Castlerock Investments Inc. et. al.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Relief granted to mutual funds for extension of lapse date of prospectus for 77 days -- Lapse date extended to permit updating of the disclosure across the fund family to reflect the purchase and amalgamation of another fund family -- Extension of lapse date will not affect the currency or accuracy of the information contained in the prospectus -- Securities Act (Ontario).
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., s. 62(5).
April 26, 2011
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OFONTARIO
(the Jurisdiction)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
CASTLEROCK INVESTMENTS INC.
(the Manager)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
CI INVESTMENTS INC.
(the CI Manager)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE FUNDS LISTED IN SCHEDULE A
(the Funds, and together with the Manager and the CI Manager, the Filers)
DECISION
Background
The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application from the Filers for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the Legislation) for an exemption that the time limits pertaining to filing the renewal prospectuses of the Filers be extended as if the lapse date of the simplified prospectuses and annual information forms dated May 14, 2010, July 14, 2010 and July 23, 2010, respectively, of the Funds, as amended from time to time, (collectively, the Prospectus) is July 30, 2011 (the Requested Relief).
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application; and
(b) the Filers have provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System (MI 11-102) is intended to be relied upon in all of the provinces and territories of Canada (other than the Jurisdiction).
Interpretation
Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions and MI 11-102 have the same meaning in this decision unless they are defined in this decision.
Representations
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:
1. Each Fund is a reporting issuer (or the equivalent) as defined in the Legislation of each of the Jurisdictions and is not in default of securities legislation in any jurisdiction.
2. Each Fund currently distributes its securities in all the Jurisdictions pursuant to the Prospectus.
3. The earliest lapse date of the Prospectus under the Legislation is May 14, 2011.
4. The Manager is a corporation controlled by CI Investments Inc. (the CI Manager). The Manager is not in default of securities legislation in any jurisdiction.
5. The CI Manager manages, in aggregate, over 170 mutual funds (the Affiliated Funds). The CI Manager is not in default of securities legislation in any jurisdiction.
6. The Affiliated Funds currently distribute their securities to the public under three simplified prospectuses and annual information forms (collectively, the CI Prospectuses), each of which have July 14, 2011, July 23, 2011 and July 30, 2011 as their earliest lapse dates, respectively, under the Legislation.
7. There was a change of control of the Manager on December 15, 2010, when the CI Manager purchased all of the outstanding shares of Hartford Investments Canada Corp. (now Castlerock Investments Inc.).
8. There is a special unitholder meeting for the Castlerock Funds (listed in Schedule A) scheduled for April 28, 2011 pursuant to a management information Circular dated March 22, 2011. At the meeting the unitholders will vote on a proposed amalgamation of the Manager and CI Manager. The target date for the amalgamation is June 30, 2011. Depending on the outcome of the meeting, significant changes may need to be made to the prospectus between the pro forma and final filings.
9. It is the intention of the Manager to adopt operational and administrative features for the Castlerock Funds which are consistent with the Affiliated Funds in order that investors in the Castlerock Funds and the Affiliated Funds can more easily compare the features of these mutual funds. However, these changes are extensive and require changes to the back office facilities, information disseminated to financial advisors and prospectus disclosure of the Castlerock Funds. The Manager currently anticipates that it will require until mid-July 2011 to implement some of these changes.
10. As well, it is possible that the CI Manager will make minor changes to various features of the Affiliated Funds as part of the process of renewing the CI Prospectuses. The Manager would like the flexibility to file the renewal prospectus of the Castlerock Funds on the same timeline as the renewal prospectuses for the Affiliated Funds in order to ensure that the operational and administrative features of the Castlerock Funds can be made consistent with those of the Affiliated Funds.
11. If the Requested Relief is not granted, the Castlerock Funds will be required to renew the prospectus in May, 2011 and then subsequently amend and restate the prospectus and annual information form in July, 2011 so that it reflects the changes made to the Castlerock Funds in order for them to be consistent with the operational and administrative features of the Affiliated Funds and also so that it reflects the proposed amalgamation of the Manager and CI Manager targeted for June 30, 2011. The two filings in such close proximity will result in unnecessary costs to the Funds and their investors.
12. Taking these timelines into account, the Filer submits that a July 30, 2011 lapse date extension is required to meet all security law requirements.
13. There have been no material changes in the affairs of any Fund since the filing of the Prospectus, other than those for which amendments have been filed. Accordingly, the Prospectus represents current information regarding each Fund.
14. The Requested Relief will not affect the accuracy of the information in the Prospectus and therefore will not be prejudicial to the public interest.
Decision
The principal regulator is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the principal regulator with the jurisdiction to make the decision has been met.
The decision of the principal regulator under the Legislation is that the Requested Relief is granted.
SCHEDULE A
LIST OF FUNDS
CASTLEROCK FUNDS
CI FUNDS
HARBOUR FUNDS
SIGNATURE FUNDS
PORTFOLIO SERIES
SYNERGY FUNDS
PORTFOLIO SELECT SERIES
CAMBRIDGE FUNDS
LAKEVIEW FUNDS