CI Investments Inc. et al.
Headnote
NP 11-203 -- Coordinated Review -- Lapse date of mutual fund prospectus extended until merger of funds -- Extension of lapse date will not affect the currency or accuracy of the information contained in the prospectus -- Securities Act (Ontario)
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., s. 147.
July 17, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
BRITISH COLUMBIA, ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN,
MANITOBA, ONTARIO, QUÉBEC, NOVA SCOTIA,
NEW BRUNSWICK, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND,
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR,
NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NUNAVUT AND
YUKON
(the "Jurisdictions")
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
CI INVESTMENTS INC. (the "Filer")
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
CI GLOBAL BALANCED CORPORATE CLASS,
CI GLOBAL BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATE
CLASS, CI GLOBAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS
CORPORATE CLASS, CI GLOBAL FINANCIAL
SERVICES CORPORATE CLASS, KNIGHT BAIN
CANADIAN BOND FUND, KNIGHT BAIN
CORPORATE BOND FUND, KNIGHT BAIN
DIVERSIFIED MONTHLY INCOME FUND, KNIGHT
BAIN PURE CANADIAN EQUITY FUND, KNIGHT
BAIN SMALL CAP FUND, SIGNATURE CANADIAN
ASSET ALLOCATION FUND, SYNERGY CANADIAN
STYLE MANAGEMENT CORPORATE CLASS,
SYNERGY FOCUS CANADIAN EQUITY FUND,
SYNERGY FOCUS GLOBAL EQUITY FUND,
SYNERGY GLOBAL STYLE MANAGEMENT
CORPORATE CLASS and SIGNATURE LONG-TERM
BOND FUND (the "Funds")
DECISION
Background
The securities regulatory authority or regulator in each of the Jurisdictions (the "Decision Maker") has received an application from the Filer on behalf of the Funds for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdictions (the "Legislation") that the time limit pertaining to the distribution of securities of the Funds under their multi-fund simplified prospectus dated July 18, 2008 (the "Prospectus") be extended to permit the continued distribution of securities of the Funds until August 17, 2009 (the "Exemption Sought").
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a coordinated review application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application; and
(b) the decision is the decision of the principal regulator and evidences the decision of each other Decision Maker.
Interpretation
Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions and Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System have the same meaning if used in this decision, unless otherwise defined.
Representations
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer and the Funds:
1. The Filer is the manager of the Funds. The Filer and the Funds are not in default of any of the requirements of the Legislation.
2. The Funds are reporting issuers under the Legislation. Securities of the Funds are currently qualified for distribution in all Jurisdictions under the Prospectus, as amended.
3. Pursuant to the Legislation, the lapse date for the distribution of securities of the Funds under the Prospectus is July 18, 2009 (the "Lapse Date").
4. Pursuant to the Legislation, provided a pro forma simplified prospectus is filed 30 days prior to July 18, 2009, a final version is filed by July 28, 2009, and a receipt for the simplified prospectus is issued by the securities regulatory authorities by August 7, 2009, the securities of the Funds may be distributed after the Lapse Date during the prospectus renewal period.
5. On June 11, 2009, the Filer announced by press release, in connection with which a material change report and amendment to the Prospectus were filed on SEDAR, that it is proposing to streamline its mutual fund line-up by merging the Funds into other mutual funds managed by it.
6. The independent review committee for the Funds has reviewed all of the proposed mergers with respect to conflict of interest issues and has determined that the mergers achieve a fair and reasonable result for investors. Subject to obtaining all applicable investor, regulatory and other required approvals, the Filer intends to effect the mergers on or about August 17, 2009, after which the Funds will be wound up.
7. The mergers will be effected in accordance with applicable requirements of the Legislation, including National Instrument 81-102 Mutual Funds, National Instrument 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure ("NI 81-106") and National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds.
8. In view of the proposed mergers, the Filer does not intend to file a renewal prospectus for the Funds. Securities of the Funds will therefore not be qualified for distribution in the period that follows the Lapse Date and that leads up to the effective date of the mergers unless an extension of the Lapse Date is granted. The Filer wishes to continue to distribute securities of the Funds during that period and expects sales principally to be to existing investors in the Funds participating in systematic trading programs, including pre-authorized purchase plans and automatic rebalancing services. An extension of the Lapse Date is therefore requested until August 17, 2009.
9. If the Exemption Sought is not granted, a pro forma simplified prospectus and a final simplified prospectus for the Funds would have to have been filed by June 18, 2009 and July 28, 2009 respectively in accordance with the existing time limits for the renewal of the Prospectus, notwithstanding that the Funds will be wound up after the effective date of the mergers. A pro forma simplified prospectus was not filed in order to avoid the costs and potential confusion which may result from the Funds having a renewal prospectus that would be used for only approximately one month.
10. There have been no material changes in the affairs of the Funds other than those for which amendments to the Prospectus have been filed. Accordingly, the Prospectus represents the current information regarding the Funds.
11. The extension requested will not affect the currency or accuracy of the information contained in the Prospectus, as amended, and as may be further amended in accordance with NI 81-106, and accordingly will not be prejudicial to the public interest.
Decision
Each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the Decision Maker to make the decision.
The decision of the Decision Maker under the Legislation is that the Exemption Sought is granted.