
An international adviser is not required to monitor Canadian revenue on an ongoing basis. Eligibility for the exemption is assessed with reference to revenues as of the end of the adviser's last financial year. The 10% threshold in paragraph 8.26(4)(d) is determined by looking back at the revenue of the firm and its affiliates "during its most recently completed financial year".
Notice requirement
If a firm is relying on the exemption in more than one jurisdiction, it must provide an initial notice by filing a Form 31-103F2 with the regulator in each jurisdiction where it relies on the exemption. If there is any change to the information in the firm's Form 31-103F2, it must update it by filing a replacement Form 31-103F2 with them.
So long as the firm continues to rely on the exemption, it must file an annual notice with each regulator. Subsection 8.26(5) does not prescribe a form of annual notice. An email or letter will therefore be acceptable.
In Ontario, compliance with the filing and fee payment requirements applicable to an unregistered exempt international firm under Ontario Securities Commission Rule 13-502 Fees satisfies the annual notification requirement in subsection (5).
8.26.1 International sub-adviser
This exemption permits a foreign sub-adviser to provide advice to certain registrants, without having to register as an adviser in Canada. In these arrangements, the registrant is the foreign sub-adviser's client, and it receives the advice, either for its own benefit or for the benefit of its clients. One of the conditions of this exemption is that the registrant has entered into an agreement with its client that it is responsible for losses that arise out of certain failures by the sub-adviser.
We expect that a registrant taking on this liability will conduct appropriate initial and ongoing due diligence on the sub-adviser and ensure the investments are suitable for the registrant's client. We also expect that the registrant will maintain records of the due diligence conducted. See Part 11 of this Companion Policy for more guidance.
Division 4 Mobility exemption -- firms
8.30 Client mobility exemption -- firms
The mobility exemption in section 8.30 allows registered firms to continue dealing with and advising clients who move to another jurisdiction, without registering in that other jurisdiction. Section 2.2 [client mobility exemption -- individuals] contains a similar exemption for registered individuals.
The exemption becomes available when the client (not the registrant) moves to another jurisdiction. A registered firm may deal with up to 10 "eligible" clients in each other jurisdiction. Each of the client, their spouse and any children are an eligible client.
A firm may only rely on the exemption if:
• it is registered in its principal jurisdiction
• it only acts as a dealer, underwriter or adviser in the other jurisdiction as permitted under its registration in its principal jurisdiction
• the individual acting on its behalf is eligible for the exemption in section 2.2
• it complies with Parts 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms and 14 Handling client accounts -- firms, and
• it acts fairly, honestly and in good faith in its dealings with the eligible client
Firm's responsibilities for individuals relying on the exemption
In order for a registered individual to rely on the exemption in section 2.2, their sponsoring firm must disclose to the eligible client that the individual and if applicable, the firm, are exempt from registration in the other jurisdiction and are not subject to the requirements of securities legislation in that jurisdiction.
As soon as possible after an individual first relies on the exemption in section 2.2, their sponsoring firm must complete and file Form 31-103F3 in the other jurisdiction.
The registered firm must have appropriate policies and procedures for supervising individuals who rely on a mobility exemption. Registered firms must also keep appropriate records to demonstrate they are complying with the conditions of the mobility exemption.
See the guidance in section 2.2 of this Companion Policy on the client mobility exemption available to individuals.
Part 9 Membership in a self-regulatory organizationan SRO
9.3 Exemptions from certain requirements for IIROC members
9.4 Exemptions from certain requirements for MFDA members
NI 31-103 has two distinct sections, sections 9.3 and 9.4, which distinguish the exemptions which are available on the basis of whether or not the member of IIROC or the MFDA is registered in another category. This clarifies our intent with respect to the exemptions for SRO members and recognizes that IIROC and the MFDA have rules in these areas.
Sections 9.3 and 9.4 contain exemptions from certain requirements for investment dealers that are IIROC members, and for mutual fund dealers that are MFDA members and in Québec, for mutual fund dealers to the extent equivalent requirements are applicable under the regulations in Québec. However, if an SRO member is registered in another category, these sections do not exempt them from their obligations as a registrant in that category. For example, if a firm is registered as an investment fund manager and as an investment dealer with IIROC, section 9.3 does not exempt them from their obligations as an investment fund manager under NI 31-103.
Mutual fund dealers registered in that category in Québec that are MFDA members are exempt from section 12.12 relating to the delivery of financial information, as well as sections 14.5.2 to 14.6.2 relating to the custody of assets. Subsection 9.4(3) provides that these dealers may rely on certain of the exemptions in subsections 9.4(1) and (2) relating to custody of assets, provided the conditions of the exemption are met; these exemptions are set out in paragraphs 9.4(1)(m), (1)(m.2) to (1)(n.2) and paragraphs 9.4(2)(g), (2)(g.2) to (2)(h.2).
However SRO members that are registered in multiple categories may use the forms prescribed by the SROs, on certain conditions. See sections 12.1, 12.12 and 12.14 for requirements on calculating working capital and the delivery of working capital calculations for SRO members that are registered in multiple categories.
We expect registered firms that are members of IIROC or the MFDA to comply with the by-laws, rules, regulations and policies of IIROC or the MFDA, as applicable (SRO provisions). These firms cannot rely on the exemptions in Part 9 unless they are complying with the corresponding SRO provisions specified in NI 31-103. We regard compliance with IIROC or MFDA procedures, interpretations, notices, bulletins and practices as relevant to compliance with the applicable SRO provisions.
For these purposes, a firm that has an exemption from an SRO provision and complies with the terms of that exemption would be considered to have complied with that SRO provision.
Part 10 Suspension and revocation of registration -- firms
The requirements for surrendering registration and additional requirements for suspending and revoking registration are found in the securities legislation of each jurisdiction. The guidance for Part 10 relates to requirements under both securities legislation and NI 31-103.
There is no renewal requirement for registration but firms must pay fees every year to maintain their registration and the registration of individuals acting on their behalf. A registered firm may carry on the activities for which it is registered until its registration is:
• suspended automatically under NI 31-103
• suspended by the regulator under certain circumstances, or
• surrendered by the firm
Division 1 When a firm's registration is suspended
Suspension
A firm whose registration has been suspended must not carry on the activity it is registered for. The firm otherwise remains a registrant and is subject to the jurisdiction of the regulator. A suspension remains in effect until the regulator reinstates or revokes the firm's registration.
If a firm that is registered in more than one category is suspended in one of the categories, the regulator will consider whether to suspend the firm's registration in other categories or to impose terms and conditions, subject to an opportunity to be heard.
Automatic suspension
A firm's registration will automatically be suspended if:
• it fails to pay its annual fees within 30 days of the due date
• it ceases to be a member of IIROC, or
• except in Québec, it ceases to be a member of the MFDA
Firms do not have an opportunity to be heard by the regulator in the case of any automatic suspension.
10.1 Failure to pay fees
Under section 10.1, a firm's registration will be automatically suspended if it has not paid its annual fees within 30 days of the due date.
10.2 If IIROC membership is revoked or suspended
Under section 10.2, if IIROC suspends or revokes a firm's membership, the firm's registration as an investment dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked.
10.3 If MFDA membership is revoked or suspended
Under section 10.3, if the MFDA suspends or revokes a firm's membership, the firm's registration as a mutual fund dealer is suspended until reinstated or revoked. Section 10.3 does not apply in Québec.
Suspension in the public interest
A firm's registration may be suspended if the regulator exercises its power under securities legislation and determines that it is no longer in the public interest for the firm to be registered. The regulator may do this if it has serious concerns about the ongoing fitness of the firm or any of its registered individuals. For example, this may be the case if a firm or one or more of its registered or permitted individuals is charged with a crime, in particular fraud or theft.
Reinstatement
"Reinstatement" means that a suspension on a registration has been lifted. Once reinstated, a firm may resume carrying on the activity it is registered for.
Division 2 Revoking a firm's registration
Revocation
10.5 Revocation of a suspended registration -- firm
10.6 Exception for firms involved in a hearing or proceeding
Under sections 10.5 and 10.6, if a firm's registration has been suspended under Part 10 and has not been reinstated, it is revoked on the second anniversary of the suspension, except if a hearing or proceeding concerning the suspended registrant has commenced. In this case the registration remains suspended.
"Revocation" means that the regulator has terminated the firm's registration. A firm whose registration has been revoked must submit a new application if it wants to be registered again.
Surrender
A firm may apply to surrender its registration in one or more categories at any time. There is no prescribed form for an application to surrender. A firm should file an application to surrender registration with its principal regulator. If Ontario is a non-principal jurisdiction, it should also file the application with the regulator in Ontario. See the Companion Policy to Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System for more details on filing an application to surrender.
Before the regulator accepts a firm's application to surrender registration, the firm must provide the regulator with evidence that the firm's clients have been dealt with appropriately. This evidence does not have to be provided when a registered individual applies to surrender registration. This is because the sponsoring firm will continue to be responsible for meeting obligations to clients who may have been served by the individual.
The regulator does not have to accept a firm's application to surrender its registration. Instead, the regulator can act in the public interest by suspending, or imposing terms and conditions on, the firm's registration.
When considering a registered firm's application to surrender its registration, the regulator typically considers the firm's actions, the completeness of the application and the supporting documentation.
The firm's actions
The regulator may consider whether the firm:
• has stopped carrying on activity requiring registration
• proposes an effective date to stop carrying on activity requiring registration that is within six months of the date of the application to surrender, and
• has paid any outstanding fees and submitted any outstanding filings at the time of filing the application to surrender
Completeness of the application
Among other things, the regulator may look for:
• the firm's reasons for ceasing to carry on activity requiring registration
• satisfactory evidence that the firm has given all of its clients reasonable notice of its intention to stop carrying on activity requiring registration, including an explanation of how it will affect them in practical terms, and
• satisfactory evidence that the firm has given appropriate notice to the SRO, if applicable
Supporting documentation
The regulator may look for:
• evidence that the firm has resolved all outstanding client complaints, settled all litigation, satisfied all judgments or made reasonable arrangements to deal with and fund any payments relating to them, and any subsequent client complaints, settlements or liabilities
• confirmation that all money or securities owed to clients has been returned or transferred to another registrant, where possible, according to client instructions
• up-to-date audited financial statements with an auditor's comfort letter
• evidence that the firm has satisfied any SRO requirements for withdrawing membership, and
• an officer's or partner's certificate supporting these documents
Part 11 Internal controls and systems
General business practices -- outsourcing
Registered firms are responsible and accountable for all functions that they outsource to a service provider. Firms should have a written, legally binding contract that includes the expectations of the parties to the outsourcing arrangement.
Registered firms should follow prudent business practices and conduct a due diligence analysis of prospective third-party service providers. This includes third-party service providers that are affiliates of the firm. Due diligence should include an assessment of the service provider's reputation, financial stability, relevant internal controls and ability to deliver the services.
Firms should also:
• ensure that third-party service providers have adequate safeguards for keeping information confidential and, where appropriate, disaster recovery capabilities
• conduct ongoing reviews of the quality of outsourced services
• develop and test a business continuity plan to minimize disruption to the firm's business and its clients if the third-party service provider does not deliver its services satisfactorily, and
• note that other legal requirements, such as privacy laws, may apply when entering into outsourcing arrangements
The regulator, the registered firm and the firm's auditors should have the same access to the work product of a third-party service provider as they would if the firm itself performed the activities. Firms should ensure this access is provided and include a provision requiring it in the contract with the service provider, if necessary.
Division 1 Compliance
11.1 Compliance system
General principles
Section 11.1 requires registered firms to establish, maintain and apply policies and procedures that establish a system of controls and supervision (a compliance system) that:
• provides assurance that the firm and individuals acting on its behalf comply with securities legislation, and
• manages the risks associated with the firm's business in accordance with prudent business practices
Operating an effective compliance system is essential to a registered firm's continuing fitness for registration. It provides reasonable assurance that the firm is meeting, and will continue to meet, all requirements of applicable securities laws and SRO rules and is managing risk in accordance with prudent business practices. A compliance system should include internal controls and monitoring systems that are reasonably likely to identify non-compliance at an early stage and supervisory systems that allow the firm to correct non-compliant conduct in a timely manner.
The responsibilities of the UDP are set out in section 5.1 and those of the CCO in section 5.2. However, compliance is not only a responsibility of a specific individual or a compliance department of the firm, but rather is a firm-wide responsibility and an integral part of the firm's activities. Everyone inat the firm should understand the standards of conduct for their role. This includes the board of directors, partners, management, employees and agents, whether or not they are registered.
Having a UDP and CCO, and in larger firms, a compliance group and other supervisory staff, does not relieve anyone else in the firm of the obligation to report and act on compliance issues. A compliance system should identify those who will act as alternates in the absence of the UDP or CCO.
Elements of an effective compliance system
While policies and procedures are essential, they do not make an acceptable compliance system on their own. An effective compliance system also includes internal controls, day to day and systemic monitoring, and supervision elements.
Internal controls
Internal controls are an important part of a firm's compliance system. They should mitigate risk and protect firm and client assets. They should be designed to assist firms in monitoring compliance with securities legislation and managing the risks that affect their business, including risks that may relate to:
• safeguarding of client and firm assets
• accuracy of books and records
• trading, including personal and proprietary trading
• conflicts of interest, including referral arrangements
• money laundering
• business interruption
• hedging strategies
• marketing and sales practices, including the use of titles and designations by the firm's registered individuals, and
• the firm's overall financial viability
Internal controls should also be specifically designed to assist firms in monitoring compliance with the know your client, know your product and suitability determination obligations.
Monitoring and supervision
Monitoring and supervision are essential elements of a firm's compliance system. They consist of day to day monitoring and supervision, and overall systemic monitoring.
(a) Day to day monitoring and supervision
In our view, an effective monitoring and supervision system includes:
• monitoring to identify specific cases of non-compliance or internal control weaknesses that might lead to non-compliance
• referring non-compliance or internal control weaknesses to management or other individuals with authority to take supervisory action to correct them
• taking supervisory action to correct them, and
• minimizing the compliance risk in key areas of a firm's operations
In our view, effective day to day monitoring should include, among other things
• approving new account documents
• reviewing and, in some cases, approving transactions
• approving marketing materials
• approving information made publicly available that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client of the firm, and
• preventing inappropriate use or disclosure of non-public information.
Firms can use a risk-based approach to monitoring, such as reviewing an appropriate sample of transactions.
The firm's management is responsible for the supervisory element of correcting non-compliance or internal control weaknesses. However, at a firm's discretion, its CCO may be given supervisory authority, but this is not a necessary component of the CCO's role.
Anyone who supervises registered individuals has a responsibility on behalf of the firm to take all reasonable measures to ensure that each of these individuals:
• deals fairly, honestly and in good faith with their clients
• addresses conflicts of interest in the best interest of their clients
• puts the client's interests first when making suitability determinations for their clients
• complies with securities legislation
• complies with the firm's policies and procedures, and
• maintains an appropriate level of proficiency
(b) Systemic monitoring
Systemic monitoring involves assessing, and advising and reporting on the effectiveness of the firm's compliance system. This includes ensuring that:
• the firm's day to day supervision is reasonably effective in identifying and promptly correcting cases of non-compliance and internal control weaknesses
• policies and procedures are enforced and kept up to date, and
• everyone at the firm generally understands and complies with the policies and procedures, and with securities legislation
Specific elements
More specific elements of an effective compliance system include:
(a) Visible commitment
Senior management and the board of directors or partners should demonstrate a visible commitment to compliance.
(b) Sufficient resources and training
The firm should have sufficient resources to operate an effective compliance system. Qualified individuals (including anyone acting as an alternate during absences) should have the responsibility and authority to monitor the firm's compliance, identify any instances of non-compliance and take supervisory action to correct them.
The firm should provide training to ensure that everyone at the firm understands the standards of conduct and their role in the compliance system, including ongoing communication and training on changes in regulatory requirements or the firm's policies and procedures.
(c) Detailed policies and procedures
The firm should have detailed written policies and procedures that:
• identify the internal controls the firm will use to ensure compliance with legislation and manage risk
• set out the firm's standards of conduct for compliance with securities and other applicable legislation and the systems for monitoring and enforcing compliance with those standards
• clearly outline who is expected to do what, when and how
• are readily accessible by everyone who is expected to know and follow them
• are updated when regulatory requirements and the firm's business practices change,
and• take into consideration the firm's obligation under securities legislation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its clients,
• take into consideration the firm's obligation to address conflicts of interest in the best interest of its clients, and
• take into consideration the firm's obligation to put the client's interest first when making suitability determinations for its clients.
Registered firms should have compliance systems that are thorough and effective in all locations of business of the firm, not just the firm's head office.
(d) Detailed records
The firm should keep records of activities conducted to identify compliance deficiencies and the action taken to correct them.
Setting up a compliance system
It is up to each registered firm to determine the most appropriate compliance system for its operations. Registered firms should consider the size and scope of their operations, including products, types of clients or counterparties, risks and compensating controls, and any other relevant factors.
For example, a large registered firm with diverse operations may require a large team of compliance professionals with several divisional heads of compliance reporting to a CCO dedicated entirely to a compliance role.
All firms must have policies, procedures and systems to demonstrate compliance. However, some of the elements noted above may be unnecessary or impractical for smaller registered firms.
We encourage firms to meet or exceed industry best practices in complying with regulatory requirements.
11.2 Designating an ultimate designated person
Under subsection 11.2(1), registered firms must designate an individual to be the UDP. Firms should ensure that the individual understands and is able to perform the obligations of a UDP under section 5.1. The UDP must be:
• the chief executive officer (CEO) of the registered firm or the individual acting in a similar capacity, if the firm does not have a CEO. The person acting in a similar capacity to a CEO is the most senior decision maker in the firm, who might have the title of managing partner or president, for example
• the sole proprietor of the registered firm, or
• the officer in charge of a division of the firm that carries on all of the registerable activity if the firm also has significant other business activities, such as insurance, conducted in different divisions. This is not an option if the core business of the firm is trading or advising in securities and it only has some other minor operations conducted in other divisions. In this case, the UDP must be the CEO or equivalent.
To designate someone else as the UDP requires an exemptive relief order. Given that the intention of section 11.2 is to ensure that responsibility for its compliance system rests at the very top of a firm, we will only grant relief in rare cases.
We note that in larger organizations, the UDP is sometimes supported by an officer who has a compliance oversight role and title within the organization and who is more senior than the CCO. We have no objection to such arrangements, but it must be understood that they can in no way diminish the UDP's regulatory responsibilities.
If the person designated as the UDP no longer meets these requirements, and the registered firm is unable to designate another UDP, the firm should promptly advise the regulator of the actions it is taking to designate a new UDP who meets these requirements.
11.3 Designating a chief compliance officer
Under subsection 11.3(1), registered firms must designate an individual to be the CCO. Firms should ensure that the individual understands and is able to perform the obligations of a CCO under section 5.2.
The CCO must meet the applicable proficiency requirements in Part 3 and be:
• an officer or partner of the registered firm, or
• the sole proprietor of the registered firm
If the CCO no longer meets any of the above conditions and the registered firm is unable to designate another CCO, the firm should promptly advise the regulator of the actions it is taking to designate an appropriate CCO.
Division 2 Books and records
Under securities legislation, the regulator may access, examine and take copies of a registered firm's records. The regulator may also conduct regular and unscheduled compliance reviews of registered firms.
11.5 General requirements for records
Under subsection 11.5(1), registered firms must maintain records to accurately record their business activities, financial affairs and client transactions, and demonstrate compliance with securities legislation.
The following discussion provides guidance for the various elements of the records described in subsection 11.5(2).
Financial affairs
The records required under paragraphs 11.5(2)(a), (b) and (c) are records firms must maintain to help ensure they are able to prepare and file financial information, determine their capital position, including the calculation of excess working capital, and generally demonstrate compliance with the capital and insurance requirements.
Client transactions
The records required under paragraphs 11.5(2)(g), (h), (i), (l) and (n) are records firms must maintain to accurately and fully document transactions entered into on behalf of a client. We expect firms to maintain notes of communications that could have an impact on the client's account or the client's relationship with the firm. These communications include
• oral communications
• all e-mail, regular mail, fax and other written communications
While we do not expect registered firms to save every voicemail or e-mail, or to record all telephone conversations with clients, we do expect that registered firms maintain records of all communications relating to orders received from their clients.
The records required under paragraph 11.5(2)(g) should document buy and sell transactions, referrals, margin transactions and any other activities relating to a client's account. They include records of all actions leading to trade execution, settlement and clearance, such as trades on exchanges, alternative trading systems, over-the-counter markets, debt markets, and distributions and trades in the prospectus-exempt market.
Examples of these records are:
• trade confirmation statements
• summary information about account activity
• communications between a registrant and its client about particular transactions, and
• records of transactions resulting from securities a client holds, such as dividends or interest paid, or dividend reinvestment program activity
Know your client
Paragraph 11.5(2)(l) requires firms to maintain records that demonstrate compliance with the know your client obligations in section 13.213.2, the know your product obligations in section 13.2.1 and the suitability determination obligations in section 13.3. This includes records for unsuitable trades in subsection 13.3(2).
We expect firms to establish, maintain and apply policies, procedures and controls relating to the know your client process, in accordance with their category of registration, their business model, their client's type of account and the nature of the relationship with their clients. We also expect firms to maintain adequate documentation to support their supervision of the know your client process.
These policies, procedures and controls should include, at a minimum, a process for:
• determining the appropriate level of know your client information to be collected in the circumstances
• determining how subjective elements of know your client, including investment time horizon, investment objectives and risk profile are established for clients and demonstrating this process, and
• a process for determining what is a significant change in a client's information
We expect firms to maintain records to evidence a client's confirmation of the accuracy of their know your client information.
Know your product
We expect firms to establish, maintain and apply policies, procedures and controls relating to the know your product process, in accordance with the firm's category of registration and its business model, and maintain adequate documentation to support their supervision of the know your product process. These policies, procedures and controls should include, at a minimum, a process for reviewing, approving and monitoring all securities offered to its clients. See section 13.2.1 of this Companion Policy for more guidance on the know your product obligation.
Suitability determinations
Registrants should document the basis upon which they make a suitability determination. We expect registrants to maintain records documenting all relevant facts, including key assumptions, the scope of data considered, and the analysis performed in making the suitability determination.
We expect firms to:
• establish policies and procedures for making a suitability determination (including the criteria used and when it is performed) and demonstrate that the suitability process is consistently applied across the firm,
• maintain adequate documentation of the suitability determination for each recommendation and decision made, and
• establish a process to periodically review a sample of client files to ensure that the suitability process is consistently applied throughout the firm. Results of this review should be documented and independently reviewed by the CCO or an individual holding a senior position in the firm. Areas of non-compliance should be discussed with staff in a timely manner and highlighted in training sessions. Significant compliance issues should be escalated to the firm's UDP to ensure that corrective action is taken in a timely manner.
Firms must also maintain records for unsuitable trades in subsection 13.3(2.1), including the obligation to:
• document of the actions taken by the registrant to address the issues identified, and
• maintain the investor's written or electronic instructions to proceed with the trade.
In our view, a pattern of unsuitable trades that are reported as having been directed by a client may be an indication that a registrant does not comply with the obligation to make a suitability determination. We expect firms to establish, maintain and apply policies, procedures and controls to identify a pattern of unsuitable trades.
Client relationship
The records required under paragraphs 11.5(2)(k) and (m) should document information about a registered firm's relationship with its client and relationships that any representatives have with that client.
These records include:
• communication between the firm and its clients, such as disclosure provided to clients and agreements between the registrant and its clients
• account opening information
• change of status information provided by the client
• disclosure and other relationship information provided by the firm
• margin account agreements
• communications regarding a complaint made by the client
• actions taken by the firm regarding a complaint
• communications that do not relate to a particular transaction, and
• conflicts records
Each record required under paragraph 11.5(2)(k) should clearly indicate the name of the accountholder and the account the record refers to. A record should include information only about the accounts of the same accountholder or group. For example, registrants should have separate records for an individual's personal accounts and for accounts of a legal entity that the individual owns or jointly holds with another party.
Where applicable, the financial details should note whether the information is for an individual or a family. This includes spousal income and net worth. The financial details for accounts of a legal entity should note whether the information refers to the entity or to the owner(s) of the entity.
If the registered firm permits clients to complete new account forms themselves, the forms should use language that is clear and avoids terminology that may be unfamiliar to unsophisticated clients.
Conflicts of interest
General principles
The records required under paragraphs 11.5(2)(p), (q) and (r) are records that registered firms must maintain to demonstrate compliance with their obligations in Part 13. Registered firms must document and demonstrate how they have addressed the conflicts of interest identified under sections 13.4.1 and 13.4.2 in the best interest of the client. A registered firm's policies and procedures for addressing conflicts should set out a process for the firm and its registered individuals to:
• identify existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest,
• determine the level of risk to the client's interest that the conflict poses, and
• address the conflict in proportion to the risk that the conflict poses to their client's interests.
Degree of materiality
We expect firms to use their discretion when deciding how much detail to provide when describing a conflict and how it has been addressed. As the materiality of a conflict increases, we expect to see greater detail about the conflict and how it is being addressed. For example, we expect to see more detailed documentation for conflicts related to sales practices, compensation arrangements, incentive practices, referral arrangements, the use of proprietary products and services, and product-shelf development conflicts.
If the materiality of a particular conflict of interest is low then the registered firm may record that conflict in a more general way, such as by category or type of conflict as opposed to recording each instance of such a conflict and how the firm has addressed this conflict in each instance. For example, subject to compliance with applicable securities legislation or SRO rules, if a firm has established a code of conduct or policy that limits the receipt of gifts or promotional items from third parties then, depending on the circumstances, it may be sufficient for that firm to record the details of its policy and the related procedures and controls, and how violations of that policy are addressed.
Referral arrangements
Registered firms must document all referral arrangements between the registered firm, its registered individuals, and another person or company, as well as all fees paid or received by the registered firm or its registered individuals pursuant to such arrangements. As part of its obligations under paragraph 11.5(2)(p), the registered firm must demonstrate how it has addressed or plans to address, conflicts related to referral arrangements in the client's best interest, and why the registered firm has determined that the specific referral is in the client's best interest. We expect that the registered firm will also document the due diligence analysis of the parties to which it is referring clients.
Sales practices, compensation arrangements and incentive practices
As part of a firm's obligations under paragraph 11.5(2)(q) we expect registered firms to document, where applicable:
• sales practices set by the firm including:
• sales targets and revenue quotas to which its registered individuals are subject,
• sales targets and revenue quotas for the sale of proprietary products
• compensation arrangements set by the firm including:
• how the firm compensates its registered individuals
• other compensation arrangements that the registered firm or its registered individuals benefit from including:
• how issuers, related or connected parties to those issuers, related or connected parties to the registered firm, or investment fund managers compensate the registered firm, including through embedded commissions
• incentive practices set by the firm, including:
• monetary and non-monetary benefits provided by the registered firm to its registered individuals as incentives
• other incentive practices that the registered firm or its registered individuals benefit from, including:
• monetary and non-monetary benefits that the registered firm or its registered individuals receive from issuers, related or connected parties to those issuers, related or connected parties to the registered firm, or investment fund managers including:
• a list of issuers, or related or connected parties to those issuers, that have provided incentives such as shelf fees, due diligence fees, shares, options, warrants, performance fees, or production bonuses
• how the registered firm tracks and oversees such benefits
Misleading business titles and designations
Section 13.18 prohibits registrants from, among other things, using titles or designations that could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead existing and prospective clients. Under paragraph 11.5(2)(r), we expect the registered firm to have policies and procedures relating to the use of titles and designations that promote transparency for potential and existing clients, particularly for more vulnerable and less sophisticated investors.
These policies and procedures should also include guidance on what titles and designations may be used and describe any restrictions or prohibitions related to titles and designations, including the requirement for pre-approval of their registered individuals' use of titles and designations. The registered firm should clearly communicate these policies and procedures to their registered individuals and enforce them accordingly.
Publicly available information
Section 14.1.2 requires registered firms that offer dealing or advising services to non-permitted clients to make publicly available information that a reasonable investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client of the firm. We expect firms to provide factual information and avoid unsubstantiated claims or comparisons. Under paragraph 11.5(2)(s), we expect registered firms to have policies and procedures relating to this information.
Internal controls
The records required under paragraphs 11.5(2)(d), (e), (f), (j), (o), (p) and (oq) are records firms must maintain to support the internal controls and supervision components of their compliance system.
11.6 Form, accessibility and retention of records
Third party access to records
Paragraph 11.6(1)(b) requires registered firms to keep their records in a safe location. This includes ensuring that no one has unauthorized access to information, particularly confidential client information. Registered firms should be particularly vigilant if they maintain books and records in a location that may be accessible by a third party. In this case, the firm should have a confidentiality agreement with the third party.
Division 3 Certain business transactions
11.8 Tied selling
Section 11.8 prohibits an individual or firm from engaging in abusive sales practices such as selling a security on the condition that the client purchase another product or service from the registrant or one of its affiliates. These types of practices are known as "tied selling". In our view, this section would be contravened if, for example, a financial institution agreed to lend money to a client only if the client acquired securities of mutual funds sponsored by the financial institution.
However, section 11.8 is not intended to prohibit relationship pricing or other beneficial selling arrangements similar to relationship pricing. Relationship pricing refers to the practice of industry participants offering financial incentives or advantages to certain clients.
11.9 Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets
Notice requirement
Under section 11.9, registrants must give the regulator notice if they propose to acquire an ownership interest in voting securities (or securities convertible into voting securities) or assets of another registered firm or the parent of another registered firm. This notice must be delivered to the principal regulator of the registrant proposing to make the acquisition and to the principal regulator of the registered firm they propose to acquire, if that firm is registered in Canada. If the principal regulator of both firms is the same, only one notice is required.
Registrants acquiring securities or assets of another registered firm for a client in nominee name do not need to provide notice under section 11.9. For purposes of this section, a substantial part of the assets of the registered firm would include a registered firm's book of business, a business line or a division of the firm, among other things. This notice gives the regulator an opportunity to consider ownership issues that may affect a firm's fitness for registration.
Filing of the notice with the principal regulator
It is intended that the notice filed with the principal regulator(s) will be shared with other regulators with an interest in the proposed acquisition. Therefore, although only the principal regulator(s) will receive a notice, other jurisdictions may object to the proposed acquisition under subsections 11.9(4) and 11.9(5). The registrant will have an opportunity to be heard in any jurisdiction that has objected to the proposed acquisition. It is our intent, however, to coordinate the review of these notices and any decisions to object to these proposed acquisitions.
Subsection 11.9(4) does not apply in British Columbia. However, the regulator in British Columbia may exercise discretion under section 36 or 161 of the BC Securities Act (BCSA) to impose conditions, restrictions or requirements on the registrant's registration or to suspend or revoke the registration if it decides that an acquisition would affect the registrant's fitness for registration or be prejudicial to the public interest. In these circumstances, the registrant would be entitled to an opportunity to be heard, except if the regulator issues a temporary order under section 161 of the BCSA.
Content of the notice
When preparing the notice under section 11.9, registrants should consider including the following information to help the regulator assess the proposed transaction:
• the proposed closing date for the transaction
• the business reasons for the transaction
• the corporate structure, both before and after the closing of the proposed transaction, including all affiliated companies and subsidiaries of the acquirer and any registered firm involved in the proposed transaction whether interests in a company, partnership or trust are held directly or through a holding company, trust or other entity
• information on the operations and business plans of the acquirer and any registered firm involved in the proposed transaction, including any changes to Item 3.1 of Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration such as primary business activities, target market, and the products and services provided to clients of any registered firm involved in the proposed transaction
• any significant changes to the business operations of any registered firm involved in the proposed transaction, including changes to the CCO, the UDP, key management, directors, officers, permitted individuals or registered individuals
• whether the registered firms involved in the proposed transaction have written policies and procedures to address conflicts of interest that may arise following the transaction and information on how such conflicts of interest have been or will be addressed.
• whether the registered firms involved in the proposed transaction have adequate resources to ensure compliance with all applicable conditions of registration
• a confirmation that any registered firm involved in the proposed transaction will comply with section 4.1 following the transaction
• details of any client communications in connection with the transaction that have been made or are planned or an explanation of why no communications to clients are anticipated
• whether a press release will be issued in relation to the proposed transaction
11.10 Registered firm whose securities are acquired
Notice requirement
Under section 11.10, registered firms must notify their principal regulator if they know or have reason to believe that any individual or firm is about to acquire 10% or more of the voting securities (or securities convertible into voting securities) of the firm or the firm's parent. This notice gives the regulator an opportunity to consider ownership issues that may affect a firm's fitness for registration. We expect this notice to be sent as soon as the registered firm knows or has reason to believe such an acquisition is going to take place.
Filing of the notice with the principal regulator
It is intended that the notice filed with the principal regulator(s) will be shared with other regulators with an interest in the proposed acquisition. Therefore, although only the principal regulator(s) will receive a notice, other jurisdictions may object to the proposed acquisition under subsections 11.10(5) and 11.10(6). The registered firm will have an opportunity to be heard in any jurisdiction that has objected to the proposed acquisition. It is our intent, however, to coordinate the review of these notices and any decisions to object to these proposed acquisitions.
Application for registration
We expect any individual or firm that acquires assets of a registered firm and is not already a registrant will have to apply for registration. We will assess their fitness for registration when they apply.
Subsection 11.10(5) does not apply in British Columbia. However, the regulator in British Columbia may exercise discretion under section 36 or 161 of the BCSA to impose conditions, restrictions or requirements on the registrant's registration or to suspend or revoke the registration if it decides that an acquisition would affect the registrant's fitness for registration or be prejudicial to the public interest. In these circumstances, the registrant would be entitled to an opportunity to be heard, except if the regulator issues a temporary order under section 161 of the BCSA.
Content of the notice
Refer to the guidance in section 11.9.
Part 12 Financial condition
Division 1 Working capital
12.1 Capital requirements
Frequency of working capital calculations
Section 12.1 requires registered firms to notify the regulator as soon as possible if their excess working capital is less than zero.
Registered firms should know their working capital position at all times. This may require a firm to calculate its working capital every day. The frequency of working capital calculations depends on many factors, including the size of the firm, the nature of its business and the stability of the components of its working capital. For example, it may be sufficient for a sole proprietor firm with a dedicated and stable source of working capital to do the calculation on a monthly basis.
Form 31-103F1 Calculation of excess working capital
Application of NI 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards
Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital (Form 31-103F1) must be prepared using the accounting principles used to prepare financial statements in accordance with National Instrument 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards (NI 52-107). Refer to section 12.10 of this Companion Policy and Companion Policy 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards (52-107CP) for further guidance on audited financial statements.
IIROC and MFDA member firms that are also registered in another category
IIROC and MFDA member firms that are also registered in a category that does not require SRO membership must still comply with the financial filing requirements in Part 12 Financial condition, even if they are relying on the exemptions in sections 9.3 and 9.4. Provided certain conditions are met, SRO members that are registered in other categories may be permitted to calculate their working capital in accordance with the SRO forms and file the SRO forms instead of Form 31-103F1.
For example, if the SRO firm is also an investment fund manager, it will need to report any net asset value (NAV) adjustments quarterly in order to comply with the investment fund manager requirements, notwithstanding that its SRO has no such requirements. However, they may be permitted to calculate their working capital in accordance with the SRO forms and file the SRO forms instead of Form 31-103F1. See sections 12.1, 12.12 and 12.14 for the requirements on delivery of working capital calculations for SRO members that are registered in multiple categories.
Working capital requirements are not cumulative
The working capital requirements for registered firms set out in section 12.1 are not cumulative. If a firm is registered in more than one category, it must meet the highest capital requirement of its categories of registration, except for those investment fund managers who are also registered as portfolio managers and meet the requirements of the exemption in section 8.6. These investment fund managers need only meet the lower capital requirement for portfolio managers.
If a registrant becomes insolvent or declares bankruptcy
The regulator will review the circumstances of a registrant's insolvency or bankruptcy on a case-by-case basis. If the regulator has concerns, it may impose terms and conditions on the registrant's registration, such as close supervision and delivering progress reports to the regulator, or it may suspend the registrant's registration.
12.2 Subordination agreement
Non-current related party debt must be deducted from a firm's working capital on Form 31-103F1, unless the firm and the lender have executed a subordination agreement in the form set out in Appendix B of NI 31-103 and delivered a copy of that agreement to the regulator. A portion of the non-current loan becoming current would not impact the original subordination agreement; the firm would have to notify the regulator if the firm repays the loan or any part of the non-current portion of the loan. However, the current portion of the originally-intended non-current subordinated loan would have to be included in Line 4 of Form 31-103F1, and could not be included in Line 5 of Form 31-103F1. This may not be the total amount of the original loan as set out in the subordination agreement, and as such the amount in the subordination agreement would not agree to Line 5 of Form 31-103F1.
Related party debt due on demand or repayable by the firm at any time, including pursuant to a revolving line of credit, is an example of a current liability. These types of liabilities are not eligible to be subordinated for the purposes of calculating excess working capital. The amount of current related party debt must be included in line 4 -- Current liabilities of Form 31-103F1.
Firms must deliver subordination agreements to the regulator on the earlier of 10 days after the execution of the agreement or the date on which the firm excludes the amount of the related party debt from its excess working capital calculation. A firm may not exclude the amount until the subordination agreement is executed and delivered to the regulator.
The firm's obligations under section 12.2 to notify the regulator 10 days before it repays the loan or terminates the subordination agreement apply regardless of the terms of any loan agreement. Firms should ensure the terms of their loan agreements do not conflict with their regulatory requirements.
If a subordinated related party debt is being increased and the incremental increase is to be subordinated, the subordination agreement submitted to the regulator should only report the incremental increase. Firms should not report the full balance of the related party debt, as noted on the statement of financial position, on the new subordination agreement unless the previous subordination agreement is terminated and notification of this termination is made in accordance with section 12.2.
In conjunction with the submission of a new subordination agreement, the regulator may request that the firm provide a schedule detailing the total outstanding subordinated debt.
The regulator may request that additional documentation be provided in conjunction with the firm's notice of repayment of a subordinated debt in order to assess whether the firm will have sufficient excess working capital following the repayment. This may include updated interim financial information and a completed Form 31-103F1.
At the time the firm submits a notice of repayment, the firm should provide an updated schedule to the regulator, detailing the total outstanding subordinated debt following the repayment.
Division 2 Insurance
Insurance coverage limits
Registrants must maintain bonding or insurance that provides for a "double aggregate limit" or a "full reinstatement of coverage" (also known as "no aggregate limit"). The insurance provisions state that the registered firm must "maintain" bonding or insurance in the amounts specified. We do not expect that the calculation would differ materially from day to day. If there is a material change in a firm's circumstances, it should consider the potential impact on its ability to meet its insurance requirements.
Most insurers offer aggregate limit policies that contain limits based on a single loss and on the number or value of losses that occur during the coverage period.
Double aggregate limit policies have a specified limit for each claim. The total amount that may be claimed during the coverage period is twice that limit. For example, if an adviser maintains a financial institution bond of $50,000 for each clause with a double aggregate limit, the adviser's coverage is $50,000 for any one claim and $100,000 for all claims during the coverage period.
Full reinstatement of coverage policies and no aggregate limit policies have a specified limit for each claim but no limit on the number of claims or losses during the coverage period. For example, if an adviser maintains a financial institution bond of $50,000 for each clause with a full reinstatement of coverage provision, the adviser's maximum coverage is $50,000 for any one claim, but there is no limit on the total amount that can be claimed under the bond during the coverage period.
Insurance requirements are not cumulative
Insurance requirements are not cumulative. For example, a firm registered in the categories of portfolio manager and investment fund manager need only maintain insurance coverage for the higher of the amounts required for each registration category. Despite being registered as both a portfolio manager and an investment fund manager, when calculating the investment fund manager insurance requirement under subsection 12.5(2), an investment fund manager should only include the total assets under management of its own investment funds. It is only with respect to its own funds that the registrant is acting as an investment fund manager.
12.4 Insurance -- adviser
The insurance requirements for advisers depend in part on whether the adviser holds or has access to client assets.
An adviser will be considered to hold or have access to client assets if they do any of the following:
• hold client securities or cash for any period
• accept funds from clients, for example, a cheque made payable to the registrant
• accept client money from a custodian, for example, client money that is deposited in the registrant's bank or trust accounts before the registrant issues a cheque to the client
• have the ability to gain access to client assets
• have, in any capacity, legal ownership of, or access to, client funds or securities
• have the authority, such as under a power of attorney, to withdraw funds or securities from client accounts
• have authority to debit client accounts to pay bills other than investment management fees
• act as a trustee for clients
• act as fund manager or general partner for investment funds, or
• use a custodian that is not functionally independent of the adviser and that, if used, allows the registered firm to access client assets
A registered firm will generally be considered to have access to client assets through the use of a custodian that is not functionally independent of the firm when any of the following apply:
• the registered firm and the custodian share the same mind and management such that the registered firm and the custodian would not reasonably be considered to be operating independently
• the custodial activities are performed by personnel that are not separate from, or are unable to act independently from, personnel of the registered firm
12.6 Global bonding or insurance
Registered firms may be covered under a global insurance policy. Under this type of policy, the firm is insured under a parent company's policy that covers the parent and its subsidiaries or affiliates. Firms should ensure that the claims of other entities covered under a global insurance policy do not affect the limits or coverage applicable to the firm.
Division 4 Financial reporting
12.10 Annual financial statements
12.11 Interim financial information
Accounting Principles
Registrants are required to deliver annual financial statements and interim financial information that comply with NI 52-107. Depending on the financial year, a registrant will look to different parts of NI 52-107 to determine which accounting principles and auditing standards apply:
• Part 3 of NI 52-107 applies for financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2011;
• Part 4 of NI 52-107 applies to financial years beginning before January 1, 2011.
Part 3 of NI 52-107 refers to Canadian GAAP applicable to publicly accountable enterprises, which is IFRS as incorporated into the Handbook. Under Part 3 of NI 52-107, annual financial statements and interim financial information delivered by a registrant must be prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP applicable to publicly accountable enterprises except that any investments in subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates must be accounted for as specified for separate financial statements in International Accounting Standard 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. Separate financial statements are sometimes referred to as non-consolidated financial statements.
Subsection 3.2(3) of NI 52-107 requires annual financial statements to include a statement and description about this required financial reporting framework. Section 2.7 of 52-107CP provides guidance on subsection 3.2(3). We remind registrants to refer to these provisions in NI 52-107 and 52-107CP in preparing their annual financial statements and interim financial information.
Part 4 of NI 52-107 refers to Canadian GAAP for public enterprises, which is Canadian GAAP as it existed before the mandatory effective date for the adoption of IFRS, included in the Handbook as Part V. Under Part 4 of NI 52-107, annual financial statements and interim financial information delivered by a registrant must be prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP for public enterprises except that the financial statements and interim financial information must be prepared on a non-consolidated basis.
12.14 Delivering financial information -- investment fund manager
NAV errors and adjustments
Section 12.14 requires investment fund managers to periodically deliver to the regulator, among other things, a completed Form 31-103F4 Net Asset Value Adjustments if any NAV adjustment has been made. A NAV adjustment is necessary when there has been a material error and the NAV per unit does not accurately reflect the actual NAV per unit at the time of computation.
Some examples of the causes of NAV errors are:
• mispricing of a security
• corporate action recorded incorrectly
• incorrect numbers used for issued and outstanding units
• incorrect expenses and income used or accrued
• incorrect foreign exchange rates used in the valuation, and
• human error, such as inputting an incorrect value
We expect investment fund managers to have policies that clearly define what constitutes a material error that requires an adjustment, including threshold levels, and how to correct material errors. If an investment fund manager does not have a threshold in place, it may wish to consider the threshold in IFIC Bulletin Number 22 Correcting Portfolio NAV Errors or adopt a more stringent policy.
Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms
Division 1 Know your client, know your product and suitability determination
13.2 Know your client
General principles
Registrants act as gatekeepers of the integrity of the capital markets. They should not, by act or omission, facilitate conduct that brings the market into disrepute. As part of their gatekeeper role, registrants are required to establish the identity of, and conduct due diligence on, their clients under the know your client (or KYC) obligation in section 13.2. Complying with the KYC obligation can help ensure that trades are completed in accordance with securities laws.KYC information formshelps form the basis for determining whether trades in securities are suitable for investors. This helpssuitability, in order to protect the client, the registrant and the integrity of the capital markets. The KYC obligation requires registrants to take reasonable steps to obtain and periodically update information about their clients. The KYC process is an ongoing one which does not end after the initial KYC analysis is complete.
Establishing the identity and reputation of the client
Clients that are individuals
Registrants must collect information to establish the identity of the clients that are individuals. Registrants must also take reasonable steps to confirm the accuracy of the information collected, in order to form a reasonable belief that they know the identity of the individual.
Verifying a client's reputation
Paragraph 13.2(2)(a) requires registrants to make inquiries if they have cause for concern about a client's reputation. The registrant must and to make all reasonable inquiries necessary to resolve the concern. This includes making a reasonable effort to determine, for example, the nature of the client's business or the identity of beneficial owners where the client is a corporation, partnership or trust. See subsection 13.2(3) for additional guidance on identifying clients that are corporations, partnerships or trusts.
Identifying insiders
Under paragraph 13.2(2)(b), a registrant must take reasonable steps to establish whether the client is an insider of a reporting issuer or any other issuer whose securities are publicly traded. We consider "reasonable steps" to include explaining to the client what an insider is and what it means for securities to be publicly traded.
For purposes of this paragraph, "reporting issuer" has the meaning given to it in securities legislation and "other issuer" means any issuer whose securities are traded in any public market. This includes domestic, foreign, exchange-listed and over-the-counter markets. This definition, but does not include issuers whose securities have been distributed through a private placement and are not freely tradeable.
A registrant need not ascertain whether the client is an insider if the only securities traded for the client are mutual fund securities and scholarship plan securities referred to in paragraphs 7.1(2)(b) and 7.1(2)(c). However, we encourage firms, when selling highly concentrated pooled funds, to enquire as to whether a client is an insider of the issuer of any securities held by the fund, notwithstanding the exemption provided in subsection 13.2(7). In addition, we remind registrants that they remain subject to the requirement in paragraph 13.2(2)(b) when they trade any other securities than those listed in paragraphs 7.1(2)(b) and 7.1(2)(c).
This exemption does not change an insider's reporting and conduct responsibilities.
Clients that are corporations, partnerships or trusts
Subsection 13.2(3) requires registrants to establish the identity of any person who owns or controls 25% or more of the shares of a client that is a corporation or exercises control over the affairs of a client that is a partnership or trust. We remind registrants that this is in addition to the requirement in paragraph 13.2(2)(a) which requires registrants to make inquiries if they have cause for concern about a client's reputation. If a registrant has cause for concern about a particular client that is a corporation, partnership or trust, they may need to identify all beneficial owners of such entity.
KYC for conducting suitability determination
Understanding the client
We expect the KYC process to result in registrants thoroughly understanding the client. KYC information must not be made to correspond or match with a security, account or portfolio. In addition, a registrant may need to ask different questions to gather sufficient information in a particular area. For example, we expect registrants to have a meaningful understanding of what their client's investment needs and objectives are, and it is not sufficient to simply ask the client if their investment objectives fall into one of a short list of pre-determined product-focused options, such as "growth", "income" or "balanced", or to limit the KYC process to a mechanical attribution of clients into such limited options.
Interaction with the client
The process of collecting and updating the client's information requires a meaningful interaction with the client, even if that interaction does not take the form of a face-to-face conversation and regardless of the medium used. Registrants should take the opportunity of the initial KYC collection to explain the client's role in keeping KYC information current with the registrant.
Tools such as questionnaires and investment policy statements may be used to facilitate the collection of KYC information and to document the client's investment needs and objectives.
Providing assistance to clients
While some of the information collected can be readily obtained from the client, other elements may require explanation and further discussion with the client. For example, clients may need assistance in articulating what their investment needs and objectives are, or may also provide instructions that are unclear or seem inconsistent with their KYC information. In these situations, the registrant should make further inquiries of the client. We expect particular care to be exercised by registrants concerning more vulnerable and less sophisticated clients.
The registrant should not simply assume that the client will understand the KYC questions and related discussions or interactions. The KYC questions should therefore be in plain language and provide to the client explanations of what each question or item relates to and what relevant terms and expressions mean, including:
• financial circumstances
• investment needs and objectives
• investment knowledge
• risk profile, and
• investment time horizon
Collection of KYC information and use of technology
Responsibilities arising from the KYC obligation cannot be delegated. A registrant must not rely on a third party, such as a referral agent, for KYC information. Although technological tools or services may be used to facilitate the collection of KYC information, the registrant is responsible for the KYC process regardless of the tools or services used.
The KYC obligation is the same whether a registrant operates under the traditional model of interacting with clients face-to-face or via an online platform or other technology, although the extent of information gathered to support a registrant discharging its KYC obligation may vary.
Tailoring the KYC process
A registrant should tailor its KYC process to reflect its business model and the nature of its relationships with clients. Paragraph 13.2(2)(c) outlines the information to be collected, although the depth of inquiry and what constitutes sufficient information required to support a suitability determination will vary according to the nature of the client's relationship with the registrant, the securities and services to be provided to the client, the client's personal and financial circumstances, the client's investment needs and objectives, and the registrant's business model. For example, extensive KYC information will be required if the registrant offers a fully-customized service or is a portfolio manager with discretionary authority for a client with relatively complex financial circumstances.
KYC information to support use of prospectus exemptions
Registrants should develop a KYC process that provides for the collection of sufficient information about the client to allow the registrant to determine if the client meets the requirements of a prospectus exemption that is proposed to be relied on.
Client's personal circumstances
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(i) requires the registrant to ensure that it has sufficient information on the client's personal circumstances. For individuals, this includes:
• date of birth
• address and contact information
• civil status or family situation
• number of dependants
• employment status and occupation
• whether someone other than the client is authorised to provide instructions on the account, and
• whether someone other than the client has a financial interest in the account.
For non-individuals, this includes:
• legal name
• head office address and contact information
• type of legal entity, i.e. corporation, trust, or other entity
• form and details regarding the organization of the legal entity, i.e. articles of incorporation, trust deed, or other constating documents
• nature of business, and
• persons authorized to provide instructions on the account and details of any restrictions on their authority.
Client's financial circumstances
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(ii) requires the registrant to ensure that it has sufficient information on the client's financial circumstances. A client's financial circumstances include, where applicable:
• annual income
• liquidity needs
• financial assets
• net worth, and
• whether the client is using leverage or borrowing to finance the purchase of securities.
Registrants should obtain a breakdown of financial assets, including deposits and type of securities such as mutual funds, listed securities, exempt securities, and net worth, which should cover all types of assets and liabilities. This can help establish that the information collected accurately reflects the client's financial circumstances and will assist the registrant in their suitability determination of any investment made.
Client's liquidity needs
Liquidity needs are an important aspect of a client's financial circumstances. The registrant should ascertain the extent to which a client wishes or needs to access all or a portion of their investments to meet their ongoing and short-term expenses and financial obligations or fund major planned expenditures. Liquidity needs also include money set aside for unanticipated financial emergencies, such as job loss or disability.
When assessing a client's liquidity needs, a registrant should consider whether the client has any other means to cover their expenditures, whether the needs are expected or unexpected, and whether, once the need materializes, the money will be withdrawn on a regular basis, such as once a month or once a year.
Leverage or borrowing to finance the purchase of securities
Understanding a client's financial circumstances includes whether or not a client is using leverage or is borrowing to finance the purchase or carrying of securities. When a client uses leverage or borrows money to invest, or borrows against the value of their investments, we expect the registrant to gather more specific details regarding the client's financial circumstances, including, for example, information regarding the client's cash flow, debts and breakdown of financial assets. This will help the registrant with their suitability determination for an investment funded or carried through borrowing.
Client's investment objectives
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(iii) requires the registrant to ensure that it has sufficient information on the client's investment needs and objectives. A client's investment objectives are the results they want to achieve when investing, such as capital preservation, income generated by invested capital, capital growth or speculation. A client's investment objectives help establish what particular type of investments are needed to fulfill the purpose of the account or portfolio. Investment needs and objectives are determined based on the client's financial goals, financial needs, and any applicable investment constraints and preferences.
Financial goals can be monetary targets driven by specific future liquidity needs. A client's financial goals can be set for short or long term, but should be specific and measurable. The registrant's approach in ascertaining their clients' investment objectives should include an opportunity for clients to express their financial goals in meaningful terms, such as saving for retirement to maintain a certain lifestyle, increasing wealth by a certain percentage in a specific number of years, investing for purchase of a home, or investing for the post-secondary education of the investor's children.
When establishing a client's investment objectives, a registrant should consider setting out the investment return that would be required to meet the client's financial goals, taking into account the client's risk profile. A registrant should also provide explanations to the client as to whether the outcome of their account or portfolio is on track to achieve their financial goals.
Depending on the nature of the relationship with the client, and the securities and services offered by the registrant, registrants should take into account whether there are any other priorities, such as paying down high interest debt or directing cash into a savings account, that are more likely to achieve the client's investment objectives and financial goals than a transaction in securities.
Client's investment knowledge
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(iv) requires the registrant to ensure that it has sufficient information on the client's investment knowledge, which is the client's understanding of financial markets, the relative risk and limitations of various types of investments, and how the level of risk taken affects potential returns. This supports assessing the client's risk profile.
We expect registrants to inquire about the client's level of awareness and previous experiences with finances and investments. This inquiry should not only rely on self-assessment by the client. A registrant should also make further inquiries if the information provided by the client appears to be inconsistent with their level of investment knowledge. For example, a client may indicate that they have limited investment knowledge and experience, while also indicating a willingness to take on a high level of risk. In these circumstances, a registrant should take into account the client's investment knowledge when assessing the client's risk profile.
Client's risk profile
Determination of the client's risk profile
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(v) requires the registrant to ensure that it has sufficient information on the client's risk profile. Understanding the client's risk profile, namely a client's relationship toward investment risk, is an important step in the KYC process and an essential element a registrant should consider when making a suitability determination for a client. Establishing a client's risk profile involves understanding the client's willingness to take risk, sometimes referred to as risk tolerance or risk attitude, and their ability to endure potential financial loss, sometimes referred to as risk capacity. Risk tolerance and risk capacity act as separate, considerations that limit how much risk a client is willing and able to take. Therefore, the risk profile for a client should reflect the lower of the client's willingness to accept risk and the client's capacity to withstand declines in the value of their portfolio. Other factors may be relevant for a registrant to consider when establishing a client's risk profile, such as loss aversion, or the tendency to prefer avoiding losses to realizing equivalent gains.
Registrants should have in place a thorough process for assessing the level of risk a client is willing and able to take, including:
• assessing a client's capacity for loss,
• appropriately interpreting client responses to questions and not attributing inappropriate weight to certain answers, and
• identifying clients that are more suited to placing their money in cash deposits or guaranteed products because they are unwilling or unable to accept the risk of loss of capital.
Assessing a client's capacity for loss involves the registrant having an understanding of the client's financial circumstances, including liquidity needs, debts, income and assets. Another consideration in determining risk capacity is how much of a client's total investments a particular investment or account represents. Age and life stage can also be important considerations when assessing a client's capacity to withstand loss.
The process for developing a client's risk profile should be supportable and reliable. The questions and answers that are used to establish the level of risk a client is willing and able to take should be documented. The questions should be fair, clear and not misleading.
Tools such as questionnaires should be designed to arrive at a meaningful risk profile for the client. Registrants should monitor the use of tools used to aid in the risk profiling process and recognize and mitigate any limitations inherent in the use of the tool. For example, questions which are used to determine a client's risk tolerance should not be limited to a range of risk levels within certain types of securities. A registrant who is only gathering risk tolerance information, especially for exempt market products, may not obtain a meaningful understanding of what is a client's actual risk tolerance. In our view, having a single category for risk tolerance, applied to all clients, is not acceptable.
A client's risk profile should not be manipulated to justify recommending higher-risk products, and clients should not be influenced by a representative as to the way they respond to questions related to risk tolerance.
Resolving conflicts between a client's expectations and risk profile
A client's investment needs and objectives may conflict with the level of risk that they are willing and able to take. In these circumstances, the registrant should discuss this conflict in detail with the client. Clients may also have unrealistic expectations, for example the expectation to earn high returns with little risk. A desire to meet unrealistic expectations may lead clients with a lower risk tolerance to invest in higher-risk products that are unsuitable for them. A detailed discussion of the relationship between risk and return is critical to establishing realistic expectations.
Registrants should not override the risk a client is willing and able to accept on the basis that the client's expectations on returns to meet their investment objectives cannot otherwise be met given the risk profile associated with their KYC responses. The registrant should identify any mismatches in the client's investment needs and objectives, risk tolerance and capacity for loss. The questions at the source of this conflict should be revisited with the client. If a client's goals or return objectives cannot be achieved without taking greater risk than they are able or willing to take, alternatives should be clearly explained such as saving more, spending less or retiring later.
Where after discussion, it is determined that the client does not have the capacity or tolerance to sustain the potential losses and volatility associated with a higher risk portfolio, the registrant should explain to the client that their need or expectation for a higher return cannot realistically be met, and as a result, the higher risk portfolio is unsuitable. The interaction with the client and end results should be properly documented.
Client's investment time horizon
Subparagraph 13.2(2)(c)(vi) requires the registrant to ascertain the client's investment time horizon. When a client identifies their investment time horizon, the registrant has the responsibility to assess its feasibility and reasonableness in comparison to the client's liquidity needs, age, investment objectives, risk profile, and other particular circumstances. The length of the client's investment time horizon impacts the types of investments that may be suitable for the client. Investors with a longer investment time horizon may have a greater degree of flexibility when building a portfolio, whereas a shorter investment time horizon may mean that conservative investments may be the only suitable option.
Client's confirmation
Under section 13.2(3.1), the registrant must obtain the client's confirmation of the accuracy of the information collected under subsection 13.2(2), including any significant changes to the client's information. This confirmation may be evidenced by handwritten, electronic or digital signature or by maintaining notes in the client file detailing the client's instructions to change the information. It should also be verified by providing written confirmation to the client with details of the instructions for change and providing an opportunity for the client to correct any changes that have been made. A registrant should consider implementing additional controls to evidence any change in client name, address or banking information since these changes may bring about an increased potential for fraud. Controls could include obtaining the client's handwritten, electronic or digital signature.
We expect registrants to record the date on which information is collected under subsection 13.2(2) and updated under subsections 13.2(4) or 13.2(4.1). The books and records required to be maintained under section 11.5 [general requirements for records] should include maintaining evidence of a client's confirmation of the accuracy of their KYC information.
Significant change to client information
A significant change to a client's information includes changes to the risk profile, investment time horizon or investments needs and objectives of the client, and changes that would reasonably be expected to have a significant impact on the net worth or income of the client. A significant change to the client's information collected under subsection 13.2(2) or updated under subsection 13.2(4) or 13.2(4.1) may result in the client's KYC information no longer accurately reflecting the client's current situation.
Keeping KYC information current
Under subsection 13.2(4), registrants are required to make reasonable efforts to keep their clients' KYC information current. We consider information to be current if it is sufficiently up-to-date to support a suitability determination. For example, a portfolio manager with discretionary authority should update its clients' KYC information frequently. A dealer that only occasionally recommends trades to a client should ensure that the client's KYC information is up-to-date at the time a proposed trade or recommendation is made. Without adequate and timely KYC information, registrants cannot meet their suitability determination obligations. We expect registrants to determine a proper time period for reviewing and updating clients' information that is in accordance with the client's circumstances, the registrant's category of registration, business model and the type of relationship they have with a client.
Subsection 13.2(4.1) sets out the minimum frequency for reviewing and updating a client's KYC information. Some registrants may need to review and update a client's information more frequently in response to significant changes in the client's circumstances. If an exempt market dealer is also registered in another dealer registration category, we expect that KYC information is updated within 12 months prior to making a trade or recommendation of an exempt security.
Updating the KYC information means that the registrant should review and refresh the information on record after having a meaningful and documented interaction with the client in order to keep the information current. It does not mean, however, that the registrant has to re-collect all of the information. The extent of the update will depend on how long it has been since the last update of the client's information. We expect registrants to be proactive in determining that KYC information is current and, at a minimum, to periodically confirm with clients that the information they have on file remains current.
When there is a change in a client's circumstances, or when a significant change occurs in the client's information collected under subsection 13.2(2) with respect to a client's specific account, a registrant should consider whether the change should prompt an update of KYC information specific to other accounts of the client held by the registrant.
13.2.1 Know Your Product
General obligations of registrants
Section 13.2.1 sets out know your product (or KYP) requirements for both firms and individuals. In order to make the suitability determination that is required by section 13.3 [suitability determination], registrants must have a thorough knowledge and understanding of all securities that are purchased and sold for, or recommended to, their clients.
Subsection 13.2.1(1) prohibits a registered firm from making a security available to clients unless the firm has first taken reasonable steps to understand the security, including the structure, features, returns and risks, as well as the initial and ongoing costs of the security and the impact of those costs. We take the view that a registered firm makes a security available to clients by:
• purchasing or selling it for a client,
• recommending it to a client,
• placing the security on the firm's "shelf", product or watch list, or
• advertising or promoting the security in any medium, including distributing marketing material about the security to a client.
Subsection 13.2.1(3) prohibits registered individuals from purchasing or selling a security for, or recommending a security to, a client unless the registered individuals have complied with certain conditions. Under paragraph 13.2.1(3)(a), registered individuals must first have taken reasonable steps to understand, at a general level, each security available for them to purchase and sell for, or recommend to, clients, as well as how those securities compare to one another. Registered individuals must have a high level understanding of the structure, features, returns, risks and costs of each such security in order to be able to compare them, and to be able to select a smaller universe to focus on should they choose to do so.
Under paragraph 13.2.1(3)(b), registered individuals must also have taken reasonable steps to thoroughly understand all securities they purchase and sell for, or recommend to, clients before purchasing or selling those securities for clients or making recommendations to clients in respect of those securities. This thorough understanding includes understanding the structure, features, returns and risks of the securities, as well as the initial and ongoing costs of the securities and the impact of those costs.
Firm KYP process
Subsection 13.2.1(1) requires registered firms to analyse and understand, approve (or reject) and monitor securities that they intend to make available to clients. Firms must establish and maintain written policies and procedures setting out their KYP process, including their procedures for documenting the process, and must apply these policies and procedures consistently.
The extent of the KYP process required for a security will depend on the structure and features of that security, and a firm's policies and procedures should set out the different levels of review for different types of securities, as appropriate. For example, complex investment products, including those that are novel, not transparent in structure, or involve leverage, options or other derivatives, may require a more extensive review than more straightforward securities. Securities sold under a prospectus exemption may require a more extensive review because of the limited disclosure available about them and the less liquid nature of the securities.
We expect that a firm's KYP process will include: a process for analysing and understanding the securities that a firm is considering making available to clients; a process for approving those securities; and a process for ongoing monitoring and reassessment of the securities that a firm makes available to clients.
Securities of related or connected issuers
Registrants are not relieved of their KYP obligations in respect of securities of related and connected issuers. Where a firm offers securities of related and connected issuers as well as other securities, we expect that the securities of related and connected issuers will be subject to the same KYP process as those of other issuers. Securities of related and connected issuers must be analysed and understood, approved and monitored in an objective manner and must be subject to the same scrutiny as securities of other issuers. We remind registrants of the requirements in Part 13, Division 2 [conflicts of interest] and their obligation to address conflicts in the best interests of their clients, including those that arise as a result of recommending securities of related and connected issuers to clients, or trading in securities of related and connected issuers for clients.
Where firms offer securities of related or connected issuers as well as other securities, we expect that the performance of related and connected issuers will be subject to the same scrutiny as the performance of other issuers. For example, we expect that the criteria used to remove a product offered by an unrelated or unconnected issuer should also result in the removal of products sharing the same attributes from related or connected issuers.
Understanding the securities made available to clients
A firm's KYP process must include an analysis of a security's structure, features, returns and risks, as well as initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, so that firms can meet the requirement to take reasonable steps to understand each security made available to clients. We expect this would include an analysis of:
• the general structure and features of the security, including:
• the overall complexity, transparency and uniqueness of the security's structure and features
• the basis of the security's return, for example capital growth, dividends and interest rate, and the likelihood of achieving its investment objectives and any expected returns
• the time horizon, including liquidity limitations and any features that lock in the principal and/or returns
• the use of leverage by the issuer
• the conflicts of interest, if any, inherent in the security, arising for example from the compensation structure, related party issues or other factors, including an assessment of how any conflicts of interest are being addressed by the issuer
• the parties involved, including the issuer's financial position, history and viability, as well as the qualification, reputation and track record of the parties involved in key aspects of the security or the issuer's operations (for example, management of the issuer, portfolio manager, product manufacturer or sponsor, guarantors or significant counterparties)
• the risks of the security, including:
• risks related to the security itself, such as liquidity risk, price volatility, default risk and exposure to counterparty risk,
• risks related to assets underlying the security, and
• the risk of loss of some or all of the amount invested;
• the initial and ongoing costs of acquiring, owning and disposing of a security, as well as the impact of those costs on performance, client returns or otherwise, including:
• fees paid to registrants or other parties, such as commissions, sales charges, trailer fees, management fees, incentive fees, referral fees and redemption fees
• embedded costs in the security, such as expenses or bid-ask spreads
• how the security can be used as part of an investment strategy by representatives, including how it could fit with other securities in client portfolios
• the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the issuer or the offering, including:
• any laws or rules of self-regulatory organizations that apply to the issuer or any registrant involved
• if distributed under an exemption, whether the security meets the requirements of the exemption
• jurisdiction and legal characteristics, and
• frequency, completeness and quality of the disclosure relating to the issuer or the offering.
As part of its KYP process to understand a security, a firm must also understand how that security generally compares with similar securities available in the market, and must take this into account when determining whether or not to approve the security to be made available to clients. Our expectation is that firms consider the overall competitiveness of the security, as compared to a reasonable range of similar investment opportunities, as a factor to be considered when approving the security. As noted above, this requirement applies equally to securities of related and connected issuers, and firms must understand generally how securities of their related and connected issuers compare with similar securities available in the market, regardless of whether or not the firm makes securities of unrelated or unconnected issuers available to clients.
Firms are expected to have the appropriate skills and experience to perform the necessary analysis of all securities to be made available to clients. We expect that firms will include representation from all relevant parts of the firm, such as compliance and risk management, when completing their analysis. Some firms may wish to establish a product review committee, which would include appropriate representation from within the firm, to conduct this analysis.
Due diligence process
In addition to firms reviewing and assessing information and documentation provided by issuers, we expect firms to conduct and document their own due diligence to demonstrate that they understand the securities under consideration. Firms must document their independent analysis of the security's structure, features, returns, risks and initial and ongoing costs of the security, as well as the impact of those costs. We expect firms to undertake an in-depth analysis of the security where any issues are identified during their review process.
A security cannot be approved by a firm based solely on:
• representations, information, documentation, analyses or reports received from issuers or other third parties, including related parties and "independent" third parties, about the security, its structure, features and risks, its suitability for clients or its expected returns
• its similarities to other securities, or
• recommendations made by other market participants to their clients or by unregistered persons providing general advice.
Guidelines or client profiles
We expect that, as part of their KYP process, firms will consider guidelines or client profiles identifying the type of client for whom a particular security might be appropriate, as well as any restrictions or controls on the use of the security in client portfolios, such as concentration limits or guidelines or limits on the types of investment strategies that may be used with the security. Any guidelines or client profiles should consider the necessary risk profile, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, income and net worth that clients for whom the security might be appropriate should have. Firms should also identify the types of circumstances when the security would not be appropriate or where it would not be possible to meet the obligations under section 13.3 [suitability determination] in respect of that security. Where appropriate, firms should assign concentration limits to individual securities or general classes of securities. Registered individuals must still comply with their obligations under section 13.3 [suitability determination] in respect of each recommendation to or purchase or sale for a client.
Training and compliance system requirements
As part of the KYP process, firms are expected to assess whether any additional training or proficiency requirements are necessary in order for their registered individuals to understand the securities and make appropriate suitability determinations. We remind firms of the requirements in section 3.4.1 [firm's obligation to provide training]. Firms must also assess any modifications that may need to be made to their compliance or other systems in order to support the offering of the security.
Approval of a security
After completing the necessary analysis, where a firm concludes that a particular security should be made available to clients, a firm must document its approval of the security. This approval must take place before the firm makes the security available to clients. As part of its approval of the security, we expect the firm to also approve any client guidelines and any necessary controls on the sale or recommendation of the security. We expect, at a minimum, that individuals from a firm's senior management, compliance and risk management areas will be involved in the approval process. Any necessary controls or restrictions on the sale, recommendation, or use of the security, and any necessary training programs, must be put in place before the security is made available.
We expect that part of a firm's approval of a security will be making a determination that the security has a reasonable prospect of being a suitable investment for at least some clients, and that firms will document their rationale for this determination.
Monitoring
A firm's KYP process must include a process for monitoring and reassessing securities that have been approved by the firm and continue to be made available to clients, to confirm that they remain appropriate over time. In addition, firms are expected to maintain reasonably up to date analyses of securities held in their client accounts even if they no longer continue to make those securities available to clients.
A firm's process for monitoring and reassessing securities that it has made available to clients includes monitoring for significant changes to those securities, as well as for changes to the business environment or market conditions that would affect the risks or other aspects of the securities. Firms should revisit their approval, guidelines or client profiles for securities as appropriate. We expect that, in cases where a change to a security is significant, firms and their registered individuals will consider whether or not the change would require new suitability determinations for clients holding that security.
A firm is also expected to monitor compliance with client profiles, as well as any controls or restrictions placed on the sale, recommendation, or use of the security, including the use of the security by representatives in connection with any investment strategies. Firms must revisit their approval, guidelines or client profiles, as well as their controls or restrictions, in response to any issues discovered through this monitoring process.
In addition, a firm is expected to monitor and reassess training needs.
Firms are also expected to monitor the performance of the securities made available to clients, as well as client outcomes and any complaints related to the securities, as part of their overall obligation to monitor and reassess securities that have been approved by the firm, to confirm that they remain appropriate over time. We expect that this monitoring and reassessment will include an assessment of the continued competitiveness of the securities that a firm makes available to clients, as compared to similar securities available in the market (whether or not the firm has made such similar securities available to clients).
Overall offering of firm
Under subsection 13.2.1(2), firms must ensure that, overall, their security and service offerings, including the associated costs, are consistent with how those firms hold themselves out. A firm's offerings should meet the reasonable expectations of its clients that result from how the firm holds itself out. This is part of a registrant's general duty to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its clients.
Requirements applicable to registered individuals
Before purchasing or selling a security for, or recommending a security to, a client, registered individuals must have complied with the conditions set out in subsection 13.2.1(3). Under paragraph 13.2.1(3)(a), registered individuals must first have taken reasonable steps to understand, at a general level
• the securities that are available for them to purchase and sell for, or recommend to, clients, and
• how the securities that a firm makes available to clients, and that the registered individual is able to purchase and sell for or recommend to clients, compare to one another.
This involves a high level understanding of the structure, features, returns, risks and costs of each security that a firm makes available to clients that the registered individual is able to purchase and sell for, or recommend to, a client. Registered individuals must have a high level understanding of each such security in order to be able to compare them, and to be able to select a smaller universe to focus on should they choose to do so.
Under paragraph 13.2.1(3)(b), registered individuals must also have taken reasonable steps to thoroughly understand all securities that they purchase and sell for or recommend to clients, and must have this thorough understanding prior to any such purchase or sale for a client or recommendation to a client. This obligation requires a thorough understanding of the specific structure, features, returns and risks of each security purchased and sold for or recommended to clients. Registered individuals must also have a thorough understanding of the initial and ongoing costs associated with the purchase and holding of a security, as well as a thorough understanding of the impact of these costs. A registrant must take this information into account when making a suitability determination.
The fact that a security is "approved" by the firm is not enough to discharge a registered individual's obligation to take reasonable steps to thoroughly understand the security being purchased or sold for, or recommended to, a client by the registered individual.
Securities that registered individuals purchase and sell for, or recommend to, clients must have gone through the KYP process described above. If, under the registered firm's business model, registered individuals are able to propose a new security (that the registered individuals could recommend under their registration category) for the firm to make available to clients, we expect the firm to consider the security. However, the firm must approve the security prior to its registered individuals purchasing that security for a client or making any recommendations to a client in respect of that security.
Firm obligation to ensure representatives have the information to meet their KYP obligations
Subsection 13.2.1(5) requires that firms ensure their registered individuals have the information necessary to enable them to comply with their KYP obligations. We expect that firms will provide their registered individuals with access to the information gathered and analysis completed on securities that the firms have approved to be made available to clients. We also expect that firms will provide their registered individuals with any necessary training and tools, for example, as well as take any other steps necessary to enable their registered individuals to comply with their KYP obligations. We remind firms of their obligations under section 3.4.1 [firm's obligation to provide training].
Where securities to be sold pursuant to exemptions from the prospectus requirements under securities legislation are made available to clients, we expect that firms will train their registered individuals on the characteristics and concerns related to exempt securities to ensure that their registered individuals understand those securities and recommend them only in appropriate circumstances. This includes training on:
• risks, such as heightened liquidity and valuation risk
• conflicts of interest, for example, where the securities are issued by a related party, and
• eligibility requirements.
13.3 Suitability determination
Scope of the suitability determination
General principles
The obligation to make a suitability determination is a fundamental obligation owed by registered firms and registered individuals to their clients and is critical to ensuring investor protection. It is a cornerstone of the registration regime and an extension of the duty to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith which registered firms and their registered individuals owe to their clients.
Suitability obligation
Subsection 13.3(1) requires registrants to take reasonable steps to ensure that a proposed trade is suitable for a client beforecannot be determined, in any circumstances, without complying with the KYC and KYP obligations. The information and knowledge resulting from these processes are prerequisites to a registrant's ability to determine suitability. We expect registrants to gather sufficient information through the KYC process to support a suitability determination. Registrants must also have a thorough knowledge and understanding of all securities that are purchased and sold for, or recommended to, their clients. Refer to guidance in section 13.2 and section 13.2.1.
The client's risk profile is also an essential element of the suitability determination. Using the risk rating of a specific security as the only input in analysing the overall risk of the client's portfolio is not in our view an acceptable practice.
Under subsection 13.3(1), the obligation to make a suitability determination applies to actions taken by a registrant for a client including opening an account for a client, purchasing, selling, depositing, exchanging or transferring securities for a client's account, and taking any other investment action for a client, or making a recommendation or accepting instructions from the client. To meet this suitability obligation, registrants should have in-depth knowledge of all securities that they buy and sell for, or recommend to, their clients. This is often referred to as the "know your product" or KYP obligation.
Registrants should know each security well enough to understand and explain to their clients the security's risks, key features, and initial and ongoing costs and fees. Having the registered firm's approval for representatives to sell a product does not mean that the product will be suitable for all clients. Individual registrants must still determine the suitability of each transaction for every client.decision to take any such action. An investment action for a client also includes a recommendation or decision for the continued holding of securities. The obligation to make a suitability determination also extends to the type of account recommended to the client and therefore may evolve for as long as the client maintains an account with a registered firm.
In this Companion Policy, "suitability determination" refers to a determination made by a registrant that satisfies the criteria in paragraphs 13.3(1)(a) and (b).
Interests of the client are paramount
The client's interests, as distinguished from those of the registrant, are at the core of the obligations under section 13.3. The fact that a recommendation or decision is determined by the registrant, on a reasonable basis, to be suitable for a client pursuant to paragraph 13.3(1)(a) will therefore not be considered to be enough to meet this obligation; the registrant must also determine that the action puts the client's interests first pursuant to paragraph 13.3(1)(b).
A suitability determination comprises both the suitability and the client interest components, in all cases, including:
Registrants should also be aware of, and act in compliance with, the terms of any exemption being relied on for the trade or distribution of the security.
In all cases, we expect registrants to be able to demonstrate a process for making suitability determinations that are appropriate in the circumstances.
• upon the occurrence of certain events in accordance with subsection 13.3(2), and
• upon receiving a client instruction.
We expect registrants to act with integrity towards their clients, and pay particular attention to any residual self-interest which may affect client outcomes. They must put the client's interests first, whether in terms of remuneration, financial gains or other incentives, and exercise their professional judgement in a client-centric manner when opting for one decision or recommendation among other suitable possibilities, if any. For example, maintaining inappropriate amounts of cash in the client's account, or leaving cash in the account uninvested for unduly long periods of time would not meet the requirement of putting the client's interest first.
If the registrant cannot recommend a suitable type of account or security to the client because these are not available at the firm, we expect the registrant to decline to provide the securities or the services to the client.
Portfolio approach to suitability
Suitability must not be determined only on a trade by trade basis, but rather on the basis of the client's overall situation. Registrants must consider suitability in the context of the client's accounts at the firm, including the impact of the recommendation or decision on the account and the overall concentration and liquidity in all of the client's accounts as further explained below.
(a) Multiple accounts held by the client at the registrant
A portfolio approach to suitability should be taken where the client has multiple investment accounts with the firm. The client's investment needs and objectives, investment time horizon or risk profile may not be identical for all of the accounts, for example when the client holds a registered education savings plan (RESP) account, a cash account (such as a tax-free savings account) and a margin account at the firm. We nevertheless expect the registrant to make a suitability determination by taking into consideration whether a recommendation or decision for one account materially affects the concentration and liquidity of client's investments across all accounts held with the firm.
(b) Investments held by the client outside the registrant
Depending on the circumstances, a registrant should inquire about the client's other investments or holdings held elsewhere in order to inform its suitability determination. These circumstances include the type of relationship with the client, the type of securities and the amount of the client's investment in proportion to their other investments or holdings.
Account type suitability
The obligation to make a suitability determination extends to the type of account recommended to the client, the dealer or adviser compensation option and the nature of the service offered to the client, including the use of investment strategies such as leveraging. The suitability determination of the account type should be made prior to the opening of the account. If a client chooses a type of account that is not suitable, the registrant should inform the client of its determination and the reasons for its determination and not open the account unless the client instructs the registrant to proceed nonetheless.
Where a firm offers both fee based and commission based accounts, the firm and representative should explain the features and fees or commissions associated with both types of accounts to the client, and recommend the type of account that puts the client's interests first.
Suitability obligationsdetermination cannot be delegated
Registrants may not:
• delegate their suitability obligations to anyone else, or
• satisfy the suitability obligation by simply disclosing the risks involved with a trade
Only permitted clients may waive their right to a suitability determination. Registrants must make a suitability determination for all other clients. If a client instructs a registrant to make a trade that is unsuitable, the registrant may not allow the trade to be completed until they warn the client as required under subsection 13.3(2).
KYC information for suitability depends on circumstances
The extent of KYC information a registrant needs to determine suitability of a trade will depend on the:
• client's circumstances
• type of security
• client's relationship to the registrant, and
• registrant's business model
In some cases, the registrant will need extensive KYC information, for example, if the registrant is a portfolio manager with discretionary authority. In these cases, the registrant should have a comprehensive understanding of the client's: delegate their obligations under section 13.3 to an unregistered individual, for example, an administrative assistant or a referral agent, or to a registrant at another firm.
Factors for determining suitability
Specific factors are indicated
• investment needs and objectives, including the client's time horizon for their investmentsParagraph 13.3(1)(a) indicates specific factors upon which a registrant must base its suitability determination. We expect a meaningful suitability determination to be made by all registrants. It requires meaningful interaction with the client to obtain a sufficient understanding of the client, and to determine whether a proposed investment strategy is suitable for the client in light of the client's investment needs and objectives and risk profile. Subparagraph (a)(viii) requires registrants to take into account any other relevant factor under the circumstances.
Portfolio concentration
Over-concentration in certain securities can have a significant impact on a client's investments. For example, registrants must assess whether the client's investments are over-concentrated in:
• illiquid exempt market securities as compared to more liquid publicly traded securities,
• securities of a single issuer, or group of related issuers, as compared to a broadly based portfolio of issuers, or
• securities of an issuer, or group of related issuers, that provides exposure to a single industry or asset class, for example, real estate, as compared with a broadly based portfolio of issuers that provide exposure to diversified industries or asset classes.
When assessing concentration as referred to in subparagraph 13.3(1)(a)(v), registrants should consider the client's overall portfolio concentration and document reasonable concentration thresholds to ensure that a client's total investment in exempt market securities, or a particular security, sector, or industry does not exceed thresholds that would make the investment being unsuitable in accordance with paragraph 13.3(1)(a).
Registrants should consider a number of factors when determining the thresholds, for example the type of security, market conditions, and redemption or other liquidity restrictions. Generally, the higher the concentration in a particular type of security, sector or industry, the more steps the registrant should take, and appropriately document, to demonstrate that the investment was suitable for the client.
Registrants should establish written procedures to calculate, monitor and manage concentration risks in a client's portfolio. These procedures should be consistently applied to all client accounts and should include thresholds whereby any concentration in excess of the thresholds requires further assessment or review by compliance staff. When establishing these procedures, registrants should establish stricter or lower concentration thresholds for clients who require liquidity or have limited ability or willingness to withstand losses such as, for example, seniors, individuals with limited assets or income, and individuals with limited investment knowledge.
Potential and actual impact of costs
Cost as referred to in subparagraph 13.3(1)(a)(vi) is interpreted broadly and can include all direct and indirect costs, fees, commissions and charges, including trailing commissions and any other kind of direct and indirect registrant compensation which may be associated with a client purchasing, selling, holding or exchanging a security, or a registrant making a decision for a client's managed account.
Costs can have a significant impact on a client's return over time. Registrants must assess the relative costs of various options available to clients at the firm when making a suitability determination, as well as the impact of those costs. This includes assessing the impact on the client's overall return of any compensation paid, directly or indirectly, to the registrant, whether by the client, a registered individual's sponsoring firm, or a third party.
Different options available to clients at the firm may have different costs associated with them. For example, even after registrants have addressed conflicts of interest in the client's best interest as required by Part 13, Division 2 [conflicts of interest], it may be the case that certain options available at the firm compensate registered individuals better than others. For example, recommending certain securities or account types to clients may compensate registered individuals better than other securities or account types available at the firm. Such higher payouts may come at the price of higher costs to the client, directly or indirectly. Registered individuals must put their client's interest first when selecting between multiple suitable options available to the client.
Unless a registrant has a reasonable basis for determining that a higher cost security will be better for a client, we expect the registrant to trade, or recommend, the lowest cost security available to the client in the circumstances that meets the requirements of subsection 13.3(1). However, we recognize that there may be reasons why a specific higher cost security available at the firm may be better for a client than other suitable securities available at the firm. We expect registrants to include an assessment of the relative costs of, including the relative compensation associated with, various options available when documenting the reasonable basis for their suitability determinations.
Consideration of a reasonable range of alternatives
Registrants have an obligation to consider a reasonable range of alternative recommendations or decisions available to the registered individual through the registered firm when making a suitability determination. What constitutes a reasonable range of alternative recommendations or decisions will depend upon the circumstances, including the firm's product range, the degree of skill and proficiency of the registrant and the client's particular circumstances.
Reassessing suitability
A suitability determination is required upon the occurrence of an event in subsection 13.3(2) and may also be triggered on periodic account reviews. The extent of the requirement to make a new suitability determination may also vary according to the composition of the client's account. For example:
•
overall financial circumstances, including net worth, income, current investment holdings and employment status, andpre-authorised purchases or systematic withdrawals pursuant to established plans do not require a suitability determination prior to each purchase or withdrawal; however, a suitability determination must be made prior to establishing a systematic plan as well as upon the occurrence of a triggering event, and•
risk tolerance for various types of securities and investment portfolios, taking into account the client's investment knowledgewhen a client's account consists only of illiquid securities that have no redemption features, for example exempt market securities distributed by exempt market dealers, we recognize that the extent of the reassessment of the suitability determination may be limited due to the illiquid nature of the securities. However, we expect that the registrant will take this fact into account when making future recommendations for the client, including any additional investments in the same security.
In other cases, the registrant may need less KYC information, for example, if the registrant only occasionally deals with a client who makes small investments relative to their overall financial position.
If the registrant recommends securities traded under the prospectus exemption for accredited investors in NI 45-106, the registrant should determine whether the client qualifies as an accredited investor.
If a client is opening more than one account, the registrant should indicate whether the client's investment objectives and risk tolerance apply to a particular account or to the client's whole portfolio of accounts.
Registered firm and financial institution clients
Under subsection 13.3(3), there is no obligation to make a suitability determination for a client that is a registered firm, a Canadian financial institution or a Schedule III bank.
Refer to guidance in Appendix F Part 14 -- Client reporting requirements and sole EMDs for a discussion of transactional and ongoing client relationships.
Unsuitable investments
Dealing with unsuitable client-directed trades (unsolicited orders)
A registrant has no obligation to accept a client order or instruction which it considers to be unsuitable. In our view, marking the order as unsolicited is not sufficient. The registrant must take the measures set out in subsection 13.3(2.1) to deal with the order and advise the client in a timely manner against proceeding.
Should the client choose to keep an unsuitable investment, it may be appropriate to recommend changes to other investments held by the client at the firm in order to maintain the suitability of the overall account. Any advice given should be documented if the client declines to follow the registrant's recommendation.
Exceptions
Permitted clients
Under subsection 13.3(4), registrants do not haveThere are exceptions to the requirement to make a suitability determination for a permitted client if:
• the permitted client has waived their right to suitability in writing, and
• the registrant does not act as an adviser for a managed account of the permitted client A permitted clientunder subsections 13.3(3) and 13.3(4), for clients that are Canadian financial institutions, Schedule III banks or certain permitted clients. Permitted clients may waive their right to suitability for all trades under a blanket waiver.
SRO exemptions SRO rules may also provide conditional exemptions from the suitability obligation,obligations under section 13.3, for example, for dealers who offer order execution only services.
Review by the regulator of the suitability determination
We will not review whether the suitability determination has been met based on events subsequent to the determination by the registrant, nor do we expect that there is only one best decision, recommendation or course of action: there could be several decisions or recommendations that the registrant has a reasonable basis for concluding are equally suitable and that puts the interests of the client first. Our review will be based on what a reasonable registrant would have done under the same circumstances.
Division 2 Conflicts of interest
Responsibility to identify conflicts of interest
13.4 Identifying and responding to conflicts
What is a conflict of interest?
Section 13.4 covers a broad range of conflicts of interest. It requires registered firms to take reasonable steps to identify existing material conflicts of interest and material conflicts that the firm reasonably expects to arise between the firm and a client. As part of identifying these conflicts, a firm should collect information from the individuals acting on its behalf regarding the conflicts they expect to arise with their clients.
We consider a conflict of interest to include any circumstance where:
1.
We consider a conflict of interest to be any circumstance wherethe interests of different parties, such as the interests of a client and those of a registrant, are inconsistent or divergent.
Responding to conflicts of interest
2. a registrant may be influenced to put their interests ahead of their client's interests, or
A registered firm's policies and procedures for managing conflicts should allow the firm and its staff to:
3. monetary or non-monetary benefits available to a registrant, or potential detriments to which a registrant may be subject, may compromise the trust that a reasonable client has in their registrant.
• identify conflicts of interest that should be avoided
In determining whether a registrant has taken reasonable steps to identify existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest, we do not expect registrants to anticipate every potential conflict no matter how remote the conflict might be. However, registrants should be aware that the obligation to identify existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest extends beyond identifying only material conflicts.
• determine the level of risk that a conflict of interest raises, and
Determining the materiality of a conflict will help firms determine how significant their controls should be, or whether the conflict must be avoided altogether. However, a firm cannot properly address a conflict in the best interest of their clients unless the firm has accurately identified the conflict in a timely way. NI 31-103 requires registered individuals to take reasonable steps to identify existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts and to report such conflicts to their sponsoring firm. Firms must then assess how material the conflict is and what the appropriate response should be.
• respond appropriately
In order to address conflicts in the best interest of clients, a registered firm and its registered individuals should, on an ongoing basis, take proactive steps to anticipate reasonably foreseeable conflicts, identify existing conflicts, and appropriately respond to those conflicts of interest.
Addressing conflicts in the best interest of the client
When responding to any conflict of interest, registrants should consider their standard of care for dealing with clients and apply consistent criteria to similar types of conflicts of interest.addressing conflicts of interest in the best interest of clients, a registered firm and its registered individuals must put the interests of their clients first, ahead of their own interests and any other competing considerations. Registrants must address conflicts of interest by either avoiding those conflicts or by implementing controls sufficient to address the conflict in the client's best interest.
All existing and reasonably foreseeable conflicts, not just material conflicts, must be addressed in the best interest of clients. Conflicts of interest that are not material can be addressed in a manner that is proportionate to the limited risk that such conflicts pose to affected clients. For example, subject to compliance with applicable securities legislation or SRO rules, conflicts arising from the receipt by registered firms and their employees of gifts or promotional benefits from third parties may, depending on the circumstances, be adequately addressed by the registered firm adopting an appropriate code of conduct that establishes reasonable limits on the receipt of such gifts or benefits. We also expect firms to monitor compliance with such codes of conduct regularly.
Registered firms could consider the following examples of controls when determining how to address conflicts in the best interest of clients:
•
In general, three methods are used tostructures, policies, and procedures to identify and respond to conflicts of interest that include:• a working description of conflicts of interest that enables the registered firm, and each individual acting on its behalf, to understand and identify conflicts of interest that may arise;
• a defined escalation procedure for handling potential conflict situations, for example, an internal requirement that when individuals acting on a registered firm's behalf become aware of an existing or reasonably foreseeable conflict of interest, the employee should promptly report the conflict of interest to the CCO of the firm;
• a clear delineation of firm and representatives' responsibilities with respect to identifying and addressing conflicts of interest;
• avoidance• regular reporting of material conflicts of interest by the CCO to the firm's UDP, executive management and board of directors (or equivalent) including how the firm is addressing such conflicts in the best interest of clients; and
• control, and• periodic testing of the firm's conflicts management framework;
• a system for confirming that effective conflicts disclosure is provided to clients.
If a registrant allows a serious conflict of interest to continue, there is a high risk of harm to clients or to the market. If the risk of harming a client or the integrity of the markets is too high, the conflict needs to be avoided. If a registered firm does not avoid a conflict of interest, it should take steps to control or disclose the conflict, or both. The firm should also consider what internal structures or policies and procedures it should use or have to reasonably respond to the conflict of interest.While controls are essential to ensuring that registrants respond to conflicts in the best interest of clients, registered firms should also demonstrably commit to addressing conflicts of interest. For example, registered firms should promote a tone from the top, set by the firm's UDP, executive management, and the firm's board of directors (or equivalent), that emphasizes the importance of integrity when dealing with clients and the handling of conflicts in the best interest of clients.
Avoiding conflicts of interest
Registrants must avoid all conflicts of interest that are prohibited by law. If a conflict of interest is not prohibited by law, registrants should avoid the conflict if it is sufficiently contrary to the interests of a client that there can be no other reasonable response.a conflict of interest if there are no controls available in the circumstances that would be sufficient to address the risks to the clients' interests. In these circumstances, we would consider that such a conflict cannot be addressed in the clients' best interest and must be avoided. Similarly, if a particular conflict is capable of being addressed in the best interest of clients by using controls, but the specific controls being used by a firm are not sufficiently mitigating the risks to clients, the firm must avoid that conflict until they have sufficient controls in place to properly address it. In such circumstances, the conflict is not being addressed in the best interest of clients and must be avoided.
For example, some conflicts of interest are so contrary to another person's or company's interest that a registrant cannot use controls or disclosure to respond to them. In these cases, the registrant should avoid the conflict, stop providing the service or stop dealing with the client.
We expect registered firms to avoid particular conflicts if that is the only response that would be reasonable in the circumstances and consistent with the obligation to address conflicts in the best interest of clients. Registered firms must avoid such conflicts even if that avoidance means foregoing an otherwise attractive business opportunity or type of compensation for the firm or its registered individuals.
Controlling conflicts of interest
Pursuant to subsections 11.5(2) and 13.4.2(2), if a registered firm is controlling a conflict of interest then the registered firm must be able to demonstrate that the controls in place are sufficient to address the conflict in the best interest of its clients. If the controls in place at a firm are not sufficient to address the conflict in the best interest of its clients, the firm must avoid that conflict.
Examples of conflicts of interest
Conflicts arising from proprietary products
It is a conflict of interest for a registered firm to trade in, or recommend, proprietary products. Such firms must be able to demonstrate that they are addressing this conflict in the best interest of its clients. If a registered firm is not controlling this conflict in the best interest of its clients, the firm must avoid this conflict.
Registered firms should design their organizational structures, lines of reporting and physical locations to control conflicts of interest effectively. For example, the following situations would likely raise a conflict of interest: who trade in, or recommend, proprietary products in addition to non-proprietary products could consider the following examples of controls when determining how to address such conflicts in the best interest of their clients:
• prohibiting monetary or non-monetary benefits at the firm that could bias individual recommendations towards proprietary products over non-proprietary products
• demonstrating that proprietary products are subject to the same know your product processes and selection criteria, as well as ongoing performance and other monitoring, as non-proprietary products
• clearly documenting how proprietary products fit within the firm's business model and strategy, and how they are aligned with client interests
• monitoring the use and level of proprietary products in client portfolios to assist in evaluating whether the conflict is being addressed in the best interests of clients
• making non-proprietary products offered by the firm as easy to access for its registered individuals and its clients as proprietary products offered by the firm
• clearly disclosing to clients the nature of the firm's product and service offerings and the extent to which proprietary products may be included in client portfolios, and
• obtaining independent advice on, or an independent evaluation of, the effectiveness of the firm's policies, procedures, and controls to address this conflict.
Registered firms who only trade in, or recommend, proprietary products could consider the following examples of controls when determining how to address this conflict in the best interest of their clients:
• clearly documenting how the proprietary products fit within the firm's business model and strategy, and how they are aligned with client interests
• providing clear disclosure to clients about the nature of the firm's product and service offerings and that only proprietary products will be included in client portfolios
• developing client profiles setting out the types of investors for whom the proprietary products may be suitable, including concentration or other limits for such securities where appropriate, and turning away any potential clients who do not fit the profile for that product
• establishing a thorough oversight process for compliance with Part 13 Division 1 [know your client, know your product and suitability determination] in respect of proprietary products
• establishing thorough know your product processes for the proprietary products, including subsequent performance and other monitoring of the securities, and an ongoing evaluation of the suitability of the securities for client portfolios
• conducting periodic due diligence on comparable non-proprietary products available in the market and evaluating whether the proprietary products are competitive with the alternatives available in the market, and
• obtaining independent advice on, or an independent evaluation of, the effectiveness of the firm's policies, procedures, and controls to address this conflict.
Conflicts arising from third-party compensation
It is a conflict of interest for a registrant to receive third-party compensation. We also consider circumstances where registrants receive greater third-party compensation for the sale or recommendation of certain securities relative to others to be a conflict of interest. If a registrant is not controlling these conflicts in the best interest of its clients, the registrant must avoid these conflicts.
Registered firms should be able to demonstrate that both product shelf development and client recommendations are based on the quality of the security without influence from any third-party compensation associated with the security. Registered firms could consider the following examples of controls when considering how to address these conflicts in the best interest of their clients:
• confirming that securities which provide lower levels of third-party compensation or no third-party compensation are included in the evaluation process, and that such process is free from bias towards securities that provide third-party compensation or higher third-party compensation. For example, by evaluating securities before the application of third-party compensation, or by ensuring that securities providing third-party compensation or higher third-party compensation are subject to the same know your product processes and selection criteria as other similar securities providing lower levels of third-party compensation or no third-party compensation.
• as part of the firm's product shelf development, conducting periodic due diligence on securities on the firm's shelf that provide third-party compensation to determine whether such securities are competitive with comparable alternatives available in the market (including those that do not provide third-party compensation)
• clearly documenting how securities that provide third-party compensation fit within the firm's business model and strategy, and how they are aligned with client interests and the services provided to clients. Registrants should in particular take the following factors into account:
• the range of ongoing investment and financial services provided to clients
• the extent of such services, and
• controls to confirm that the services are provided;
• developing client profiles setting out the types of investors for whom securities that provide third-party compensation may be suitable
• maintaining internal compensation arrangements for registered individuals that do not solely tie the registered individual's compensation, either directly or indirectly, to commission revenue that is based on securities recommended or sold
• monitoring registered individuals' recommendations to determine whether predominance is given to securities that provide third-party compensation or higher third-party compensation, and to assist in evaluating whether the conflict is being addressed in the best interests of clients, and
• imposing consequences on registered individuals for breaches of the firm's conflict of interest policies and procedures that are sufficiently severe to counteract the potential incentives that registered individuals might have to put their own interests ahead of their clients' interests.
Conflicts arising from internal compensation arrangements and incentive practices
Sales and revenue targets create conflicts of interest between registered individuals and their clients. For example, setting overly aggressive sales targets may cause registered individuals to put their interests ahead of their clients' interests. Also, as the negative consequences for failing to meet a sales or revenue target become more severe, the risk increases that registered individuals will put their interests ahead of their clients' interests.
Similarly, compensation arrangements and incentive practices that are heavily weighted towards sales activity or revenue generation also create conflicts of interest between registered individuals and their clients.
It is a conflict of interest for registered firms to create incentives to sell or recommend certain products or services over others. It is also a conflict of interest for registered individuals to receive greater compensation from their sponsoring firm for the sale or recommendation of certain products or services over others.
Registered firms must be able to demonstrate that they are addressing these conflicts in the best interest of their clients. If a registrant is not controlling these conflicts in the best interest of its clients, the registrant must avoid these conflicts. Registered firms could consider the following examples of controls when considering how to address such conflicts in the best interest of their clients:
• applying consequences for conflicts violations that are proportionate to the potential benefit that could be achieved for reaching the sales or revenue target or the compensation or incentive threshold. For example:
• prohibiting the registered individual from future participation in the compensation arrangement or incentive practice
• requiring that the registered individual be compensated in a way that does not vary depending on the amount of revenue that they generate for the firm or the product or service that they recommend
• requiring that a portion of the benefits or bonus be repaid to the registered firm, and
• demotion or termination of employment;
• tying a portion of the registered individual's variable compensation to the absence of valid client complaints against the registrant, or to the registered individual's compliance with the registered firm's policies and procedures;
•
advisory staff reporting to marketing stafflimiting the registered individual's variable compensation to a lower portion of their total compensation;•
compliance or internal audit staff reporting to a business unit, anddeferring payment of a portion of the compensation or incentive for a reasonable amount of time; and•
registered representatives and investment banking staff in the same physical locationmaintaining internal compensation arrangements for registered individuals that demonstrate that they are neutral towards products.
In addition to controlling these conflicts in the best interest of clients, registrants must comply with the suitability determination obligation under section 13.3. If certain products or services available at a firm compensate its registered individuals better than others, in addition to determining that the recommendation is suitable, registered individuals must put their clients' interest first when deciding which product or service to recommend. As a result, the client's interests, not the registrant's interests, must guide the recommendations made by a registrant to its clients. Registrants must not recommend a product or service just because it pays them better than other alternatives. This is also consistent with a registrant's obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its clients.
Conflicts of interests at supervisory level
If compliance or supervisory staff's compensation is tied to the sales or revenue generation of the registered individuals that they supervise, this creates a conflict of interest that may cause compliance or supervisory staff to put their interests ahead of the clients' interests. Compliance and supervisory staff may not be able to properly oversee these registered individuals when compensated in this manner.
Depending on the conflict of interest,size of the registered firm, this conflict may be practically unavoidable. In such circumstances, we expect registered firms may control the conflict by: to address this conflict in the best interest of clients by implementing policies and procedures sufficient to mitigate the risk to clients' interests and to closely monitor for compliance with these policies and procedures.
• assigning a different representative to provide a service to the particular client
• creating a group or committee to review, develop or approve responses
• monitoring trading activity, or
• using information barriers for certain internal communication
Disclosing conflicts of interest
(a) When disclosure is appropriate
Registered firms should ensure that their clients are adequately informed about any conflicts of interest that may affect the services the firm provides to them. This is in addition to any other methods the registered firm may use to manage the conflict.
(b) Timing of disclosure
Under subsection 13.4(3), if a reasonable investor would expect to be informed of a conflict, a registered firm must disclose the conflict in a timely manner. Registered firms and their representatives should disclose conflicts of interest to their clients before or at the time they recommend the transaction or provide the service that gives rise to the conflict. This is to give clients a reasonable amount of time to assess the conflict.
We note that where this disclosure is provided to a client before the transaction takes place, we expect the disclosure to be provided shortly before the transaction takes place. For example, if it was initially provided with the client's account opening documentation months or years previously we expect that a registered representative would also disclose this conflict to the client shortly before the transaction or at the time the transaction is recommended.
For example, if a registered individual recommends a security that they own, this may constitute a material conflict which should be disclosed to the client before or at the time of the recommendation.
(c) When disclosure is not appropriate
Disclosure may not be appropriate if a conflict of interest involves confidential or commercially sensitive information, or the information amounts to "inside information" under insider trading provisions in securities legislation.
In these situations, registered firms will need to assess whether there are other methods to adequately respond to the conflict of interest. If not, the firm may have to decline to provide the service to avoid the conflict of interest.
Registered firms should also have specific procedures for responding to conflicts of interest that involve inside information and for complying with insider trading provisions.
(d) How to disclose a conflict of interest
Registered firms should provide disclosure about material conflicts of interest to their clients if a reasonable investor would expect to be informed about them. When a registered firm provides this disclosure, it should:
• be prominent, specific, clear and meaningful to the client, and
• explain the conflict of interest and how it could affect the service the client is being offered
Registered firms should not:
• provide generic disclosure
• give partial disclosure that could mislead their clients, or
• obscure conflicts of interest in overly detailed disclosure
Examples of conflicts of interest
This section describes specific situations where a registrant could be in a conflict of interest and how to manage the conflict.
Relationships with related or connected issuers
When a registered firm trades in, or recommends securities of, a related or connected issuer, it should respond to the resulting conflict of interest by disclosing it to the client.
To provide disclosure about conflicts with related issuers, a registered firm may maintain a list of the related issuers for which it acts as a dealer or adviser. It may make the list available to clients by:
Conflicts in fee-based accounts
• posting the list on its website and keeping it updated
If a client is in a fee-based account and that account holds securities with embedded commissions, we consider this to be a conflict of interest. Firms can address this conflict in the best interest of clients in a number of ways. For example:
•
providing the list to the client at the time of account opening, orusing a different series of the security that does not contain an embedded commission, or•
explaining to the client at the time of account opening how to contact the firm to request a copy of the list free of chargeensuring that the client is made whole.
The list may include examples of the types of issuers that are related or connected and the nature of the firm's relationship with those issuers. For example, a firm could generally describe the nature of its relationship with an investment fund within a family of investment funds. This would mean that the firm may not have to update the list when a new fund is added to that fund family.
However, this type of disclosure may not meet the expectations of a reasonable investor when a specific conflict with a related or connected issuer arises, for example, when a registered individual recommends a trade in the securities of a related issuer. In these circumstances, a registered firm should provide the client with disclosure about the specific conflict with that issuer. This disclosure should include a description of the nature of the firm's relationship with the issuer.
Like all disclosure, information regarding a conflict with a related or connected issuer should be made available to clients before or at the time of the advice or trade giving rise to the conflict, so that clients have a reasonable amount of time to assess it. Registrants should use their judgment for the best way and time to inform clients about these conflicts. Previous disclosure may no longer be relevant to, or remembered by, a client, while disclosure of the same conflict more than once in a short time may be unnecessary and confusing.
Firms do not have to disclose to clients their relationship with a related or connected issuer that is a mutual fund managed by an affiliate of the firm if the names of the firm and the fund are similar enough that a reasonable person would conclude they are affiliated.
Relationships with other issuers
Firms should assess whether conflicts of interest may arise in relationships with issuers that do not fall within the definitions of related or connected issuers. Examples include non-corporate issuers such as a trust, partnership or special purpose entity or conduit issuing asset-backed commercial paper. This is especially important if a registered firm or its affiliates are involved in sponsoring, manufacturing, underwriting or distributing these securities.
The registered firm should disclose the relationship with these types of issuers if it may give rise to a conflict of interest that a reasonable client would expect to be informed about.
Competing interests of clients
If clients of a registered firm have competing interests, the firm should make reasonable efforts to be fair to all clients. Firms should have internal systems to evaluate the balance of these interests.
For example, a conflict of interest can arise between investment banking clients, who want the highest price, lowest interest rate or best terms in general for their issuances of securities, and retail clients who will buy the product. The firm should consider whether the product meets the needs of retail clients and is competitive with alternatives available in the market.
Registrants should also evaluate on an ongoing basis whether a fee-based compensation arrangement is in the best interest of the client, given the client's circumstances, investment needs and objectives, and the account activity. Registrants offering fee-based accounts should have controls in place to confirm that clients are receiving services consistent with the terms of the account or agreement with their clients.
Addressing conflicts between clients
We recognize that there can be competing interests among clients, and that a registrant may have difficulty trying to address these conflicts in the best interest of all their clients simultaneously. Addressing such conflicts in the best interest of clients means that the conflict must be addressed fairly and transparently between the clients. Firms should have internal systems to evaluate and document the balancing of competing client interests.
Conflicts related to referral arrangements
Paid referral arrangements are conflicts of interest and must be addressed in the best interest of the client. Before a registrant refers a client, in exchange for a monetary or non-monetary benefit, to another registered firm or registered individual, the referring registrant must determine that the referral is in the client's best interest. When engaging in this analysis, we expect registrants to consider why they are referring the client to a specific registered firm or individual.
Registered firms and individuals must not put their interests ahead of the interests of their client when making a client-referral. We therefore expect that registrants not make a client referral just because it pays them better than other alternatives. This is also consistent with a registrant's obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its clients.
See sections 11.5 and 13.7 of this Companion Policy for guidance on books and records obligations relating to referral arrangements and the specific obligations relating to these arrangements.
Purchasing assets from a client outside the normal course of business
The purchase of an asset from a client outside the normal course of a registrant's business creates a conflict of interest that we expect registrants to generally avoid, unless the registrant can clearly demonstrate that the purchase is in the client's best interest.
Individuals who serve on a board of directors
(a) Board of directors of another registered firm
Under section 4.1, a registered individual must not act as a director of another registered firm that is not an affiliate of the individual's sponsoring firm.
(b) Board of directors of non-registered persons or companies
Section 4.1 does not apply to registered individuals who act as directors of unregistered firms. However, significant conflicts of interest can arise when a registered individual serves on a board of directors. Examples include conflicting fiduciary duties owed to the company and to a registered firm or client, possible receipt of inside information and conflicting demands on the representative's time.
Registered firms should consider controlling the conflict by:
• requiring their representatives to seek permission from the firm to serve on the board of directors of an issuer, and
• having policies for board participation that identify the circumstances where the activity would not be in the best interests of the firm or its clients
Conflicts of interests are further exacerbated when a registered individual acts as a director, officer, shareholder, owner or partner of an issuer whose securities the registered individual also recommends to clients. In such situations the responsibility to the firm and the registered individual to address the conflicts of interest is heightened due to the severity of the risk to the client.
The regulator will take into account the potential conflicts of interest that may arise when an individual serves on a board of directors when assessing that individual's application for registration or continuing fitness for registration.
(c) Board of directors of reporting issuers
A representative of a registrant acting as a director of or adviser to a reporting issuer raises concerns with respect to conflicts of interest, particularly in relation to issues of insider information, trading and timely disclosure. All registrants should be conscious of their responsibilities in these situations and weigh the burden of dealing in an ethical manner with the conflicts of interest against the advantages of acting as a director of a reporting issuer, many shareholders of which may be clients of the registrant.
Directors of a reporting issuer have an obligation not to reveal any confidential information about the issuer until there is full public disclosure of the information, particularly when the information might have a bearing on the market price or value of the securities of the issuer.
Any director of a reporting issuer who is a partner, director, officer, employee or agent of a registrant should recognize that the director's first responsibility with respect to confidential information is to the reporting issuer. A director should meticulously avoid any disclosure of inside information to partners, directors, officers, employees or agents of the registrant or to its clients.
If a partner, director, officer, employee or agent of a registrant is not a director but is acting in an advisory capacity to a reporting issuer and discussing confidential matters, the same care should be taken as if that person were a director. Should the matter require consultation with other personnel of the registrant, adequate measures should be taken to guard the confidential nature.
Individuals who have outside business activities
Conflicts can arise when registered individuals are involved in outside business activities, for example, because of the compensation they receive for these activities or because of the nature of the relationship between the individual and the outside entity. Before approving any of these activities, registered firms should consider potential conflicts of interest. If the firm cannot properly control a potential conflict of interest, it should not permit the outside activity.
Registrants must disclose all outside business activities in Form 33-109F4 (or Form 33-109F5 for changes in outside business activities after registration). Required disclosure includes the following, whether the registrant receives compensation or not:
• any employment and business activities outside the registrant's sponsoring firm
• all officer or director positions, and
• any other equivalent positions held, as well as positions of influence.
The following are examples of outside business activities that we would expect to be disclosed:
• paid or unpaid roles with charitable, social or religious organizations where the individual is in a position of power or influence and where the activity places the registered individual in contact with clients or potential clients, including positions where the registrant handles investments or monies of the organization
• being an owner of a holding company
The regulator will take into account the potentialexisting and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an individual's outside business activities when assessing that individual's application for registration or continuing fitness for registration, including the following:
• whether the individual will have sufficient time to properly carry out their registerable activities, including remaining current on securities law and product knowledge
• whether the individual will be able to properly service clients
• what is the risk of client confusion and are there effective controls and supervision in place to
manageaddress the risk• whether the outside business activity presents a conflict of interest for the individual, and whether that conflict of interest should be avoided or can be appropriately
managedcontrolled• whether the outside business activity places the individual in a position of power or influence over clients or potential clients, in particular clients or potential clients that may be vulnerable
• whether the outside business activity provides the individual with access to privileged, confidential or insider information relevant to their registerable activities
A registered firm is responsible for monitoring and supervising the individuals whose registration it sponsors. In relation to outside business activities, this includes:
• having appropriate policies and procedures to deal with outside business activities, including ensuring outside business activities do not:
• involve activities that are inconsistent with securities legislation, IIROC requirements or MFDA requirements
;, and• interfere with the individual's ability to remain current on securities law and product knowledge
• requiring individual registrants to disclose to their firm, and requiring the firm to review and approve, all outside business activities prior to the activities commencing
• requiring individual registrants to disclose to any new sponsoring firm, and requiring that new sponsoring firm to review and approve, all outside business activities prior to the registered individual joining the new sponsoring firm
• ensuring the firm's chief compliance officer is able to properly supervise and monitor the outside business activities
• maintaining records documenting its supervision of outside business activities and ensuring these records are available for review by regulators
• ensuring that
potentialexisting and reasonably foreseeable conflicts of interest are identified and that appropriate steps are taken tomanageaddress such conflicts in the best interest of clients• ensuring outside business activities do not impair the ability to provide adequate client service, including, where necessary, having an alternate representative available for the client
• ensuring the outside business activity is consistent with the registrant's duty to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its clients
• implementing risk management, including proper separation of the outside business activity and registerable activity
• preventing exposure of the firm to complaints and litigation
• assessing whether the firm's knowledge of the individual's lifestyle is commensurate with its knowledge of the individual's business activities and staying alert to other indicators of possible fraudulent activity. For example, if information comes to the firm's knowledge (including through a client complaint) that a registered individual's lifestyle is not commensurate with the individual's compensation by the firm, we would expect the registered firm to make further inquiries to assess the situation.
Failure to discharge these responsibilities may be relevant to the firm's continued fitness for registration.
Registered individual's responsibility to address conflicts of interest
If a conflict arises between a registered individual and their client, the registered individual must promptly report that conflict to their sponsoring firm. The registered individual must not proceed with the activity in question until their sponsoring firm has given its consent to proceed. If the registered firm thinks that the conflict must be avoided, the registered individual is prohibited from proceeding with the activity in question. Prior to a firm giving its consent to an individual to proceed with an activity, the firm must put necessary controls in place.
However, the registered firm's consent does not automatically mean that the registered individual has satisfied their obligation to address the conflict in the best interest of their client. If a registered individual has received the consent of their sponsoring firm to proceed with the activity, the registered individual must also assess whether that decision is consistent with their client's best interest. This may result in the registered individual deciding to avoid the conflict notwithstanding the firm's consent. Registered individuals and their sponsoring firms each have a distinct obligation to address conflicts in the best interest of the client.
Conflicts disclosure
Disclosing conflicts of interest
A registrant must provide disclosure about conflicts in all cases where prescribed by securities legislation or SRO rules applicable to the registrant. However, disclosure alone is not sufficient to address a conflict of interest in the best interest of clients. Not only does disclosure sometimes fail to mitigate the risks related to conflicts of interest, but in some instances disclosure of conflicts may aggravate the potential risks to a client's interests.
We expect that clients will use disclosure about conflicts of interest to help inform their decision when evaluating the registrant's business practices, conflicts management and overall performance on an ongoing basis. As a result, the disclosure that clients receive is critical to their ability to make an informed decision about how to manage and evaluate their relationship with the registrant. Disclosure regarding conflicts of interest must therefore be fulsome in content as set out in NI 31-103, must be prominent, specific and written in plain language, and must be disclosed at the appropriate time in order to be meaningful.
(a) When disclosure is appropriate
Registered firms should ensure that their clients are adequately informed about conflicts of interest that may affect the products and services provided to them.
(b) Timing of disclosure
If a reasonable investor would expect to be informed of a conflict, a registered firm must disclose the conflict in a timely manner. This is to give clients a reasonable amount of time to assess the conflict.
Where this disclosure is provided to a client before a transaction that gives rise to a conflict, we expect the disclosure to be provided in a timely manner before the transaction takes place. For example, if the registrant provided disclosure of the conflict of interest to the client with the client's account opening documentation months or years earlier, we expect that a registered representative would also disclose the transaction-related conflict to the client shortly before the transaction or at the time the transaction is recommended.
For example, if a registered individual recommends a security that they own, this will constitute a conflict that must be disclosed to the client before or at the time of the recommendation.
(c) When disclosure is not appropriate
Disclosure may not be appropriate if a conflict of interest involves confidential or commercially sensitive information, or the information amounts to "inside information" under insider trading provisions in securities legislation.
In these situations, registered firms will need to assess whether there are other methods to adequately address the conflict of interest. If not, the firm may have to decline to provide the service to avoid the conflict of interest.
Registered firms should also have specific procedures for responding to conflicts of interest that involve inside information and for complying with insider trading provisions.
(d) How to disclose a conflict of interest
Disclosure about a conflict of interest should not:
• be generic disclosure;
• give partial disclosure that could mislead their clients; or
• obscure the conflicts of interest in overly detailed disclosure or buried in the middle of a large disclosure document.
In order to help make conflicts disclosure more prominent, firms should consider using a stand-alone, and succinct, conflicts disclosure document.
Examples of conflicts of interest
Proprietary product disclosure
If a registrant is trading in, or recommending, proprietary products, a reasonable client would expect to be informed of that conflict. The registrant should disclose if they only offer proprietary products or whether they offer a mix of proprietary products and non-proprietary products on their shelf and recommended product list.
With respect to the potential impact of this conflict and the risk it could pose to clients' interests, if the registrant is only offering proprietary products then the registrant should consider making the following disclosure prior to opening an account for the client:
The suitability analysis conducted by the firm and its representatives will not consider the larger market of non-proprietary products or whether those non-proprietary products would be better, worse, or equal in meeting the client's investment needs and objectives.
The firm must also disclose how they are addressing this conflict in the best interest of their clients.
When providing disclosure about proprietary products, a registered firm may also choose to maintain a list of the related or connected issuers for which it acts as a dealer or adviser. It may make the list available to clients by
• posting the list on its website and keeping it updated
• providing the list to the client at the time of account opening, or
• explaining to the client at the time of account opening how to contact the firm to request a copy of the list free of charge
The list may include examples of the types of issuers that are related or connected and the nature of the firm's relationship with those issuers. For example, a firm could describe the nature of its relationship with an investment fund within a family of investment funds. This would mean that the firm may not have to update the list when a new fund is added to that fund family.
As noted above, information regarding proprietary product conflicts should be made available to clients before or at the time of the advice or trade giving rise to the conflict, so that clients have a reasonable amount of time to assess it. Subject to compliance with section 13.4.5, registrants should use their judgement for the best way and time to inform clients about these conflicts. Previous disclosure may no longer be relevant to, or remembered by, a client, while disclosure of the same conflict more than once in a short time may be unnecessary and confusing.
Firms do not have to disclose to clients their relationship with a related or connected issuer that is a mutual fund managed by an affiliate of the firm if the names of the firm and the fund are similar enough that a reasonable person would conclude they are affiliated.
Relationships with other issuers
Firms should assess whether conflicts of interest may arise in relationships with issuers that do not fall within the definitions of related or connected issuers. Examples include non-corporate issuers such as a trust, partnership or special purpose entity or conduit issuing asset-backed commercial paper. This is especially important if a registered firm or its affiliates are involved in sponsoring, manufacturing, underwriting or distributing these securities.
The registered firm should disclose the relationship with these types of issuers if it may give rise to a conflict of interest that a reasonable client would expect to be informed about.
Compensation practicesconflicts
Prior to entering into a transaction with a client, a registrant must disclose any commissions or other compensation that they will be receiving in respect of the transaction.
If a representative's compensation differs depending on the products or services provided, a reasonable client would expect to be informed of that conflict. With respect to the nature and extent of the conflict, the registrant should disclose a summary of the compensation conflict in plain language. For example, if particular products pay a larger percentage-commission than other products available to the client, the extent of the compensation difference should be explained.
Registrants must explain the potential impact of this conflict and the risk it could pose to clients' interests, including an explanation of the increased risk that the firm's representatives may be influenced to recommend a product that provides them better compensation, even though another product available at the firm may be just as good, or better, at meeting the client's investment needs and objectives. The firm must also disclose how it is addressing this conflict in the best interest of its clients. Registered firms must provide this disclosure:
• prior to opening an account for the client if the conflict may be present throughout the relationship between the registered firm and the client,
• at the time the conflict occurs or,
Registered firms should consider whether any particular benefits, compensation or remuneration practices are inconsistent with their obligations to clients, especially if the firm relies heavily on commission-based remuneration. For example, if there is a complex product that carries a high commission, the firm may decide that it is not appropriate to offer that product.
• in the case of a transaction-related conflict, prior to entering into the transaction with the client.
13.5 Restrictions on certain managed account transactions
Section 13.5 prohibits a registered adviser from engaging in certain transactions in investment portfolios it manages for clients on a discretionary basis where the relationship may give rise to a conflict of interest or a perceived conflict of interest. The prohibited transactions include trades in securities in which a responsible person or an associate of a responsible person may have an interest or over which they may have influence or control.
Disclosure when responsible person is partner, director or officer of issuer
Paragraph 13.5(2)(a) prohibits a registered adviser from purchasing securities of an issuer in which a responsible person or an associate of a responsible person is a partner, officer or director for a client's managed account. The prohibition applies unless the conflict is disclosed to the client and the client's written consent is obtained prior to the purchase.
If the client is an investment fund, the disclosure should be provided to, and the consent obtained from, each security holder of the investment fund in order for it to be meaningful. This disclosure may be provided in the offering memorandum that is provided to security holders. Like all disclosure about conflicts, it should be prominent, specific, clear and meaningful to the client. Consent may be obtained in the investment management agreement signed by the clients of the adviser that are also security holders of the investment fund.
This approach may not be practical for prospectus qualified mutual funds. Investment fund managers and advisers of these funds should also consider the specific exemption from the prohibition under section 6.2 of National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds (NI 81-107) for prospectus-qualified investment funds.
Restrictions on trades with certain investment portfolios
Paragraph 13.5(2)(b) prohibits certain trades, including, for example, those between the managed account of a client and the managed account of:
• a spouse of the adviser
• a trust for which a responsible person is the trustee, or
• a corporation in which a responsible person beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting securities
It also prohibits inter-fund trades. An inter-fund trade occurs when the adviser for an investment fund knowingly directs a trade in portfolio securities to another investment fund that it acts for or instructs the dealer to execute the trade with the other investment fund. Investment fund managers and their advisers should also consider the exemption from the prohibition that exists for inter-fund trades by public investment funds under section 6.1 of NI 81-107.
Paragraph 13.5(2)(b) is not intended to prohibit a responsible person from purchasing units in the investment fund itself, nor is it intended to prohibit one investment fund from purchasing units of another fund in situations where they have the same adviser.
In instances where an IIROC dealer, who is also an adviser to a managed account, trades between its inventory account and the managed account, the dealer is expected to have policies and procedures that sufficiently mitigate the conflicts of interest inherent in such transactions. Generally, we expect these policies and procedures to ensure that:
• the trades achieve best execution as referenced in National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules, while ensuring that the trades are consistent with the objectives of the managed account
• reasonable steps are taken to access information, including marketplace quotations or quotes provided by arms-length parties, to ensure that the trade is executed at a fair price
• there is appropriate oversight and a compliance mechanism to monitor this trading activity in order to ensure that it complies with applicable regulatory requirements, including the requirements referred to above.
13.6 Disclosure when recommending related or connected securities
Section 13.6 restricts the ability of a registered firm to recommend a trade in a security of a related or connected issuer. The restrictions apply to recommendations made in any medium of communication. This includes recommendations in newsletters, articles in general circulation, newspapers or magazines, websites, e-mail, Internet chat rooms, bulletin boards, television and radio.
It does not apply to oral recommendations made by registered individuals to their clients. These recommendations are subject to the requirements of section 13.4.Part 13 Division 2 [Conflicts of interest].
Division 3 Referral arrangements
Division 3 sets out the requirements for permitted referral arrangements. Regulators want to ensure that under any referral arrangements:
• individuals and firms that engage in registerable activities are appropriately registered
• the roles and responsibilities of the parties to the written agreement are clear, including responsibility for compliance with securities legislation, and
• clients are provided with disclosure about the referral arrangement to help them evaluate the referral arrangement and the extent of any conflicts of interest
Registered firms have a responsibility to monitor and supervise all of their referral arrangements to ensure that they comply with the requirements of NI 31-103 and other applicable securities laws and continue to comply for so long as the arrangement remains in place.
As noted above, paid referral arrangements are conflicts of interest that must be addressed in the best interest of the client.
Prohibited referral arrangements
Subsection 13.8(1) prohibits registered firms and registered individuals from providing a referral fee to a person or company who is not registered. However, pursuant to section 13.8(2), registered firms and registered individuals may accept a referral fee from both registrants and non-registrants.
Although registered firms and registered individuals are still permitted to receive client-referrals from non-registrants, registered firms and registered individuals are not permitted to provide a referral fee to non-registrants in exchange for that client referral.
Obligations to clients
A client who is referred to an individual or firm becomes the client of that individual or firm for the purposes of the services provided under the referral arrangement. The registrant receiving a referral must meet all of its obligations as a registrant toward its referred clients, including know your client, know your product, and suitability determinations. Registrants involved in referral arrangements should manage any related conflicts of interest in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 13 Dealing with clients -- individuals and firms. For example, if the registered firm is not satisfied that the referral fee is reasonable, it should assess whether an unreasonably high fee may create a conflict that could motivate its representatives to act contrary to their duties toward their clients.
13.7 Definitions -- referral arrangements
Section 13.7 defines "referral arrangement" in broad terms. Referral arrangement means an arrangement in which a registrant agrees to payprovide or receive a referral fee. The definition is not limited to referrals for providing investment products, financial services or services requiring registration. It also includes receiving a referral fee for providing a client name and contact information to an individual or firm. "Referral fee" is also broadly defined
Section 13.7 also defines "referral fee" in broad terms. It includes sharing or splitting any commission resulting from the purchase or sale of a security. We will examine, on a case-by-case basis, whether a given payment is a referral fee or not. For example, a representative who is planning to retire may decide to sell their business, including their book of clients, to another registrant in exchange for an ongoing payment. Depending on the circumstances, if the regulators are satisfied that the transaction is a bona fide sale of a business then the ongoing fee provided, in exchange for the book of clients, may not be considered a referral fee.
In situations where there is no expectation of reward or compensation, we would not consider the receipt of an unexpected gift of appreciation to fall within the scope of a referral arrangement. One of the key elements of the referral arrangement is that the registrant agrees to pay or receive a referral fee for the referral of a client. This agreement or understanding is absent in the case of unexpected gifts
Depending on the circumstances, even if a given payment is not described as a 'referral fee' by the contracting parties, that payment may nevertheless be captured by the definition of a referral fee, and be subject to the related requirements, if the payment is in essence being provided in exchange for a client-referral.
13.8 Permitted referral arrangements
Under section 13.8, parties to a referral arrangement are required to set out the terms of the arrangement in a written agreement. This is intended to ensure that each party's roles and responsibilities are made clear. This includes obligations for registered firms involved in referral arrangements to keep records of referral fees. Payments do not necessarily have to go through a registered firm, but a record of all payments related to a referral arrangement must be kept. This record should include:
• the name(s) of the client(s) referred;
• the amount of the fee;
• the person or company paying the fee; and
• who provides the disclosure to referred clients.
We expect referral agreements to include:
• the roles and responsibilities of each party
• limitations on any party that is not a registrant (to ensure that it is not engaging in any activities requiring registration);• the disclosure to be provided to referred clients
,; and• who provides the disclosure to referred clients.
If the individual or firmRegistrants receiving the referral is a registrant, theyreferrals are responsible for:
• carrying out all activity requiring registration that results from the referral arrangement
,; and• communicating with referred clients.
Registered firms are required to be parties to referral agreements. This ensures that they are aware of these arrangements so they can adequately supervise their representatives and monitor compliance with the agreements. This does not preclude the individual registrant from also being a party to the agreement.
A party to a referral arrangement may need to be registered depending on the activities that the party carries out. Registrants cannot use a referral arrangement to assign, contract out of or otherwise avoid their regulatory obligations.
Registrants may wish to refer their clients to other registrants for services that they are not authorized to perform under their category of registration. In making referrals, registrants should ensure that the referral does not itself constitute an activity that the registrant is not authorized to engage in under its category of registration.
We would generally not consider the referral of a client by a registrant of a client to a registered dealer to constitute trading by the referring registrant if, in the referral:
• the referring registrant
does not makemakes any statement to the client about the merits of a specific security or trade,• the referring registrant
does not makemakes any recommendation or otherwiserepresentrepresents to the client that a specific trade is suitable for that client or another person or company,andor• the referring registrant
does not acceptaccepts any instructions from the client in respect of trades to be made by the registered dealer.
13.8.1 Limitation on referral fees
A registrant may not provide or receive referral fees that are ongoing payments that continue for more than 36 months. Ongoing referral fees also cannot be greater than 25% of the compensation paid by the client to the registrant who is providing the services for which they were referred. For example, if a referred client is paying a registrant a 1% management fee, an ongoing referral fee paid for that client-referral cannot exceed a quarter of that management fee.
Paragraph 13.8.1(c) prohibits firms from imposing a surcharge on a referred client to offset the referral fees that a firm had to pay in exchange for the referral.
13.9 Verifying the qualifications of the person or company receiving the referral
Section 13.9 requires the registrant making a referral to satisfy itself that the party receiving the referral is appropriately qualified to perform the services, and if applicable, is appropriately registered. The registrant is responsible for determining the steps that are appropriate in the particular circumstances. For example, this may include an assessment of the types of clients that the referred services would be appropriate for.
13.10 Disclosing referral arrangements to clients
The disclosure of information to clients required under section 13.10 is intended to help clients make an informed decision about the referral arrangement and to assess any conflicts of interest. The disclosure should be provided to clients before or at the time the referred services are provided. A registered firm, and any registered individuals who are directly participating in the referral arrangement, should take reasonable steps to ensure that clients understand:
• which entity they are dealing with
• what they can expect that entity to provide to them
• the registrant's key responsibilities to them
• the limitations of the registrant's registration category
• any relevant terms and conditions imposed on the registrant's registration
• the extent of the referrer's financial interest in the referral arrangement, and
• the nature of any
potentialexisting oractualreasonably foreseeable conflict of interest that may arise from the referral arrangement
Division 4 Loans and margin
13.12 Restriction on lending to clients
The purpose of section 13.12 is intended to limit the financial exposure of a registered firm. To the extent that products sold to clients are structured in a way that would result in the registrant becoming a lender to the clients, including the registrant extending margin to the client, we would consider the registrant to not be in compliance with section 13.12.
Section 13.12 prohibits registrants from lending money, extending credit or providing margin to clients as we consider that this activity creates a conflict of interest which cannot be easily managed.
We note that SROs are exempt from section 13.12 as they have their own rules or prohibitions on lending, extending credit and providing margin to clients. Direct lending to clients (margin) is reserved for IIROC members. The MFDA has its own rules prohibiting margining and, except in specific limited circumstances, lending.
Division 5 Complaints
13.14 Application of this Division
Investment fund managers are only subject to Division 5 if they also operate under a dealer or adviser registration, in which case the requirements in this Division apply in respect of the activities conducted under their dealer or adviser registration.
In Québec, a registered firm is deemed to comply with this Division if it complies with sections 168.1.1 to 168.1.3 of the Québec Securities Act, which provides a substantially similar regime for complaint handling.
The guidance in Division 5 of this Companion Policy applies to firms registered in any jurisdiction including Québec.
However, section 168.1.3 of the Québec Securities Act, includes requirements with respect to dispute resolution or mediation services that are different than those set out in section 13.16 of NI 31-103. In Québec, registrants must inform each complainant, in writing and without delay, that if the complainant is dissatisfied with how the complaint is handled or with the outcome, they may request the registrant to forward a copy of the complaint file to the Autorité des marchés financiers. The registrant must forward a copy of the complaint file to the Autorité des marchés financiers, which will examine the complaint. The Autorité des marchés financiers may act as a mediator if it considers it appropriate to do so and the parties agree.
13.15 Handling complaints
General duty to document and respond to complaints
Section 13.15 requires registered firms to document complaints, and to effectively and fairly respond to them. We are of the view that registered firms should document and respond to all complaints received from a client, a former client or a prospective client who has dealt with the registered firm (complainant).
Firms are reminded that they are required to maintain records which demonstrate compliance with complaint handling requirements under paragraph 11.5(2)(m).
Complaint handling policies
An effective complaint system should deal with all formal and informal complaints or disputes in a timely and fair manner. To achieve the objective of handling complaints fairly, the firm's complaint system should include standards allowing for objective factual investigation and analysis of the matters specific to the complaint.
We take the view that registered firms should take a balanced approach to the gathering of facts that objectively considers the interests of
• the complainant
• the registered representative, and
• the firm
Registered firms should not limit their consideration and handling of complaints to those relating to possible violations of securities legislation.
Complaint monitoring
The firm's complaint handling policy should provide for specific procedures for reporting the complaints to superiors, in order to allow the detection of frequent and repetitive complaints made with respect to the same matter which may, on a cumulative basis, indicate a serious problem. Firms should take appropriate measures to deal with such problems as they arise.
Responding to complaints
Types of complaints
All complaints relating to one of the following matters should be responded to by the firm by providing an initial and substantive response, both in writing and within a reasonable time:
• a trading or advising activity
• a breach of client confidentiality
• theft, fraud, misappropriation or forgery
• misrepresentation
• an undisclosed or prohibited conflict of interest, or
• personal financial dealings with a client
Firms may determine that a complaint relating to matters other than the matters listed above is nevertheless of a sufficiently serious nature to be responded to in the manner described below. This determination should be made, in all cases, by considering if an investor, acting reasonably, would expect a written response to their complaint.
When complaints are not made in writing
We would not expect that complaints relating to matters other than those listed above, when made verbally and when not otherwise considered serious based on an investor's reasonable expectation, would need to be responded to in writing. However, we do expect that verbal complaints be given as much attention as written complaints. If a complaint is made verbally and is not clearly expressed, the firm may request the complainant to put the complaint in writing and we expect firms to offer reasonable assistance to do so.
Firms are entitled to expect the complainant to put unclear verbal issues into written format in order to try to resolve confusion about the nature of the issue. If the verbal complaint is clearly frivolous, we do not expect firms to offer assistance to put the complaint in writing. The firm may nonetheless ask the complainant to put the complaint in writing on his or her own.
Timeline for responding to complaints
Firms should
• promptly send an initial written response to a complainant: we consider that an initial response should be provided to the complainant within five business days of receipt of the complaint
• provide a substantive response to all complaints relating to the matters listed under "Types of complaints" above, indicating the firm's decision on the complaint
A firm may also wish to use its initial response to seek clarification or additional information from the client.
Requirements for providing information about the availability of dispute resolution or mediation services paid for by the firm are discussed below.
We encourage firms to resolve complaints relating to the matters listed above within 90 days.
13.16 Dispute resolution service
Section 13.15 requires a registered firm to document and respond to each complaint made to it about any product or service that is offered by the firm or one of its representatives. Section 13.16 provides for recourse to an independent dispute resolution or mediation service at a registered firm's expense for specified complaints where the firm's internal complaint handling process has not produced a timely decision that is satisfactory to the client.
Registered firms may be required to make an independent dispute resolution or mediation service paid for by the firm available to a client in respect of a complaint that
• relates to a trading or advising activity of the firm or its representatives, and
• is raised within six years of the date when the client knew or reasonably ought to have known of the act or omission that is a cause of or contributed to the complaint
As soon as possible after a client makes a complaint (for example, when sending its acknowledgment or initial response to the complaint), and again when the firm informs the client of its decision in respect of the complaint, a registered firm must provide a client with information about
• the firm's obligations under section 13.16,
• the steps the client must take for an independent dispute resolution or mediation service to be made available to the client at the firm's expense, and
• the name of the independent service that will be made available to the client (outside of Québec, this will normally be the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI), as discussed below) and how to contact it
A client may escalate an eligible complaint to the independent dispute resolution or mediation service made available by the registered firm in two circumstances:
• If the firm fails to give the client notice of its decision within 90 days of receiving the complaint (telling the client that the firm plans to take more than 90 days to make its decision does not 'stop the clock'). The client is then entitled to escalate the complaint to the independent service immediately or at any later date until the firm has notified the client of its decision.
• If the firm has given the client notice of its decision about the complaint (whether it does so within 90 days or after a longer period) and the client is not satisfied with the decision, the client then has 180 days in which escalate the complaint to the independent service.
In either instance, the client may escalate the complaint by directly contacting the independent service.
We think that it may sometimes be appropriate for the independent service, the firm and the client involved in a complaint to agree to longer notice periods than the prescribed 90 and 180 day periods as a matter of fairness. We recognize that where a client does not cooperate with reasonable requests for information relating to a complaint, a firm may have difficulty making a timely decision in respect of the complaint. We expect that this would be relevant to any subsequent determination or recommendation made by an independent service about that complaint.
The client must agree that the amount of any recommendation by the independent service for monetary compensation will not exceed $350,000. This limit applies only to the amount that can be recommended. Until it is escalated to the independent service, a complaint made to a registered firm may include a claim for a larger amount.
Except in Québec, a registered firm must take reasonable steps to ensure that the dispute resolution and mediation service that is made available to its clients for these purposes will be OBSI. The reasonable steps we expect a firm to take include maintaining ongoing membership in OBSI as a "Participating Firm" and, with respect to each complaint, participating in the dispute resolution process in a manner consistent with the firm's obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with its client. This would include entering into consent agreements with clients contemplated under OBSI's procedures.
Since section 13.16 does not apply in respect of a complaint made by a permitted client that is not an individual, we would not expect a firm that only has clients of that kind to maintain membership in OBSI.
A registered firm should not make an alternative independent dispute resolution or mediation service available to a client at the same time as it makes OBSI available. Such a parallel offering would not be consistent with the requirement to take reasonable steps to ensure that OBSI will be the independent service that is made available to the client. Except in Québec, we expect that alternative service providers will only be used for purposes of section 13.16 in exceptional circumstances.
We would regard it as a serious compliance issue if a firm misrepresented OBSI's services or exerted pressure on a client to refuse OBSI's services.
If a client declines to make use of OBSI in respect of a complaint, or if a client abandons a complaint that is under consideration by OBSI, the registered firm is not obligated to provide another service at the firm's expense. A firm is only required to make one dispute resolution or mediation service available at its expense for each complaint.
Nothing in section 13.16 affects a client's right to choose to seek other recourse, including through the courts.
Registrants that are members of an SRO, including those that are registered in Québec, must also comply with their SRO's requirements with respect to the provision of independent dispute resolution or mediation services.
Registrants who do business in other sectors
Some registrants are also registered or licensed to do business in other sectors, such as insurance. These registrants should inform their clients of the complaint mechanisms for each sector in which they do business and how to use them.
Division 6 Registered sub-advisers
13.17 Exemption from certain requirements for registered sub-advisers
Section 13.17 contains an exemption from certain client related requirements for registered sub-advisers. These requirements are not necessary because in a sub-adviser arrangement the sub-adviser's client is another registrant. We remind registrants that these exemptions do not apply if the client is not a registrant. One of the conditions of this exemption is that the other registrant has entered into an agreement with its client that it is responsible for losses that arise out of certain failures by the sub-adviser. We expect that a registrant taking on this liability will conduct appropriate initial and ongoing due diligence on the sub-adviser and before making recommendations or investment decisions based on the sub-adviser's advice, ensure the investment is suitable for the registrant's client.
We also expect that the other registrant and the sub-adviser will maintain records of their transactions and that the other registrant will maintain records of the due diligence conducted on the sub-adviser. See Part 11 of this Companion Policy for more guidance.
Division 7 Misleading communications
13.18 Misleading communications
Misleading business titles and designations
Section 13.18 prohibits registrants from, among other things, using titles or designations that could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead existing and prospective clients. Certain titles can be confusing to the average investor or imply that a registered individual performs a particular function at a firm or has particular expertise. Similarly, titles can give rise to certain client expectations or help to create an unfounded feeling of trust, reassurance or prestige. Registered firms should keep these considerations in mind before authorizing their registered individuals to use specific titles. Particular scrutiny should be given to the use of titles that convey an expertise in seniors' issues or retirement planning to confirm that any registered individual using such a title is appropriately qualified and competent in that area.
When considering whether a designation is misleading, registered firms should consider whether the designation has:
• a rigorous curriculum and examination process (i.e. type and length of exam)
• experience requirements, and
• been issued by a reputable or accredited organization.
Registered firms should recognize that some types of clients, such as seniors, may be particularly vulnerable to misleading designations. If a registered firm permits their registered individuals to use designations of any kind, including those that suggest an expertise in retirement planning, registered firms must have procedures in place to confirm that those designations are not misleading.
The nature of the relationship with clients and the products and services provided
If a registered firm uses advertising that exaggerates the products and services available to clients, this could reasonably be expected to mislead a client as to the products and services to be provided as well as to the nature of the relationship that may exist between the registrant and the client.
If a registered firm holds itself out as independent but offers proprietary products, this could reasonably be expected to mislead a client as to the products to be provided and as to the nature of the relationship.
If a registered firm or its registered individuals hold themselves out as being in a fiduciary-like relationship with their clients but the registrants do not actually conduct themselves to the standard of a fiduciary then this could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead a client as to the nature of the relationship between themselves and their registrant.
Titles, designations, awards, or recognitions based on sales activity or revenue generation
A registered individual's sales activity or revenue generation are distinct from their proficiency, experience, and qualifications. If a prestigious sounding title, designation, award, or recognition is tied to a registered individual's sales activity or revenue generation, this could reasonably be expected to deceive or mislead a client as to the proficiency, experience, or qualifications of that registered individual.
For example, if membership in a registered firm's "President's Club" is based partly or entirely on a registered individual's sales activity or revenue generation, the registered individual must not use that recognition or award.
Corporate officer titles
A registered individual must not use a corporate officer title, such as president or vice-president, unless their sponsoring firm has duly appointed that registered individual to that corporate office pursuant to the corporate law applicable to their sponsoring firm. The use of a corporate officer title is also still subject to the general rule set out under subsection 13.18(1) and firms must consider whether the use of a corporate officer title would be misleading prior to approving their use.
Part 14 Handling client accounts -- firms
If a client consents, documents required in this Part can be delivered in electronic form. For further guidance, see NP 11-201.
Division 1 Investment fund managers
Section 14.1 sets out the limited application of Part 14 to investment fund managers. The sections of Part 14 that apply to investment fund managers when performing their investment fund manager activities include section 14.1.1 [duty to provide information], section 14.5.2 [restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement], section 14.5.3 [cash and securities held by a qualified custodian], section 14.6 [client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust], section 14.6.1 [custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests], section 14.6.2 [custodial provisions relating to short sales], subsection 14.12(5) [content and delivery of trade confirmation] and section 14.15 [security holder statements]. An investment fund manager that is also registered as a dealer or adviser (or both) is subject to all relevant sections of Part 14 in respect of that firm's dealer or adviser activities.
Section 14.1.1 requires investment fund managers to provide information that is known to them concerning position cost, deferred sales charges and any other charges deducted from the net asset value of the securities, and trailing commissions to dealers and advisers who have clients that own the investment fund manager's funds. This information must be provided within a reasonable period of time in order that the dealers and advisers may comply with their client reporting obligations. This is a principles-based requirement. An investment fund manager must work with the dealers and advisers who distribute fund products to determine what information they need from the investment fund manager in order to satisfy their client reporting obligations. The information and arrangements for its delivery may vary, reflecting different operating models and information systems.
Division 1.1 Publicly available information
Section 14.1.2 requires registered firms that offer dealing or advising services to non-permitted clients to make publicly available information that will support informed decision-making by investors who are not currently their clients, but may be looking for products or services provided by them.
The requirement is expressed both as a general principle and with a list of prescribed information that must be included. This information is not specific to any one potential client. Some of the ways in which firms may meet the requirement to make the prescribed information publicly available include posting it on their open-access websites or directly delivering it by email or in paper form to anyone who asks for it. If the information is not easy to obtain, we would not consider it to be publicly available.
In developing disclosures to meet this requirement, firms should bear in mind the goal of making sure any potential clients will have ready access to the essential facts that would be useful to anyone wanting to identify which firms might have what they are looking for and what distinguishes one such firm from another. Firms should be careful to ensure the information is entirely factual, avoiding unsubstantiated claims or comparisons. Firms are free to create different packages of information for different groups of potential clients who might have different needs or expectations that the firm could satisfy with different products or services. A general description of the required information is sufficient because the firm is not, in this instance, tailoring its communication to a particular individual whose needs it has specifically considered. However, once a particular individual has entered into a client relationship with the firm, the disclosures under section 14.2 will also apply.
In keeping with the guidance about client communication in section 1.1 of this Companion Policy, we expect that this information will be set out in plain language, using a presentation format that makes it easy to understand. The information should be described in such a way that the investor can readily compare and contrast the different options of products, services and account relationships that are available from the firm, along with the associated costs.
Division 2 Disclosure to clients
14.2 Relationship disclosure information
Registrants should ensure that clients understand who they are dealing with. They should carry on all registerable activities in their full legal or registered trade name. Contracts, confirmation and account statements, among other documents, should contain the registrant's full legal name.
Content of relationship disclosure information
Subsection 14.2(1) sets out a general principle that a registered firm must deliver to a client all information that a reasonable investor would consider important about the client's relationship with the registrant. Firms should bear in mind that although it will very often be sufficient to provide a client with the information prescribed in subsection 14.2(2), that is not an exhaustive list and the over-arching general principle will always apply to a client-registrant relationship.
There is no prescribed form for the relationship disclosure information required under section 14.2. A registered firm may provide this information in a single document, or in separate documents, which together give the client the prescribed information.
Relationship disclosure informationThe relationship disclosure information required to be delivered under subsection 14.2(1) is intended to shape and confirm clients' expectations of the services and products they will receive through the registrant. It is therefore of the greatest importance that it should be communicated in a manner consistent with the guidance on client communications under section 1.1 of this Companion Policy. We encourage registrants to avoid the use of technical terms and acronyms when communicating with clients. To satisfy their obligations under section 14.2, registered individuals must spend sufficient time with clients as part of an in-person or telephone meeting, or other method that is consistent with their operations, to adequately explain the information that is delivered to them. We expect a firm to have policies and procedures requiring its registered individuals to demonstrate they have done so. What is considered "sufficient" will depend on the circumstances, including a client's understanding of the delivered documents.
Evidence of compliance with client disclosure requirements at account opening, prior to trades and at other times, can include detailed notes of meetings or discussions with clients, signed client acknowledgements and tape-recorded phone conversations.
Promoting client participation
Registered firms should help their clients understand the registrant-client relationship. They should encourage clients to actively participate in the relationship and provide them with clear, relevant and timely information and communications.
In particular, registered firms should help and encourage clients to:
• Keep the firm up to date. Clients should be encouraged to
• provide full and accurate information to the firm and the registered individuals acting for the firm
• promptly inform the firm of any change to their information that could result in a change to the types of investments appropriate for them, such as a change to their income, investment objectives, risk tolerance, investment time horizon or net worth
• Be informed. Clients should be
• helped to understand the potential risks and returns on investments
• encouraged to carefully review sales literature provided by the firm
• encouraged to consult professionals, such as a lawyer or an accountant, for legal or tax advice where appropriate
• Ask questions. Clients should be encouraged to
• request information from the firm to resolve concerns about their account, transactions or investments, or their relationship with the firm or a registered individual acting for the firm
• Stay on top of their investments. Clients should be encouraged to
• review all account documentation provided by the firm
• regularly review portfolio holdings and performance
Account type
Paragraph 14.2(2)(a) requires a firm to provide a description of the nature or type of a client's account. In order that a client will understand their relationship with the firm, a client will need to know how their account will operate. Examples of relevant information include whether
• there is a minimum account size
• it is a fee-based account or commissions will be payable, and
• there are limits on what products or services are made available for accounts of that type.
Further requirements in this section are intended to expand on this foundation.
Disclosure of where and the manner in which client's assets are held or accessed, including the relevant associated risks and benefits
Under paragraphs 14.2(2)(a.1) and 14.2(2)(a.2), registered firms must disclose to clients the location where, and the manner in which, client assets are held or accessed, including the relevant associated risks and benefits to the client. The risks to a client will vary depending on the type of custodial arrangement that is in place. At a minimum, we would generally expect the disclosure to include the following:
• the way(s) that the registered firm holds client's assets, and the associated risks
• the way(s) that the registered firm has access to the client's assets, and the associated risks
• whether a qualified custodian holds any or all of the client's assets
• if a custodian uses any sub-custodians to hold the client's assets in cases where the registered firm directs or arranges which custodian to use to hold client cash and securities
• if the registered firm uses a custodian that is not independent of the registered firm, and whether the registered firm has access to the client's assets through this relationship
• if a foreign custodian or a foreign dealer holds the client's cash and securities in accordance with subsection 14.5.2(3) or 14.6(2) or section 14.6.1 or 14.6.2, the rationale for using the foreign custodian or dealer and a description of the risks of using that foreign custodian or dealer, including the potential difficulty associated with the client's ability to enforce their legal rights and the potential difficulty that the client may face in respect of repatriating their assets on the bankruptcy or insolvency of the foreign custodian or dealer
Description of products and services
Under paragraph 14.2(2)(b), a firm must provide a general description of the products and services it offers to the client.
We expect this disclosure to include a general description of all amounts a client might pay during the course of holding a type of investment, including management fees associated with mutual funds. If a registered firm exclusively or primarily invests its clients' money in securities issued by the firm itself or a related party, that information should be disclosed.proprietary products, that information must be disclosed. A firm must also disclose whether there are any other restrictions or limitations on the products or services it will provide to the client. This includes, for example, restrictions that exist because of the firm's registration category or terms and conditions placed on its registration, as well as business decisions to limit what the firm offers to some of its clients based on their account type or any other consideration. Another example would be if an individual representative assigned to a client's account is restricted in the products or services that he or she can provide to the client.
Disclosure of charges and other compensation
Under paragraphs 14.2(2)(f), (g) and (h), registered firms must provide clients with information on the operating and transaction charges they might pay in making, holding and selling investments, and a general description of any third-party compensation paid to the firm by any other party. Examples of compensation paid by other parties would include such things as commissions paid by issuers and bonuses from affiliated companies relating to the client's investments, such as trailing commissions, that may be paid to the firm in relation to the client. These requirements have been drafted in broad terms and we expect firms to be careful not to omit or obscure any of the required information.
A registered firm's charges to a client and the compensation it may receive from third parties in respect of the client will vary depending on the type of relationship with the client and the nature of the services and investment products offered. A firm is not expected to provide information on all the types of accounts that it offers and the fees related to these accounts if it is not relevant to the client's situation.
"Operating charge" is defined broadly in section 1.1 and examples include (but are not exclusive to) service charges, administration fees, safekeeping fees, management fees, transfer fees, account closing fees, annual registered plan fees and any other charges associated with maintaining and using an account that are paid to the registrant. For registered firms that charge an all-in fee for the operation of the account, such as a percentage of assets under management, that fee is the operating charge. We do not expect firms with an all-in operating charge to provide a breakdown of the items covered by the fee.
"Transaction charges" is also defined broadly in section 1.1 and examples include (but are not exclusive to) commissions, transaction fees, switch or change fees, performance fees, short-term trading fees, and sales charges or redemption fees that are paid to the registrant. Although we do not consider "foreign exchange spreads" to be a transaction charge, we encourage firms to include a general notification in trade confirmations and reports on charges and other compensation that the firm may have incurred a gain or loss from a foreign exchange transaction as a best practice.
Operating charges and transaction charges include only charges paid to the registered firm by the client. Third-party charges, such as custodian fees that are not paid to the registered firm, are not included in operating charges or transaction charges. Operating and transaction charges include any sales taxes that are paid on the amounts charged to the client. Registrants may wish to inform clients where a charge includes sales tax, or separately disclose the components of the charge. Withholding taxes would not be considered a charge.
Registrants should advise clients with managed accounts whether the registrant will receivethird-party compensation from third parties, such as trailing commissions, on any securities purchased for the client and, if so, whether the fee paid by the client to the registrant will be affected by this. For example, the management fee paid by a client on the portion of a managed account related to mutual fund holdings may be lower than the overall fee on the rest of the portfolio.
Description of content and frequency of client reporting
Under paragraph 14.2(2)(i), a registered firm is required to provide a description of the content and frequency of reporting to the client. Reporting to clients includes, as applicable:
• trade confirmations under section 14.12
• account statements under section 14.14
• additional statements under section 14.14.1
• security position cost information under section 14.14.2
• annual report on charges and other compensation under section 14.17
• investment performance reports under section 14.18
Guidance about registered firm's client reporting obligations is provided in Division 5 of this Part.
Suitability determinations and KYC information
Paragraph 14.2(2)(k) requires registered firms to inform their clients of their obligation to make suitability determinations (subject to the exception in subsection 14.2(7). Paragraph 14.2(2)(l) requires registrantsfirms to provide their clients with a copy of their KYC information. Since firms have an ongoing obligation under section 13.2(4.1) to update KYC information, this means that a firm must provide a client with the KYC information it has collected at the time of account opening. We would expect registered firms to also provide a description to the client, and also whenever it has collected updated information. In order that this information will help a client to understand their relationship with the registrant, consistent with the principle in subsection 14.2(1), we expect this disclosure to include a description of the various terms (such as "risk profile" and "investment time horizon") which make up the KYC information, and explain how this information will be used in assessing the client's financial situation, investment objectives, investment knowledge and risk tolerance in determining investment suitability. that it will be used in making suitability determinations for the client. The obligation in subsection 14.2(1) is ongoing, so if KYC information is updated, it must also be provided to the client.
Benchmarks
Paragraph 14.2(2)(m) requires registered firms to provide clients with a general explanation of how investment performance benchmarks might be used to assess the performance of a client's investments and any options available to the client to obtain information about benchmarks from the registered firm. Other than this general discussion, there is no requirement for registered firms to provide benchmark information to clients. Nonetheless, we encourage firms to do so as a best practice. Guidance on the provision of benchmarks is set out in this Companion Policy at the end of the discussion of the content of investment performance reports under section 14.19.
Scholarship plan dealers
Paragraph 14.2(2)(n) requires an explanation of the important aspects of the scholarship plan that, if not fulfilled, would cause loss to the client. To be complete, this prescribed disclosure could include any options that would allow the investor to retain notional earnings in the event that they do not maintain prescribed payments under the plan and any fees associated with those options.
Investment impact of costs and restrictions
Paragraph 14.2(2)(o) requires an explanation of the potential impact that a registered firm's charges, applicable investment restrictions, and any costs embedded in investment products could each have on a client's investment returns. That explanation necessarily includes discussion of the reduced overall returns in the account because of any operating charges, and the reduced return on securities resulting from any transaction charges or ongoing ownership fees applicable to them. It also includes discussion of the potential for reduced overall returns if only a limited range of products is made available to the client. The registrant's duty to deal with the client fairly, honestly and in good faith, and its obligation to make suitability determinations that put the client's interests first, require the firm to tell the client if it does not have products or services that are suitable for the client. This determination may depend on the investment goals designated for the client's account. For example, it may make a difference if the account is the primary retirement savings vehicle for a retail investor, or is a secondary account is set up by an accredited investor for speculating in exempt market products.
Order execution trading
Subsections 14.2(7) and (8) provide that only limited relationship disclosure information must be delivered by a dealer whose relationship with a client is limited to executing trades as directed by a registered adviser acting for the client. In a relationship of this kind, each registrant must explain to the client its role and responsibility to the client, and what services and reporting the client can expect of it.
14.2.1 Pre-trade disclosure of charges
For non-managed accounts, section 14.2.1 requires disclosure to a client of charges specific to a transaction prior to the acceptance of a client's instruction. This disclosure is not required to be in writing. Oral disclosure of charges is sufficient for the purposes of disclosing charges at the time of a transaction. In the case of a client who is a frequent trader, if the firm has good reason to believe applicable "standard" charges are well understood, a brief confirmation that the usual charges will apply would be an acceptable alternative to specifying the actual amount of the charges. Specific charges must be reported in writing on the trade confirmation as required in section 14.12.
For a purchase of a security on a deferred sales charge basis, disclosure that a deferred sales charge might be triggered upon the redemption of the security, and the schedule that would apply if it is sold within the time period that a deferred sales charge would be applicable, must be presented. The actual amount of the deferred sales charge, if any, would need to be disclosed once the security is redeemed. For the purposes of disclosing trailing commissions, the dealing representative may draw attention to the information in the prospectus or the fund facts document if that document is provided at the point of sale.
With respect to a transaction involving a debt security, pre-trade disclosure should include a discussion of any commission the registered firm will receive on the trade. This discussion should include both the number of basis points that the charge represents as well as the corresponding dollar amount, or a reasonable estimate of the amount if the actual amount of the charges is not known to the firm at the time.
If a client will be investing in a mutual fund security, the firm's representative should briefly explain each of the following and how they may affect the investment:
• the management fee
• the sales charge or deferred sales charge option available to the client and an explanation as to how such charges work. This means registered firms should advise clients that mutual funds sold on a deferred sales charge basis are subject to charges upon redemption that are applied on a declining rate scale over a specified period of years, until such time as the charges decrease to zero. Any other redemption fees or short-term trading fees that may apply should also be discussed
• any trailing commission, or other embedded fees
• any options regarding front end loads
• any fees related to the client changing or switching investments ("switch or change fees")
Registrants may also wish to explain toIn order to help their clients thatto understand what trailing commissions are included in theand fund management fees that are charged to their investment funds andare, we encourage registrants to explain them in the simplest terms possible. We think this should include explaining that trailing commissions are not additional charges paid by the client to the registrant. "Trailing commission" is defined for the purposes of NI 31-103 in section 1.1 in broad terms designed to ensure that payments similar to what are generally known as trailing commissions will be subject to similar reporting requirements under this instrument.
Switch or change transactions
Processing a switch or change transaction without client knowledge is contrary to a registrant's duty to act fairly, honestly and in good faith. In our view, compliance with this duty requires that clients are informed, before any switch or change transaction is processed, of charges associated with the transaction, dealers' incentives for such a transaction (including increased trailing commissions), and any tax or other implications of such a transaction. In each case, we expect dealers to explain why a proposed switch or change transaction is appropriate for the client. We consider that providing clients with clear and complete disclosure of the charges at the time of a transaction will help clients to be aware of the implications of proposed transactions and deter registrants from transacting for the purpose of generating commissions. Registrants are also reminded that their obligations in connection with suitability and conflicts of interest apply to such transactions, as well as their obligations under any applicable SRO requirements or guidance.
We expect all changes or switches to a client's investments to be accurately reported in trade confirmations by reporting each of the purchase and sale transactions making up the change or switch, as required in section 14.12, with a description of the associated charges.
14.4 When the firm has a relationship with a financial institution
As part of their duty to clients, registrants who have a relationship with a financial institution should ensure that their clients understand which legal entity they are dealing with. In particular, clients may be confused if more than one financial services firm is carrying on business in the same location. Registrants may differentiate themselves through various methods, including signage and disclosure.
Division 3 Client assets and investment fund assets
14.5.2 Restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement
Section 14.5.2 specifies situations where registered firms must ensure that any custodian used to hold the cash or securities of a client or an investment fund is a Canadian custodian. If a registered firm has physical possession of the cash or securities of a client or an investment fund then we expect the registered firm to transfer those cash and securities to a Canadian custodian. If a registered firm has access to the cash or securities of a client or an investment fund then we expect the registered firm to confirm that those cash and securities are being held at a Canadian custodian. If a registered firm directs or arranges which custodian a client or an investment fund will use to hold their cash or securities then we expect the registered firm to direct that client or investment fund to, or arrange a custodial relationship with, a Canadian custodian.
For the purposes of section 14.5.2, we expect "cash and securities of an investment fund" to include the cash and securities that comprise the portfolio of an investment fund, as well as cash that may be held by an investment fund manager for investment in, or on the redemption of, securities of the investment fund.
Subsection 14.14(7) sets out when a security is considered to be held by a registered firm for a client. We consider the terms "hold" or "held" in this Division to include the situations identified in subsection 14.14(7). Section 12.4 of this Companion Policy provides examples of when holding or having access to client assets may occur. For the purposes of this Division, we expect all registered firms to consider the examples listed in section 12.4 in determining whether they hold or have access to client assets. For the purposes of section 14.5.2, we interpret the phrase "hold or have access" as not including the handling in transit of a client's cheque made payable to a third party.
We recognize that there may be good reasons for a foreign custodian to be used to hold client or investment fund cash or securities, including where:
• foreign securities comprise all or substantially all of the client's or investment fund's portfolio
• the registered firm's client or the investment fund is resident in a foreign jurisdiction
• a foreign custodian is required to facilitate portfolio transactions in a foreign jurisdiction, or
• using a foreign custodian is more beneficial to the client or investment fund than using a Canadian custodian for tax reasons
In such circumstances, we expect registered firms to assess the risks and benefits of using a foreign custodian compared to the risks and benefits of using a Canadian custodian and determine which custodian is more beneficial for the client. Considerations may include:
• the protections offered by an investor protection fund approved or recognized by the regulator in Canada compared to the comparable investor compensation scheme available in the foreign jurisdiction
• the robustness of the custodial regime in the foreign jurisdiction
• the potential difficulty a client or an investment fund may have enforcing its legal rights in the foreign jurisdiction
• the potential difficulty a client or an investment fund may have repatriating its assets if the foreign custodian declares bankruptcy or becomes insolvent
• the nature of the regulation of the foreign custodian, and
• the sufficiency of the equity of the foreign custodian in the circumstances
A registered firm has a duty to act fairly, honestly and in good faith with its client, or in the best interests of an investment fund that it manages, as applicable. In addition, in compliance with subsection 11.1(b), registered firms are expected to manage any risks associated with the use of a foreign custodian in accordance with prudent business practices. Accordingly, we expect registered firms to consider alternatives in their assessment of the use of a foreign custodian which, among other considerations, might include whether their client, or an investment fund that they manage, may be better served by:
• using a Canadian custodian who can appoint a foreign custodian to act as a sub-custodian, or
• limiting the client's or investment fund's exposure to a particular foreign custodian, which may include using a more diverse range of foreign custodians
Where a foreign custodian is used, we will assess this practice on a case-by-case basis.
Certain investment instruments may be both securities and derivatives. Accordingly, the custodial requirements in this Division apply to these instruments, subject to:
• the definition provision under section 14.5.1, and
• the exemption provided for customer collateral subject to the custodial requirements under National Instrument 94-102 Derivatives: Customer Clearing and Protection of Customer Collateral and Positions
Exemptions from restriction on self-custody and qualified custodian requirement
Investment fund managers are deemed to have access to the portfolio assets of the investment funds managed by them, and must ensure that the portfolio cash and securities of the investment fund are held at a qualified custodian under section 14.5.2. The exemption under paragraph 14.5.2(7)(d) is not available to investment fund managers with respect to the investment funds managed by them.
Registered advisers often create and use investment funds as a way to invest their clients' money. Registered advisers who also act as the investment fund manager of an investment fund should ensure that the portfolio cash and securities of the investment fund managed by them are held at a qualified custodian. Paragraph 14.5.2(7) (c) provides an exemption for registered firms from the requirement to use a qualified custodian for securities issued by investment funds so long as the securities issued by the investment funds are recorded on the books of the investment fund, or the fund' transfer agent, only in the name of the registered advisers' clients.
Mortgages
We recognize that mortgages may have unique custodial practices which may differ from the custodial practices of other types of securities. Mortgages are exempt from the qualified custodian requirement and restriction on self-custody in all jurisdictions of Canada provided that they meet the conditions as set out under paragraph 14.5.2(7)(f).
Prohibition on self-custody and the use of a custodian that is not functionally independent
Under subsection 14.5.2(1), the registered firm itself cannot be the custodian or sub-custodian for a client or investment fund, except in certain circumstances. Under subsections 14.5.2(5) and 14.5.2(6), the qualified custodian, or the Canadian financial institution with respect to cash, must be functionally independent of the registered firm, except in certain circumstances. For the purposes of paragraphs 14.5.2(1)(b) and 14.5.2(5)(b), we would consider a system of controls and supervision to manage the risks to the client or investment fund associated with the custody of the client's or investment fund's cash or securities to include:
• segregation of duties between the custodial function and other functions
• client asset verification examination performed by a third party
Even when a registered firm is not required to use a qualified custodian under subsections 14.5.2(2) or (3) or a Canadian financial institution under subsection 14.5.2(4), we consider it prudent for the registered firm to use a custodian that is functionally independent of the registered firm. Refer to section 12.4 of this Companion Policy for examples of having access to client assets through the use of a custodian that is not functionally independent of the registered firm. The relationship between a registered firm and a non-independent custodian can give rise to serious conflicts of interest. We remind registered firms of their obligations under section 13.4 to identify and respond to conflicts of interest. If the conflicts of interest cannot be managed fairly and effectively, the registered firm should consider using an independent custodian to hold client assets instead.
General prudent custodial practices
Assets other than cash and securities
Section 14.6 sets out the requirement that if a registered firm holds client assets or investment fund assets, which includes securities, cash and other types of assets, then that registered firm must hold the assets separate and apart from its own property, and in trust for the client or investment fund. In accordance with this Division, where a registered firm holds client assets or investment fund assets directly (for example, the assets held are not cash or securities, or the registered firm is relying on an exemption from the requirement to use a qualified custodian), we will assess those circumstances on a case-by-case basis.
We recognize that in limited cases, it may not be feasible to hold certain asset types at a qualified custodian. For example, bullion requires a custodian that is experienced in providing bullion storage and custodial services, and is familiar with the requirements relating to the physical handling and storage of bullion. Such a custodian may not meet the definition of a "qualified custodian". In those cases, we expect a registered firm that would otherwise be subject to subsection 14.5.2(2), (3) or (4), had the client assets or investment fund assets been cash or securities, to exercise due skill, care and diligence in the selection and appointment (where applicable) of the custodian. This can involve the registered firm reviewing the facilities, procedures, records, insurance coverage, and creditworthiness of the selected custodian. We would also expect registered firms to conduct a periodic review of custodial arrangements for client assets or investment fund assets.
Delivery of custodial statements
We expect registered firms to encourage clients or investment funds, as applicable, to confirm that they are receiving account statements from their custodian and, as applicable, to compare the custodial statements to the statements sent by the registered firms.
Reconciliation with custodians
Registered firms are expected to reconcile, on a regular basis, their internal records of client assets or investment fund assets and the records of the custodian where client or investment fund assets are held.
Custodial arrangements
For investment fund managers
Investment fund managers should exercise due skill, care and diligence in the selection and appointment of the custodian for the investment funds managed by them. We expect investment fund managers to conduct a periodic review of custodial arrangements for their investment funds. We also expect investment fund managers to consider whether the custodian it appoints uses all reasonable diligence, care and skill in the selection and monitoring of its sub-custodians, whether the sub-custodians would meet the definition of a "qualified custodian" and whether the appropriate segregation arrangements are observed throughout the custody chain of the portfolio assets of the investment fund.
We expect investment fund managers to put in place a written custodial agreement with the custodian on behalf of investment funds managed by them. Written custodial agreements are expected to provide for key matters such as the location of portfolio assets, any appointment of a sub-custodian, the method of holding portfolio assets, the standard of care of the custodian and the responsibility for loss. Prospectus-qualified investment funds are subject to further custodial requirements under National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds and National Instrument 41-101 General Prospectus Requirements.
For registered firms other than investment fund managers
Where registered firms, other than investment fund managers, have influence over a client's selection of a custodian, we consider it a prudent business practice for these registered firms to conduct similar due diligence to that of investment fund managers as outlined in the section above. Registered firms, other than investment fund managers, often direct or arrange the custodial arrangement for their clients; however, the registered firms are not typically a party to the custodial agreement between the client and the custodian used to hold client assets. Nevertheless, we expect registered firms that direct or arrange the custodial arrangement for their clients to understand the material terms of the written custodial agreement and to explain to the clients the main purpose of the agreement. If a custodial agreement allows a custodian to use a sub-custodian, the registered firm should alert the client to that fact and encourage the client to contact the custodian if they have any concerns with the custodial agreement.
14.5.3 Cash and securities held by a qualified custodian
Section 14.5.3 sets out requirements as to how cash and securities should be held by a qualified custodian or a Canadian financial institution. A registered firm can comply with the requirement under subsection 14.5.3(a) by verifying that cash and securities of a client or an investment fund are reported on the custodial account statement of that client or investment fund as issued by the qualified custodian or the Canadian financial institution.
A qualified custodian may arrange for the deposit of securities with a depository, or clearing agency, that operates a book-based system. Such depositories or clearing agencies include The Canadian Depository For Securities Limited, the Depository Trust Company or any other domestic or foreign depository or clearing agency that is incorporated or organized under the laws of a country or a political subdivision of a country and operates a book-based system in that country or political subdivision or operates a transnational book-based system.
14.6 Client and investment fund assets held by a registered firm in trust
Section 14.6 requires a registered firm to segregate client assets and investment fund assets and hold them in trust. When a registered firm is not required to use a qualified custodian, or a Canadian financial institution for cash, under subsections 14.5.2(2), (3) or (4), we consider it prudent for registered firms who are not members of an SRO to only hold client assets in client name, or portfolio assets of the investment fund in the name of the investment fund. This is because the capital requirements for non-SRO members are not designed to reflect the added risk of holding client assets in nominee name.
Investment fund managers may hold cash for investment in, or on the redemption of, securities of the investment fund. For the purposes of section 14.6, such cash-in-transit is considered to be cash and securities of an investment fund of the investment fund manager, and is subject to the requirements under section 14.6. Some investment fund managers choose to outsource certain fund administrative functions to a service provider, including the trust accounting function. Under some outsourcing arrangements, a service provider may be holding cash for investment in, or on the redemption of, securities of the investment fund. Under these arrangements, investment fund managers should ensure that, at a minimum, the cash is held in a designated trust account at a Canadian custodian, a Canadian financial institution, or a foreign custodian (if it is more beneficial to the investment fund to use the foreign custodian than a Canadian custodian or a Canadian financial institution), and ensure that the cash is held separate and apart from the property of the service provider.
Under other outsourcing arrangements, a service provider may be provided with access to cash for investment in, or on the redemption of, securities of the investment fund, or access to the portfolio assets of the investment fund. Investment fund managers are reminded that they are responsible and accountable for all functions that they outsource to a service provider. Delegating access to investors' cash-in-transit or portfolio assets of an investment fund can increase the risk of loss. Investment fund managers are expected to exercise heightened due diligence and oversight to ensure that the service provider has adequate controls in place and that investors' assets are adequately protected.
14.6.1 Custodial provisions relating to certain margin or security interests
Section 14.6.1 sets out acceptable custodial practices relating to margin posted with, and security interests held by, a foreign dealer or counterparty in respect of certain derivatives transactions. We expect that the assessment of the use of a foreign custodian in section 14.5.2 of this Companion Policy will apply equally to the foreign dealer referenced in this section.
In addition to these custodial practices relating to certain derivatives, a registered firm may also ensure that cash or securities of a client or investment fund are delivered to a person or company in satisfaction of its obligations under a securities lending, repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement if the collateral, cash proceeds or purchased securities that are delivered to the client or investment fund in connection with the transaction are held under the custodianship of a qualified custodian or a sub-custodian of the client or investment fund in compliance with Division 3 of Part 14.
14.6.2 Custodial provisions relating to short sales
Section 14.6.2 sets out acceptable custodial practices relating to cash or securities of a client or investment fund that are deposited with a foreign dealer as security in connection with a short sale of securities. We expect that the assessment of the use of a foreign custodian in section 14.5.2 of this Companion Policy will apply equally to the foreign dealer referenced in this section.
Division 4 Client accounts
14.10 Allocating investment opportunities fairly
If the adviser allocates investment opportunities among its clients, the firm's fairness policy should, at a minimum, indicate the method used to allocate the following:
• price and commission among client orders when trades are bunched or blocked
• block trades and initial public offerings among client accounts
• block trades and initial public offerings among client orders that are partially filled, such as on a pro-rata basis
The fairness policy should also address any other situation where investment opportunities must be allocated.
Division 5 Reporting to clients
Reporting to clients is on an account basis, except that
• securities that are not held in an account (i.e., securities reported under an additional statement) must be included in a report for the account through which they were traded, and
• subsection 14.18(4) permits performance reports for more than one account of a client and also securities not held in an account to be combined with the client's written consent.
Registered firms may choose how they meet their client reporting obligations within the framework set out in the Instrument. We encourage firms to combine client statements, position cost information and client reports into comprehensive documents or send them together. For example, an account statement and an additional statement for securities traded through (but not held) in an account might be combined, perhaps along with position cost information, each quarter. Once a year, an integrated statement such as this could be further combined with the report on charges and other compensation and the performance report, or delivered along with a separate document that combines the two reports.
We believe that integrating client reporting as much as possible within the limitations of firms' systems capabilities will better enable clients to make use of the information and that it is in the interests of registrants to have clients that are well informed about the services they provide. When client reporting information is combined or delivered together, we expect registered firms will give each element sufficient prominence among the others that a reasonable investor can readily locate it.
Consistent with the guidance on clear and meaningful disclosure to clients in section 1.1 of this Companion Policy, we expect registrants to present client statements and reports in an understandable manner and to explain, if applicable, what securities are included in different statements. Registered firms should encourage clients to contact their dealing or advising representative or the firm directly with questions about their statements and reports. We expect registered firms to ensure that clients know how their investments will be held (for example, by the firm or at an issuing fund company) and understand the different implications that this will have for them in such matters as client reporting, investor protection fund coverage and custody of their assets. If a registered firm trades in exempt market securities for a client, the firm should also explain the reasons why it is not always possible for the firm to determine a market value for products sold in the exempt market or whether the client still owns the security, and the implications that this may have for reporting on exempt-market securities.
It is the responsibility of the registered firm to produce these client statements and reports, not that of individual representatives. Registered firms should have policies and procedures in place to ensure that they are adequately supervising their registered representatives' communications with clients about the prescribed information.
The requirement to produce and deliver a trade confirmation under section 14.12, an account statement under section 14.14, an additional statement under section 14.14.1, position cost information under section 14.14.2, a security holder statement under section 14.15, a scholarship plan dealer statement under section 14.16 or client reports under sections 14.17 and 14.18 may be outsourced by a registered firm to a third-party service provider that acts as its agent. Third-party pricing providers may also be used to value securities for these purposes. Like all outsourcing arrangements, the registrant is ultimately responsible for the function and must supervise the service provider. See Part 11 of this Companion Policy for more guidance on outsourcing.
For the most part, the client reporting requirements in Part 14 do not differentiate between categories of registrant. Except for certain provisions which expressly apply only to a specific registration category (such as those tailored to scholarship plan dealers), differences in the application of these requirements between different registered dealers or registered advisers will be the result of their different operating models. In particular, exempt market dealers that are not also registered as advisers or in another category of dealer may find that not all of the client reporting requirements will apply to their operating model. Appendix F discusses how these requirements may apply in the case of some of these "sole EMDs".
14.11.1 Determining market value
Section 14.11.1 sets out the basis on which market value must be determined for client reporting purposes.
Paragraph 14.11.1(1)(a) requires the market value of a security that is issued by an investment fund not listed on an exchange to be determined by reference to the net asset value provided by the investment fund manager of the fund on the relevant date.
For other securities, a hierarchy of valuation methods that depend on the availability of relevant information is prescribed in paragraph 14.11.1(1)(b). Registrants are required to act reasonably in applying these methodologies and we understand that this process will often require a registrant to exercise professional judgment. A registered firm may not simply take valuation information from an issuer and pass it on to clients as the market value for purposes of meeting the firm's market value reporting obligations. We expect a firm to use its professional judgment as to the reliability of information provided by an issuer as an input to the firm's determination of market value in accordance with the applicable methodology prescribed in section 14.11.1.
Where possible, market value should be determined by reference to a quoted value on a marketplace. The quoted value will be the last bid or ask price on the relevant date or the last trading day prior to the relevant date. In the case of a liquid security for which a reliable price is quoted on a market place, if it can be demonstrated through use of a periodic assessment that a "last traded price" valuation approach results in security market values that are materially the same as under the "last bid and ask prices" valuation approach, it may be acceptable to use this current "last traded price" valuation approach. Registered firms should ensure that any quoted values used to determine market value do not represent stale or old prices that are not reflective of current values. If no current value for a security is quoted on a marketplace, market value should be determined by reference to published market reports or inter-dealer quotes.
We recognize that it is not always possible to obtain a market value by these methods. In such cases, we will accept a valuation policy that is consistently applied and includes procedures that assess the reliability of any valuation inputs and assumptions. If available, valuation inputs and assumptions should be based on observable market data or inputs, such as market prices or yield rates for comparable securities and quoted interest rates. If observable inputs are not available, valuation can be based on unobservable inputs and assumptions. In some cases, it may be reasonable and appropriate to value at cost, where there has been no material subsequent event affecting value (e.g. a market event or new capital raising by the issuer). "Observable" and "unobservable" inputs are concepts under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and we expect them to be applied consistent with IFRS.
If, having applied the prescribed methodology, a registered firm reasonably believes it cannot determine the market value of a security, the firm must then report its value as "not determinable" and exclude it from the calculations in client statements as prescribed in subsection 14.11.1(3).
This is not the same as determining that the market value of a security is zero. However, we would expect that if the market value of a security cannot be determined for a prolonged period of time, that fact may be an indication that the market value of the security should now be determined to be zero.
The following considerations can be used in determining when the market value for a security is not determinable:
• the position is illiquid
• there is little or no issuer and issuer-related financial data available, or the data is stale
• there is little or no financial data available for comparable issuers or for the issuer's business sector
• there is not enough data to use the valuation methodology prescribed in paragraph 14.11.1(1)(b) and/or the results of the various IFRS methodologies used have been determined to be unreliable because of the use of unreliable data or the results indicate a wide range in possible values
• the acquisition cost of the security is no longer a good estimate of the security's market value as the cost is outside the range of possible values for the security
Important to applying these considerations is establishing and maintaining a firm policy as to how many days beyond which the last data available is considered to be stale.
If the market value for a security subsequently becomes determinable, a registered firm must begin to report it in client statements and add that value to the opening market values or deposits included in the calculations in subsection 14.19(1). This would be expected if the firm had previously assigned the security a value of zero in the calculation of opening market values or deposits because it could not determine the security's market value, as required by subsection 14.19(7). This would reduce the risk of presenting a misleading improvement in the performance of the investment by only adding the value of the security to the other calculations required under section 14.19. If the deposits used to purchase the security were already included in the calculation of opening market values or deposits, the registered firm would not need to adjust these figures.
We encourage firms to disclose the foreign exchange rate used in calculating the market value of non-Canadian dollar denominated securities as a best practice.
14.12 Content and delivery of trade confirmation
Section 14.12 requires registered dealers to deliver trade confirmations.
Under paragraph 14.12(1)(b.1), registered dealers must provide the yield on a purchase of a debt security in a trade confirmation. For non-callable debt securities, the yield to maturity would be appropriate. For callable securities, the yield to call may be more useful.
Under paragraph 14.12(1)(c.1), registrants may disclose the total dollar amount of compensation (which may consist of any mark-up or mark-down, commission or other service charge) or, alternatively, the total dollar amount of commission, if any, and if the registrant applied a mark-up or mark-down or any service charge other than a commission, a prescribed general notification. The notification is a minimum requirement and a firm may elect to provide more information in its trade confirmations.
Each trade should be reported in the currency in which it was executed. If a trade is executed in a foreign currency through a Canadian dollar account, the exchange rate should be reported to the client.
Under subsection 14.12(7), a registered dealer that complies with the requirements of section 14.12 in respect of a purchase or sale of a security is not subject to the corresponding written confirmation requirements contained in any of subsections 37(1), (2) or (3) of the Securities Act (Newfoundland and Labrador), subsection 36(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario) and subsection 42(1) of The Securities Act, 1988 (Saskatchewan). For these purposes, a firm that has an exemption from section 14.12 and complies with the terms of that exemption would be considered to have complied with the requirements of that section.
14.14 Account statements
Section 14.14 requires registered dealers and advisers to deliver statements to clients at least once every three months. There is no prescribed form for these statements but they must contain the information referred to in subsections 14.14(4) and (5). The types of transactions that must be disclosed in an account statement include any purchase, sale or transfer of securities, dividend or interest payment received or reinvested, any fee or charge, and any other account activity. A firm must deliver an account statement with the information referred to in subsection (4) if any transaction was made for the client in the reporting period. A firm is only required to provide the account position information referred to in subsection (5) if it holds securities owned by a client in an account of the client.
There is no provision for consolidated statements in section 14.14 (or 14.14.1), so a registered firm must provide every client with an applicable statement for each of their accounts. Firms may provide supplementary reporting that they think a client might find useful. For example, a firm might provide a consolidated year-end statement where a client has requested a consolidated performance report under subsection 14.18(4).
14.14.1 Additional statements
A firm is required to deliver additional statements if the circumstances described in subsection 14.14.1(1) apply. The additional statements must be delivered once every three months, except that an adviser must deliver the statements on a monthly basis if requested by the client as provided in subsection 14.14.1(3). The requirements set out for the frequency of delivering account statements and additional statements are minimum standards. Firms may choose to provide the statements more frequently.
Paragraph 14.14.1(2)(g) requires disclosure about applicable investor protection funds. However, subsection 14.14.1(2.1) exempts a firm from this requirement where a client's securities are held or controlled by an IIROC or MFDA member. SRO rules require members to be participants in specified investor protection funds and prescribe client disclosures about them. To avoid the potential that clients may be confused or misinformed, registrants that are not participants in an investor protection fund should refrain from discussing its terms and conditions with clients.
Firms may choose to include securities that must be reported under the additional statement requirement in a document that it refers to as an account statement, consistent with their clients' expectations that their accounts are not limited to securities held by the firm, provided it satisfies the requirements for content of statements set out in sections 14.14 and 14.14.1.
14.14.2 Security position cost information
Section 14.14.2 requires the delivery on a quarterly basis of position cost information for securities reported in account statements and additional statements. For purposes of section 14.14.2, a security position is "opened" when the registered firm that is providing a statement to a client first acquires or holds securities for that client or when it first obtains trading authority over securities (as in the case of securities transferred into a discretionary account of a portfolio manager).
Position cost information is an investment performance measurement tool that provides investors with a comparison to the market value of each security position they have open. Position cost may be either the book cost or the original cost of the securities, determined in accordance with their respective definitions in section 1.1.
Position cost is not tax information and a registered firm may not depart from the defined meaning of "original cost" or "book cost" in order to align position cost with tax cost for a security position. Registered firms may provide clients with tax cost as supplementary information if they wish to do so, provided the difference is made clear to clients. If the tax treatment of a security is an important part of its marketing to investors, we would expect a registered firm to provide tax information as well as position cost information, consistent with the duty to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with clients.
Registered firms must include the definition of book cost or original cost, depending on which method the firm is using, in the statement or document where the position cost information appears as contemplated under subsection 14.14.2(4). Firms can comply with this requirement in a footnote.
In determining position cost for transferred securities, a registered firm may rely on position cost information provided by the transferring firm, if
• the transferring-out firm is also subject to the requirement to provide individual position cost information to clients, and
• the transferring-in firm has no reason to believe the information is not reliable.
Where securities were transferred from another registrant firm, a registrant may also elect to use market value information as at the date of the transfer as the position cost. Firms must specify each security position where market value has been used rather than book or original cost. A footnote could be used for this purpose, with disclosure such as "because book cost information for this security position was unavailable, we have used market value information as of the transfer date as the position cost".
If a security position was opened before July 15, 2015, a registered firm can choose to report (a) the cost of the security position, (b) the market value of the security position as at December 31, 2015, or (c) the market value of the security position as at a date earlier than December 31, 2015, if the firm reasonably believes accurate recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date. Examples of circumstances under which we would consider it to be reasonable and not misleading for a firm to use a date earlier than December 31, 2015 for some but not all of its clients' security positions opened before July 15, 2015 include when a firm that uses the same earlier date for:
• all client accounts or security positions that were transferred to the firm at the same time, or
• all clients that are on the same reporting system of the registered firm, if the firm has more than one reporting system.
If a security position is built up over time with successive transactions (purchases or transfers), an average can be used to determine the cost of the position. The average may include both book or original cost information used for some of the transactions and market value used for others. In such cases, the disclosure applicable where market value has been used should be modified as necessary. For example: "The cost of this security position has been determined using an average of market value as of the date on which some securities were transferred into your account when it was opened, and the book cost of securities that we subsequently purchased for your account." It is also permissible to differentiate between positions in the same security that were opened in separate transactions by reporting positions valued at book cost or original cost separately from those where market value was used, instead of averaging them into a single number. However, this alternative approach has the potential to confuse clients, so clear explanatory notes should be provided if it is used.
Position cost information must be delivered at least quarterly. A firm may combine position cost information with an account statement or additional statement for the period, or it may send it separately. If it chooses to send position cost information separately, the firm must deliver it within 10 days after the statement(s) have been delivered and must also include the market value information from the statement(s) for the period in order that the client will be able to readily compare the information. Although a firm may deliver statements under section 14.14 or section 14.14.1 more frequently than quarterly, it is not required to provide position cost information except on a quarterly basis.
14.15 Security holder statements
Section 14.15 sets out the client reporting requirements applicable to a registered investment fund manager where there is no dealer or adviser of record for a security holder on the records of the investment fund manager.
14.16 Scholarship plan dealer statements
Section 14.16 provides that sections 14.14 [account statements], 14.14.1 [additional statements] and 14.14.2 [security position cost information] do not apply to a scholarship plan dealer that delivers prescribed information to a client at least once every 12 months. Subsection 14.19(4) sets out performance reporting requirements for scholarship plans.
14.17 Report on charges and other compensation
Registered firms must provide clients with an annual report on the firm's charges and other compensation received by the firm in connection with their investments. Examples of operating charges and transaction charges are provided in the discussion of the disclosure of charges and other compensation in section 14.2 of this Companion Policy. The annual report must include information about all of the firm's current operating charges that might be applicable to a client's account. A firm is only required to include the charges for those of its services that it would reasonably expect the particular client to utilize in the coming 12 months.
The discussion of debt security disclosure requirements in section 14.12 of this Companion Policy is also relevant with respect to paragraph 14.17(1)(e).
Scholarship plans often have enrolment fees payable in instalments in the first few years of a client's investment in the plan. Paragraph 14.17(1)(f) requires that scholarship plan dealers include a reminder of the unpaid amount of any such fees in their annual reports on charges and other compensation.
Payments that a registered firm or its registered representatives receive from issuers of securities or other registrants in relation to registerable services to a client must be reported under paragraph 14.17(1)(g). This disclosure requirement includes any form of payment to the firm or a representative of the firm linked to sales or other registerable services to the client receiving the report. Examples of payments that would be included in this part of the report on charges and other compensation include some referral fees, success fees on the completion of a transaction or finder's fees. This part of the report does not include trailing commissions, as they are specifically addressed in paragraph 14.17(1)(h).
Registered firms must disclose the amount of trailing commissions they received related to a client's holdings. The disclosure of trailing commissions received in respect of a client's investments must be included with a notification prescribed in paragraph 14.17(1)(h). The notification must be in substantially the form prescribed, so a registered firm may modify it to be consistent with the actual arrangements. For example, a firm that receives a payment that falls within the definition of "trailing commission" in section 1.1 in respect of securities that are not investment funds can modify the notification accordingly. The notification set out is the required minimum and firms can provide further explanation if they believe it will be helpful to their clients.
Registered firms may want to organize the annual report on charges and other compensation with separate sections showing the charges paid by the client to the firm, and the other compensation received by the firm in respect of the client's account.
Appendix D of this Companion Policy includes a sample Report on Charges and Other Compensation, which registered firms are encouraged to use as guidance.
14.18 Investment performance report
Where more than one registrant provides services pertaining to a client's account, responsibility for performance reporting rests with the registered firm with the client-facing relationship. For example, if a registered adviser has trading authority over a client's account at a registered dealer, the adviser must provide the client with an annual investment performance report; this is not an obligation of the dealer that only executes adviser-directed trades or provides custodial services in respect of the client's account.
Performance reporting to clients is required to be provided separately for each account. Securities of a client required to be reported in an additional statement under section 14.14.1, if any, must be covered in a performance report that also includes any other securities in the account through which they were transacted. However, subsection 14.18(4) provides that with client consent, a registrant may provide consolidated performance reporting for that client. A registrant may also provide a consolidated performance report for multiple clients, such as a family group, but only as a supplemental report, in addition to reports required under section 14.18.
14.19 Content of investment performance report
Subsection 14.19(5) requires the use of each of text, tables and charts in the presentation of investment performance reports. Explanatory notes and the definition of "total percentage return" must also be included. The purpose of these requirements is to make the information as understandable to investors as possible.
To help investors get the most out of their investment performance reports and encourage informed discussion with their registered dealing representative or advising representative, we encourage registered firms to consider including:
• additional definitions of the various performance measures used by the registrant
• additional disclosure that enhances the performance presentation
• a discussion with clients about what the information means to them
Registrants should not mislead a client by presenting a return of the client's capital in a manner that suggests it forms part of the client's return on an investment.
Registered representatives are also encouraged to meet with clients, as part of an in-person or telephone meeting, to help ensure they understand their investment performance reports and how the information relates to the client's investment objectives and risk tolerance.
Appendix E of this Companion Policy includes a sample Investment Performance Report which registered firms are encouraged to use as guidance.
Opening market value, deposits and withdrawals
As part of paragraphs 14.19(1)(a) and (b), registered firms must disclose the market value of cash and securities in the client's account as at the beginning and the end of the 12-month period covered by the investment performance report. The market value of cash and securities at account opening is assumed to be zero.
Under paragraphs 14.19(1)(c), (d) and subsection 14.19(1.1), registered firms must also disclose the market value of all deposits and transfers of cash and securities into the account, and the market value of all withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities out of the account, for the 12-month period covered by the performance report, as well as, subject to certain exceptions discussed below, since account opening. Deposits and transfers into the account (which do not include reinvested distributions or interest income) should be shown separately from withdrawals and transfers out of the account.
If an account was opened before July 15, 2015, registered firms must present the market value of all cash and securities in the client's account as at one of the following dates:
(a) January 1, 2016 or an earlier date, if the firm's first performance report to the client covered the 2016 calendar year (paragraph 14.19(1.1)(c)),
(b) July 15, 2015 or an earlier date, if the firm's first performance report to the client covered some other period (paragraph 14.19(1.1.)(b)).
A registered firm may choose a date earlier than July 15, 2015 or January 1, 2016, as applicable under paragraphs 14.19(1.1)(b) or (c), only if the firm reasonably believes accurate recorded historical market value information is available for the client's account, and it would not be misleading to the client to provide that information as at the earlier date. As with position cost information, examples of circumstances under which we would consider it to be reasonable and not misleading for a firm to use a date earlier than July 15, 2015 or January 1, 2016, as applicable, for some but not all of its clients' accounts include when a firm that uses the same earlier date for:
• all client accounts that were transferred to the firm at the same time, or
• all clients that are on the same reporting system of the registered firm, if the firm has more than one reporting system.
The registered firm must also present the market value of all deposits, withdrawals and transfers of cash and securities since the date chosen under paragraphs 14.19(1.1)(b) or (c).
Subsection 14.19(7) requires a registered firm that cannot determine the market value for a security position to assign the security a value of zero for the performance reporting purposes and the reason for doing so must be disclosed to the client. The explanation may be included as a note in the performance report. As described in section 14.11.1 of this Companion Policy, if a registered firm is subsequently able to value that security it may need to adjust the calculation of the market values or deposits to avoid presenting a misleading improvement in the performance of the account.
A registered firm is not required to deliver a nil report in circumstances where it reasonably believes that none of a client's securities have a determinable value. We would expect the firm to tell the client that it will not be delivering an investment performance report for the period and explain why.
Change in market value
The opening market value, plus deposits and transfers in, less withdrawals and transfers out, should be compared to the market value of the account as at the end of the 12-month period for which the performance reporting is provided and also since inception in order to provide clients, in dollar terms, with the performance of their account.
The change in the market value of the account since inception is the difference between the closing market value of the account and total of opening market value plus deposits less withdrawals since inception. The change in the value of the account for the 12-month period is the difference between the closing market value of the account and total of opening market value plus deposits less withdrawals during the period. If the client's account was opened before July 15, 2015, a registered firm is required to disclose the change in value of a client's account since one of July 15, 2015, January 1, 2016 or an earlier date determined on the basis of the same criteria as described above with reference to paragraphs 14.19(1.1)(b) or (c).
The change in market value includes components such as income (dividends, interest) and distributions, including reinvested income or distributions, realized and unrealized capital gains or losses in the account, and the effect of operating charges and transaction charges if these are deducted directly from the account. Rather than show the change in value as a single amount, registered firms may opt to break this out into its components to provide more detail to clients.
Percentage return calculation method
Paragraph 14.19(1)(i) requires firms to provide the annualized total percentage return using a money-weighted rate of return calculation method. No specific formula is prescribed, but the method used by a firm must be one that is generally accepted in the securities industry. A registered firm may, if it so chooses, provide percentage returns calculated using both money-weighted and time-weighted methods. In such cases, the firm should explain in plain language the difference between the two sets of performance returns.
Paragraph 14.19(1)(j) requires that performance reports include a notification with specified information about how the client's percentage return was calculated. This includes an explanation in general terms of what the calculation method takes into account. We do not expect firms to include a formula or an exhaustive list. For example, a firm could explain that under a money weighted method, decisions a client made about deposits and withdrawals to and from the client's account have affected the returns calculated in the report and that this means it represents the client's personal rate of return. We expect firms to use this notification to help clients understand the most important implications of the calculation methodology. A client's personal rate of return should be compared to the client's target rate of return, if the client has one, so that progress toward that goal can be assessed. We expect a firm that also uses a time weighted method to explain the difference between the two rates of return in plain language. For example, the firm could explain that the returns calculated under a time weighted method may not be the same as the actual returns in the client's account because they do not necessarily show the effect of deposits and withdrawals to and from the account, and that a time weighted return is useful in determining how well a money manager performed, but not necessarily how the client's account actually grew.
Performance reporting periods
Subsection 14.19(2) outlines the minimum reporting periods of 1, 3, 5 and 10 years and the period since the inception of the account. For accounts opened before July 15, 2015, a registered firm may use a deemed inception date of January 1, 2016, July 15, 2015 or an earlier date determined on the basis of the same criteria as that described above.
Registered firms may opt to provide more frequent performance reporting. However performance returns for periods of less than one year can be misleading and therefore, must not be presented on an annualized basis, consistent with subsection 14.19(6).
Scholarship plans
Under paragraph 14.19(4)(c), for scholarship plans, the information required to be delivered in the investment performance report includes a reasonable projection of future scholarship payments that the plan may pay to the client or the client's designated beneficiary upon the maturity of the client's investment in the plan.
A scholarship plan dealer is also required under paragraph 14.19(4)(d) to provide a summary of any terms of the plan, which if not met by the client or the client's designated beneficiary under the plan, may cause the client or the designated beneficiary to suffer a loss of contributions, earnings or government contributions in the plan. The disclosure here is not intended to be as detailed as the disclosure at account opening. It is intended to remind the client of the unique risks of the plan and the ways in which the client's scholarship plan may be seriously impaired. This disclosure must be consistent with other disclosures required to be delivered to clients under applicable securities legislation.
To the extent that a scholarship plan dealer and the plan itself are not the same legal entity but are affiliates of one another, the dealer may meet obligations to deliver annual investment performance reports by drawing attention to the plan's direct mailing of reports to a client by the plan's administrator.
Benchmarks and investment performance reporting
The use of benchmarks for investment performance reporting is optional. There is no requirement to provide benchmarks to clients in any of the reports required under NI 31-103.
However, we encourage registrants to use benchmarks that are relevant to a client's investments as a useful way for a client to assess the performance of their portfolio. Benchmarks need to be explained to clients in terms they will understand, including factors that should be considered by the client when comparing their investment returns to benchmark returns. For example, a registrant could discuss the differences between the composition of a client's portfolio that reflects the investment strategy they have agreed upon and the composition of an index benchmark, so that a comparison between them is fair and not misleading. A discussion of the impact of operating charges and transaction charges as well as other expenses related to the client's investments would also be helpful to clients, since benchmarks generally do not factor in the costs of investing.
If a registered firm chooses to present benchmark information, the firm should ensure that it is not misleading. We expect registrants to use benchmarks that are
• discussed with clients to ensure they understand the purpose of comparing the performance of their portfolio to the chosen benchmarks and determine if their information needs will be met
• reasonably reflective of the composition of the client's portfolio so as to ensure that a relevant comparison of performance is presented
• relevant in terms of the
investinginvestment time horizon of the client• based on widely recognized and available indices that are credible and not manufactured by the registrant or any of its affiliates using proprietary data
• broad-based securities market indices which can be linked to the major asset classes into which the client's portfolio is divided. The determination of a major asset class should be based on the firm's own policies and procedures and the client's portfolio composition. An asset class for benchmarking purposes may be based on the type of security and geographical region. We do not expect an asset class to be determined by industry sector
• presented for the same reporting periods as the client's annualized total percentage returns
• clearly named
• applied consistently from one reporting period to the next for comparability reasons, unless there has been a change to the pre-determined asset classes. In this case, the change in the benchmark(s) presented should be discussed with the client and included in the explanatory notes, along with the reasons for the change
Examples of acceptable benchmarks would include, but are not limited to, the S&P/TSX Composite index for Canadian equities, the S&P 500 index for U.S. equities, and the MSCI EAFE index as a measure of the equity markets outside of North America.
14.20 Delivery of report on charges and other compensation and investment performance report
Registered firms must deliver the annual report on charges and other compensation under section 14.17 and the investment performance report under section 14.18 for a client together. These client reports may be combined with or accompany an account statement or additional statement for a client, or must be sent within 10 days after an account statement or additional statement for the client.
Appendix A
Contact information
Jurisdiction
|
E-mail
|
Fax
|
Address
|
|
|||
Alberta
|
(403) 297-4113
|
Alberta Securities Commission,
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 600, 250-5th St. SW
|
|
|
|
Calgary, AB T2P 0R4
|
|
|
|
Attention: Registration
|
|
|||
British Columbia
|
(604) 899-6506
|
British Columbia Securities Commission
|
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 10142, Pacific Centre
|
|
|
|
701 West Georgia Street
|
|
|
|
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1L2
|
|
|
|
Attention: Registration
|
|
|||
Manitoba
|
(204) 945-0330
|
The Manitoba Securities Commission
|
|
|
|
|
500-400 St. Mary Avenue
|
|
|
|
Winnipeg, MB R3C 4K5
|
|
|
|
Attention: Registrations
|
|
|||
New Brunswick
|
(506) 658-3059
|
Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick / Commission des services financiers et des services aux consommateurs du Nouveau --Brunswick
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 300, 85 Charlotte Street
|
|
|
|
Saint John, NB E2L 2J2
|
|
|
|
Attention: Registration
|
|
|||
Newfoundland & Labrador
|
(709) 729-6187
|
Superintendent of Securities, Service NL
|
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 8700, 2nd Floor, West Block
|
|
|
|
Confederation Building
|
|
|
|
St. John's, NL A1B 4J6
|
|
|
|
Attention: Manager of Registrations
|
|
|||
Northwest Territories
|
(867) 873-0243
|
Government of the Northwest Territories
|
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 1320
|
|
|
|
Yellowknife, NWT X1A 2L9
|
|
|
|
Attention: Deputy Superintendent of Securities
|
|
|||
Nova Scotia
|
(902) 424-4625
|
Nova Scotia Securities Commission
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 400, 5251 Duke Street
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 458
|
|
|
|
Halifax, NS B3J 2P8
|
|
|
|
Attention: Deputy Director, Capital Markets
|
|
|||
Nunavut
|
(867) 975-6590 (Faxing to NU is unreliable. The preferred method is e-mail.)
|
Legal Registries Division
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Justice
|
|
|
|
Government of Nunavut
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 1000 Station 570
|
|
|
|
Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0
|
|
|
|
Attention: Deputy Registrar
|
|
|||
Ontario
|
(416) 593-8283
|
Ontario Securities Commission
|
|
|
|
|
22nd Floor
|
|
|
|
20 Queen Street West
|
|
|
|
Toronto, ON M5H 3S8
|
|
|
|
Attention: Compliance and Registrant Regulation
|
|
|||
Prince Edward Island
|
(902) 368-6288
|
Consumer and Corporate Services Division,
|
|
|
|
|
Office of the Attorney General
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 2000, 95 Rochford Street
|
|
|
|
Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8
|
|
|
|
Attention: Superintendent of Securities
|
|
|||
Québec
|
(514) 873-3090
|
Autorité des marchés financiers
|
|
|
|
|
Direction de l'encadrement des intermédiaires
|
|
|
|
800 square Victoria, 22e étage
|
|
|
|
C.P 246, Tour de la Bourse
|
|
|
|
Montréal (Québec) H4Z 1G3
|
|
|||
Saskatchewan
|
(306) 787-5899
|
Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 601
|
|
|
|
1919 Saskatchewan Drive
|
|
|
|
Regina, SK S4P 4H2
|
|
|
|
Attention: Registration
|
|
|||
Yukon
|
(867) 393-6251
|
Department of Community Services Yukon
|
|
|
|
|
Yukon Securities Office
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 2703 C-6
|
|
|
|
Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2C6
|
|
|
|
Attention: Superintendent of Securities
|
Appendix B
Terms not defined in NI 31-103 or this Companion Policy
Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions:
• adviser registration requirement
• Canadian securities regulatory authority
• dealer registration requirement
• exchange contract (AB, SK, NB and NS only)
• foreign jurisdiction
• jurisdiction or jurisdiction of Canada
• local jurisdiction
• investment fund manager registration requirement
• prospectus requirement
• registration requirement
• regulator
• securities directions
• securities legislation
• securities regulatory authority
• SRO
• underwriter registration requirement
Terms defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions:
• accredited investor
• eligibility adviser
• financial assets
Terms defined in National Instrument 81-102 Investment Funds:
• money market fund
Terms defined in the Securities Act of most jurisdictions:
• adviser
• associate
• company
• control person
• dealer
• director
• distribution
• exchange contract (BC only)
• insider
• individual
• investment fund
• investment fund manager
• issuer
• mutual fund
• officer
• person
• promoter
• records
• registrant
• reporting issuer
• security
• trade
• underwriter
Appendix C
Proficiency requirements for individuals acting on behalf of a registered firm
The tables in this Appendix set out the education and experience requirements, by firm registration category, for individuals who are applying for registration under securities legislation.
An individual must not perform an activity that requires registration unless the individual has the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently, including, in the case of registered representatives, understanding the structure, features, returns and risks, and the initial and ongoing costs and the impact of those costs, of each security the individual recommends.
CCOs must also not perform an activity set out in section 5.2 unless they have the education, training and experience that a reasonable person would consider necessary to perform the activity competently.
Acronyms used in the tables
BMP: Branch Manager Proficiency Exam |
CIM: Canadian Investment Manager designation |
|
|
CA: Chartered Accountant |
CSC: Canadian Securities Course Exam |
|
|
CCO: Chief Compliance Officer |
EMP: Exempt Market Products Exam |
|
|
CCOQ: Chief Compliance Officers Qualifying Exam |
IFIC: Investment Funds in Canada Course |
|
|
CFA: CFA Charter |
MFDC: Mutual Funds Dealer Compliance Exam |
|
|
CGA: Certified General Accountant Exam/Partners, Directors |
PDO: Officers', Partners' and Directors' and Senior Officers Course Exam |
|
|
CMA: Certified Management Accountant |
SRP: Sales Representative Proficiency Exam |
|
|
CIF: Canadian Investment Funds Course Exam |
|
Investment dealer |
|||||
|
|||||
Dealing representative |
CCO |
||||
|
|||||
Proficiency requirements set by IIROC |
Proficiency requirements set by IIROC |
||||
|
|||||
Mutual fund dealer |
|||||
|
|||||
Dealing representative |
CCO |
||||
|
|||||
One of these five options: |
One of these two options: |
||||
|
|||||
|
1. |
CIF |
|
1. |
CIF, CSC or IFIC; and PDO, MFDC or CCOQ and 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
|
|||||
|
2. |
CSC |
|
2. |
CCO requirements -- portfolio manager or exempt from these under section 16.9(2) |
|
|||||
|
3. |
IFIC |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
4. |
CFA Charter and 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
5. |
Advising representative requirements -- portfolio manager or exempt from these under section 16.10(1) |
|
|
|
Exempt market dealer |
|||
|
|||
Dealing representative |
CCO |
||
|
|||
One of these four options: |
One of these two options: |
||
|
|||
1. |
CSC |
1. |
PDO or CCOQ and EMP or CSC and 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
|
|||
2. |
EMP |
2. |
CCO requirements -- portfolio manager or exempt from these under section 16.9(2) |
|
|||
3. |
CFA Charter and 12 months of relevant securities industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
|
|
|
|||
4. |
Advising representative requirements -- portfolio manager or exempt from these under section 16.10(1) |
|
|
|
|||
Scholarship plan dealer |
|||
|
|||
Dealing representative |
CCO |
||
|
|||
|
|
SRP, BMP, and PDO or CCOQ and 12 months of relevant security industry experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
|
|
|||
Restricted dealer |
|||
|
|||
Dealing representative |
CCO |
||
|
|||
Regulator to determine on a case-by-case basis |
Regulator to determine on a case-by-case basis |
Portfolio manager |
||||||
|
||||||
Advising representative |
Associate advising representative |
CCO |
||||
|
||||||
One of these two options: |
One of these two options: |
One of these three options: |
||||
1. |
CFA and 12 months of relevant investment management experience in the 36-month period before applying for registration |
1. |
Level 1 of the CFA and 24 months of relevant investment management experience |
1. |
CSC except if the individual has the CFA or CIM designation, PDO or CCOQ, and CFA or a professional designation as a lawyer, CA, CGA, CMA, notary in Québec or the equivalent in a foreign jurisdiction, and: |
|
|
||||||
2. |
CIM and 48 months of relevant investment management experience (12 months gained in the 36-month period before applying for registration) |
2. |
CIM and 24 months of relevant investment management experience |
|
• |
36 months of relevant securities experience working at an investment dealer, registered adviser or investment fund manager, or |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
• |
36 months providing professional services to the securities industry and 12 months working at a registered dealer, registered adviser or investment fund manager, for a total of 48 months |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
2. |
CSC except if the individual has the CFA or CIM designation, PDO or CCOQ and five years working at: |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
• |
an investment dealer or a registered adviser (including 36 months in a compliance capacity), or |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
• |
a Canadian financial institution in a compliance capacity relating to portfolio management and 12 months at a registered dealer or registered adviser, for a total of six years |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
3. |
PDO or CCOQ and advising representative requirements -- portfolio manager |
Restricted portfolio manager |
||||
|
||||
Advising representative |
Associate advising representative |
CCO |
||
|
||||
Regulator to determine on a case-by-case basis |
Regulator to determine on a case-by-case basis |
Regulator to determine on a case-by-case basis |
||
|
||||
Investment fund manager |
||||
|
||||
CCO |
||||
|
||||
One of these three options: |
||||
1. |
CSC except if the individual has the CFA or CIM designation, PDO or CCOQ, and CFA or a professional designation as a lawyer, CA, CGA, CMA, notary in Québec or the equivalent in a foreign jurisdiction, and: |
|||
|
||||
|
• |
36 months of relevant securities experience working at a registered dealer, registered adviser or investment fund manager, or |
||
|
||||
|
• |
36 months providing professional services in the securities industry and 12 months working in a relevant capacity at an investment fund manager, for a total of 48 months |
||
|
||||
2. |
CIF, CSC or IFIC; PDO or CCOQ and five years of relevant securities experience working at a registered dealer, registered adviser or an investment fund manager (including 36 months in a compliance capacity) |
|||
|
||||
3. |
CCO requirements for portfolio manager or exempt from these requirements under section 16.9(2) |
Appendix D
[Name of Firm]
Annual Charges and Compensation Report
Client name |
Your Account Number: 123456 |
|
|
Address line 1 |
|
|
|
Address line 2 |
|
|
|
Address line 3 |
|
This report summarizes the compensation that we received directly and indirectly in 20XX. Our compensation comes from two sources:
1. What we charge you directly. Some of these charges are associated with the operation of your account. Other charges are associated with purchases, sales and other transactions you make in the account.
2. What we receive through third parties.
Charges are important because they reduce your profit or increase your loss from investing. If you need an explanation of the charges described in this report, your representative can help you.
Charges you paid directly to us
RSP administration fee |
$100 |
|
|
||
Total charges associated with the operation of your account |
|
$100 |
|
||
Commissions on purchases of mutual funds with a sales charge |
$101 |
|
|
||
Switch fees |
$45 |
|
|
||
Total charges associated with transactions we executed for you |
|
$146 |
|
||
Total charges you paid directly to us |
|
$246 |
Compensation we received through third parties
Commissions from mutual fund managers on purchases of mutual funds (see note 1) |
$503 |
|
|
Trailing commissions from mutual fund managers (see note 2) |
$286 |
|
|
Total compensation we received through third parties |
$789 |
|
|
Total charges and compensation we received in 20XX |
$1,035 |
Notes:
1. When you purchased units of mutual funds on a deferred sales charge basis, we received a commission from the investment fund manager. During the year, these commissions amounted to $503.
2. We received $286 in trailing commissions in respect of securities you owned during the 12-month period covered by this report.
Investment funds pay investment fund managers a fee for managing their funds. The managers pay us ongoing trailing commissions for the services and advice we provide you. The amount of the trailing commission depends on the sales charge option you chose when you purchased the fund. You are not directly charged the trailing commission or the management fee. But, these fees affect you because they reduce the amount of the fund's return to you. Information about management fees and other charges to your investment funds is included in the prospectus or fund facts document for each fund.
Our current schedule of operating charges
[As part of the annual report of charges and compensation, registrants are required to provide their current operating charges that may be applicable to their clients' accounts. For the purposes of this sample document, we are not providing such a list.]
Appendix E
Your investment performance report |
For the period ending December 31, 2030 |
Investment account 123456789
Client name
Address line 1
Address line 2
Address line 3
|
This report tells you how your account has performed to December 31, 2030. It can help you assess your progress toward meeting your investment goals. |
|
|
||
|
Speak to your representative if you have questions about this report. It is important that you tell your representative if your personal or financial circumstances have changed. Your representative can recommend adjustments to your investments to keep you on track to meeting your goals. |
|
|
||
Amount invested means opening market value plus deposits including: |
||
|
||
the market value of all deposits and transfers of securities and cash into your account, not including interest or dividends reinvested. |
||
|
||
Less withdrawals including: |
||
|
||
the market value of all withdrawals and transfers out of your account. |
||
|
||
Total value summary |
||
|
||
Your investments have increased by $36,492.34 since you opened the account |
||
|
||
Your investments have increased by $2,928.85 during the past year |
||
|
||
Amount invested since you opened |
|
|
|
||
your account on January 1, 2015 |
$16,300.00 |
|
|
||
Market value of your account on December 31, 2030 |
$52,792.34 |
Change in the value of your account
This table is a summary of the activity in your account. It shows how the value of your account has changed based on the type of activity.
|
Past year |
Since you opened your account |
|
||
Opening market value |
$51,063.49 |
$0.00 |
|
||
Deposits |
$4,000.00 |
$21,500.00 |
|
||
Withdrawals |
$(5,200.00) |
$(5,200.00) |
|
||
Change in the market value of your account |
$2,928.85 |
$36,492.34 |
|
||
Closing market value |
$52,792.34 |
$52,792.34 |
What is a total percentage return?
This represents gains and losses of an investment over a specified period of time, including realized and unrealized capital gains and losses plus income, expressed as a percentage.
For example, an annual total percentage return of 5% for the past three years means that the investment effectively grew by 5% a year in each of the three years.
Your personal rates of return
The table below shows the total percentage return of your account for periods ending December 31, 2030. Returns are calculated after charges have been deducted. These include charges you pay for advice, transaction charges and account-related charges, but not income tax.
Keep in mind your returns reflect the mix of investments and risk level of your account. When assessing your returns, consider your investment goals, the amount of risk you're comfortable with, and the value of the advice and services you receive.
|
Past year |
Past 3 years |
Past 5 years |
Past 10 years |
Since you opened your account |
|
|||||
Your account |
5.51% |
10.92% |
12.07% |
12.90% |
13.09% |
Calculation method
We use a money weighted method to calculate rates of return. Contact your representative if you want more information about this calculation.
The returns in this table are your personal rates of return. Your returns are affected by changes in the value of the securities you have invested in, dividends and interest that they paid, and also deposits and withdrawals to and from your account.
If you have a personal financial plan, it will contain a target rate of return, which is the return required to achieve your investment objectives. By comparing the rates of return you actually achieved (shown in the table) with your target rate of return, you can see whether you are on track to meet your investment objectives.
Contact your representative to discuss your rate of return and investment objectives.
Appendix F
Part 14 Client reporting requirements and sole EMDs
This appendix discusses how the client reporting requirements in Part 14 may apply to some exempt market dealers that are not also registered as advisers or in another category of dealer (sole EMDs) as a result of their limited operating model.
Overview:
Holding client assets and other specified criteria
The applicability of some of the client statement requirements depends on whether a registered firm holds client assets (account statements) or, if it does not, whether certain other specific criteria apply (additional statements). Other client reporting requirements may or may not apply depending on whether a registered firm has a "client" at the relevant point in time (annual report on charges and other compensation, and annual report on investment performance).
Sole EMDs do not normally hold client assets and where that is the case, they can disregard provisions that only apply where client assets are held by a registered firm. In circumstances where a sole EMD holds client assets (as may be the case with mortgage syndications), it must deliver account statements with the information required under subsections 14.14(4) and 14.14(5) along with position cost information under section 14.14.2. Furthermore, since holding client assets is a clear indication of an ongoing client relationship, a sole EMD is also subject to the requirement to deliver an annual report on charges and other compensation under section 14.17 and an annual investment performance report under section 14.18.
Transactional vs ongoing client relationship
Some sole EMDs have only limited, transactional relationships with their clients -- as opposed to the ongoing client relationships that are typical of most other registrants' operating models. An example of a transactional relationship would be where an EMD's relationship with a client is limited to a specific private placement transaction and does not involve
• a security specified in paragraph 14.14.1(1)(c)
• any trailer fee or similar ongoing compensation in relation to the client's ownership of a security
• the EMD holding client assets
• any expectation on the part of the EMD that there may be further transactions with the client or services provided to the client. For example, if an EMD regularly contacts the client regarding any securities offered by the EMD, this will be considered an ongoing relationship
• any expectation on the part of the client that the EMD will continue to provide services to the client after the completion of the transaction. The example described above applies in this case as well.
In this example, the EMD would be required to deliver one account statement with transactional information under subsection 14.14(4), but would not be required to deliver any
• further account statements under section 14.14
• additional statements under section 14.14.1
• position cost information under section 14.14.2
• annual report on charges and other compensation under section 14.17
• annual investment performance report under section 14.18
A sole EMD should consider carefully whether it is in an ongoing client relationship before concluding that any of the client statement requirements do not apply to it.
Section-by-section analysis:
Relationship disclosure information, pre-trade disclosure of charges and trade confirmation
A sole EMD always has a client at the time of the transaction and will be subject to other requirements relating to relationship disclosure (section 14.2), pre-trade disclosure of charges (section 14.2.1) and trade confirmations (section 14.12). However, if it has no other dealings with the investor, the EMD might conclude that it is no longer in a client relationship at the point in time when it would otherwise be required to prepare further client statements and reports, as discussed below.
Account statements
An account statement has two principal elements: transactional information and account position information. Transactional information is specific to the securities involved and is required in almost all circumstances where there has been a transaction. Account position information is a snap-shot of the whole account and is required only where the firm holds client assets.
Subsection 14.14(1) requires an EMD to deliver transactional information prescribed under subsection 14.14(4) to clients on a quarterly basis or, if so requested, each month. This requirement applies regardless of whether the firm holds client assets. For EMDs that hold client assets, account position information under subsection 14.14(5) is also required. Note that subsection 14.14(2) requires an EMD to deliver an account statement with transactional information under subsection 14.14(4) "after the end of any month in which a transaction was effected in securities held by the dealer in the client's account" [emphasis added].
The effect of these requirements is that, if one or more transactions occurred in the reporting period, a sole EMD must provide the client with an account statement with transactional information (but not account position information if no clients assets are held) either
• at the end of the month, if requested by a client, or
• at the end of the quarter, by default.
This applies even where an EMD does not have an ongoing client relationship.
Additional statements
An "additional statement" (registered firms subject to the requirements in section 14.14.1 are not required to call it this in client communications -- "account statement" would do for those purposes) is the way clients get the equivalent of account position information where the registered firm does not hold their assets. It only applies in certain circumstances. More specifically, subsection 14.14.1(1) requires a registered dealer or adviser that does not hold client assets to provide an additional statement with account position information under subsection 14.14.1(2) on a quarterly basis if
• it has trading authority over the client's account in which the securities are held or were transacted (not, of course, applicable to a sole EMD),
• it receives certain continuing payments in respect of securities it traded for a client (e.g., trailing commission), or
• it is the dealer of record for a client's securities issued by a mutual fund or certain labour-sponsored investment vehicles (EMDs trading securities of an investment fund should be aware of the definition of "mutual fund" under securities legislation).
In effect, a registered firm is deemed to have an ongoing client relationship in these circumstances. If none of these circumstances apply, there is no requirement for a sole EMD to provide clients with an additional statement.
Position cost information
Subsection 14.14.2(1) requires quarterly delivery of position cost information under criteria which effectively mean that if a sole EMD has to provide account position information to a client, either in an account statement or an additional statement, it also has to provide position cost information to the client.
Annual report on charges and other compensation
Subsection 14.17(1) requires delivery of a report on charges and other compensation to a client every 12 months. It will apply if the sole EMD is subject to the requirement to provide account position information to a client, either in an account statement under subsection 14.14(5) or an additional statement under subsection 14.14.(1).
However, even if the requirement in subsection 14.17(1) is triggered, the EMD would not be required to send a "nil" report if it did not receive any of the specified charges or other compensation during the 12-month period.
Annual investment performance report
Subsection 14.18(1) requires annual delivery of an investment performance report to a client. Note that the elements of the performance report set out in section 14.19 will depend on market values that are contained in the account position information provided in the account statements and additional statements sent under sections 14.14 and 14.14.1, respectively. The effect of subsection 14.18(6) is that no investment performance report is required if a firm reasonably believes that either (a) there are no securities of a client in respect of which it would be required to provide account position information to a client, either in an account statement or an additional statement, or (b) if there are such securities, no market value can be determined for any of them.
Annex D: Summary of Comments on Consultation Paper 33-404 and Responses
ANNEX D
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS ON CONSULTATION PAPER 33-404 AND RESPONSES
This annex summarizes, at a high level, the written public comments we received on CP 33-404 and our responses to those comments. Approximately 85% of the comment letters we received were from industry stakeholders (including registrants, industry associations and law firms), and approximately 15% of the comment letters were from non-industry stakeholders (including investors, investor advocates, academics and others).
For clarity, the comments and responses are organized as follows:
1. Comments and responses on the conflicts of interest proposals
2. Comments and responses on the KYC proposals
3. Comments and responses on the KYP proposals
4. Comments and responses on the suitability proposals
5. Comments and responses on the RDI proposals
1. Comments and responses on the conflicts of interest proposals
General
We received mixed comments on the proposal with respect to conflicts of interest, although most commenters agreed that conflicts are an important area for the CSA to focus its efforts. There was disagreement about whether disclosure alone should be sufficient to address conflicts. Some commenters maintain that disclosure is an effective means of addressing conflicts and question the CSA research described in CP 33-404 on the limitations of disclosure.
A few commenters mentioned that requiring more disclosure could have a significant and disproportionate adverse effect on integrated firms and on capital raising. Others believe that the CSA will not be able to effectively address conflicts unless compensation and incentives issues are dealt with, and which disclosure alone will not address.
In addition, there was support for updating, expanding and enforcing National Instrument 81-105 Mutual Fund Sales Practices and Companion Policy 81-105 and for considering more generally monetary and non-monetary incentives internal to a dealer firm that favour the distribution of certain products over others, including proprietary products.
Effectiveness of the current rules governing conflicts of interest
Several commenters assert that existing rules are sufficient to regulate how registrants should respond to conflicts, whether in NI 31-103, SRO rules or professional codes of conduct, to address our concerns. It has been suggested that we should focus on enforcing these existing requirements and provide guidance to uphold the rule. In addition, several commenters suggested we align our proposals with SRO rules or clarify how our proposals differ from those requirements. If there is a gap for registrants that are not overseen by SROs, the commenters indicate that we should address it in order to ensure clients receive similar treatment regardless of the type of registrant or business model a registrant operates.
While some commenters think disclosure is an effective means of addressing conflicts, a few commenters believe that disclosure alone is not a sufficient remedy for dealing with conflicts, as it tends to reinforce trust in registrants.
Almost all commenters have expressed the view that the requirement that registrants have a "reasonable basis" for concluding that a client "fully understands" the implications and consequences of a conflict is problematic. They believe it would be difficult for a registrant to evidence this and satisfy regulators that such requirement has been met.
Prioritizing the client's interest
Commenters were fairly equally divided about whether the requirement to prioritize the interests of a client ahead of the firm in resolving conflicts is appropriate. Many are in favor of prioritizing the client's interest but are concerned about the practical implications of operationalizing such a standard. Others expressed the view that where multiple courses of action could be taken, the one that maximizes the interest of the client should be selected.
It has been suggested that we should provide specific guidance on the types of conflicts that are so significant they must be avoided and cannot be addressed through disclosure. In addition, the CSA should give examples of measures that may be taken to control conflicts in a manner that prioritizes the interest of the client. Finally, some commenters suggested that conflicts should be resolved in a manner that is "consistent with" the interests of the client, or "not detrimental to" the interests of the client.
Specific registration categories or business models
Several commenters raised concerns with the "one-size-fits-all" approach, namely applying the same standard to all registration categories and business models. Commenters expressed the view that this approach may present challenges for some firms, and have requested guidance to clarify our expectations for different registration categories and business models, such as firms that offer proprietary products.
CSA Response
Existing rules are not sufficient to achieve the outcome we are seeking of creating an obligation to respond to the conflict once identified and to prioritize the interest of clients ahead of the registrant.
Disclosure alone is not sufficient to address a conflict of interest in the best interest of clients. In other words, disclosure in conjunction with other controls must be used to address a conflict of interest in the best interest of clients. We also propose guidance on what would be appropriate controls to address different types of conflicts, and what conflicts are so significant that they must be avoided.
With respect to the "one-size-fits-all" approach under this new requirement, as introduced in CP 33-404, we do not propose scalability measures for the conflicts requirements. The conflict of interest standard is a fundamental registrant-conduct standard, similar to the fair dealing rule, which should not vary based on the registrant's business model, registration category, or the type of client.
We propose an obligation to identify and respond to conflicts by both the representative and the firm and we use the same standard for both, and provide guidance on procedures and controls that firms could implement to address the conflicts.
Moreover, we considered carefully the concerns previously raised on conflicts that arise from compensation arrangements and incentive practices as prescribed in National Instrument 81-105. The Proposed Amendments related to the conflicts of interest will provide guidance to registrants on how to address various types of conflicts arising from compensation arrangements and incentive practices.
Finally, with respect to proprietary products, we propose more guidance in 31-103CP generally on how firms can manage conflicts raised by the sale of proprietary products, and how firms with different business models (e.g. integrated mutual fund dealers, exempt market dealers, firms that offer proprietary products in addition to non-proprietary products, firms that only offer proprietary products) could comply with the requirement under the proposed Rule.
2. Comments and responses on the KYC proposals
General
In general, the commenters who provided comments on KYC proposals were critical of the proposed reforms to section 13.2 of NI 31-103. Several commenters believe that regulators are aiming for a one-size-fits-all approach to the collection of KYC information. They expressed the need for KYC obligations to be scalable in accordance with the level of service desired by clients.
Level of proficiency on tax related matters
Several commenters believe that collecting tax information when the representatives do not have any tax expertise does not serve the interest of investors, creating risks of reliance and a potential for errors which could harm clients. Because the required industry courses only provide a basic outline, registrants should not be encouraged through regulation to give advice on tax strategies. This could result in investors not seeking independent tax advice and could cause investors to believe that they are receiving tax or financial planning advice when this is not the scope of the agreed upon professional relationship.
Furthermore, many commenters believe that clients may perceive requests for this information as an intrusion in their affairs, and not all clients may be willing to provide this information. Finally, requiring the collection of tax information may increase significantly the costs of professional liability insurance and consequently, the service fees paid by clients.
However, certain commenters outlined that registrants should have a better understanding of clients' tax position and thus, receive more training in tax matters.
Codification of the new account form or the specific form used to collect the prescribed KYC content
The large majority of commenters disagree with codifying the specific form of the document, or a new account application form to collect the prescribed KYC information. The majority of commenters are of the opinion that the proposal to have a specific KYC form, as a distinct document from the other documents in the account opening package, would have the effect of inundating the client with paper work. Different practices are noted, for example some IIROC dealers do not provide for a specific KYC form.
In addition, some commenters believe that the CSA should delegate this direction to the SROs, as they are in a better position to monitor this activity and provide further guidance as needed. It has been suggested that the CSA should adopt a principles-based approach to the form of this document or set out specific guidance regarding minimum KYC criteria to be adopted by firms as part of their KYC protocols.
While several commenters expressed concerns about mandating a specific form of document, one commenter encouraged the CSA to work with scholarship plan dealers to establish uniform and consistent KYC information.
With respect to the form of the risk profiles, commenters are mostly negative on the risk profile proposal, with its requirement to carry out a "thorough exploration of the relevant subjective and objective factors". They view this requirement as not being within regulator expertise, and unresponsive to the variety of current business models.
Signature of the KYC form
Several commenters expressed an objection to this proposal, mainly for technological reasons as not all dealers have a paper-based KYC collection and approval process. One commenter has suggested that the word "signed" should have a definition consistent with current technology and would allow, for example, an on-line review and approval rather than requiring a signature on a physical piece of paper.
Additionally, one commenter has suggested that the CSA should provide guidance indicating sufficient flexibility to accommodate clients' preference for digital communications and to allow digital client acknowledgments and confirmations, for example by reply e-mail, in lieu of physical signatures. Another commenter outlined that registrants are already subject to extensive supervision by the dealer to ensure compliance with SRO rules. The majority of commenters believe that supervisory signatures would consume management time, and would not add meaningfully to investor protection.
With respect to the proposed requirement to update KYC information every 12 months, several commenters believe it would significantly detract from registrants' primary responsibility of advising their clients and managing their accounts. This is considered by the commenters as being costly and cumbersome. To mitigate this, and related consequences, it has been suggested to the CSA to preserve flexibility for registrants in refreshing KYC information. The commenters believe this should continue to be tailored for different advisory models. For example, the exempt market dealer model, with its challenges on the issue of whether or not there is a continuing client-registrant relationship, may be problematic in this respect.
Commenters also indicated that clients sometimes refuse to provide the requested information, while others choose not disclose it without the registrant's knowledge.
CSA Response
In the KYC Proposed Amendments, we propose a more principles-based approach for KYC reforms, removing some of the more prescriptive elements proposed in CP 33-404, and keeping the requirements scalable across different types of client relationships and the level of service desired. In addition, the existing SRO rules have been taken into account.
As suggested by several commenters, we do not require the collection of tax information, but may in future focus on increasing the proficiency of representatives on basic tax issues. Moreover, we have not mandated a specific KYC form. However, we identify certain essential elements of KYC that should be mandated and required for all types of business models and client relationships.
We have also reexamined parts of the guidance on KYC in 31-103CP, which outlines our expectation on the due diligence process that firms should put in place regarding the KYC process, ensuring that the process is flexible enough to take into account various business models and the spectrum of client relationships and needs. In addition, 31-103CP contains guidance on other matters, including:
• key elements to be considered by the registrant with respect to the collection of KYC information,
• client's authorization for the KYC information collected both at initial account opening and upon material changes, and
• frequency with which the KYC information should be updated.
3. Comments and responses on the KYP proposals
General
Commenters were generally very critical of the KYP proposals for both registered firms and representatives. Commenters generally agreed that the proposed reforms would be unworkable, be costly, advantage proprietary firms and cause serious unintended consequences.
The CSA considered the comments received on the KYP proposals for both registered firms and representatives and, in particular, considered the likelihood of the unintended consequences of the KYP proposals raised by commenters if the reforms were to be implemented as proposed in CP 33-404. The CSA have significantly redesigned the proposals.
KYP proposals for representatives
Commenters generally agreed that the proposals that representatives have a thorough understanding of all securities on their firm's product list and how those securities compare to one another are not workable. They assert that it is not possible for a representative to have such an in-depth knowledge of every security on the firm's product list, unless the product list itself is limited, and not every representative has the expertise to sell all securities available at a registered firm. In addition, they assert that this requirement may pose challenges for certain types of registrants, including advising representatives of portfolio management firms (where the universe of securities may be available to those representatives) as well as firms with multiple divisions, where all securities offered by the firms may not be able to be sold by all representatives. Commenters expressed concern that such a requirement would cause the narrowing of product lists and reduced investor choice.
An alternative approach recommended was that representatives should know and understand the products they recommend in light of the needs of their clients, and that the CSA should focus instead on the process for product due diligence. Some commenters expressed support for a requirement that representatives know general categories of securities or asset classes, and the general range of products available to clients at the firm.
KYP proposals for firms
In CP 33-404, we asked commenters to respond to various questions relating to the differentiation of firms by product list (e.g., proprietary and mixed / non-proprietary) and proposed KYP requirements for certain firms to undertake a market investigation, product comparison, and a product list optimization process. As we are not proceeding with these reforms as proposed, we have outlined and responded in a general way to the concerns raised by commenters.
The vast majority of commenters were very critical of the KYP proposals for registered firms. Some commenters felt that the distinction between proprietary and mixed/non-proprietary firms would not be clear or meaningful, and some commenters felt that the definition of what is "proprietary" would need careful consideration even if the distinction had value. In any event, a major concern of commenters related to the fact that the KYP requirements differed between these two types of firm and that the requirements applying to mixed/non-proprietary firms were onerous. Commenters generally agreed that the proposed requirements for mixed/non-proprietary firms to undertake a market investigation, product comparison, and a product list optimization process would be costly, would advantage proprietary firms, and would cause serious unintended consequences, such as:
• firms will narrow their product lists;
• firms may move to a proprietary model;
• reduced choice for investors;
• small firms would exit the industry / there would be industry consolidation;
• there would be an adverse impact on independent product manufacturers.
CSA Response
We have considered the comments received and have redesigned the KYP proposals for representatives. The KYP Proposed Amendments include:
• a more practical and workable requirement that registered individuals generally understand the securities available for them to trade in or recommend to clients, and generally understand how those securities compare to one another; and
• a requirement that registered individuals thoroughly understand securities they trade in or recommend to clients.
We have maintained the emphasis from CP 33-404 on a representative understanding all costs associated with a security being recommended and the impact of those costs.
We have also considered the comments received on the KYP proposals for firms and recognize the concern of commenters that there may be serious unintended consequences if they were to be implemented as proposed in CP 33-404. We have therefore significantly redesigned the proposals, and have not carried forward the market investigation, product comparison and product list optimization requirements for firms, nor have we imposed requirements that are differentiated between proprietary and mixed/non-proprietary firms.
We have instead proposed reforms that are designed to increase rigour and transparency around the securities and services that registrants make available to their clients. These reforms are intended to work together with reforms to conflicts of interest and RDI, and support enhanced suitability determination requirements. In addition, we have proposed a principles-based requirement that a firm must ensure that the securities and services it offers are consistent with how it holds itself out to clients.
4. Comments and responses on the suitability proposals
General
The comments received on the suitability proposed reforms were significant, extensive in most instances and occasionally divided, such as on the issues of what makes an investment "most likely" to achieve a client's needs and objectives, and what it means to accept an instruction to "hold" an investment. A remark that was recurrent in many comments on the suitability proposed reforms was related to how the proposals would be assessed and reviewed by in-house compliance staff and be enforced by regulators.
In addition, commenters believe that the requirement to perform a suitability analysis at least once every 12 months raises challenges for most registrant categories or business models. It has been suggested that this may be overly cumbersome, inefficient and costly or simply unnecessary for clients with modest balances and where no changes have occurred in client circumstances during the year.
Finally, many commenters do not believe it is necessary for a significant market event to trigger a new and full suitability analysis in all instances where the client is exposed as it may not lead to a different outcome. According to several commenters, it is unlikely that a market event, even if significant, will have changed the nature of the risk profile of a particular security or the client's portfolio. Likewise, the commenters observed that a material change in the risk profile of a single issuer should not, in a portfolio that is suitable, be cause for an immediate suitability analysis in all instances.
Financial strategies as part of the suitability determination process
As per the proposal to consider other basic financial strategies in determining suitability, the majority of comments received noted that this approach assumes that all clients want or need a) a full financial plan, or b) to have their entire investment strategy and the composition of their portfolio (re)assessed, regardless of the clients' expectations or the registrant's business model. Most believe this requirement may result in registrants providing advice in areas where they do not have the required expertise.
Potential challenges of the implementation of the requirement to ensure that a purchase, sale, hold or exchange of a product is the "most likely" to achieve the client's investment needs and objectives
With respect to the requirement to ensure that a purchase, sale, hold or exchange of a product is the "most likely" to achieve the client's investment needs and objectives, most commenters are of the opinion that this standard would be highly susceptible to after-the-fact second-guessing, which would expose firms to unnecessary compliance costs and potential legal and regulatory risks.
Some commenters believe that this requirement could establish unrealistic client expectations of guaranteed outcomes and needs to be clarified. Others suggested replacing the phrase "most likely" by something that acknowledges the decision was made in the context of subjective factors that were present at the time, such as "likely in the context in which the decision was made."
Other formulations such as "reasonably likely to achieve" and "reasonable under the circumstances" were suggested by commenters. Finally, several commenters believe that this requirement would result in fewer product choices for investors as firms look to reduce their product shelves to be able to comply with the requirement. They are of the view that this could also result in a reduction of qualified, experienced registrants available to service a wide range of investors.
Key elements determining the suitability of an investment
Commenters outlined that by increasingly clarifying the scope of the rule with respect to these requirements, the CSA run the risk of standardizing practices, with implications for loss of competitiveness and operating costs, as well as the need to multiply the exceptions to be managed. These commenters recommend a more principle-based approach rather than a detailed, prescriptive approach.
CSA Response
We agree with comments that the use of the phrase "most likely" and referring to "client's investment objectives" could establish unrealistic client expectations of guaranteed outcomes. Instead, the CSA propose that there must be "a reasonable basis" to conclude that an investment action taken by a registrant satisfies prescribed criteria for a suitability determination. That determination would not only require that an investment action taken by a registrant be suitable based on prescribed factors, but also that it puts the client's interest first.
We propose further guidance in 31-103CP and various examples which illustrate how we expect the firm to implement this requirement.
Additionally, we propose a requirement that suitability be assessed on a portfolio basis, rather than trade-by-trade only and specify circumstances when suitability should be reassessed.
5. Comments and responses on the RDI proposals
General
The comments received on the RDI proposals were generally supportive of the principles of transparency, meaningful disclosure and clarity as they relate to the client-registrant relationship. However, there were warnings against adding to the amount of RDI that registrants are already required to deliver. It was suggested that many clients do not read the existing disclosures because they find them to be too long. There were also several commenters who said that it would be better to wait and see the effects of implementing the Client Relationship Model Phase 2 and mutual funds Point of Sale requirements before making further enhancements to client disclosure requirements.
There was support for additional guidance on RDI, but no consensus. Some commenters felt it would be unnecessary. Some suggested principles-based guidance would be better than a prescriptive approach to enable flexibility among business models. One argued for mandated RDI forms, taking the view that guidance alone would be ineffective. There were several strong objections to the proposition in the proposed general disclosure guidance that registrants should have a "reasonable basis for concluding that a client fully understands the implications and consequences for the client of the content being disclosed" from commenters who felt it would be very difficult to operationalize.
Registration in a restricted category
Several commenters were supportive of the proposal that firms registered in a restricted category would be required to include that information in their RDI. They agreed that this information would enable investors to make more informed decisions, and thought the proposal would be workable. Several others objected because they felt that "restricted" would be perceived as having negative connotations and an implication that some types of firms are better than others.
Commenters also objected to the proposed requirement for restricted firms to inform clients that a full range of securities would not be considered in their suitability analyses. They questioned the practical benefits of having such a requirement, and raised the potential for the unintended consequence that investors might assume that suitable products offered by a restricted registrant are insufficient for their needs. It was suggested that the proposed disclosure for restricted category firms assumes, wrongly, that all investors have a realistic option of becoming a client of a full service firm. Some investor advocates argued that disclosure would be inadequate, based on the limitations of what investors understand about their investment options.
Use of proprietary products
Many commenters supported disclosure concerning the use of "proprietary products", at least in principle. However, there were concerns about client confusion about the meaning of the phrase, particularly when extended to the concept of a firm with a "mixed /non-proprietary" product shelf. Commenters expressed concerns that the potential for unintended consequences outweighs the potential benefits of such disclosure. Common objections relating to the challenge of making the information meaningful to clients included:
• some firms that would be categorized as mixed/non-proprietary may offer a much broader range of products than others,
• what a given firm offers some types of client may differ from what it offers others,
• proportions of proprietary and non-proprietary products may change frequently, and
• there may be a perceived implication that one type of product is inherently better.
CSA Response
We acknowledge the concern that to be genuinely useful, client communications, including RDI, must not be allowed to become overly long and complex. We are also mindful of the dangers of the other unintended consequences noted by commenters.
At the same time, we remain convinced that clear information about product costs, the use of proprietary products and limitations on the products or services that will be made available to clients are important to client's understanding of what to expect from the relationship with their registrant.
We therefore revisited our proposals for RDI and re-focused them on the elements that we believe will make a real difference for clients. The Proposed Amendments require firms to provide the listed information, but we no longer propose prescriptive detail. Consistent with the Proposed Amendments regarding KYP, firms would not be required to categorize themselves as "proprietary" or "mixed/non-proprietary." Firms would only have to tell each client if their account will consist primarily or exclusively of proprietary products (this essentially carries forward guidance added to the Companion Policy in 2017). Firms would have to tell each client about any restrictions on the products or services that would be provided to them. Firms would have to explain the impact charges, ongoing product fees and restrictions on products or services might have on a client, but can exercise professional judgment as to how best to do that in the circumstances, provided some basic guidance added to the Companion Policy is taken into account.
Our expectations for clear, meaningful and above all, not misleading, communications with clients are stressed with additions to the guidance in the Companion Policy. This is found both in the sections concerning RDI guidance and in proposed new Part 13, Division 7 [Misleading communications].
Annex E: Ontario Local Matters
ANNEX E
ONTARIO LOCAL MATTERS
1. Introduction
The purpose of this Annex is to cover, to the extent not already covered in the main body of this notice, matters required by subsections 143.2(2) and 143.8(2) of the Securities Act (Ontario) (the Act).
2. Authority for proposed amendments to NI 31-103
Rule making authority for the proposed amendments is in paragraphs 2, 7, 8 and 8.1 of subsection 143(1) of the Act.
3. Alternatives considered
For reasons set out in the main body of this notice, the status quo is not satisfactory. Rule making was the only alternative considered.
4. Unpublished materials
In publishing the proposed amendments and changes, we have not relied on any significant unpublished study, report or other written materials.
5. Anticipated costs and benefits of the proposed amendments
Paragraph 143.2(2)7 of the Securities Act requires the OSC to provide a description of the anticipated costs and benefits of proposed amendments to a rule. The description is set out in the regulatory impact analysis provided in Schedule 1 to this Annex.
Schedule 1: Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client-Focused Reforms)
SCHEDULE 1
Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client Focused Reforms)
In this report, we provide an overview of the anticipated costs and benefits of the proposed amendments to National Instrument 31-103 as outlined in the Reforms to Enhance the Client-Registrant Relationship (Client Focused Reforms) (the Proposed Amendments).
Overall, we anticipate that the proposed amendments, if implemented, will be significant in addressing the five investor protection concerns originally highlighted by the CSA in Consultation Paper 33-404 Proposals to Enhance the Obligations of Advisers, Dealers, and Representatives Toward their Clients. In particular, we anticipate that the proposed amendments will:
1. raise the standard of conduct for registrants towards what clients expect it to be,
2. result in more specific and more useful advice for clients,
3. result in better engagement between clients and registrants,
4. result in portfolios with better diversification, lower costs and higher risk-adjusted returns over time,
5. increase the probability that clients will reach their investing and savings goals,
6. increase market transparency and confidence and increase trust in registrants,
7. allow registrants the flexibility within the new framework to re-evaluate business models and business practices to find those that best meet their circumstances,
8. make it easier for new entrants and less well-known registrants to compete in the market,
9. make it easier for registrants to compete based on their unique value proposition, and
10. support enhanced market oversight and enforcement.
We anticipate that the proposed amendments will impose significant one-time, transition costs as registrants evaluate, adapt and implement new compliance processes and controls for their particular business model. We anticipate that the proposed amendments will impose only marginally higher on-going costs of compliance as the compliance processes and controls likely to be implemented to address one area of proposed reform are likely to address other reform areas as well. For example, the same product evaluation process that is likely to promote compliance with the proposed conflict rules is also likely also to be quite effective at promoting compliance with the proposed know your product (KYP) rules and some of the proposed suitability rules.
We anticipate that registrants will have some control over the one-time and on-going costs of compliance depending on how they respond to the proposed amendments. Much depends on the choices registrants make with respect to such things as the conflicts they decide to manage versus those they avoid. We anticipate that registrants will make these choices based on what they see as their unique value proposition to clients and how they foresee that value proposition developing over time. Aside from the direct impact of the proposed amendments, registrants will also likely make these choices considering the backdrop of significant technological, process and demographic change occurring in the industry that is challenging existing business models and existing relationships in the industry.
We anticipate that the one-time and on-going costs likely to be imposed by the proposed amendments will be borne directly by registrants, indirectly by their service providers and, to a certain extent, passed on to clients. Overall, we believe that the potential benefits of the proposed amendments are more than proportionate to the costs imposed.
In CP 33-404, the CSA outlined and provided evidence for five investor protection concerns that served as the rationale for policy change. These concerns and their descriptions are reproduced in their entirety below. They form the basis for the evaluation of the impacts of the proposed amendments. The five investor protection concerns are:
1. Clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing:
At least part of the reason for this is the wording of the existing suitability requirement. Failure of registrants to consider all relevant factors, including product costs and investment strategies (such as the use of leverage or choosing active over passive management of assets) in their suitability analysis may prevent clients from meeting the goals of their investment activity.
2. Expectations Gap:
Most investors incorrectly assume that their registrants must always provide advice that is in their best interest. As a result, clients have misplaced reliance or trust on their registrants, resulting in opportunities for some registrants to take advantage of their clients and creating an expectations gap between clients and registrants. Most investors place too much reliance on their registrants, which exacerbates the agency problem inherent in the client-registrant relationship and can result in sub-optimal investments. Clients need to understand the nature of the relationship, and what level of trust and reliance they should afford their registrant. The problem of misplaced reliance is exacerbated when registrants (1) use titles or designations that exaggerate their proficiency or the services they actually provide and (2) sell a limited or proprietary shelf of products.
3. Conflicts of Interest:
The application in practice of the current conflicts of interest rules is, in many instances, less effective than intended. Not only is the concern that disclosure may be ineffective in mitigating conflicts of interest, disclosure may have a counter-intuitive effect of increasing reliance on advice where the client is told such advice is, or potentially is, conflicted. Part of the challenge for regulators is identifying when disclosure of conflicts is effective, and when it may exacerbate the conflict situation or is ineffective.
4. Information Asymmetry:
The current regulatory framework is, in many instances, less effective than intended in mitigating the consequences of the information and financial literacy asymmetry between registrants and their retail clients. With the limited financial literacy of most investors, the increasing complexity of securities products and the limited effectiveness of initiatives to improve financial literacy, coupled with the challenge that most investors have in avoiding biases and applying their financial knowledge in their decision making, more onus for prioritizing the client's interest and ensuring that clients understand the information and advice they receive should shift onto registrants.
5. Clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them:
There are a number of potential causes of this concern, including opaqueness in the suitability assessment, existing requirements that require more clarity to assist in effective enforcement, barriers to obtaining redress for a registrant breach, and lack of effective compliance and enforcement in certain cases.
In addition to evaluating how the Proposed Amendments address the five investor protection concerns, we also highlight, where applicable, impacts to specific stakeholders including specific registration channels, business models and investor groups. We also consider the potential costs as well as other potential negative impacts of the Proposed Amendments.
There are a number of important facts to take into account when evaluating the impacts of the Proposed Amendments.
1. The vast majority of household and individuals (90%+) that own securities will be working with a registrant that is overseen by one of the two SROs, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) or the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA){1}. Portfolio Manager (PM), Exempt Market Dealer (EMD), and Scholarship Plan Dealer (SPD) registrants are likely to be servicing at most 10% of households that own securities.{2} Therefore, we reiterate that it is our intention that our final amendments will be incorporated into SRO rules and guidance.
2. Most approved persons and most of the assets administered in the MFDA and IIROC channels are held through vertically integrated dealers.{3} In the MFDA channel, 95% of assets and 94% of approved persons are with a vertically integrated dealer.{4} In the IIROC channel, 95% of assets and 88% of approved persons are with a vertically integrated dealer.{5}
3. Most approved persons and most of the assets held in the MFDA channel are with vertically integrated dealers that offer only proprietary products. 69% of assets and 65% of approved persons are with dealers that offer only proprietary mutual funds (primarily focused on fund-of-fund products).{6}
4. Mutual funds are by far the most popular investment held by Canadians that own securities. Mutual funds and ETFs respectively are held by 69% and 19% of Canadians that hold securities. Overall, 74% of Canadians that hold securities own a mutual fund, ETF or both.{7}
Know Your Client (KYC)
The proposed amendments to the KYC requirements in subsection 13.2 (2) require the registrant to obtain information about the client in terms of their personal circumstances, risk profile (as opposed to just their risk tolerance), investment time horizon and investment knowledge. Through the proposed CP guidance, firms are also expected to obtain more detail and to be more specific about all aspects of the KYC process. For example, firms are expected to draw out from clients their specific investment needs, objectives and investment time horizons. Rather than forcing clients to select from general terms such as growth, income, long-term, short-term, firms would be expected instead to help clients identify specific needs such as "I need to save for retirement in 15 years."
The proposed factors added to the KYC requirements along with the expectation that KYC information become more detailed and specific is likely to help address concern 1 that, Clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing. These changes would, if implemented, be foundational for improving subsequent suitability determinations. More specific, comprehensive and detailed KYC information should allow for more specific, comprehensive and detailed suitability determinations.
Conversely, more specific, comprehensive and detailed KYC information would help strengthen and support compliance and regulatory oversight which, combined with the potential reduction in the opacity of suitability determinations, may help to address concern 5, that Clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them.
An indirect potentially positive impact of the proposed KYC requirement and guidance is its effect in helping to ensure that the advice can be "tailored" to each client as is often advertised by firms. This may contribute, in a small way, to reducing the expectations gap (concern 3).
We anticipate that these changes, if implemented, will impact most firms operating in our market today including most MFDA and IIROC dealers. Therefore, the majority of investors, assuming that benefits outlined above are realised, are likely to be positively impacted by these changes.
We anticipate that firms will need to update their KYC forms and processes as a result of the proposed amendments to KYC and those firms with a more transactional client relationship will need to request a wider range of client information. We anticipate that this will result in significant one-time transition costs with marginally higher on-going costs.
Know Your Product (KYP)
The proposed amendments to the KYP requirements in subsection 13.2.1(1) both codify longstanding guidance and also overlay a more formal product approval and monitoring requirement for firms. We anticipate that these changes are likely to help address investor concern 3 conflicts of interest as the more formal approval and monitoring requirements must include a conflicts analysis which puts added responsibility on the firm to justify what is on their product shelf. Similarly, we anticipate that the creation of an approval, monitoring and reassessment process would allow for better subsequent oversight and effective enforcement helping to address concern 5, that clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them.
Over time, we anticipate that these new requirements will result in improvements including a higher provision of lower cost, better performing securities to clients.
In terms of the cost of compliance for firms, it is important to point out that there are likely to be many efficiencies in compliance processes. The same product evaluation process that is likely to promote compliance with the conflict rules related to third-party compensation and the use of proprietary products is also likely to be effective at delivering on the KYP requirements.
In terms of the impact to industry, we anticipate that there will be a one-time, transitional cost for firms to set up an approval and monitoring process to meet the new requirements. On-going costs are likely to be less significant once these controls are in place. We anticipate that third party service providers (data providers, analytics firms, etc.) will also market their services and assist registrants in developing these controls.
Suitability
The proposed amendments to the suitability requirements impact, either directly or indirectly, all five investor protection concerns. The proposed changes to subsection 13.3 (1) and the introduction of subsection 13.3 (2) would directly address concern 1, that Clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing, by forcing registrants to consider all relevant factors including costs and their impact on client returns, the account type offered as well as overall liquidity and concentration of the client's portfolio. Proposed guidance provided for subsections 13.3 (1) and (2) also makes clear the expectation that registrants are to take a portfolio approach to suitability.
The proposed requirement to put the client's interest first when making an investment action also directly responds to concern 3, regarding conflicts of interest and concern 2 regarding the expectations gap. Putting the client's interest first when making an investment action has the potential to bring the client/registrant relationship closer to what clients already think they are receiving thereby reducing the gap. Putting the client's interest first also has the potential to indirectly respond to concern 4, regarding information asymmetry. The registrant would be required to consider the situation from the client's point of view and to consider those factors that would be important to the client if they were fully informed. This could result in outcomes that would be equivalent to the situation where no information asymmetry exists.
Finally, the proposed requirements to put the client's interest first as well as the addition of relevant factors to consider bring more clarity to what is expected of the suitability process. We anticipate that this added clarity would improve the effectiveness of enforcement actions addressing concern 5, Clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them.
We anticipate that, if implemented, the proposed amendments to the suitability requirements are likely to result in better diversification of client portfolios and lower portfolio costs to clients over time. 'Number-matching,' the process of corresponding product risk disclosures to client risk tolerance levels will not be compliant with the proposed portfolio approach to suitability. For any prospective change to a client's portfolio, the registrant will need to consider the impact to the overall portfolio attributes (including the risk and return) which will necessitate the consideration of interactions between the securities in the portfolio. In addition, the proposed explicit requirement to consider KYP as part of the suitability determination would likely force registered individuals to look more closely at the underlying funds held in packaged solutions such as fund-of-funds than is the case today and to potentially consider alternative bundles of securities with similar portfolio risk attributes but lower cost and better return potential.
We anticipate that, if implemented, the proposed changes to suitability will be most impactful to clients in the MFDA and IIROC channels where the practice of 'number-matching' and the use of packaged solutions are most prevalent today.
For firms that tend not to have an on-going relationship with clients such as exempt-market dealers (EMDs), the proposed changes to the suitability requirements are most likely to impact the overall portfolio concentration and liquidity in the context of the client's entire portfolio if disclosed (not just the assets held with that firm).
We anticipate that the cost of transition to a portfolio approach to suitability that puts the client's interest first and takes into account multiple new factors including cost will be significant for most firms. Firms will need to ensure that they have the ability to monitor the attributes of portfolios versus just single securities in those portfolios. For larger firms, this is likely to require the building and implementation of new compliance systems and oversight processes. However, these costs would largely be one-time in nature and once new suitability processes are in place, we do not anticipate that on-going compliance costs will be materially higher than they are today.
Conflicts
Similar to suitability, the proposed amendments to the conflict of interest rules help address all five investor protection concerns. In particular, the proposed requirements for registered firms and registered individuals to identify and address all conflicts in the best interest of the client or conversely, avoid any conflict that cannot be addressed in the best interest of the client (s13.4.1, s13.4.2, s13.4.3) goes to addressing concern 3 (conflicts of interest). Specifically, our concern that current conflict rules are less effective than intended.
Coupled with the proposed changes to conflicts disclosure that a firm may not rely solely on disclosure to address a conflict (subsection 13.4.5 (5)), these proposed changes would significantly reduce the expectations gap (concern 2) by raising the standard of conduct for registrants to what clients already expect.
The proposed changes to the conflict rules also indirectly impact information asymmetry (concern 4) in a manner similar to suitability. Registrants would be forced to consider and control for their own biases potentially resulting in client outcomes that are equivalent to those that would result if the client were well informed of these biases and pushed back on them independently.
Guidance accompanying the proposed conflicts rule is specific to the most prominent conflicts encountered today, including the use of proprietary products, third-party compensation and internal compensation arrangements and incentives. This signals to registrants that certain conflicts need to be addressed without question and we anticipate that this would help to address concerns 1 and 5 that clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing and clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them.
On this last point, we anticipate that the proposed guidance for the specific conflicts -- use of proprietary products, third-party compensation and internal compensation arrangements and incentives -- will have a significant impact on the products recommended and distributed by registrants today. The expectation that registrants will be able to demonstrate that third-party compensation and affiliation was not a factor in their recommendations to clients is likely to lead to the following changes in recommendations over time:{8}
1. for firms that offer both third-party and proprietary products, a reduction in the usage of proprietary products or a significant increase in the competitiveness of proprietary products;
2. a shift towards index tracking products;
3. a shift towards lower cost products;
4. an increase in the usage of products offered by less well-known market participants;
5. an increase in the usage of products that do not pay third-party compensation;
6. a shift towards the use of direct pay arrangements with clients;
7. a movement towards internal incentive structures that better align with the interests of clients.
We anticipate that these changes will have the most impact on dealers in the MFDA channel where the use of embedded commissions and reliance on proprietary products is highest followed by dealers in the IIROC channel where embedded commissions and proprietary products are also used and where there is heavy reliance on grid based compensation. There may also be the potential for an unintended consequence as some dealers may choose to move to a proprietary-only model.{9}
As was discussed above with respect to the proposed amendments to KYP, the evaluation and compliance processes used to address conflicts will likely be the same or highly overlapping to those introduced for KYP (and some parts of suitability). Therefore, we anticipate that one-time transition costs for registrants will be significant while the on-going costs will not be.
Publicly Available Information
The proposed amendment (subsection 14.1.2(1)) to require the registered firm to make publicly available information that an investor would consider important in deciding whether to become a client, including information on the products and services offered (and any limitations on those offerings), fee schedules, account minimums and account types available, is likely to have a significant impact on the market and significant benefits for investors.
We anticipate that the proposed amendment will ensure that clients "know the deal" before they enter into a relationship with a registrant and are more likely to "find the right deal" that meets their needs. Put another way, we anticipate that the proposed amendment will help reduce search costs over time{10} and will help to address investor protection concern 1 (Clients are not getting the value or returns they could reasonably expect from investing) and concern 2 (expectations gap).
The publicly posted document will likely also help address concern 3 -- conflicts of interest -- because it is requires the firm to identify any material limitations to the products and services offered, any restrictions on the clients to whom it makes products, services or accounts available and any third-party compensation it is likely to receive. This coupled with the fact that the proposed disclosure document will likely be evaluated by the client away from the influence and control of the registered individual allows the client to investigate further -- to do their due diligence -- on what they are reading before they become a client. Proposing to publicly post the document would allow analysts, journalists and other interested parties to view and evaluate the information potentially leading to the production of dealer guides of the sort we already see for online advisors and discount brokerages and other industry reports. This would help to lessen information asymmetry concerns (concern 4) over time. Moreover, we anticipate that the public posting of this information would likely provide further incentive for firms to evaluate their fees, to streamline and simplify fee and commission schedules, to offer alternative compensation arrangements and to consider changes to their product offerings in order to meet the demands of a more informed consumer.
Finally, the publicly posted documents would make business models more transparent to all including regulators which could contribute to more effective oversight of the market potentially helping to address concern 5 -- clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them.
In terms of the cost to registrants, we do not anticipate that either the transition costs or the on-going costs of providing this document will be material. In all cases, dealers have prepared an internal document that includes the majority of this information for their registered individuals. The transition costs would be focused on making those internal documents suitable for potential clients and the public generally. Likewise, the on-going costs of providing this document amount to the cost of updating it in response to a change in business practices and fee schedules and the cost of public provision which in most cases will be posting the document to the firm's website.
Relationship Disclosure
The proposed expansion of the information required to be delivered to the client (primarily at account opening) will include disclosures as to whether the firm will primarily or exclusively provide proprietary products, whether there are any other restrictions on the products or services provided and the impact on a client's investment returns of fees, costs and any restrictions on products or services offered (subsection 14.2 (2)).
The proposed changes will potentially help address information asymmetry and the expectations gap by better signaling to the client what they can expect from the relationship and what the impact of any restrictions might be on investing outcomes.
However, given that the registered individual will have control over the framing and timing of these disclosures, the other disclosures that are likely to be provided at the same time and the efficacy of point of sale disclosures more generally, we should not overstate the potential impact of these changes particularly relative to the other proposals put forward (e.g. publicly posted document, proposed rules around misleading disclosures etc.) that will likely address information asymmetry and the expectations gap.
In terms of the impacts to industry, we do not anticipate that these additional disclosures will be costly to produce, particularly once transition has occurred.
Education and Experience Requirements
In addition to the changes being proposed for conflicts, suitability, KYP and KYC, there have been conforming changes proposed to the proficiency requirements (subsection 3.4.1(1)). First, there is a proposed codification of the expectation that firms be responsible for providing training to registered individuals in all aspects of securities laws. Second, firms are expected to provide training specific to the proposed enhancements to the requirements regarding conflicts, KYC, KYP and suitability, including that registered individuals understand and be able to communicate the impact of costs on client returns. This training will help address all five investor protection concerns indirectly by making it more likely that registered firms and registered individuals respond effectively to the proposed amendments.
In terms of the impact to industry, we anticipate that while some firms will develop their own training program, others are likely to rely on course providers and other third-party service providers for training content that is not firm-specific. Based on the current cost of courses with similar content and the number of registrants in the market today, we anticipate that the per firm cost of this training will be somewhat significant at first (as existing registrants will require continuing education training) but over time, will result in a marginal increase in course content and training cost for new registrants.
Referral Arrangements
There are several changes to referral arrangements that have been proposed, the most impactful of which would likely be:
• the prohibition of the payment of referral fees to non-registered firms and non-registered individuals (subsection 13.8 (1)),
• the limitation on the referral fees payments amounts to 25% of the of the fees or commissions collected (paragraph 13.8.1(b)), and
• the limitation on the length of time a referral fee can be paid to 36 months from the date of referral (paragraph 13.8.1(a)).
These proposals have been put forward to help address conflicts of interest (concern 3). Specifically, three main concerns with respect to the payment of referral fees exist.
First, there is a concern that referral fee payments provide an incentive for registered individuals to give up their registration. There is a potential regulatory arbitrage concern created when registered individuals can generate similar levels of income without incurring the added oversight and cost of being registered. Remaining players in the system all pay higher costs as more registrants give up their registration and investor protection suffers as more of the advice and relationship chain is held outside of the purview of regulators and compliance officers.
Second, and related to the first issue, we have noted several instances where non-registrants are receiving the bulk of the revenue generated through registerable activity. In some cases, registrants are reporting that greater than 80% of the revenue generated through registerable activities such as portfolio management is being handed over to non-registrants as referral fee payments.{11} As a principle, there is a belief that if an individual is receiving the bulk of the revenues from the registerable activity then that individual should be registered.
Third, there are market power concerns regarding the ability of referring agents to extract referral fees from registrants. Certain registrants may not want to pay the referral fee or current referral fee levels but are being forced to under the current system.
We anticipate that the proposed changes to referral fee arrangements will address these three concerns head on. There will no longer be an incentive to give up registration as individuals will now be giving up their livelihood. Likewise, we anticipate that the proposed cap and time limits on referral fees should help alleviate the market power concerns.
These proposals may have unintended consequences however in that both referral arrangements that leave the client worse off and referral arrangements that benefit the client will be impacted.
Much depends on motivation for the payment and acceptance of the referral. For example, if as a result of the payment of the referral fee, clients are 'right channeled' to registrants that are more likely to meet their needs then the payment of the referral fee can be beneficial to the client's interests. In such a situation, the proposed prohibitions may increase our concerns around the expectations gap as clients will be expecting too much from the wrong registrant. If the payment of a referral fee is conflict-creating, such as when it causes the referrer to not adequately vet the referee or consider other potential referees, or moves a client to a channel that is better for the profitability of a parent company of two parties to a referral arrangement, then these proposals can improve client outcomes and potentially result in better channel/registrant fit for the client. There is a balance underlying the proposed changes to referral arrangements.
In terms of impacts to various registrants and their business models, the proposed prohibition of payments of referral fees to non-registrants is likely to have a significant impact on PMs, EMDs and SPDs.
For PMs that service retail clients to some degree (60% of PM firms and 9% of PM assets){12}, a large share of their referral arrangements are with non-registered entities such as financial planners. These firms will likely need to turn to alternatives such as traditional advertising to attract clients. However, it is not clear where the clients being referred to PMs by financial planners today would go in the future. Some referring agents may decide to become registered and bring over their clients in order to keep existing relationships and revenue lines intact. Others may decide to refer clients to alternative financial service providers instead.
SPDs generate the majority of their client leads by paying referral fees to non-registered entities. It will likely be difficult for SPDs to adjust to an alternative model for generating leads. EMDs that are focused on service oriented activities such as M&A activity or debt/equity financing etc. (as opposed to product distribution) often pay referral fees to large investors and institutions. This proposed rule will prohibit these payments between what are mostly institutional players.
The proposed limitation on referral fee payment amounts to 25% of the of the fees or commissions collected and the limitation on the length of time a referral fee can be paid to 36 months from the date of referral, will likely impact vertically integrated firms the most by reducing the willingness of related party dealers to refer over clients that may be better suited or more profitably serviced in another channel of the firm. These firms may also consider how to restructure the arrangement in order to circumvent these limits.
Ultimately, we anticipate that investors will benefit from these proposals. A larger share of individuals will remain registered and subject to oversight, fees paid to registrants will be more likely to align with the services each registrant is providing and it is more likely that referrals will be made in the best interest of the client.
Misleading Communications
In this section we consider the impact of the proposed prohibitions on misleading communications by the registered individual and registered firm (subsections 13.8 (1) and (2)) and the proposed requirement that offerings by the firm align with how the firm holds itself out (subsection 13.2.1 (2)). We include the latter provision in this section because we expect that in practice firm's offerings and services are more likely to be relatively fixed and the firm will likely adjust how it holds itself out to meet the requirement rather than the other way round.
These proposals would, if implemented, significantly curtail the firm's ability to hold itself out as something that it is not and for the registered individual to use titles, awards and other methods to induce more trust and reliance by the client than is warranted based on their accumulated skills, experience and the limitations of their registration category. Therefore, these proposals primarily help reduce the expectations gap (concern 2) and information asymmetry (concern 4). These proposals also help to address concern 5 -- clients are not getting outcomes that the regulatory system is designed to give them -- by providing compliance and enforcement staff with new tools to drive more investor friendly behaviour by market participants.
In terms of the impact to industry, we anticipate that there will be significant one-time, transitional costs of compliance as firms adjust their marketing and compensation arrangements (and potentially the products and services offered) to meet the new requirements. On-going costs are likely to be less significant once compliance processes are developed.
{1} Mutual fund dealers operating strictly in Québec are overseen by the Chambre de la sécurité financière.
{2} Based on OSC analysis of households by wealth thresholds as well as analysis of the 2016 OSC Risk Assessment Questionnaire
{3} An "integrated dealer" is a dealer that is owned by or affiliated with an investment fund manager or that has a branding arrangement with an IFM.
{4} Source: MFDA at December 31, 2017, OSC categorizations.
{5} Source: IIROC at December 31, 2017, OSC categorizations. Note: Only IIROC members categorized as Retail, Managed Account or Integrated are included. Total assets considered for each firm include both retail and institutional client assets.
{6} Source: MFDA at December 31, 2017, OSC categorizations. MFDA dealers with 80% or more of their mutual fund assets held in funds managed by an affiliate were categorized as proprietary-only.
{7} Source: 2017 CSA Investor Index, Innovative Research Group (https://www.securities-administrators.ca/uploadedFiles/Investor_Tools/CSA07%20Investor%20Index%20Deck%20-%20Full%20Report%20-%2020171128.pdf)
{8} The anticipated impacts discussed in this section (particularly impacts 1 through 5) are based on analyses of the risk-adjusted, peer group and excess return performance of fee-based and other non-trailing commission paying mutual fund and ETF series. The impacts highlighted resulted no matter which evaluation process was applied (e.g. risk-adjusted comparisons, peer group, excess return comparisons over various time periods). We have focused on mutual funds and ETFs because they are the most prevalent securities held by Canadians and they are the products where conflict issues from third-party compensation and use of proprietary products typically arise. We evaluated the universe of funds using their non-trailing commission paying series versions to ensure that we were evaluating the product before additional costs related to services and advice provided by the dealer were applied. We anticipate that many registrants will follow a similar approach if the proposed changes to the conflict rules and guidance are implemented.
{9} In the proposed amendments and guidance to address conflicts relating to the sale of proprietary products, registered firms who only trade in, or recommend, proprietary products are encouraged to implement controls such as conducting periodic due diligence on comparable non-proprietary products and obtaining independent evaluations of the firm's controls relating to the sale of proprietary products. In contrast, registered firms that offer both proprietary and non-proprietary products are expected to demonstrate, on an on-going basis, that the recommendations made with respect to proprietary products, were the result of an unbiased evaluation and review process. We anticipate that the controls in the proprietary-only business model are likely to be less onerous and less impactful than the controls in the mixed, proprietary and non-proprietary business model. Therefore, if the proposed amendments are implemented, we anticipate that a small number of firms that currently offer both proprietary and non-proprietary products but still hold a large proportion of client assets in proprietary products may determine that it makes more sense for them to move to a proprietary-only business model going forward.
{10} Search costs in this context include the transaction costs (including lost time and effort) and switch costs associated with finding or switching between advisors. In the absence of publicly available information about an advisor's skill, service offerings and costs, these search costs can be significant resulting in market inefficiency, poor investor outcomes and lower market confidence. For example, we know from existing research that investors are reluctant to switch advisors even when they are unhappy in part because they do not believe they will do better elsewhere or do not have enough information to identify those dealers that are likely to meet their needs. Multi-- year surveys reveal that there is a sizeable amount of the investing public in Canada that are paying indirectly for advice that they would prefer to pay directly for. See Advisor Impact, 2011, "Economics of Loyalty 2011" completed on behalf of Brandes Investment Partners for the Canadian market, Advisor Impact, 2008 "Economics of Loyalty" completed on behalf of Vanguard for the U.S. market. Also see, Pollara, "Canadian Mutual Fund Investors' Perceptions of Mutual Funds and the Mutual Funds Industry," various years. This survey which is completed annually on behalf of the Investment Funds Institute of Canada has continually demonstrated that a large proportion (~40%) of mutual fund investors would prefer to pay for their ongoing advisory services directly to their advisor yet a much smaller share (typically less than 20%) suggest that they actually do.
{11} Based on a review of the 2016 OSC Risk Assessment Questionnaire data.
{12} Source: 2016 OSC Risk Assessment Questionnaire.